the government produces a book. 319 pages outline the federal election laws and all those who have been criminally prosecuted had ended up in prison. >> sean: and quickly. thankfully, the email scandal -- they've got this. >> the espionage act. to count that work tortured and twisted by james comey. and removing classified materials.

the last time the federal election commission updated these regulations was april, 2006. more than ten years ago. that was before the iphone had been introduced into twitter was still in development and facebook was only for college students. in fact 35 of the members were not yet in congress myself or the chairman included. much has changed in that time. a presidential candidate use twitter to wage a presidential campaign and it is time we recognized in today's world television and radio are not the only media carrying political ads. i'm confident we can prevent meddling by russia and other states by protecting the first amendment rights of americans. i was encouraged to see they reopened 2011 comments period on social media, political exercising after these revelations. however, i am still concerned about the problem within that have led to the years of gridlock and inaction. we cannot continue waiting for action from the ftc. our adversaries have shown they can act quickly and exploit our inability to enforce the law. according to the recent poll, 60% of americans want

host: is there a role for the federal election commission in this? julia: well, federal election commission has, i think, a play here.oles to one is, you know, they could disclosure of these ads, online advertising. same ould require the amount of disclosure that's required on other types of ads, about who paid for it. this weird thing, when you buy an ad on facebook, you have to an disclose your spending to the federal election commission. reports about what you spent on your campaign. but you can very easily obscure by just placing them through a consultant and then it spent money t you with this digital consultant and those people don't always say hether they placed it on facebook or what was the campaign so there isn't a lot of information about how much money s being spent by campaigns on facebook, twitter, all these different social media platforms, so they could amount of at transparency. there is also a role for the federal communications maybe because they actually require an enhanced amount of disclosure for ads, and perhaps those rules cou

commission we asked you simple question. >> you know what we're just reporting what the federal election commission which is federal government they're required to do campaigns are required to file this. donald trump's campaign was required file this so. we're simply asking will join the campaign trail. >> that's a lie. it's a lie. >> that's right. that's right that's a lie. >> are you part of the fake news. >> you can take that up with federal election commission. >> okay. >> thank you we don't appreciate being paid a lie. >> are you a lie. >> all right. thanks so much for voyning us tonight. >> back after the break. mpanies deny coverage for pre-existing conditions. seniors would be charged thousands more. 685,000 virginians would lose their health care. denying coverage to thousands of veterans, children and the disabled. john adams: higher costs, less coverage, hurting virginians. mark: i'm mark herring, candidate for attorney general, and i sponsored this ad. in a noisy world ... northern virginia's own novec is listening to its cust who want reliable, affordable electricity, renewa

>> guest: the federal election commission has i think a couple of roles to play here. one is they could demand disclosure of the ads of -- online advertising so could require the same amount of disclosure required on other types of ads about who paid for it. there's also this weird thing so when you buy an ad on facebook, you have -- as a politician you have the disclose your spending to the federal election commission, you file these reports about what you spend on your campaign. but you can very easily obscure the buys by placing them through a consultant and then just says you sent money with this digital consulted tenant and those people don't say whether they placed it on facebook 0 the campaign there isn't a lot of information how much money is being spent by campaigns on facebook, twitter, different social media platforms so they could increase that amount of transparency. and there's also 0 role for the federal communications commission, maybe, because they actually require an enhance it amount of disclosure for television ads and perhaps those rule could be tr

>> guest: well, the federal election commission a i think, a couple roles to play here. one is, you know, they could demand disclosure of these ads on online advertising. so they could require the same amount of disclosure that's required on other types of ads about who paid for it. there's also this weird thing, so when you buy an ad on facebook, you have -- as a politician, you have to disclose your spending to the federal election commission. you file these sort of reports about what you spent on your campaign. but you can very easily obscure those buys by just placing them through a consultant, and then it just says that you spent money with this digital consultant, and those people don't always say whether they place it on facebook or what was the campaign. so there isn't a lot of information about what is being spent on all these different social media platforms. so they could increase that amount of transparency. and there's also a role for the federal communications commission maybe because they actually require an enhanced amount of disclosure for television ads

