the fec has re-opened the debate and perhaps the rules would start to apply. facebook was the leading group arguing against those rules being applied to online advertising, saying that the ads were so small that kind of disclose sure would be really hard to fit into the ad, but they've dropped their objections to it now. >> host: now, facebook is also saying they're not a journalism organization, they're a tech company. correct? >> guest: yeah, i think that they -- cheryl sandberg spoke whether they're a tech company or media company. she made this fine distinction which is they're a tech company, they employ engineers and don't write news articles but they understand they have some responsibility of the media company to make sure the content, the way she described it, safe. sounds like they're softening that distinction right now. >> guest: some of these platforms are becoming editors s and arbitors of what can be published. is that fair assessment? >> guest: absolutely. facebook and google are the biggestgatekeepers to what people see in news, what kind of n

the fec doesn't have jurisdiction over them so i wouldn't expect them to be particularly involved in this right now. >> david mccabe has been our guest on the communicators. >> my pleasure as always. >> a live picture of the white house rose garden where president trump and the singapore prime minister will make a joint statement shortly.

isn't that a function that the fec could undertake at this point? >> yes. as you mentioned, that's one of the things fec is good at and recently revamped the public face of those disclosures, making them more searchable online. and certainly policies could be developed in cooperation with social medias of the world who are very good at putting things online, i think, to make it all feasible and usable. >> thank you. i yield back. >> thank you. i recognize myself for another five minutes. mr. dickerson, i want to follow up on something mr. vandewalker said. does a russian in russia have first amendment rights in the united states? >> russian in russia certainly has fewer first amendment rights than an american. or than a russian would have on american soil. >> gotcha. mr. goodman, can the government of russia buy an ad saying come to moscow on broadcast television? >> there is no restriction which prohibits a foreign government from buying an ad. i think there would be a restriction on them buying an ad which would be explicit advocacy. because that would be

isn't that a function that the fec could undertake at this point? >> yes. as you mentioned, that's one of the things fec is good at and recently revamped the public face of those disclosures, making them more searchable online. and certainly policies could be developed in cooperation with social medias of the world who are very good at put things online, i think, to make it all feasible and usable. >> thank you. i yield back. >> thank you. i recognize myself for another five minutes. mr. dickerson, i want to follow up on something mr. vanderwalker said. does a russian in russia have first amendment rights in the united states? >> russian in russia certainly has fewer first amendment rights than an american. or than a russian would have on american soil. >> gotcha. mr. goodman, can the government of russia buy an ad saying come to moscow on broadcast television? >> there is no restriction which prohibits a foreign government from buying an ad. i think there would be a restriction on them buying an ad which would be explicit advocacy. because that would be il

the fec doesn't have jurisdiction over them so i wouldn't expect them to be particularly involved in this right now. >> david mccabe has been our guest on the communicators. >> my pleasure as always. >> a live picture of the white house rose garden where president trump and the singapore prime minister will make a joint statement shortly. while we wait for the president, here's some of what is ahead this week in congress. >> roundtable on the week ahead in washington. we are joined by usa today, washington correspondent paul singer. we are going to be talking about all the issues here in washington d.c. another important week for tax reform for the president, we showed our viewers a column in usa today talking about it to be joined for a house republican conference call yesterday to talk about tax reform. where else is he going to go to make this pitch this week when it comes to tax reform. >> on tuesday he is going up to capitol hill to attend the senate republican weekly luncheon that the caucus has. the tax reform bill is likely going to be a big topic of discussion. as you know t

deadlocks at the fec have increased and passed up chances to strengthen regulations. congress can reform the agency, including by making the number of commissioners odd and requiring at least one member to be non-partisan. thank you, and i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. >> i'd like to thank the gentlemen for your remarks. we're going to start the first line of questioning with the gentleman from michigan, mr. mitchell. you're recognized for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chair. it appears to me that a number of the individuals testifying are conflating general or social ads, opinion posts, as being the -- political ads as being the same thing. as mr. rothenberg notes, there were sophisticated posts about social issues some of which were made widely available. by operators, including those outside the united states. now, let me ask you, how are we going to determine what's fake news and real news? who determines that for us? >> well, i wouldn't ask the platforms to determine it. >> that doesn't answer my question. who determines that? if we're going to

