we are a federation of states. the central government was created by independent, sovereign states that had fought long and hard and defeated the most powerful military in the world to get their independence and their sovereignty. they were not about to go into a union where they had to give that up. they were going to be equal. now, the government takes the position that dominion over land within the borders of a state has absolutely nothing to do with state sovereignty. nothing to do whatsoever. so let me show you where this thing all started, where the states started first arguing about equal sovereignty. you got it the -- dominion over land. under its 1609 charter, virginia claimed a massive swath of land all the way out to california, and maryland was this little land-bound lock state over here to the right. maryland said we're not joining a state where we're going to be swallowed up by this behemoth called virginia. and we're also not willing to join a union of states where virginia can create subsequent vess

it says the state chose to use federal law to determine whether a federal post exchange was a federal instrumentality. we're going to correct its understanding of federal law. on reman, the state now freed from its misapprehensions of state law decide what it thinks state law requires. >> how does it work. should be pretty elementary. i mean, i looked at the indian case. that seems a little far out. the -- definitely gives you support on your statement here. suppose you took justice scalia's example. we have iowa state rule 56. we interpret iowa state rule 56 the same way as the federal rules of civil procedure. that's our rule. now this is what it means in that case. they say but we're doing it under iowa state rule. you say we can review that because they said that iowa state rule is the same as the federal. is that right? how do you fit that in the words of 1257? >> i doubt that that would satisfy the court. there is a theoretical answer and a practical answer. let me give the practical answer first. the states that govern the federal rules of evidence and civil procedure uniformly

to fund the federal government. even then, washington was dysfunctional. it is not a new thing. the federal officials were very slow to work out these plans and put them into action. at the same time, millions of americans, many recent immigrants wanted land of their own. unwilling to wait for a federal government to act, they moved on to the land in large waves of occupancy. large parts of the midwest and the west in the united states were settled by squatters. congress were then engaged in fierce debates about whether illegal acts should be reported bygranting -- rewarded granting this waters the land. squatters the land. congress effectively gave up in 1862.act in the aftermath of the homestead act, settlement was moving into the areas of the west where 160 acres, which was a limitation in the act, was unworkable. westerners in the early 20th century were left to develop new forms of the federal land laws. the next great american utopian fantasy projected on the west was shaped by the progressive movement at the

compatible with traditional american federal-- federalism thinking. so, i'm going to turn now to the broader issue of the history of the public lands. i have spent a lot of time thinking and writing about over the last 40 years. on the whole, i sometime ago and recognize that federal land management over the past 200 years has been a history of failure. the roots of that failure lying in american national ignorance of the real circumstances in the west. time and again members of congress and the wider american public have projected utopian fantasies on the west and then enacted laws-- supposedly designed to realize insanities. it is left to westerners to try to find a way of living with these misguided laws. the first washington fantasy concerns the disposal of federal lands in the 19th century. of federal officials wanted to publicly plan orderly process of land settlement. another key idea was that since the lands were federal property, their disposal should raise large revenues to fund the federal government. but, even then washington was dysfuncti

to fund the federal government. but even then washington was dysfunctional. it's not a new thing. and the whole federal officials were very slow to work out their plans and put them into action. at the same time, millions of americans, many recent immigrants wanted some land of their own. unwilling to wait for a cumbersome federal government to act, they simply moved on to the lands in large waves of occupancy. large parts of the midwest and the west in the united states were settled by squatters. congress would then engage in fierce debates about whether illegal acts should be rewarded by granting the squatters a retroactive property right. in the end, they always capitulated to the squatters. with the homestead act, congress effectively gave up. you might call it the legalized squatting act of 1862. but as has so often been the case, official washington got it wrong again. in the aftermath of the homestead act, settlement was moving into the arid wild areas of the west where 160 acres, which was the limitation in

