as far as dpw's process to my knowledge i'm not sure if that has been completed yet. >> it would be great to get an answer what is occurring. was it four trees on the steuart street side and maybe the project sponsor can answer that question. >> just to reiterate for ceqa purposes and comply with the ordinance and ensure there is no significant impact under ceqa. >> it's good to know it will comply with the urban forestry ordinance. i would like to know what the conclusion is and how it applies and therefore not a ceqa issue. thank you. >> supervisor campos. >> thank you very much madam president and i just wanted to follow up on the questions that supervisor kim was asking and specifically going back to the issue of the embarcadero side (paused). is that correct that at this time the finding was with respect to the building, the entire building? >> yes. sara jones environmental review officer. in 2009 the board of supervisors did find that the building -- or did conclude that the building should be considered a historical resource so demolition of that building as was proposed under that