those are line items from these fec reports that capture all of the -- >> right. but if millions of dollars are being spent and this firm is doing opposition research someone has got to be saying where is it. >> right. and i don't know who was part of those conversations in april when the firm, the research firm fusion gp a came to mark elias apparently and said hey, a republican had been funding this workup until now, we think you might be interested in it. i'm not sure who had the conversation that gave the green light -- >> someone clearly had to know. >> yes. and whoever that person is i would shake their hand and offer to take them out to a steak dinner. i'm glad there was somebody who was trying to get to the bottom of donald trump's web of opaque business connections. >> ed, it's sort of the colonel clinic defense i see nothing -- >> it doesn't pass the smell test. you know, anderson, one of the things the late phyllis slaply used to say is run for office and lose because you learn how campaigns work. in campaigns opposition research especially of the kind

about the filing, there's questions about the legality of whether they listed all these things on the fec forms or how they pay for it. >> the ammo for fusion gps is they use law firms as cutouts. they are able to shield their activities through the attorney-client privilege. it looks in this case we may have another situation where the law firm was used two cloak where the money was going. based on the complaint, they were not fully responsive to how this money was being used, calling it legal services when it was really for opposition research. >> bret: thank you. trump-russia collusion narrative has been a mainstay of mainstream media coverage for months. doug mckelway looks at where we are. >> no sense of decency, sir? >> russian collusion in american politics is as old as the cold war. in june 2016, democratic national committee announced its service had been hacked. on july 22, wikileaks began publishing 20,000 hacked dnc emails, embarrassing the party and its candidate, hillary clinton. later, candidate donald trump fueled the fire, in effect asking russia to spy on his democratic

the traditional regulations from the fec and the sec require disclosures by the media running the ads for they are receiving the insertion orders and payment for those ads. no programming runs that hasn't been vetted by those companies. in the digital world, every page is cobbled together from multiple sources and assembled on the fly inside a user's internet browser. sponsored links and social commentary come together from scores of computers. scores of other suppliers may be contributing measurement, ad verification and auction pricing services. only a portion of the advertising is sold directly by publishers. the greater portion is sold and distributed by third party technology companies which do their work via automated systems, programmatically in the industry parlance. legislative proposals that would require web sites to field expensive disclosure mechanisms create burdens on struggling media organizations, yet would barely capture the illicit political communication which is placed programmatically. this is why we would like the congress' support for strengthening the self-reg

we have learned that the fec records -- through the fec records that trump campaign paid an lit ka nearly $6 million over the last six months of 2016. that's a lot of money. >> yeah. and you see that kind of major expenditure in september for that company and you've heard from some people who worked in the trump campaign, they're saying essentially that they're not really sure that that figure is accurate on that spreadsheet from the fec. so it's interesting. i mean, you had this whole pattern with cambridge an lit ka on the one hand sort of saying this data meant so much or these ideas that somehow they had a special secret sauce and they had psychological profiles of 200 million u.s. citizens. that was something that was discredited and they eventually backed off of it and now you have the trump campaign who at one point of the taunting this company and their secret sauce and how valuable they were on election da. now you have this distancing. we've seen this pattern before, whether it was paul manafort, this idea that he was only a small part of the campaign. even steve bannon, a small

. >> con esto una breve pausa, al regresar el dasa aquÍ con nosotros en en fec mo nos cuenta cÓmo vicenteeggo. l'eggo my eggo. cuando se enteró que probé un detergente más barato que tide para ahorrar unos dólares... es que el que sabe, sabe mamita. porque más vale poco y bueno que mucho y no tan bueno, ¿cierto? ahora volví a tide y mi ropa se ve impecable otra vez, pero... es que perro viejo late echao ¿qué significa eso? que más vale suegra por vieja que por suegra mija tide, calificado #1 si tiene ser limpio, tiene que ser tide [ riendo ] [ se besan ] [ locutor ] ibesa el arcoíris! isaborea el arcoíris! ♪ (mÚsica) ♪ ♪ (mÚsica) ♪ >> es uno de los jÓvenes mÁs exitosos del regional mexicano y estrella de televisiÓn por su programa el vato, sÚper Éxito de telemundo, recientemente conversÉ con el dasa. >> gracias, es un gusto estar para mÍ aqui hablando desde otra parte de mi corazÓn. >> ¿cÓmo logra un joven de tu edad cuando comienza en sonora en esas difÍciles situaciones donde te creiste? ¿cÓmo sale adelante?. >> siendo realista, siempre mi papÁ y mi mama me pintaron la vida muy realista