the actions of the federal reserve say in loaning money to aig, congress some years into the federal reserve's existence in the 1930s loosened up the terms under which the federal reserve could lend money to nonbanks such as aig. they did that because the federal reserve's efforts during the depression were notably ineffective. we had employment go up to 25%. it lasted the better part of ten years. people thought if we were going to have a federal be reserve, it ought to at least be more effective. so under that provision, which i believe was legislated in 1935, the statute calls for exigent circumstances and so on. they could do more. the dodd-frank act, by the way, passed after the crisis restricts the fed from doing that. it's not clear now if we had a future crisis and there were an aig about to go down whether the fed could make that loan. in my belief, that was a grave -- to make that restriction was a grave error. you don't want fire departments using too much water. but to tell them ahead of time if there's a fire, it's the fault of the people who were, you know, reckless wit

, but if this is a federal building on federal land, isn't it federal law enforcement that has the jurisdiction? not local? >> absolutely. it is the federal jurisdiction. and that's what -- which really begs the question of what the federal government is going to do about this, because you're right, this is their responsibility to secure this building. and it remains true that there are no federal employees in that building. it was the christmas and new year's break. it is winter in this fish and wildlife refuge. so the hours are more limited. there's fewer staff there. normally at this time of year. so that's one reason why there was nobody there and why there was no confrontation from the initial get-go. but it does beg the question, as you said, it is federal responsibility, this is the fbi's responsibility. and the longer they allow a grandparent of armed individuals to take over a federal building and they don't do anything about it, it really perhaps would seem to encourage more of this to happen. by the way, these groups are all over the country. there's a lot of these folks who believe

federal officers haven't simply run them off of the property.ave the militia men proved when you have got a cause, being armed matters. armed politics. it's the inside story. ♪ >>> welcome to "inside story." i'm ray suarez. the last couple of years has highlighted people power around the world, marching, chanting, bringing their demands to the power 68. in hong kong, mexico, france, spain. in the united states, the country's at tension was commanded by hundreds of thousz who took to the streets of new york, washington, d.c., st. louis, chicago to shout their anger at the way american society devalued the lives of black citizens. in the state of oregon men organized by the bundy family seized a small obscure federal facility. the fact that the men are heavily armed appears to change the calculus around protests in ways that can't be exaggerated. police aren't telling them simply to go home or marching back into the building and pushing them out. joining me now, reporter carol mckinley, who has been covering the occupation of the federal building.

to fund the federal government. but even then, washington was dysfunctional. it's not a new thing. and the whole federal officials were very slow to work out their plans and put them into action. at the same time, millions of americans, many recent immigrants wanted some hand land of their own. i'm willing to wait for a cumbersome federal government to act. they simply moved on to the lands in large waves of occupancy. large parts of the midwest and the west in the united states were settled by squatters. congress would then engage in fierce debates about whether illegal acts should be rewarded by granting the squatters retroactive property right. in the end, they always capitulated to the squatters. with the homestead act, congress effectively gave up. you might call it the legalized squatting act of 1862. but as so often has been the case, official washington got it wrong again. in the aftermath of the homestead act, settlement was moving into the arid, wild areas of the west where 160 acres, which was a limitatio

i didn't have any trouble selling federalism either.again, maybe that's because i am in the west, but everybody very much understands how hard it is for a state to operate when the federal government is coming in on top and changing the rules all the time and whether it's our water, our lands, you name it, you know, we're fighting for our lives out there in many ways. we already have 85% of our land controlled by the federal government, which astonishes probably most people in this room. so i guess it could be state to state. it could be the region you're in. but federalism, the rule of law, those things are absolutely hitting home in our state. and again, we have been lucky. we have been on the immigration case. we've been on the waters of the u.s. case. we are now defending against the aclu the nation's first education savings accounts. $5,000 can go to any parent for any type of school. and we're being sued under a blaine amendment that many of you may know the history of that, that had a lot of anti-catholic bigotry. and we were abl

