the fdca says you have to have -- >> didn't the lower courts go beyond that? representations were made that the lower courts relied on studies that have been found discredited and removed. so they were obviously look at not just what the fda was looking a t. >> that wasn't quite the right sound bite. that was jackson arguing why should the courts get into this. mark joseph stern, how did that go? >> very poorly for the anti abortion advocates here represented by erin hawley. she said we've proved time and again it poses a threat to women but as judge brown pointed out, it's a very safe drug. safer than viagra and tylenol. they sited these studies that purported to show it was actually dangerous and caused excessive bleeding but in between those decisions and today, those studies were retracted for being insufficiently rigorous and sponsored by abortion groups that had an ax to grind against abortion. i think when the justices did reach the merits, there was very little that erin could do here to persuade them that this pill is especially dangerous. it falls sq