the fec had an opportunity to make these rules six years ago google and facebook argued against.tter at the time did have those disclaimers. the fec did nothing and it became the instant standard. >> why are we seeing the ceos on the hill because they weren't summoned specifically isn't it the serious enough, big enough issue at this point where 126 million, half of the voting population of the u.s., are exposed to these ads, that we should see a sheryl sandberg or mark zuckerberg on the hill? >> i don't know who the committee actually called to testify, so i can't speak to whether it was the committees or the companies that chose who to speak. i think one thing you will see today is evidence of the culture clash. you'll find no two further disparate mindsets than washington and silicon valley, and at least the general councils have the legal backing to speak both languages. >> if you had to parse the three names, twitter, alphabet, facebook, who walks on to the hill with more vulnerability twitter because of the exposure to bots? facebook because of their scale? google because o

. >> and fec reports that campaign have to file. said they paid you guys $12 said they paid you guys $1274.94. >> for what? >> that's right. >> i don't know i'm tell you. >> field consulting. >> i was asking if you would hit the road again. >> don't act like the fake news and put a lie out there. >> this is from the federal election commission we asked you simple question. >> you know what we're just reporting what the federal election commission which is federal government they're required to do campaigns are required to file this. donald trump's campaign was required file this so. we're simply asking will join the campaign trail. >> that's a lie. it's a lie. >> that's right. that's right that's a lie. >> are you part of the fake news. >> you can take that up with federal election commission. >> okay. >> thank you we don't appreciate being paid a lie. >> are you a lie. >> all right. thanks so much for voyning us tonight. >> back after the break. mpanies deny coverage for pre-existing conditions. seniors would be charged thousands m

the traditional regulations from the fec and the sec require disclosures by the media running the ads for they are receiving the insertion orders and payment for those ads. no programming runs that hasn't been vetted by those companies. in the digital world, every page is cobbled together from multiple sources and assembled on the fly inside a user's internet browser. sponsored links and social commentary come together from scores of computers. scores of other suppliers may be contributing measurement, ad verification and auction pricing services. only a portion of the advertising is sold directly by publishers. the greater portion is sold and

fcc and ll we see the the fec at this hearing or perhaps some hearings at those commissions as well? david: the fcc, federal election ommission is doing some work around looking at whether or not there should be different disclosure requirements for ads.al one of the things that make this so complicated is there is not really a clear single regulator google and s like facebook and twitter. so actually the fcc doesn't have the ads so i ver wouldn't expect them to be particularly involved in this right now. mccabe is with axios and he's been our guest on "the communicators." david: thank you as always, peter. "communicators," russia's involvement in the 2016 lection with propublica senior reporter julia angwin. julia: facebook has said they earned that a bunch of ads placed during the election were outfits under an anonymous accounts, and they divisive ads, y not necessarily, it seems like, candidate or another, but just aimed at charged ivisiveness on topics. >> watch "the communicators," on ay night at 8:00 eastern c-span 2. c-span, a discussion on freedom of the

our colleague sarah frier reported this week how facebook lobby to four years with the fec in washingtonom having to have their political ad spending regulated the way it is on tv, radio, and prints. their argument is the space is too small and there are not enough characters for you to add all of those disclaimers that he would have on radio and tv. now, there is a real possibility that legislators could come in and force regulators to impose limits on this and that could slow up the trickle of money. >> it is remarkable to me that facebook and twitter seems like punching bags all week and facebook this week, the stock was actually up hearing why does wall street care about this and should they? >> i think the stock market has been bullish and not really responsive to the russian concerns. i also think from facebook's perspective, there will always be the fact that it is reflective that the situation was far worse with the government handling election hacking. i think they will always be the second player there and there will be a lot of political cover for them if the situation gets wo