we turned our attention to the laws and regulations in the political advertisements into the federal election commission oversees the campaign-finance law and enforcement of disclaimer requirements for the public communication and the candidates and campaign authorities or political action committees and federal offices. in addition, the fcc enforces additional to closure and requirements on broadcast cable satellite and radio ads. some have proposed increase disclaimer malls are those on internet platforms and have proposed a role for the ftc. at the interface between these three regulatory agencies and how they each apply to the wall is something to the oversight committee is situated to examine, and i hope that we dig into that today. in many ways this is an example of the continued efforts to examine the technology is the level of urgency and importance to the hearing that cannot be understated. since the democratic experiment, the adversaries have sought to destroy what our forefathers fought for to use the nation's unique undermining of the robust resilience but now the tools have chang

we will see if that is enough to keep washington at bay. >> is there a role for the federal election commission in all of this? >> it has a couple roles to play. one is, they could demand disclosure of these ads on online advertising. they could require the same amount of disclosure that's required on other types of ads about who paid for it. there is also this weird thing , when you buy an ad, you have to disclose your spending and file these reports about what you spent on your campaign. you can very easily obscure those buys by just placing them through a consultant and it says you spend money with this digital consultant and those people don't always say whether they placed on facebook or what was campaigns. there isn't a lot of information about how much money is being spent on facebook, twitter and all the social media platforms. they could increase their transparency. there's always also a role that require enhanced disclosure for television ad and perhaps those roles could be transferred over toward the fec. >> julie, when it comes to television and radio, and noun new or med

elections without covert interference by four nations. it's unlawful for any for national directly or indirectly to make a contribution or donation in connection with the federal, state, or local election. that doesn't use the language of expressed advocacy. says any contribution. would it be within the constitutional authority with congress to ban and perhaps the chairman was aeschylus, not just expressed advocacy spending by foreign nationals, but also in a political advertising taking place during the election season. would we have to be a authority to do that on the theory they don't enjoy the first amendment rights of the american people are indeed with permanent residence of the country people were here in our part of the country. does anybody have an opinion on that? >> i think the problem is less a matter of the first amendment and the supreme court in buckley said per se that actors cannot do process detour was a wasn't covered. >> with john the line between expressed advocacy and political advocacy. we have two separate categories and campaign laws apply on one side but not the other. perhaps they could apply on both sides for these entities and gove

early in the federal election last month the state election must be a welcome relief for them and thiss a huge relief they're very joyful as we just saw in the report and it's a victory the kind of which they haven't had for years and especially in this year they have all they've lost the last three regional and central elections so for them it's really something that will give them a new push and especially important for martin shows the party leader who can all be.

take their seats in the bundestag on tuesday after the party finished third in last month's federal elections. hate has no place in the people's house that was the message of today's demonstration as thousands marched on berlin's bundestag. and most of the protesters showed up because they're worried about the a.f.p. ninety two deputies from the far right party will enter parliament in less than two days from now. we must live together all people together and we must not allow this process most of these things to come to the bottom and i think today as a german you hold a special responsibility to ensure that parties like the f.t. don't have a say in politics politik. can organize the demonstration he came to germany as a refugee he says the protests should be a wake up call to f.t. voters we want the the voters to reflect their mindset you know they voted for a party which said a lot of racist things which is not ok. so it is a wake up call and we want to stress that racism is not allowed in our business talk the f.d.a. was voted into parliament almost a month ago with thirteen percent of th

elections in lower saxony the loss could make it more difficult for c.d.u. leader and german chancellor angela merkel as she enters talks on forming the next federal coalition government. on the morning after an election it's a political ritual to present a bookie or flowers even if there's nothing to celebrate the c.d.u. suffered a defeat in lower saxony this past sunday the defeat party chief anglo-american carefully tried to keep away from this week's explode tory talks with the center left green party and the free market liberal. christian democrats are going into these exploited tory talks knowing that we have the strongest force among those involved and that we want to negotiate fairly with everyone but i don't see the lower saxony election result as weakening us and this task. is nevertheless the defeat already has spurred the debate within the christian democrats on the party's future political orientation. it's untrue sure to show our entire political program it must be clear that an alternative to ass on the right side of the political spectrum is not necessary. i believe a shift to the right would simply be the wrong signal that people want us to