this of course was work that ben bernanke and the federal reserve did in 2008 but there was no federal reserve in 1907. i thought if i joined the action now when it struck the institution called knickerbocker trust a fairly large bank in new york morgan and stillman had sent an underling by the name of ben strong to the knickerbocker to make a report. the knickerbocker was housed on 34th street and fifth avenue and corinthian temple designed by stanford white. the sidewalk in front was besieged by a mob of depositors some of whom were war sac chills with which they have to carry off sack loads of cash paid inside the bank stacks of green currency bound to the thousand dollar loss for piled on the counters. as ben strong whenever the books at the riverbank he could hear depositors in the public area clamoring for their money. he wrote the consternation of the faces of people in that line i shall never forget. by little after noon on tuesday october 22 the knickerbocker had paid out eight $9 and suspended operations. strong reported that he could not in such timed dodge for the knickerbo

that is when the federal government saw it to limit access of federal lands.hey did so by road closures and limiting motorized access. they further limited's by specifying things that might be ok for atv travel. they would limit horseback travel. with certain limits they would use horses by saying that you would have to have horse feed that had to have seedlings from invasive plant species. 1990's,ase, back in the i'll say 1997, there is a large meeting there at the federal center. they saw people from the general public to come in and speak. they had the limitation of access. i was with a new company. i was aware of the meeting. so, i called the federal center and talked to the personnel. i asked them who was there to speak against the limitation of public access? i was told that nobody had come in to speak on the limitation. that surprised me. unfortunately, i did not change my day. i did what was necessary for the family. them whoent, i asked was there to speak for the closures? was told they had 15-20 speakers. they had various environmental groups in supp

federalism issues it wasn't the senate anymore. that was years ago. it's probably even more so now as we see with these administrative programs. you mentioned waters of the united states. there's endangered species act. i'd like to hear your perspective on operating as a constitutional officer on behalf of the state, looking at these programs and deciding what action to take to push back against federal overreach. >> sure. we've had two big ones since i've been in office. and these are very western issues, so i won't -- hopefully i don't bore you guys to death. waters of the u.s., hopefully many of you have heard about, has hinged for many decades on the phrase navigable waters. most any crowd i speak to about waters of the u.s., anyone can articulate what they think a navigable water is. and obviously for federalism type crowd, that was the hook. something that was interstate is the only reason that the federal government had any capacity to be in this space. so what's happened with this rule is they decided to reinterpret that ph

federal prosecutors released the indictment. it accuses burfoot of using his role in public office to direct projects in a virginia beach company 's favor. 10 on your side's matt gregory has more background on the company at the center of the burfoot indictment. back in april, the fbi supbeanoed documents about anthony burfoots dealings with tivest development and construction tivest was a residential and commercial development company headquartered in virginia beach. the indictment says burfoot became a silent partner in tivest ten years ago, when burfoot was a norfolk city councilman. if true that would, put him in partnership with etheridge. etheridge was found guilty in 2013 on federal charges related to bank fraud in the collapse of the bank of the commonwealth. once the bank began to collapse, tivest went 2010. tivest defaulted on loans, laid off its employees, and dwight etheridge declared personal bankruptcy. etheridge is currently in the federal prison in petersburg serving a four year prison sentence. matt gregory 10 o

at the federal level it's a big surprise in december was that they actually passed a federal transportation bill a multi-euro bill i think the last 10 years that's been our biggest advocacy point at the federal level. so, we are going to continue to work the program is fully funded with giving us an opportunity to focus on advancing san francisco's ironies at the federal level in particularly with respect to the new start small start and court catastrophe program. we want to make sure that central subway, currently in the pipeline continue to move forward as well as line up the next round of projects to get into the pipeline including the downtown extension and-. michelle is going to give you a little more detail on the transportation bill in the next item. at the federal level, were also going to be looking for new funding sources as part of policy initiatives. so, explain road uses them of carbon fees, looking for those things to move forward as well as looking for more federal support and for 04 vision zero. some project delivery is another thing we consistently had in our agenda in orde

