implications of that as well as implications on everything from our wildlife, our moose, our trout, to our fauna and lots of other things that affect the state.

they bring in lots of flora and fauna.llewellyn park, the lot sizes are quite large and they do not allow fences. the idea, there would be a shared, open space, where any individual owner could roam in this big, public nature grounds. they are kind of interesting examples for several reasons. one of which, in the llewellyn park there is a gatehouse, which they used as a way to promote the idea of privacy, security, these fundamental features of suburban life that we think of today. but also, they suggest as exclusivity. these were in fact, country homes for very wealthy city people. later in the 19th century we have the origins of streetcar suburbs that had houses that are often a little less elaborate, but interesting, nonetheless. streetcars become popularized in the late 19th century because they become electrified and are able to travel faster. this is an image of pittsburgh. you can see all of the bridges between pittsburgh crossing the rivers around it. these bridges are not carrying automobiles, but rather, pedestri

llegÓ de manera inesperada a una casa en florida y atacÓ al perro de la familia y hasta un oficial de fauna ventana. mÁs seguro de ese lado. que tengan un excelente fin de semana, cuidado con la lluvia. fÉlix: 6 de enero y estas son las principales noticias. las autoridades identificaron a esteban santiago, un joven de origen puertorriqueÑo, como el presunto responsable de un ataque en el aeropuerto de miami. univisiÓn tuvo acceso a imÁgenes de esteban santiago que podrÍan entregar pistas sobre esteban santiago.

one nonprofit organization, fauna & flora international, is trying to help. their conservation response unit, or cru, made up of 14 elephants, is being deployed to prevent human/wildlife conflict. in communities where conflicts exist, the cru will push elephants back to remaining forest areas away from villages. >> [eaking local language] >> these approaches can be very effective on the small scale, um, and also in the short term. at the end of the day, as elepnt habitathrinks, elephants are going to spend more and more time coming out of the forest. the long-term solution is not community based initiatives to drive elephants back to the forest. the long-term solution is to make sure there's enough room for the elephants to live in the natural habitat without having to come into human habitation. >> the best hope to conserve the sumatran elephant is actually to conserve the ones in aceh, because that's where the biggest populations are. so in order to conserve the elephants, we've got to conserve those lowland rainforests, which means conserving leuser. >> gr

95% more on i enjoyed this life, is because i was born on this planet with this richness of flora, faunawater and clean air, that is a huge part of what i enjoy about life. and god save us if we do not pass that on to our kids either. ted turner: let's say the human condition right now is like a baseball game. and if it was a baseball game, it would be the seventh inning, and we are down by two runs with two innings to go. that does not mean that we are beaten. we are way behind right now, we are behind the eight ball. but we have not lost yet. we have time, if we hold the other team right where they are. if we all of a sudden wake up tomorrow, and we decide that we are going to do everything right instead of half the things right and half the things wrong, we used to be doing everything wrong, but basically we are now doing about half the things right and half the things wrong, but the conditions call for us to survive, we have to do everything right. terre: the urgency of global climate change is now recognized by almost every nation. what is needed, as we have heard, is global action

costa rica is a natural treasure, home to 5% of the world's species of flora and fauna. >> translator: costa rica's vibrant plants and animals are similar to okinawa's i wanted to reflect the bingata tradition no matter what. >> reporter: he wantnted to dept more than natural beauty. he wanted to express his feelings about peace. paperr stencils are used in bingata. these traditional patterns have been passed down from generation to generation. but okinawa became a battlegrounds in world war ii, most bingata kimono and paper stencils were lost then, but some were found on the japanese mainland.. hihis grandfather set about copying designs from these old stencilsls. he learned that neutral costa rica has no standing army. he wanted to reflect costa rica's commitment to peace. >> translator: thinking about both japan and costa rica, i felt a strong connection to the idea about peace from the very beginning. >> reporter: this is the design he came up with. it features lots of hummingbirds, butterflies, and plant, and on the hem is a bird said to bring happiness. he wanted the natural par