democrats the result is good news for maxwell cornish and partners who did poorly in last month's federal election. the the the social democrats haven't forgotten how to party just three weeks after their worst election results in modern german history the s.p.d. years back coming out as the strongest party in lower saxony for the first time in nearly twenty years. as a fitting you know this is a great evening for the s.p.d. in lower saxony and for me many thanks to the voters but also to my party members who fought passionately he lied and it came to. it's a remarkable turnaround in the summer of the s.p.d. he was far behind in polling the victory in lower saxony was badly needed after party leader martin schulz his historic defeat in the bonus talk elections. i think you know sing in austin and he does what the social democrats achieved in lower saxony is unique in the history of election campaigns in germany and we're not i mean thankful but we're also very proud and very happy about this great success i think and what the isn't close enough or pretty is pretty bleak candidate band manages cons

. >> there's from f.e.c., federal elections commission finding that opposition research has a value.something of value, it's a contribution, so in the end it would be hard to say this is not a donation of something of value. it's a potential for violation of federal elections commission laws. >> and to be fair they claim they never received anything. >> that's right. there's a computer fraud act that makes it illegal to hackment's computer. similarly it would make it a crime for you to make use of that information knowingly, i steal something, that's a crime. you receive that stolen property, knowing that it's stolen, that's a separate crime. so the question here is, did they know that this was hacked information illegally so? did they agree to use it for their political interests? if so, potential conspiracy to violate the computer fraud and abuse act. >> all under investigation, and they have all claimed inspects, but this is something that robert mueller is looking at. >> which is why the investigation will take a while. >> much to the chagrin of the white house. thank you both. >

doing very well over the past couple of years in germany they performed rather poorly in the federal election last month the state election must be a welcome relief for them and this is a huge relief they're very joyful as we saw just saw in the report and it's a victory of the kind of which they haven't had for years and especially in this year they have all lost the last three regional and central elections so for them it's really something that will give them a new push and especially important for martin shows the party leader who can all be pretty certain that he will remain part of you know for the full for the next few months at least for the next couple of years probably. thank you so much. from d.w. politics and you are watching news still to come the kenyan businesses losing money as uncertainty mounts over the country's national elections that's coming up in business. now to some of the other stories making news around the world today iraqi state media say government troops have taken control of areas around the kurdish held city of kirkuk kurdish officials have reported clashes bu

your company the been the song is holding its fullest bottom entry session since september as federal election is the first ask of the new german parliament is to elect a new president the bottom that is the biggest and most right wing in post-war history and the first summit also includes the far right will tentative a joke. many which has promised to shake up german politics as i mention let's now take a look at the f.t. party and what its promise to do to the german parliament how it plans to change the narrative. ok we're just looking at live pictures coming to from the bundestag where vote counting has finished to elect a new president for the bundestag and vote counting is now going on and while we're waiting for the results to come in listen to look at the far right if tea party alternative for germany which is represented in the been the star for the first time now the party's a nation's third biggest party so how influential is the party and what does it plan to do to shape political discussion in germany here's a report. on the first to really get into. your. view. germany's politici

party in september the de came in third in federal elections it was the first times as in the one nine hundred fifty s. that a party to the right of the conservatives was voted into the blindest tug on tuesday germany's new parliament is due to meet and nearly one hundred eighty deputies will be seated for the first time. on the political correspondent kate brady is covering the demonstration for us she's standing by and berlin's brandenburg gate that's where the demonstrators are now gathering hello to you kate so what can we expect from this demonstration today. well we're expecting anywhere anywhere between four and ten thousand protesters to turn out today in berlin ahead of the a.f.d. enter in parliament of course on tuesday they demonstrate the demonstration itself has been able to demonstration against racism and hate now joining me now is ali can one of the initiators all of the demonstration here today so early you say that this demonstration represents the eighty seven percent of german voters who didn't vote for the a.f.p. on september twenty fourth but of course thirteen pe