. >> yeah, we went back and looked at some of the fec records and fi filings and found after trump won the nomination, he campaign started a series of payments to cambridge analytica, and so it's clear there was more of a relationship there than what was conveyed in that statement. jared kushner, who headed up one of the data operations also told "forbes" magazine that after the president won the nomination, they kept both data operations going simultaneously and a lot was shared between them. by doing that they could see -- sort of they could see the scale and it was a pretty good operation. >> stay with us. betsy, you look at the full statement from the trump campaign on this one. they don't mention cambridge analytica. they say we just relied on the rnc, et cetera, et cetera, and sort of dodging the key question here. how does this move the ball and to where? >> the trump campaign statement doesn't do anything to undermine the importance of the news i broke yesterday, which is that the ceo of a data analytics firm that the trump campaign paid nearly $6 million to over the course of

months to than three go, the fec on because of providing a key reprieve to wall street over mifid 2.et's bring in our team of financial regulator reporters. what start with the sec, sort of retrieved is that offering to wall street> ? >> among the complicated issues with>> mifid, one of the most complicated with the u.s., by complying, they will be violating u.s. sec rules and the sec, they have been lobbying them for months, the sec seems close to saying, it is fine if you violate u.s. rules to comply with mifid, we will not punish you. mark: how will that go down eu?in the ed -- >> one of the last pickups before mifid starts. the global reach of mifid, a lot done in brussels for european markets desk law done in brussels for european markets has a wide range of fact. a large relief to wall street and probably do some of the european investment funds that will be consuming research from wall street. vonnie: last -- on the goldman called, the cfo was asked about the impact on goldman and we got interesting details. let's have a listen. >> mifid 2 will make it more important than it h

>> what we do know is that in reviewing some of the records, and some of the fec filings, we found just after trump won the nomination, his campaign started a series of payments to cambridge analytica totaling $5 million. so it was more of a relationship than what was conveyed in that statement, and jared kushner also told "forbes" magazine, that after they won the nomination they kept going simultaneously, and by doing that we could scale to a pretty good operation. >> thank you very much. thank you for sharing all of that new reporting with us. president trump is blasting the democrats after it was revealed the dnc and the clintons helped to fund the dossier against him. he calls it a disgrace. joe johns is live at the white house with more. what you have learned, joe? >> reporter: good morning, alisyn. the white house dealing with a new piece of the puzzle, and the president choosing to turn it around and focusing on how far the clinton campaign would go to get dirt on him. >> don't forget. hillary clinton denies this, she knew nothing, and all of a sudden we found out -- >> attempti

this cuts to the core of it, i quote in their complaint to the fec, the purpose of some portion of the payments to perkins coy, that is the law firm, was not for legal services. those payments were intended to fund opposition research. the false reporting clearly failed commission requirements for disclosing purpose of disbursement. president trump said yesterday, he thought the payments for the dossier against him was a quote disgrace. press tex sierra leone raw sanders, took it a bit further this morning. listen here. >> if proves if anyone colluding with the russians to affect the election look no further than the clintons and look no further than the dnc. this is hypocrisy at highest level and may be a new low in american politics. reporter: back to the complaint, neil, right or not, when you talk to people about how campaigns, politicians set up organizations work, this kind of funding setup, is not necessarily uncommon. neil? neil: thank you, my friend. meantime, president trump likely ordering a gag order lift on the informant, letting him testify before congress. letting him se

according to the campaign's own fec filings, the trump campaign paid cambridge an lit ka $5.9 million. and there were dozens of profiles of the mercer-funded cambridge an lit ka as the beating heart of the trump campaign's data operation, including this bbc tour of where the operation had been housed. >> cambridge an lit ka was here. so it was just a line of computers. this is where their operation was and this is kind of the brain of the data. this was the data center. >> this is the data center, the center of the data center. >> exactly right. yes, it was. >> i'm joined by business insider political correspondent natasha bare trant who's been covering this and msnbc contributor and former fbi agent, author of "how to catch a russian spy." what's the significance of this? >> it's the first known instance that we've seen where the trump campaign directly reached out to wikileaks during the election. we saw that trump throughout the entire election was praising wikileaks, was telling russia to please find these 33,000 missing e-mails. and if true, which julian assange said that this wa