government. >> the lapds that abut thed federal land -- abut thed federal band they are paying to rancho uphold their business, their family lynn lineage of ranking, for federal prosecutors say there is an anti-terrorism act let's apply it to them. >> they said, we're just burning property. lou: u.s. attorney, in the district of oregon who brought the case to add to the sentence, she has been relieved of her duties because an inspector general pound impro priority on her part. >> for health issues, this looks like it was a long time in coming for her, she did say, is this job wore me out. it took too much. lou: she is -- if you do that. she is accused of having frat ernized with her staff. >> it seems that there is some issues of employee -- relationships that are inappropriate. lou: she put two guys in prison for burning 127 acres of grazing land to protect themselves and their land, if these fools if that courtroom, that u.s. attorney's office are that ignorant this is rank abuse of power, these people are pygmies. >> what the jury did not hear. it was not the jury's fault. lou: why t

so why can't our federal agencies? we simply cannot allow the buildup of unnecessary and costly regulations over time. i will end with just one last comment. rules and regulations often have unintended consequences. it is our responsibility as lawmakers to not only recognize when this happens but to then proactively fix it. the scrub act is a commonsense solution that forces lawmakers and our agencies to be honest about their regulatory system by fixing the rules that need fixing and dropping those that have outlived their useful purpose. i want to thank senator hatch for his leadership on this and urge all of my colleagues to support this legislation. and, mr. president, i ask unanimous consent that the senate stand in recess as if under the previous order. the presiding officer: without objection. the senate stands adjourned until -- the senate stands in until -- the senate stands in >> as president obama prepared for a state of the union address, he released this video on twitter. >> i'm working on my state of the a

we have 4.1 million federal employees. we have 645 federal agencies and set agencies. we can keep finding reasons to do more things. i think the way that we handled the situation is to begin to teach the populace that if you can stay at home and get government subsidies, or get a minimum wage job, maybe get a little more staying at home. let's teach those people that when you go to work, you meet people, they get opportunities and they are much better off than the person sitting at home receiving those things. that is the can-do attitude that made america great, not the "what can you do" attitude that is taking us down. [applause] governor christie: i'm all for the president encouraging making work something more than just the paycheck that you get. the practical fact of the matter is when you actually look at the way these programs work and the responsibility for measuring them, the presence rhetoric is not going to make it so that someone will -- that person will not make that decision, no matter how much the president tells them they can go up the ladder, but they s

the federal government spending is increasing about 11%. i know of two banks of a combined cyber security budget of $1.25 billion for next year. dhs' entire budget for cyber security next year is about $900 million, 75% of what two banks are spending by themselves. cyber crime costs our nation a half trillion dollars a year, yet we are successfully prosecuting maybe 1% of cyber criminals. we need to spend more on cyber security. two, government needs to act with greater urgency. it took congress two years to -- sorry, it took congress six years to pass information sharing bill. in 2009 major trade associations presented congress and the administration with detailed recommendations on cyber security. in 2011 the house gop task force reported on cyber security embraced the recommendations as did president obama's executive order. four years after the task force report we still have not seen any substantial work on the top recommendation in that report or the executive orders. for example, the gao task force report and the executive order and

court facing federal terrorism charges.came from iraq in 2012 as refugees. in sacramento, authorities arrested this man. prosecutors allege he travelled to syria to fight alongside extremist groups and then lied to u.s. authorities about his travels. >>> in houston a federal grand jury indicted this man on charges he tried to provide material support toilz. dan patrick said: >>> there are new details this morning about the search for the alleged mastermind behind the paris attacks. belgian officials say they found a fingerprint of the man. they also report finding three belts that could have been used to carry explosives. he has been on the run since the november attacks. >>> three days after north korea's latest nuclear test. south korea is stepping up its propaganda broadcasts. and the international community is stepping up the pressure on pyongyang over the nuclear test. >> reporter: it is a tactic not used since august, and one the north koreans call an act of war. exactly at midday, south korea restarted its loud speak