or how, or whether, vibrations resonating down the posts and into the sea bed create stress in the fauna of the surrounding habitats?" and finally, this from jackson marshall: "i think they are ugly." as always, we welcome your comments at pbs.org/newshour, on our facebook page, or on twitter @newshour. >> stewart: the chinese-american artist whose deer paintings inspired the film "bambi," has died. tyrus wong's paintings impressed walt disney, who produced the animated film in 1942. tyrus wong was 106 years old. and finally as the year comes to a close, northern michigan's lake superior state university has released its annual list of words that should be banished for misuse or overuse. the 2017 list includes echo chamber, guesstimate, dad-bod, listicle, and post-truth. that's all for this edition of pbs newshour weekend. i'm alison stewart. good night, and happy new year. captioning sponsored by wnet captioned by media access group at wgbh access.wgbh.org >> pbs newshour weekend is made possible by: bernard and irene schwartz. judy and josh weston. the cheryl and philip milstein family

there allegedly was plant life, fauna, on the moon, and even some winged -- bat-like creatures that resemble the flying monkeys in the wizard of oz much later. in 1835, that's what they said late on the moon. of course this was a tall tale. of course it was made up. all the other newspapers called out "the new york sun" for making this up. the new york sun, however, never admitted it, and it circulation rose to match the "times of london," and by then it was the most read newspaper in the world. it was fun. it was entertaining. they reported on courts and police reports and crime. this had not been done before. another newspaper founded at this time was "the new york herald," founded in 1835. it was a little different. its mission was to provide a correct picture of the world, to give people information about their city, and to the independent of politics, of religion, of the elite at that time. they shocked readers with this, by the way. they came out and said, we don't practice any particular religion. we are not protestants, we are not catholics. they called things what they were. they us

allegedly there was plant life and fauna on the moon. creaturesome bat like that resembled the flying monkeys from the wizard of oz. in 1835, that is what they said. of course, this was a tall tale. of course it was made up. and all the other newspapers called them out for making it up at the new york sun never admitted it. but it only that, circulated the rival for that in london. so this put the new york sun on the map. it was fun. it was entertaining. court andted on police reports and crime. this had been done before. newspaper that was founded around this time was the new york herald. that was 1835. and this was a little bit different. his mission was to provide a correct picture of the world. give people information about independentnd to be , the elite, religion at that time. he shocked readers with this. know,e out and said, you we don't practice any particular religion. we are not protestants or catholics. he called things what they were. he used frank language. in his the word leg newspaper instead of limb. scandalous. he used

implications of that as well as implications on everything from our wildlife, our moose, our trout, to our fauna and lots of other things that affect the state. now, i do appreciate your comments about being at the table as we continue to negotiate around climate change. in 2009 the u.s. government, along with other nations that are part of the group of 20, the g-20, agreed to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. i for one believe that the science shows that fossil fuels have contributed dramatically to climate change. and while much of the responsibility for this g-20 agreement falls on the treasury department, the state department also does have a role in overseeing the objective. so, i really have a two-part question here with respect to subsidies for fossil fuels. the first is at this time when many of our oil companies, particularly large oil companies like exxon are reaping very good profits, do we really need to continue these subsidies? and second, if confirmed, how would you as secretary of state help to fulfill our international commitment to phase out those fossil fuel subsidies? >> well,

common between languages and national history, the way biologists have taught us to see flora and fauna. you would never know it from the way language is taught in the school system. you would never know it from even taking just one but two linguistic classes that certain things are really not hit on. so i want to give you a new way of looking at language that will feel good, all of this makes it so you can walk down the street feeling better about what you hear and possibly feeling better about your own speech what it comes down to is this. language is inherently changeable. language changes. it's not that it might change. it always will change. it must change. if you ask somebody whether they think language has changed him out of the anybody would say no. but i think we can to think what language changes is, first of all, that you need new words for new things, like anybody would say that. you would assume a lot of those words probably are going to come from foreign languages, and that is something in my process is exciting. we all know that slang changes. language of change is much m