he's put in place people, bureaucrats in the justice department, fec which looks over telecom mergersething like this. if this happens, this is huge. i say "if" because these deals can fall apart. but they are talking. >> neil: thank you. charlie gasper in, fox business network. bottom line, we are going to be following this. we are going to be following the tax talks. they are having a devil of a time agreeing on how we need them. there is the issue of paying for it. we are all over it. >> kimberly: i'm kimberly guilfoyle with juan williams, jesse watters jesse watters, dana perino and greg gutfeld. it's 5:00 in new york city and this is "the five" ." tonight democrats on the defensive as their own russian scandal widens. an fbi informant working undercover at the time of the controversial uranium one deal is now free to talk. the justice department's has lifted a gag order so we can tell his story to lawmakers who want to know more about the obama administration's uranium deal with moscow. and about the cash that flowed to the clinton foundation

they might have been having you comply with fec reports. >> right. >> all sorts of things. >> and that's a good point of if we do end up getting further information on this from that bank subpoena. i mean, it may be very opaque in terms of where -- how those payments funneled through. the democrats have said, the democratic leaning law firm, named on being the democratic funder here, they said in the statement about this, well, listen, we weren't the only people that funded the research. the republicans should come out and admit it now, too. the republicans so far are not doing that and may be hard to figure it out seeing the records. >> so my guess is that it was the best funded republican presidential campaign at the time that was also getting the most criticism from donald trump. that's just my guess. >> a low energy campaign? >> yeah. but a high money campaign. and the campaign that knew how to do this stuff and that's my guess. >> so far, i have to say on the republican side, i have looked into this a lot. like everybody denies it. associated pacs deny it. everybody says wasn't me,

the dnc was doing it as a campaign and they probably violated the fec laws because they did not disclose it. >> don't pivot, jack. how much did the gop spend? just tell me. how much do you think -- you're a republican insider. >> scott, zero. zero on this report. >> they spent no money? >> zero on this report. they spend $9 million but nobody knows about it. $9 million, scott. >> hold on for a second. this discussion is not over. i want to get back lynn back in and michael back in. we have to take a quick break, but we will, of course, continue this and i want to get to the president calling pore more of the e-mails from hillary clinton to be released from the state department. also talk more about the gag order the president wants lifted off of this fbi informant talking about uranium and, of course, more about the charges coming from the special prosecutor according to cnn sources. >> right. >>> and also ahead, u.n. ambassador nikki haley says that if the u.s. isn't careful, we could face a security threat here at home from extremists in africa. coming up, hear from the ambassador as s

information comes out, but as he was saying, you know, all of this that draws in people from the dnc, the fecilings, all of the ts that weren't crossed and is that weren't dotted, it does lead to speculation and it's not very often that i sympathize with tom perez, but he took over the dnc at a time when a lot was in turmoil. you've got tom perez saying, nope, i have no idea. i don't know what's going on. you've got john podesta saying he had no knowledge. hillary clinton, of course. all of these people that claim they had no idea that $9 million went out the door allegedly. so it -- you know, at the end of all of this, i hope that we have some clarity. monday will definitely give us some clues. >> do you expect, amanda, that we will hear from the president before monday about this? >> i don't know if it necessarily behooves him to make a comment on this. i think as two segments ago, he's going to try to have a nice leisurely weekend and i don't think it's politically speed expedient or necessary for him to comment at this point. >> peter, you were going to say something. >> one, the economy

learning tonight that a nonpartisan group called the campaign legal center has filed a complaint with the fec saying that hillary clinton and the dnc, in fact, broke the law by failing to disclose payments connected to this phony fake news russian propaganda dossier. now, hillary clinton and her campaign more than happy to help create and spread russian disinformation in this campaign against donald trump. and earlier today, president trump reacted to this explosive scandal and here's what he had to say on that. >> i think it's very sad what they've done with this fake dossier, made up and i understand they paid a tremendous amount of money. and hillary clinton always denied it. the democrats always denied it. and now only because it's going to come out in a court case they said yes, they did it. they admitted it. and they are embarrassed by it but i think it's a disgrace. >> sean: beyond a disgrace. the president also blasted hillary clinton during an interview. he was on with our friend lou dobbs tonight on our sister network, the fox business network. watch. this don't forget hillary clint