and she will be the lead federal appointee, the lead federal official to coordinate the federal response to this particular situation. given the significant public health equities that are involved, it makes sense that somebody from hhs would play this role. she will be principally responsible for dealing with state and local officials and coordinating the assistance that can be provided by the federal government, not just by hhs, but also federal agencies like the department of housing and urban development, the epa, and others that -- the united states department of agriculture, that can provide some assistance here. i can also tell you that the mayor of flint, karen weaver, is visiting the white house today on a prescheduled trip. the u.s. council of mayors is meeting in washington this week. there's a special session at the white house for newly-elected mayors. i know in advance of that group meeting with newly-elected mayors, mayor weaver had the opportunity to sit down today with valerie jarrett, the president's senior adviser, to discuss some of the challenges the city is facing r

it's a federal habeas statute is a federal law, right? and teague is an interpretation of that federal law. was that federal law at issue in this case? >> the teague standard-- >> of course it wasn't. >> but the teague standard, the teague exceptions could well be constitutionally required. teague doesn't apply. >> that's why we don't take a position. particularly -- >> you want us to hold that in this case? >> we do not want you to hold that in this case. >> can we say the opposite in danforth? or the majority say the opposite in danforth? >> could you tell me why you would think that something like atkins would not be retroactive to states? as a compulsion, meaning not as by election of teague retroactivity. >> that is a difficult question that we don't take a position on, but to answer your question, justice sotomayor, the argument goes that danforth made clear that teague is an equitable interpretation to federal habeas statute. it's not constitutionally binding on the states, and that -- the court left open whether the exceptions are

the fire trucks are still there at 28th and federal. they have been putting the hose away and all that stuff but it's still there on the corner. you can't from 29th to spear, because they have it blocked off at federal and spear. take a look at the maps how you can get around it's, you can take zunigh. >> i-25 and i-70, no major accidents this morning. the gunman got into a fight. it ended in the shooting. the victim and the car 14 a few blocks -- found a few blocks %- >>> 6:04 now. aurora police are looking for another suspect that robbed a him down, pepper sprayed him and then shot at him. police have now summoned for the man who shot at him. >>> three longmont police officers managed to stop a potentially danggrous man without using lethal force. one of the officer was wearing recorded the entire or deal. israel alvarez was driving drunk and shooting his gun from his truck. officers say when he stopped the suspect he told them to shoot and even made movements likk he was reaching for a gun. officers then tased the suspect and arreste

murrah federal building in downtown oklahoma city which housed 14 federal agencies, including the secretice, the dea, and the atf. >> mcveigh believed that his bombing would be the opening salvo in a conflict against an illegitimate tyrannical federal government that needed to be brought down to its knees. boys have been really good today. send. let's get mark his own cell phone. nice. send. brad could use a new bike. send. [siri:] message. you decide. they're your kids. why are you guys texting grandma? it was him. it was him. keep your family connected. app-connect. on the newly redesigned passat. from volkswagen. e*trade is all about seizing opportunity. so i'm going to take this opportunity to go off script. so if i wanna go to jersey and check out shotsy tuccerelli's portfolio, what's it to you? or i'm a scottish mason whose assets are made of stone like me heart. papa! you're no son of mine! or perhaps it's time to seize the day. don't just see opportunity, seize it! (applause) seize it! hwe'll match any competitorse best prprice. this? what about this? price match guarantee. and t

the federal annually. the federal not defense spending on cyber security will be between six and $7 billion. private sector spending will increase 24% next year, federal spending is increasing about 11%. i know of two banks that have a combined cyber security of $1.2 billion. dhs is about 900,000,000, 75% of what two banks are spending by themselves. cybercrime costs are nations and have chilly dollars a year. if we're successfully prosecuting maybe 1% of cyber criminals. we need to spend more. two, government needs to act with greater urgency. it took congress two years -- sorry six years to pass a sharing bill. in 2009 we present to congress with detailed recommendation on cyber security. in 2011, the house gop task force embrace the recommendations but four years after the house report, we still have not seen any substantial work on the top recommendation of that report or the executive orders. for example, the gao task report, and and the executive order all call for the creation of a menu of incentive