the struggle to save our flora .nd fauna, to save the air this is ground zero of the struggle for socialh. march represents the promise of feminism against the pernicious powers of state violence. an inclusive and intersectional feminism. [cheering] an inclusive and intersectional feminism that calls on all of us to join the resistance to racism, to islamaphobia, to anti-semitism, to misogyny, the capitalist exploitation. yes, we salute the fight for $15. we dedicate ourselves to collective resistance. resistance to the billionaire, profiteers and gentrifiers, resistance to the health care privateers, resistance to the attack on muslims, immigrants, resistance to the attacks on disabled people. resistance to state violence perpetrated by the police and through the prison industrial complex. [cheering] resistance to institutional and intimate gender violence. especially against trans women of color. women's rights are human rights all over the planet and that is why we say freedom and justice for palestine. [cheering] we celebrate the impending release of chelsea manning. [cheering] and o

the way biologists have taught us to see flora and fauna. you never know it from the way language is taught in the school system. you'd never know it from even taking one or two linguistics classes that certain things are really hit on the head. i want to give you a new way of looking at language that will feel good. all this makes us easier to walk down the street feeling better about what you hear and feeling better about your own speech. and what it comes down to is this: the fact that language is inherently changeable. language changes. it's not that it might change, it always will change, it must change. if you ask somebody whether they think language should change, i don't think anybody would say no but you tend to think that what language change is his first of all, that you need new words for new things, i think anybody would accept that. you assume that a lot of those words will come from foreign languages and that process is exciting.and we know that slang changes so language changes. language change is much more profound than that

. >> eran una amenaza muy grave para la fauna local.s tenemos que devolverles todos sus esfuerzos. queremos darle la bienvenida a nuestra querida adriana martin, que viene acompaÑada de su mami. miriam carreÑo viene acompaÑada de sus abuelitos, carmen y emily. alan: 90 aÑos, 87 aÑos, y estÁn enteras y hermosas! la mami se ve como de 15. karla: tambiÉn viene eliecer marte, y amor antÚnez. alan: adriana no solamente se trajo a su mamÁ. se trajo a su papÁ, se trajo a su abuela materna y a su abuela paterna! todos a vivir contigo! karla: ¿cÓmo fue ese proceso, adriana? adriana: bueno, yo siempre digo que la vida es un ciclo, y uno nunca planea hacer estas cosas. yo soy venezolana, y la situaciÓn económica y social no estÁ muy bien allá. las grandes ideas surgen por desesperaciÓn, a veces. yo me vine joven, tenÍa 21 aÑos, estaba soltera. pero despuÉs de que se estaba aquÍ, yo soy hija Única, ella se quiso venir. y bueno, vente. vamos a ponerle ganas aquÍ en este paÍs. ya estando aquÍ, ella piensa en su mamÁ, y yo pienso en mi abuela. ¿quÉ ha

as well as applications on the fauna and other things that affect the state. i do appreciate your comments about being at the table as we continue to negotiate. in 2009, the u.s. government agreed to -- fossil fuel subsidies. i believe that fossil fuels have conservative to climate change. and much of the responsibility on the agreement falls treasury department, the state department also has a role so i have a two-part question. the first is that at this time, when -- are reaping good profits , doing it to continue the subsidies? and how does that help our international commitment to phase out the fossil fuel subsidies? ix tillerson: the first part, am happy to offer a personal view on even though that isn't within the state department role to make that judgment. this just comes from my understanding of how the various tax elements treat certain investments and research credits. i'm not aware of anything that fossil fuel industry gets that i would clear dress as a subsidy. rather it is the application of the tax code, probably. ajax code that broadly applies

that as well as implications on everything from, you know, our wildlife, our moose, our trout, to our fauna and lots of other things that affect the state. now, i do appreciate your comments about being at the table, as we continue to negotiate around climate change. in 2009, the government, along with other nations that are part of the group of 20, the g-20, agreed to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. i for one believe that the science shows that fossil fuels have contributed dramatically to climate change. and while much of the responsibility for this g-20 agreement falls on the treasury department, the state department also does have a role in overseeing the objective. so i really have a two-part question here with respect to subsidies for fossil fuels. the first is, at this time when many of our oil companies, particularly large oil companies like exxon, are reaping very good profits, do we really need to continue these subsidies? and second, if confirmed, how would you as secretary of state help to fulfill our international commitment to phase out those fossil fuel subsidies? >> well, s