there is a little more transparency than the fasttrack proposal a couple of years ago or fasttrack of 10 years ago. a little more transparency, a little more access to the public maybe, for tpp than there was in the past. it sounds like the same promises and nothing really has changed. president obama pledged in cleveland, ohio, i was an audience, in a debate with then senator clinton, senator obama promised as the clinton that he or she would renegotiate nafta. we have not seen that. these promises have been empty by administrations of both parties. reporter: canada and mexico would be part of the transpacific partnership, that is the 12 country trade debate. is this a chance to renegotiate nafta? sen. brown: that is what they say, but they are not really renegotiating nafta. in fact, some of the country of origin rules may be worse than they were. we don't know that for sure because the trade rep will not talk to us about those things. the synchronous -- secret andness of this trade agreement is astounding. again, the reason this is the past, the bill was only introduce on thursday.

it is being fasttrack to congress.ou look at the "wall street journal" article, what a bunch of bs. the democrats are for this, the republicans are against this -- the same bs over and over. host: "time magazine" looks at how fasttrack legislation could play into the 2015 presidential race. marco rubio is rarely on the same side as obama, but the florida republican who is running for president in 2016 wrote a letter to the white house expressing support. hillary clinton, who announced this week that she is running as president, is backed into a corner. so far, clinton has kept quiet on whether she supports this deal. that is from "time magazine." all weekend long, are c-span's city tour is taking booktv and american history tv on the road to say augustine georgia. today, we will offer all the coverage on say augustine in one block. >> the hotel was built by henry morris and flagger. flagler is someone who is very little known outside of florida. he was one of the wealthiest men in america. he had essentially been a cof

the president says he will sign fasttrack isf it passes.is morning we want to hear your views on fasttrack. supporters, give us a call at (202) 748-8000

those who say whatever you do with fasttrack in general, it cannot apply with the agreement.that front, whatever is said with what is in the fasttrack will not be affected in the agreement. but the dirty little secret is all the 40 pages of negotiating objectives are not negotiable. the reason is, whether or not the executive branch gets those objectives in an agreement, all the special delegate authorities apply. the president has delegated the authority to sign the agreement they have the right to write the legislation that does not go to committee. boom, onto the floor. whether or not it is the objective, and 90 day guarantee vote, even in the senate. here is another secret, the fasttrack in 1988, it has labor provisions in it. a new idea, no. why? totally unenforceable objectives. if you do a side-by-side comparison come which folks can see if they go to the ways and means committee, where forward, they are about 100 words different than the previous fast track. they do not make any objectives enforceable. host: we will start with michael in california, independent line.

where is we know there are some democrats who are supporting the notion of giving them fasttrack.ee how many follow the lead. there are a number of prominent democrats including chuck schumer don't need -- like this. the fact that the present is getting opposition from such prominent members of his party is a major stumbling block. as he prepared to go ahead with largely republican support. this is chuck schumer yesterday. >> are middle class is hurting and the evidence i've seen is that this hurts middle-class incomes and i can't leave for it in that regard. >> this guy is going to be the next leader of democrats in the senate. he is breaking with his president. if the president gets these trade deals, it will be a huge legacy item for him. is he willing to break with his own party to get it done. matt: why are democrats against this? is it free trade a potential of capitalism? erik: is there evidence to back up what schumer says? the middle class gets hurt by a deal like this? >> the debate is democrats are often marks. history with suggest this raises incomes for americans acro

. >> does she support fasttrack and risk creating an opening on her left in the presidential primarye or does she oppose it and alienate business community, create daylight between her and >>> you could call it frustration at the beach, volleyball courts on the national mall. for year playing ball on the courts near the lincoln memorial has been free. >> it's changed, you now have to play there. players say the change means the public is going to lose >> i'm very frustrated about this new policy. >> he's played for free in west potomac park for a decade. now he and hundreds of other players will have to pay a $30 nonrefundable fee online for two hours and reserve a court thanks to the national park service. >> i don't think the national park service intended to create a problem for us. i think it was an innocent thing on their part. >> it calls for volleyball leagues to preserve every reserve the court. >> give us a steady stream for upkeep and maintenance nep of the court. 100% of funds that come in for these reservation fees go back into the courts to repair and replace nets. >> gr

are there conservatives who have problems giving the president more power when it comes to fasttrackingeals, that the executive branch would get more power over congress that they want to weigh in the constitutionallests the tea partiests. >> i think those conservatives are already people who hesitate over trade. to begin with. worried about what's going on here with our economy and the american worker and they're not all, senator rob portman is our u.s. trade rep. he has concerned about the bill. high might he might not stop or vote against tpa. his concerns about a fast track at this moment the concerns may be dressed but he's not alone. there are republicans that are not only concerned about free trade, but also about executive authority and what president obama has already afforded himself. but i think when it comes to this issue, that's rooted in a resistance to trade deals. >> does it get through? >> yes. >> i think so. >> sure. >> yeah. >> next up raisins. property rights. and you. when it comes to good nutrition...i'm no expert. that would be my daughter -- hi dad. she's a dieti