you get off the federal land to state land which adjoins the federal land and the production is up 80% for crude oil and 40% for natural gas, i believe. again, it's a function of policy and ideology and not science and energy. we think it should be focused on geology. we strongly encourage the states and the feds to work together on these matters. and that's why the report points that out, because it does make a long-term difference in the united states' ability to produce energy. >> over here. >> jeremy dylan with role call. the house has passed an energy package last month. lisa murkowski is pushing her bill soon. will those packages be enough to address the concerns and do you have comments on the legislation? >> each of the packages are a little different in the house and senate. we think there needs to be a lot more focus on the infrastructure issues, things such as permitting time lines, et cetera. so is it enough? we think now is the time to go back and revisit that and look at it a little bit more specifically, particularly in light of the lifting of the crude oil export ban. n

this is federal government's property. those are federal buildings.genuous to say we don't want to fight. you're sitting in someone's space and daring them to come back. not wanting to fight and taking those actions are not really compatible. >> it sounds like they're trying to play street corner lawyer and be a little legalistic about this. we're joined now by jana reese. the mormon church chose to issue a statement today denouncing these people. what is the mormon component of what we're watching there? >> yes, you're right. yesterday the church issued a statement that strongly condemned, and that was the language used, these actions by the militia, terrorists, a big question about no mmenclature right now, how we refer to them. and the church is trying to distance themselves as what is seen as extremists who do not represent the faith. >> we've seen republican presidential candidates constantly harping on this notion of extreme islamic terrorism. are we seeing some form of extremist mormon terrorism here? what would we call this? to what extent are

we have 4.1 million federal employees. we have 645 federal agencies and subagencies. and we can keep finding reasons to do more things. i think the way that we handle the situation is begin to teach the populous that if you can stay at home and get government subsidies or you get a minimum wage job and you get maybe a little bit more from staying at home, let's teach those people that when they go to work they get skills, they meet people, they get opportunities, they get to climb the ladder, they get much better off than the person who's just sitting at home receiving those things. that's the can-do attitude that made america great, not the what can you do attitude that's taking us down. [applause] governor bush: i'm for the president -- governor christie: i'm all for the president encouraging work, something more than a paycheck that you get, but the intrinsic value of the soul that brings to you every day. but the practical matter is when you look at the way these programs work and are responsible for administering them, is that people are not making that choice. a

travel along federal. it's closed past north high school there. take hazel or elliott to get around. if you're about to get in the car, turn on koa news radio 850 am and now on 94.1 fm for traffic and cbs 4 weather together. >>> a woman who was wanted for in the south is now behind ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, >>> secondhand smoke is still a big issue for teens, almost half the teenagers in the u.s. exposed to secondhand smoke. 35% are exposed in indoor and exposed at work. >>> researchers say pediatricians only ask about sleep when a child is struggling in school. they believe they behave better when the sleep apnea is fixed. >>> according to ucla researchers, young adults often underestimate symptoms like numbness, weakness or sudden speech difficulty. doctors say the first three hours after a stroke are critical for treatment. >>> more on the weather, in some parts of colorado you just don't want to be outside right now. >> it's dangerous in places, 18 below up in craig. this is just the actual temperature.

federal budget deficit more than 430 billion dollars. that is the big dollars, ladies and gentlemen. raising the debt limit will keep spending like a drunken sailor. federal government is doing just that. there is something wrong with it. joining us is mark hyman, vice president of corporate relations for the broadcast group which owns news channel 8 and wjla channel 7. cooper, and michi gentleman, i see you have your note cards. first what is it that the american people don't understand about this deficit? i know we know people that probably make 50,000 a year. they have $100,000 a month in credit card bills. do they not mirror the federal govevement? how mama decades have we been doing this? >> public should be outraged. understandably, look this has become the status quo. we are at 18 trillion dollars plus our national debt. no one is being held accountable. this is not about one party or the other, this is republicans and democrats in control. you use the phrase spending like a drunken sailor, that is where we are today. promises to