into this i mean how can this be you elect a few months before the federal election and you start and you don't allow him to participate in lend elections well that has been already been said by our party leaders that that is the decision which was not the right one nevertheless we did i think stood did very well with martin short as a candidate who knows what had happened if you would have run the campaign we have this is a very cynical route we have and where you did well a little bit more than twenty percent and you are saying you did well as the s.p.d. no i no no i said we might have done not as good as we still did less than twenty that might be possible look at this is a disaster what you are just saying well we need a little bit of a party without shorts could end even had less than twenty percent yes could have had and yes this is a disaster was said already in our interview it is a brutal disaster and particularly that we have no right wing populist until european party we are coming is there are speakers are in the us until we have a new a new shifting in the party situation

far right party that came third in last month's federal election really one hundred and fifty deputies are set to take their seats when the biggest hog holds its first session on tuesday. well the spanish government is moving forward with what's being called the nuclear option in catalonia but red has announced unprecedented measures to temporarily strip that region of its powers and firing the leaders and triggering fresh elections now catalan president karl is wisdom on is accusing the central government of the worst attack on his region since franco meanwhile large crowds gathered in barcelona to protest spain's proposals. to these pro independence catalans the central government's decision to fire catalonia separatist leaders and trigger new elections was yet another insult in response hundreds of thousands of protesters took to barcelona streets among them as preached a moment to announce to the question on president since a possible. i want what without standing for any election with very little support and against the will of the majority the government of mariano rajoy wants to

that's the far right part of it came third and last month's federal elections. nearly one hundred fifty deputies are set to take their seats when the bundestag holds its first session on tuesday. well it's not often that all five of america's living former presidents get together on stage but last night jimmy carter bill clinton barack obama george h.w. bush and george w. bush put aside partisan differences to raise money for hurricane victims they were joined by a popular pop rock and country stars for a concert that was broadcast from houston texas. the old state on the cd the concert and a plea for help your fellow americans was so close that was the message that the five living former presidents had for america at a fundraiser in houston texas to help victims of hurricanes that devastated us gulf states and caribbean territories this fall sure sure certain words could not be prouder. of the response from americans. when they see their neighbors and they see their friends. this is stranger than me american stepped up. for the concert also featured country and

hillary clinton, for instance, the federal election commission has reported she has taken i. electionreported she has takeni. 5 election commission has reported she has taken i. 5 billion in donations since 1999 —— i. 5 million. did the clippen tos know anything, will they return that money and accept money in the future? —— clintons. return that money and accept money in the future? -- clintons. the real question is did he molest women surely, that's the real question. that's a critical question. the second question is who knew? who covered it up and did any politician... they are still allegations at the moment. which he denies. let's move on to the mail. they're talking about the energy cap on electricity and gas prices and theresa may's plan to cap energy bills running into trouble. well, yes. this has been a flagship policy for her. labour will say of course she stole it from ed millie ban. as pa rt of she stole it from ed millie ban. as part of her plan to —— miliband. as pa rt of part of her plan to —— miliband. as part of her plan to —— miliband. as part of her appeal to a wid

the government produces a book. 319 pages outline the federal election laws and all those who have been criminally prosecuted had ended up in prison. >> sean: and quickly. thankfully, the email scandal -- they've got this. >> the espionage act. to count that work tortured and twisted by james comey. and removing classified materials. destroying 33,000 documents. >> sean: death obstruction. >> yeah. >> sean: subpoenaed documents. >> by congress. >> sean: jay, let me go back to you. when you look at uranium one, you look at the russian dossier. here's my question and where my mind goes. the dossier -- the of the former mi6 guy, fusion gps. and then i've got to wonder, without the information that sara carter and john solomon reported that there were fi sa warrants? wow, could they have used phony russian propaganda? >> let me tell you something, if, in fact, the dossier was a basis for why and fifa warrant was issued, you are talking about going to court and getting a warrant to basically eavesdrop, tap, listen in on conversations based on the document that was not only unverified -- as j