are there conservatives who have problems giving the president more power when it comes to fasttracking deals, that the executive branch would get more power over congress that they want to weigh in the constitutionallests the tea partiests. >> i think those conservatives are already people who hesitate over trade. to begin with. worried about what's going on here with our economy and the american worker and they're not all, senator rob portman is our u.s. trade rep. he has concerned about the bill. high might he might not stop or vote against tpa. his concerns about a fast track at this moment the concerns may be dressed but he's not alone. there are republicans that are not only concerned about free trade, but also about executive authority and what president obama has already afforded himself. but i think when it comes to this issue, that's rooted in a resistance to trade deals. >> does it get through? >> yes. >> i think so. >> sure. >> yeah. >> next up raisins. property rights. and you. they have the procedures for it. they set the value of it and they pay you for it. in this case t

it is about fasttrack and pacific trade. doug palmer is joining us.ll of a sudden, we woke up this morning, and this trade pact is all over the pages. a deal has been reached a certain elements of the leadership on either side. what exactly has taken place? what is this trade item about? guest: it may seem sudden to much of the public, boxing this has been coming up for quite a wild. what happened yesterday is the leaders of the financial committee, senator hatch and sender widen -- senator wyden reach an agreement on fasttrack. basically, what that would do is allow president obama to submit trade agreements to congress forestry up and down vote without amendments. the most immediate reason that the white house once that legislation is because it is trying to conclude a big trade deal in the asia-pacific. this called transpacific partnership. and includes united states, the anon. the pact is controversial. business groups love it. labor groups, environmental's, and some ngos hate it. the legislation that was passed yesterday, if adopted, with ed appr

multinational corporations are calling the shots of whatever they want in tpp, whatever they want in fasttrack -- generally whatever they want. the bailouts, the tax breaks the deregulation. they get what they want here because they get what they paid for. juan: that was congressman alan grayson talking about campaign reform. doug use is -- doug hughes, i wanted to ask, were you surprised that you are able to get as far as you were able to get onto the capital lawn? doug: my thought was it was less dangerous to let me land since i had been vetted. that did not work. it turned out i was able to land safely anyway. juan: you did everything possible to warn folks ahead of time that you were doing this protest. doug: yeah. i sent an e-mail, which some people said was inadequate, but the e-mail give the reasons why they did not need to shoot me down, and i had a website. on the website, i asked people to call the website to tell them to read the e-mail, what address it went to, and who it was from. and "the tampa bay times" called him through the white house to tell them that i was coming in. every

. >> earlier today, the mayor of north charleston announced the firing of officer slager and fasttracked new steps for his police force going forward. >> today i made an executive decision and have notified my counsel, we have already ordered this morning an additional 150 body cameras so that every officer that's on the street in uniform will have a body camera. this has been a horrible tragedy. within our community. there have been two families that have been harmed great by what occurred. both the victims and the officer's family. and our hearts go out to both of them. >> apparently those first steps were enough as members of the community still voiced their displeasure during the briefing. >> no justice! >> no peace. >> no justice! >> no peace! >> no justice! >> no peace! >> all right. kimberly, let me go to you first. because you used to prosecute crimes. when you see something like this and you have evidence from a cell phone video that i don't think anyone here is going to disagree that the charge of murder seems absolutely appropriate. >> and it's been pretty swift. when they say

. >>> let me finish tonight with this news that a majority of senators voted to put this bill on fasttrackis not the way this story has been running the last several days in the paper. of since the trade bill grabbed the front page the only voices heard have been those from senator elizabeth warren that have opposed the issues. and this has become a hot debate here. the country's labor unions have been opposing. hillary clinton has yet to take sides, except it fair to say she backed the pacific rim trade deal while serving as the secretary of state calling it the gold standard of trade deals. as i've made it clear, if you want to follow this debate watch "hardball." it's going to be hot and here. "all in with chris hayes" starts right now. >>> tonight on "all in" -- >> as president and as commander in chief, i take full responsibility for all our operations. >> the president makes a stunning announcement. >> we believe a u.s. counterterrorism operation targeting an al qaeda compound in the afghanistan-pakistan border region accidentally killed warren and geeiovanni this past january. >> wh

salesses: the work that's being done between these organizations fasttrack looking at technologies that can help. mr. meadows: when will we have a plan? you said you're the guy in charge, when will we have a plan to make sure this doesn't happen in case there is 50 pounds of plastic explosive? adn. gortney: i need to do that in a closed session. mr. meadows: the silence is deafening. if you get together twice a month, your staff, how many times have most of you were all of you gotten together to discuss your responses to this hearing? did you meet as a group to discuss your responses to this hearing? >> yes we did. mr. meadows: so you got together to discuss your response to this hearing, but you don't get together to discuss the protection of assets? yes or no. mr. meadows: -- adn. gortney: mr. salesses: yes. mr. meadows: if you are wanting to be transparent, why would you try and coordinate your answer to this hearing? are you more afraid of government oversight than you are of protecting the people? >> knows her. mr. meadows: -- no, sir. to talk about some of the lessons we learned.