congresswoman, if the clinton campaign, its remnants, would simply say, a lot of that money went to, you know, fecequirements and filings and all of that. only a small portion of it went to paying for the dossier. but since they're not talking, trump can run up the score today. >> well, he can run up the score for a while. but the truth is, we already have 17 different agencies within the intelligence community saying that the russia russians interfered in our elections. our job is to find out how and why and make sure it doesn't continue to happen. that's why we're focusing on the election machines in particular. that's one of the areas i think we are most vulnerable to, and why we have to redouble our efforts in that regard. >> let me go to glen on this. how good is this -- after east months of looking at, is the dozenier, especially with regard to the alleged behavior in the hotel? >> i think on that end, nobody knows. and there hasn't been any new reporting on and the bottom line is, we're not going to be able to determine anything until all of these investigations are concluded. and i presume

had a hierarchy that looked like the campaigns i've worked on, that hired a firm that hid from the fechat they were doing investigations in russia. the other campaign clearly did not have hierarchy, did not have institutional control, went through three campaign managers. and it looks like they were sitting ducks for someone trying to get involved in american politics but too clumsy -- >> sounds like you're making excuses for bad behavior there. >> no, look, if they did something wrong and illegal, they should be indicted and thrown in jail. the russians tried to meddle in our e elections. >> i have to let him respond. >> they weren't only sitting ducks, they were very willing ducks. we know from donald trump's meeting and now with papadopoulos, every time the russians offered them something at least some member of the trump campaign rather than saying i'm going to the fbi, they said, please, yes, let's pursue this. they were not innocent here. they seemed to be interested in the collusion -- >> i've got 30 seconds, but real quickly here, john kelly we saw on fox tonight saying basical

relied on the rnc data for their campaign and have distanced themselves, but we went through some of fecnd found that the trump campaign paid cambridge analytica a substantial amount of money, some $5.9 million, in november, for some of their work. so while they may be trying to distance themselves, there are these payments to the group. >> all right. let's see where this goes. great to see you. thank you so much. >>> joining me brian, cnn political commentator and former deppty communications director for the donald trump campaign and paul begala former bill clinton white house adviser, of course. brian, welcome to the contributor skp team. >> thank you. >> doesn't mean i can be any nicer to you. just ask paul. >> it is what it is. >> what do you say to this? >> yeah. >> listen, two things happened yesterday, you had the disclosure of cambridge analytica reaching out to wikileaks and then saying we're not interested and you also have the disclosure of fusion gps that has now been further tied to the clinton campaign and dnc and actually fusion gps does have kremlin clients. if we're loo

. >> the trust issue that we will keep coming back to starting fec trust from the macro level and we picked up to the level of national response, there's interesting thing is to learn. information security and to the quirks of the trusted level. people exchange information with each other according to their own pot of gold. a lot of times it shouldn't be shared because of legal reasons or contractual obligations. trust is the most important thing among the defenders of the internet and it would also build the internet and it cannot work if it were not without its. the operators and other pieces would collapse immediately and it really is built around trust. this trust on the verified elements and by having additional people involved it is based upon trust and it's not an immature way of approaching the problem, it is a mature way and at a slightly higher level we are talking about national responses and endangering trust on a national level one of the things i've argued before in the book is the only way the government can do something called the whole nation response which is not li

i went to the fec and found out who gave donations to donald trump and said are you going to give thee same way the democrats are giving money back to harvey weinstein when donald trump has admitted sexual assault. i got the same response from all of them, silence. they didn't want to comment. we'll believe women if the person committing the wrong is a democrat but we won't believe it's a republican. donald trump is the gop and the gop is trump. that's why they stand behind this guy. donald trump did something unique, something more revolting. he had an event about this time last year, public rally, he shamed the women. he called him liars, said i'm going to sue all of them and the crowd cheered lustfully. what message does that send to women coming forward when the gop nominee can say i'm going to sue them and they are liars? >> the two biggest hypocrites are shawn antean hannity and tu carlson. they were sitting in the seats of bill o'reilly sitting in his chair. tucker carlson tweeting it's time for justice for harvey weinstein, he's a serial predator. he's sitting in bill o'reilly

