. >> we can talk about the farrell's provision we weren't away that was in the ordinance. >> so the longer period seems nor reasonable to me. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i tend to agree i'm going to think the violation occurs and then there's a 90 day period of time there might be private right of action but after that time exteriors there are can't be private right of action reverent are you farrell wanted one hundred and 5 instead of 90 making it a longer period of time. >> actually, the difference continue sxomz is 60 days and the interested party gives a 60 days past the department basically hadn't made any form determination so this is a or not a violation within 60 days of complaint if this happens this in supervisor campos legislation the interested party has to give the doves thirty days notice of their intent to foil a lawsuit their private right of action is cut off and they have to go to the regular private right of action they have to go dot whole administration process with the city and then file a lawsuit under ferals the timeline is long-range his it one hundred and 5

i wanted to thank supervisor farrell for the introduction on the studies on the private shuttles. i want to also request to cosponsor an ordinanceorce on marijuana locally. i wanted to thank supervisor campos for many years of work with community members for their work too. i wanted to thank supervisor weiner for bringing together as many forces as possible to look at that issue. also i wanted to alert people one of the big events coming on saturday has been cosponsored with my office. it will besides leadership of the richmond area it's self-help for the elderly and office of assembly phil we have over 40 different organizations that's part of our coalition. some of the groups will participate including senior organizations, sf village and asian place organizations education and youth groups and community youth center to resource center. there will be a lot of different free activities and give aways. one critical event besides yoga classes is a community kitchen that 18 reasons great organization and mission district and education outside of a group that works with young people to get them outside to learn in gardens and physi

farrell, aye. supervisor kim, aye. there are 9 ayes mptd the ordinancesed. >> item 13 is a ordinance to amend the san francisco plan by repealing the 2009 housing element and adopting the 2014 element and making the appropriate findings >> supervisor tang, aye. supervisor wine eraye. supervisor yee, aye. supervisor avalos, aye. supervisor yee, aye. supervisor comps aye. supervisor christensen, aye. supervisor co00. eye. supervisor sfairal, no. supervisor kim, aye. supervisor aye. 10 eye and 1 no with supervisor ferrule. >> this ordinance finally passed. >> item 14 is a resolution to extend temporary access and use licenses for access use maints of infrastructure near 7th street >> good afternoon everyone, welcome back rick, nice to have you back thip chamler. i have a amendment to item number 14. this was a item we heard in the land use committee laes week. i'm recommend a few clean upchanges to remove a vague reference that the department has it authority to-[inaudible] you should have receive adcopy of those changes. the department of public works acce

. >> sure the legal shut up is not under the 4014 ordinance to legalize this entitle ms. fong was mark farrell trying to solve the problem that kitchen was built without a permit so under recommendation of here prior council she was to apply for a permit for the don't guess of that kitchen. >> you've indicated in our brief that there is nothing to prove this was not done with a permit. >> right no, but all the architect was able to teller the building was not done with any permit and i wasable i looked at the building permit history on for this premises and didn't show that any such permits were issued in the past 20 years for the building of the kitchen but here the kitchen is. >> how old is this building. >> my client bought the building in 1984 i don't know how old the building is. >> i have a few questions so how many unit are in this building right now. >> technically my client lives in the upper unit this is the lower unit as a back unit where ms. functions son lives a spare bedroom type of situation not a self-contained. >> it's not a kitchen. >> right >> thank you. >> mr. sanchez. >> t

. >> sure the legal shut up is not under the 4014 ordinance to legalize this entitle ms. fong was mark farrell trying to solve the problem that kitchen was built without a permit so under recommendation of here

