>> yes, sir. >> this was at the fdle in miami? >> yes, sir. >> and who was present, if anyone, from the state attorney's office? >> no, sir. two detectives. two fdle detectives. >> do you remember the date that this took place? >> no, sir. >> a couple of weeks ago, those you went to fdle in miami and they gave you a chance to review the statement? >> yes, sir. >> and did you? >> yes, sir. >> did you review any other statements at that time? >> the interview i had, i watched the interview i had with you. >> that would be a video-taped deposition? >> yes, sir. >> did you have a chance or did you review any other material in anticipation of coming to court? >> no, sir. >> did you review the transcript or listen to the recordings made by mr. crump? >> no, sir. >> let's talk a little bit about the interview on april 2nd, 2012. i know you talked about, in this case already and that you talk about in that case the idea that the phone kept hanging up that day. >> yes, sir. >> so, in other words you and trayvon martin would be talking and

. >> and then you ended up talking to somebody from fdle, correct?rder of times i spoke osomeone? >> i'll skip the news right now. you talked to somebody from fdle. >> i believe i did another sbrir with sorrino on the phone. >> and you ended up talking to me and i took a statement from you. >> fdle then you correct. >> is that correct? >> correct. >> would it be fair to say certain questions were not asked of you at the beginning that were asked later on in the later interviews? >> new questions, correct. >> right, in the first interview you were not asked to elaborate on certain things that later on at the end you were asked to elaborate, correct? >> correct. >> in other words nobody had asked you before whether you heard this, correct? >> no. >> and i asked you that, correct? >> yes. >> and you did not for purpose of the record hear that, correct? >> no. >> in fact what mr. o'mara, he pounded on the cement you did not hear that either? >> no. >> one of the interviews mr. o'mara asked you about ground and pound. >> correct. >> you recall that. could

you had another one with fdle that was much longer, correct? >> correct. >> all of those statements included some facts that were added to one or just not added to the other, correct because of the way the questions were being asked? >> i don't know about facts, but they needed more clarification. >> sure. then, of course, we took your deposition. i think that was 50 pages or so correct? >> correct. >> again, we asked you questions, you just answered the questions as best you can. >> correct. >> mr. de a rionda wanted to make sure the jury understands just the fact that you have statement one, statement two, statement three, statement four that, are not all exactly the same, you weren't lying, were you? >> no. >> okay. >> you were just answering the questions that were being asked, right? >> correct. some had more than the other ones, yes. >> as best you could remember that vent back then, correct? >> correct. >> and you even said that if adrenaline was flowing, wasn't it? >> yes. >> it was an vent where you sort of hyperfocused on what was hap

. >> telephone and it was transcribed, and another one with fdle that was much longer. >> correct. >> in all of those statements included some facts that were added to one or just not added to the other, correct? it's because of the way the questions were being asked? >> i don't know about facts but they needed more clarification. >> sure. and then of course we took your deposition and i think that was 50 pages or so, correct? >> correct. >> and again, we asked you questions and you just answered the questions as best you can. >> correct. >> and mr. de la rionda wants the jury to understand just the fact you have statement one, statement two, statement three and statement four that are not all exactly the same, that you weren't lying, were you? >> no. >> okay, you've just answered the questions that were being asked, right? >> correct, some had more than the other ones. >> as best as you could remember of that event back then, correct? >> correct. >> and you even said that the adrenalin was flowing, wasn't it in. >> yes. >> it was an event where you sort of hyperfocus on what was happ

. >> a couple weeks ago you went to fdle in miami and they gave you a chance to review the statement?yes. >> and did you? >> yes. >> did you review any other statement at that time? >> i watched the interview that i had. >> that would be a videotaped deposition? >> yes, sir. >> did you review any other material in anticipation of coming to court? >> no, sir. >> did you review the transcript or listen to the recordings? >> no, sir. >> let's talk about the interview april 2, 2012. i know you talked about in this case already and that you talked about in that interview the idea that the phone kept hanging up that day. >> yes, sir. >> so you and trayvon martin would be talking and for no apparent reason the call would be lost. >> yes, sir. >> not because you hung up, correct? >> no, sir. >> or because you know of -- >> pardon me? >> bad signal. >> you were plagued with a bad signal all day. >> yes, sir. >> and you never knew when the phone was going to disconnect. >> no, sir. >> usually what would happen is when the phone disconnected, one or the other of you would call each other back? >