at the federal level it's a big surprise in december was that they actually passed a federal transportation bill a multi-euro bill i think the last 10 years that's been our biggest advocacy point at the federal level. so, we are going to continue to work the program is fully funded with giving us an opportunity to focus on advancing san francisco's ironies at the federal level in particularly with respect to the new start small start and court catastrophe program. we want to make sure that central subway, currently in the pipeline continue to move forward as well as line up the next round of projects to get into the pipeline including the downtown extension and-. michelle is going to give you a little more detail on the transportation bill in the next item. at the federal level, were also going to be looking for new funding sources as part of policy initiatives. so, explain road uses them of carbon fees, looking for those things to move forward as well as looking for more federal support and for 04 vision zero. some project delivery is another thing we consistently had in our agenda in orde

it is federalism. at the end of the day, what ends up happening in these debates at -- federal level, the essay basic block grants mean you don't care. you are not prioritizing it. if you don't make this a national priority, a federal program with a federal agency, you really don't care. that mindset has given us these results we have today. block grants means you have to care so much that you want to empower people who are on the ground fighting the problem in getting them the tools they need to solve these problems because they screwed it up at the federal level. >> i was contributing money to the problem -- how does that indicate not caring? this is about folks in the federal government who have a philosophy that they get to pick the winners and losers. --y care less about success i proposed to eliminate the corporate business tax completely in new jersey. the democrats came back to me with a tax credit type program and i said they kept increasing the program for job creation. all you are doing is e

at the federal level it's a big surprise in december was that they actually passed a federal transportation bill a multi-euro bill i think the last 10 years that's been our biggest advocacy point at the federal level. so, we are going to continue to work the program is fully funded with giving us an opportunity to focus on advancing san francisco's ironies at the federal level in particularly with respect to the new start small start and court catastrophe program. we want to make sure that central subway, currently in the pipeline continue to move forward as well as line up the next round of projects to get into the pipeline including the downtown extension and-. michelle is going to give you a little more detail on the transportation bill in the next item. at the federal level, were also going to be looking for new funding sources as part of policy initiatives. so, explain road uses them of carbon fees, looking for those things to move forward as well as looking for more federal support and for 04 vision zero. some project delivery is another thing we consistently had in our agenda in orde

you had been af federal employee and open that e-mail from your sister through the federal mainframe, with that have potentially infected -- uromputer : i had for computers, very comfortable and secure environments. if you want to be competitive, you have to assume your employees would be fully connected at all times. >> can you create a separate environment? mr. casado: not without additional operational overhead. >> mr. wood, you would like to comment. mr. wood: i would like to follow-up on what dr. casado said. as the use of the internet increases and the internet of things becomes more prolific, everything has an ip address, so where do you draw the line? i would almost prefer that people use my infrastructure, because i know what we do from a security perspective. i don't know what they do from a security perspective. i think there are good arguments on both sides for separation. i would rather have them on my infrastructure because i know what we do. think the approach that makes sense is to understand and protect the information and the identities of the folks who are trying to

long-standing friction between ranchers and the federal government relating to the use of federal land. so that is how we got to where we are today. hammonds were heartened -- i assume they were heartened, i should say, to have hundreds of people rallied to to theirse -- rally cause. a lot of controversy surrounding federal minimums. but i think when they saw the violence associated with it or the threat of violence, they recoiled very wisely from that. amy: richard cohen, it is been reported a prolific creator of online propaganda against islam has joined the group of militiamen in oregon. southern poverty law center has written about him. that in't tell you, amy, know a lot about that. i'm sure it is available on our website. amy: i wanted to bring janell ross in as well, reporter for the washington post blog the fix. you have a piece headlined "why , aren't we calling the oregon occupiers 'terrorists'?" of sundayby saying as afternoon, the washington post called them occupiers, new york times said militiamen, associated press for the situation this way, a family previously involved

