of the 47 who of the 47 who were-- farcical. were-- farcical. if you believe they were tried if you believe they were tried properly, the violent crimes properly, the violent crimes that would get them a long jail that would get them a long jail sentence or maybe even the death sentence or maybe even the death penalties in the u.s. penalties in the u.s. putting putting aside the four political aside the four political people who were executed, was people who were executed, was that justice for the other 43? that justice for the other 43? ist first of all, i don't know ist first of all, i don't know that the 43 were all tried on that the 43 were all tried on evidence of violent crimes. evidence of violent crimes. i know that the saudi government i know that the saudi government have said that the majority of have said that the majority of those executed were tied to those executed were tied to terrorist attacks by al-qaeda terrorist attacks by al-qaeda over a decade ago. over a decade ago. but what specifically each of but what specifically each

of the 47 who were-- farcical. if you believe they were tried properly, the violent crimes that would get them a long jail sentence or maybe even the death penalties in the u.s. putting aside the four political people who were executed, was that justice for the other 43? ist first of all, i don't know that the 43 were all tried on evidence of violent crimes. i know that the saudi government have said that the majority of those executed were tied to terrorist attacks by al-qaeda over a decade ago. but what specifically each of the individual men who were convicted was accused of and what evidence was presented against them is not clear to anyone. what i do know is that to be convicted of terrorism in saudi arabia you don't need to commit any violence. in fact, you don't need to do much other than criticise the government. that is enough to be labelled a terrorist and subject to capital punishment >>> they like to make between what you say and violence >> they like to make that link, but in their mind anything that c

trump's republican rivals either don't buy it or find it farcical. >> i got a fair question for somebody but we don't talk about that. >> reporter: in south carolina wednesday, donald trump portrayed his boycott of the debate his textbook negotiating ploy. >> i was not treated fairly. you know that? does everybody agree with that? you know in life, when with i fight with you, i'm fighting the same way. you have to be treated fairly. >> reporter: ted cruz dropping in some polls but betting on a ground game in iowa said trump is a coward. >> not that he is afraid of me. he is afraid of you. >> reporter: cruz who will likely become the number one debate target tonight proposed a final time and place for a debate with trump. >> how about the two of us in a one-on-one debate mano-mano? >> we have a venue, we have a all we are missing is a candidate. >> fox's prime time king bill o'reilly urged trump to >> here is it is what. >> bill, let me tell you. you're taking this much more >> who is? i want you to consider, all think about it. say, look. i might come back. forgive. go forward. >> i don'

. >> that level is farcical that was very far from here. >> yes, quite far from here. >> that's worse than fink. that's worse than what fink was saying. >> given the four good years we've had since then, not including last year where we were flat. let's talk about oil. i had conversations with a number of investment bankers, a lot of them trudging down to houston, shaking hands, saying hello to everybody. the expectation of the wide range of restructuring that will take place there. not every company, but many. many it's interesting, jim, because the reports back i get is there is still a sense of denial on the part of many executives who run these companies that the day is here. it's hard to imagine it's not with 2974 wti now. the day does seem to be very close for these restructurings. not necessarily all bankruptcies, some simply debt for equity. stay out of the bankruptcy proceedings. many will come, it would seem. do we -- once that process begins -- bottom in a sense? >> only if the major oil says we have so much cash, we want to come in. otherwise, no you're right about the opt