. >> fÍjense recientemente en fec nueva york calibre 50 compartiÓ escenario. >> Ángel villa gÓmez habloema calibre 50 estrenÓ un corrido para las personas que cruzan la frontera en bÚsqueda de un futuro mejor. >> el corrido nace como todas las canciones escribamos aquÍ todo es una canciÓn que la vivimos directamente porque es el personaje de juanito es real es un primo hermano de un servidor entonces te das cuenta que son millones de personas las que tienen por ahÍ similitud con esta canciÓn es una rola que salimos con el video hace una semana apenas en latino formas tenemos mÁs de 30 millones de visitas en una sola semana para "un nuevo dÍa" Ángel villa gÓmez. >>> gracias angelito. >> les queremos recordar a todos los soÑadores que tienen que enviar la aplicaciÓn fÍsica en el dÍa de hoy tienen chance hasta el 5 de octubre por favor tienen que hacerlo. >> perdÓn me estÁn informando un poquito mÁs antes de las 5 de la tarde. >> hoy 5 antes de las 5 de la tarde, ahora sÍ nos vamos con mario vannucci y reveladoras cartas a ver quÉ pasa mario. >> oh daniel. >> mis amados dueÑos del universo

it raises questions not only about the fec files but why did the clintons and the democrats cover thissay we funded this? >> sandra: democrats are asked about this. the dnc was asked and it wasn't us. we showed debbie wasserman-schultz on camera saying i didn't know anything about this. >> bill: the republican donor that began it won't come forward. trump says he thinks he knows who it is. we have no idea. >> sandra: let's talk to the state of the two parties. we're talking democrats now. how about republicans after that dramatic speech by jeff flake announcing his retirement this week, not shy he has ever been about his disagreement with this president. but he says he is not going to have a vindictive agenda towards donald trump. the president tweeted this. i want to get your reaction. he said do not underestimate the unity within the republican party. >> i think there is a lot of unity surrounding the president's agenda when it comes to things like tax reform and obamacare repeal and replace. all republicans want to do it. they disagree on some of the details but there is unity on th

andrew recalls the collegiate years of harry wallace, first after american basketball player in the fec. the co-owner of produces books with her memoir, this is a story of a happy marriage. wrapping up our look at bestsellers, according to parnassus books in nashville is katie and her experience covering the trump campaign in unbelievable. some of these authors have or will be appearing on book tv and you can watch them on our website book to be.org. you are watching the tv on c-span2. [inaudible conversations] . my name is nathan but 3 and i will be your host for an hour here. i want to welcome everybody who is watching on booktv to the southern festival of books sponsored by humanities tennessee. i want to say thank you to all those who donate, your individual donations make this event possible. thank you very much. if you would like to make a donation see me afterwards and i can introduce you to the right people who would love to talk to you. a little bit of housekeeping. i will going to introduce our offer erick erickson and erick erickson will speak a little bit and read through hi

. >>> asÍ es mi querida erika y tiene que ver con la noticia fec no lÓgico de la semana nos acoso tumciÓn que los amigos de lo ajeno se van a llevar sus pertenencias. polÉmico al fin y al cabo, los compaÑeros dijeron que nadie entra cuando no estÉ y puede ser buena alternativa. vamos a otra noticia que tiene que ver con la onda tec qui es futurista. son calles inteligentes en londres. estÁn implantando estas posibles calles que se diseÑan automÁticamente basadas en un computador para funcionar inteligentemente y entonces, sale una cebra para que crucen por ri allÍ y vienen mÁs carros y e 100 den las luces la prioridad no sean los autos inteligente ni demÁs tecnologÍas si no el peatÓn y segÚn el trafico, las calles cambien alucionante va un ci clrbt y la calle le dice que viene un ciclista pasa una lÍnea roja quiÉn pasa y no pasa. lo vamos a ver pronto. nos vamos cambiando de tema a unos audÍfonos que estÁn siendo sensaciÓn y que muchos necesitaiamos para los viajes audÍfonos de google que son traductores simultÁneos. el dÍa de la presentaciÓn no en tn dÍa inglÉs, el presentador le dec