a situation when it pertains to federal property? >> well, a -- sort of from the get-go you would want local authorities to take charge only because they know the situation, they're intimately involved. they probably know these guys. my guess is this isn't the first time to encounter law enforcement. i do think it's important for the federal government to make a strong statement in this case. it doesn't mean rush in there, but it means to assert the federal authority here. here's a bunch of men, i mean, who do they think they are, essentially? they are, you know, on federal land, heavily armed, asking others to join them. saying that they're nonviolent except unless federal authorities approach them. i mean, this is a very scary situation. we shouldn't sort of brush it off. i think it's incumbent on federal authorities whether it's the fbi, atf, or whoever to have a presence there, if only to make a statement that federal authority and jury verdicts must hold in this country. >> well, isn't another statement being made that authoriti

being developed by federal agencies. but guess what. under this administration, the updates have either been late or not issued at all. and until now, there hasn't been a way to hold these unelected bureaucrats accountable. but my bill does just that. this bill forces the executive branch to make the american people aware of regulations that are coming down the track. it prohibits any regulations from going into effect unless and until detailed information on the cost of that regulation, on its impact on jobs, and the legal basis for it is made available to the public for at least six months. predictably, the president and others argue that this bill is too tough on regulators. but you know what? i'm here to fight for hard working americans, not for unelected washington bureaucrats. mr. speaker, ensuring that folks aren't steam rolled by new regulations should be a no brainer. transparency shouldn't be controversial. it shopt be optional. and it shouldn't be a partisan issue. that's why i was honored to introduce the ale

>> when a candidate from a federal office takes out a loan to help finance their campaign, they have to report to the federal election commission and in turn to the general public that that money came from a bank, and not, for example, from the personal savings of that candidate. and cruz failed to report that he got somewhere between $1 million from two different financial institution it's to help bankroll his campaign. >> did he fail overall? or one set or another? >> no, multiple filings, this is ongoing, from the time that he took out the loan to the time it's paid off, they have to be accurately to the fcc, they should have been filed differently in july, 2012, preelection for 2012, pre-runoff for the 2012, october, 2012, and these are multiple reports that were incredible filed. >> alexis goldstein, what's this law for? to prevent? >> dodd/frank is a multi -- there are a lot of different pieces to it, and the two pieces, the volker rule, that says that if you're a large bank that enjoys banking and fdic insurance, you don't get to gamble with your own money, which could put the

so you know that it is against the law to take over a federal building. are you prepared to -- to stand if the government decides to charge you with a crime -- >> illegal again. as much as i appreciate this conversation, you are yet to be able to truly have a desire to know what is going on. >> yeah, i asked you the question, you know -- i -- i can't tell -- based on what you said, are you suggesting that we don't need a federal government is that essentially it? >> no, not at all. the federal government's purpose and responsibility is to protect the state from the outside world and to man its borders and to work with other nations with -- for international trade and to stand as a defense for the states against the outside world. >> so you don't think the federal government should have -- have -- have any land, should own federal land? you think, what it should be given away or auctioned off? is that what you think? >> well, that's not my idea. that's what our -- the supreme law of the land clearly states. it clearly states that the federal government in

the code of federal regulation now exceeds 175,000 pages. and every year the federal government promulgates thousands of new regulations. it's hard to keep up with all the regulations. time and time again. in just the fall of 2015, the semiannual unified regulatory agenda contained 2,000 more regulations, included 144 regulations expected to cost over $100 million each. this ever-growing stack of regulations has a considerable impact on the economy. i want to be clear. this happens no matter what the administration is. democrat, republican, bush, obama. it doesn't matter. it's a natural tendency of the executive branch to want to do what congress is supposed to do. and there are just things that get implemented that need to be scrubbed out of the system so we can get to some sanity and some reasonableness, so people can understand what their government is expecting of them. i think there is room and there's place for regulation, but it is a limited one and needs to be well understood and it is reasonable to cut, search, cut, find and get rid