farrell. >> aye. >> supervisor kim. >> aye. >> supervisor mar. >> aye. >> supervisor tang. >> aye. >> supervisor wiener. >> aye. >> supervisor yee. >> aye. >> there are 11 aye's. this ordinance passes unanimously. next item please madam clerk. >> item 7 a categorical exemption for the san francisco international airport plot 700 development project. >> colleagues same house same call. without objection this resolution is adopted unanimously. item 8. >> item 8 for a real property lease at 100 blanken avenue with celestina and alan salvador jimenez co-trustees for a portion of the ground floor and one five year option to extend. >> same house same call. >> i'm sorry president president. >> supervisor kim. >> i wanted to reiterate some of the comments at budget committee about the number of years this leefs month to month and therefore doubled in rent expenditures without any type of negotiations. i know the comments were already made and i want to appreciate and reiterate the comments and i hope we put something in place that doesn't allow a department to go month to month and around evictions and major rent increases and major taxpayer dollars over the years and i hope we hav

ordinance is different not a uniform thirty days. >> 45 dies in one and one hundred and 5 in farrell's and thirty days in other one so i think the museum of days probably the longer than the better to have time to do it but i am not their splitting hairs over days and commissioner richards you i think we heard from supervisor kim that is a 35-year-old precedent so probably laws of action by a nonprofit so to commissioner johnsons point this is five or six other example if you're a nonprofit start suing someone the nonprofit has a mission statement around affordable housing or whatever the specification that is common sense for me and commissioner wu i think on building what commissioner richards said there's a long history of sro history where people live and a lot of illegal hotel going on to stop the bad actors from shift the home rentals to hotel rentals there is some good. >> of the professional guardian i think we should do something about the veterans enforcement i'll willing to support. >> commissioner antonini. >> i disagree u disagree i've seen in my years many years the mayor's office and the city administration were forebodi

farrell supervisor kim supervisor tang there are 9 i's. >> okay. this item is finally passed unanimously madam clerk call the next item and item 2 an ordinance to amend the administrative code for the health care trust fund as city officers providing the members with health care and insurance and for the trust fund for the provisions felt administrative code. >> colleagues, same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. this item is passed unanimously on the first reading next item and item 3 the resolution to give the administered for the proud patterson program for the community of corrections. >> same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. this resolution is adopted national anthem. >> item 4 to authorize the fire department to accept a gift of one xl interest the benny hoff valued at approximately 50 thousand 5 hundred for marin operations same house, same call? this is adopted unanimously next. >> to authorize the police department to accept a gift of s l if mr. benny hoff for 50 thousand 5 hundred for do police department maifrn unit. >> same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. this resolution is adopte

>> item number 5 is an ordinance to ban the use of smokeless tobacco products and or any portion of a device and making environmental findings. >> the sponsor is supervisor farrell. >> thank you for having me here today in committee to discuss this legislation to ban tobacco products including chewing tobacco across san francisco. i want to thank my sponsors mar, tang and wiener for their efforts. i'm pushing for this bill because the negative the negative affects are crystal clear. showing that smokeless tobacco increases the risk of gum gum did these and nicotine addiction and is modelling of smokeless tobacco of family and friends and athletes is strongly associated. as someone who used to play baseball myself i know how addicting the substance can be i believe tobacco should have no place in baseball or any of our athletic fields in san francisco where it can influence our city's youth as a father of 3 young children i want to send the right message to him to our team and to our city's youth by saying that smokeless tobacco isn't have any place in baseball. and i know this bill will have the effect of the effect. what's shocking to me even as cigarette use d

farrell campaign and committee they stipulated to the fact it was a controlled committee they are responsible and shouldn't be left off the hook the public is entitled to you enforcing your campaign ordinance with an election that was stolen by that illegal activity thank you. >> i'm bob plant hold i hope nobody feels comfortable with the process and with whatever decision you come up with too many people who are attorneys are reading this from the view point of an attorney i'm bringing that up it can be relevant if i set up a company i've got to set up a accountability and i'm relying on the professional skill and adherence to their duties i'm running a company their supposed to handle that part of the work i'm suggesting that a candidate that is not a lawyer we know that willie brown campaign and if you hire them this is a track record their supposed to do their job and know their job in this case i'm running and running and running and speaking and speaking so it maybe there was a miss placed trust by farrell and i'm not saying he did a good job he lacks if in the negative invents but if we relied on someone that failed to do his job it may be a problem not only for him i'm going to tel