is to get the fec to int sec to recognize -- sec order to get the buy side and sell side to comply with order to comply we are not in conflict with the u.s. law. this is a very settled matter over many years of discussion. what we are asking for is not the question of whether we are for or against unbundling, but we want to make sure we are in compliance with the u.s. when our clients on either side are complying with european market alix: u.s. banks don't have to worry about mifid. do you agree with that? ken: we hope so. we have petitioned the sec in the normal course of business. they have been receptive to that. we have been trying to bring them up to speed with what is happening in europe and why that would impact the u.s. we are hoping that they are going to come out soon. this rule takes effect on genworth first. alix: what is the biggest thing you need clarity on? ken: they will need clarity from a dealer side that if they take on bundled payments for research , which would normally have been out of the soft allergan, that they are not deemed a registered investment advisor as o

la tormenta derribÓ el tendido elÉctrico y obligÓ a la evacuaciÓn de asistentes a concierto que se fecadultas por ejemplo en la alfombra roja de la obra de teatro el fantasma en el espejo cuya madrina fue itaÍi cantoral le preguntamos su opiniÓn respecto de esta serie que narra kate del castillo y esto dijo, vamos a escuchar a itatÍ cantoral. >>>adorÉ la serie de kate del castillo. le mando un beso. fantÁstica. >>> caramba no se la perdiÓ que bueno. >>> sÍ verdad quÉ fuerte la serie y todo el mundo habla al respecto de esto y tambiÉn le preguntamos a leticia calderÓn a quiÉn tambien la encontramos. >>> vamos a escuchara. >>> kate una mujer muy valiente, siempre muy emprendedora, y muy arriesgada, a veces le ha costado ¿no? pero yo la admiro personalmente por que es una mujer que va mÁs alla, de su vida quiÉn pueda hacer lo que quiera, no sÉ no oÍ la noticia serÍa tanto hablarte de que algo no escuchÉ. >>> la verdad es que estoy sorprendida no solamente por este primer capÍtulo interesante de kate del castillo sino por la reacciÓn con los famosos que como dicen, mucha gente se hubiera a

good thing because you have the potential for job losses, revenue goes down, however, it appears the fece old rule books in. it was a one sentence response about coal foods, which says this new thinking with internet was bound not happen. when you get to one trillion, scrutiny will escalate. david: you have this at the same time the trump administration is really wedded to the chicago school of economics and as long as prices do not go up, they would say to be as big as you want. katie: i agree that the regulatory landscape is favorable, which will probably prompt amazon to go faster over the near-term with some plans. bezos andjames, jeff his next move, what is it? james: i think food. food hillary. i think they need to increase the touch points with the consumer. i think what you will see, the successes they have had with fulfillment by amazon in warehouses, i think they will extend that in local arenas, where food delivery is every single day and increase the punch points and use local merchants as warehouses because everybody is fighting the cold war. how do i get free two day shippi

andrew recalls the collegiate years of harry wallace, first after american basketball player in the fec. the co-owner of produces books with her memoir, this is a story of a happy marriage. wrapping up our look at bestsellers, according to parnassus books in nashville is katie you are watching the tv on c-span2. [inaudible conversations] . my name is nathan but 3 and i will be your host for an hour here. i want to welcome everybody who is watching on booktv to the southern festival of books sponsored by humanities tennessee. i want to say thank you to all those who donate, your individual donations make this event possible. thank you very much. if you would like to make

steve: yesterday a complaint was filed with the legal center with the fec and said that the campaign law because when you make payments to anybody, you have got to reveal what it's for. ultimately, the democrats, according to the center, hid the payments and they have got to disclose that the money was spent for this particular dossier. ainsley: how did they hide this? "the washington post" says they have the money, okay. dnc and hillary's campaign have the money. they pay a law firm, perkins coy. is that how you pronounce it? they wrote on the receipt legal services. then the law firm took the millions of dollars upwards of total of $8 million. brian: 5.6. ainsley: 5 from her campaign and then 3 from the dnc. so 8 or $9 million that they paid in legal services. that law firm then hired this guy, this spy to go investigate and come up with the dossier. steve: it's completely legal to fund opposition research. ainsley: it is you just have to disclose. steve: just write down opposition research but instead they wrote down legal services. brian: look at this from here on in about going