fooling around with the voting processes in very states in a closeh election, wouldn't you have to have some kind of uniform federal standard for the voting for president? otherwise you could have an election like 2000 where everybody knows it's going to be very, very close and there's aws huge incentive for people to try to cheat. but that was what was supposed to happen, to help america's vote act which was passed to you after the 2000 election was really supposed to standardizeas that. what you found, i know this is a former secretary of state candidate, is that california, for example, was the last date night of the statewide voter roll. the implementation of hava which was intended to get much more standardize on voting equipment, the condition of voter rolls and of those kinds of things was really not well enforced. >> you would agree you would have to have something like that on a national level in order to make sure that the votes were honestly cast and counted? >> i wouldn't agree it was necessary to do that. i would support it because it's right. >> anybodyup else? >> i think for whatever the 12 states in

i do want to get to what your center did, which is file a complaint with the federal election committee the dnc over the steele dossier. tell us why. >> just to be clear, this is a somewhat different topic than any potential russian involvement in the election. we filed a formal complaint because it was revealed that the clinton campaign and the dnc has financed the research that ultimately resulted in the dossier, but if you look at the reports that they're required to file with the federal election commission, those, that money, that spending isn't listed anywhere. instead, it's listed as payments to the law firm on that represented the campaign and the dnc. it's listed as payments for legal services and it seems like that was an attempt to conceal the fact that the company and the dfc were paying the firm fusion gps to do this opposition research. >> okay. so then quickly, doing opposition research is not what you are opposed to, it wasn't specifically laid out? >> right, opposition research is completely legal. the only requirement is with all spending if federal campaigns is you di

laws like the federal election campaign act, the mccain-feingold, supreme court cases like citizens united, do those refer to and should those cover all political advertisements whether express advocacy or issue advocacy despite the platform? mr. vandewalker? >> yes. i think our campaign finance regime at its heart is about transfers of money designed to influence politics. whether that means buying a political ad, writing a check directly to a candidate, there are different ways that that can play out in detail. but, yes, i think -- >> mr. rothenberg? >> no. opinion is protected. issues are protected. that is not just a slippery slope, you're already three-quarters of the way down that slope. when it's about candidates and about actual advocacy for or against the candidate, then clearly that falls within the scope of -- >> yeah, that's what i asked. i asked specifically for express advocacy you should vote for this guy or don't vote for that guy or the issue call your congressman if this, any of those types of political speech, should that fall under these laws and supreme court cases des

. >> liable suits against major news organizations, why because the federal elections commission chairwomande what fake news is, slippery-slope, a lot of trouble. that's what i say. lauren: gary, wrap this up for us? >> dow up 23,000, new guy on the block, he's going to unlock the value over the next couple of years, 4% dividend. getting close to low here. lauren: i want to say thank you to all of you our catchen -- cashin' in crew. have a great weekend, america, i will see you on fox business every day 5:00 a.m. eastern time. ♪ >> lou: good evening, everybody. president trump addressing what may be the bigest scandal in american history. shocking implication with the obama administration and the clintons in a multimillion racketeering scheme that involved russian purchase of uranium one and gave moscow control of a fifth of american uranium. >> uranium is a big subject. if the mainstream media would cover the uranium scandal and thatus

back in 2011 facebook asked the federal election commission for an exemption. commission hasn't tried to regulate the internet since 2006. but if you're buying an advertisement on a thir party website you have to disclose who you are with the kind of paid for by language that we see from campaigns and political committees. what facebook asked was it wanted people buying ads on its website not to include that information. >> what was their rationale behind that argument? >> the year before google for its google ads that you find in search, if you put in hillary clinton, you'll get a few sponsored ads, google adds not to include that language because there's a small amount of text there. but google said that those ads would go back to a web page where it includes, if you click on the link you'll see the paid for my hillary for america or whatever committee is paying for it. facebook argued that its ads were like, very similar to google ads or like campaign buttons, you don't have to put the paid for by on a campaign button. but the difference in what facebook wan

since its passage in 1971 the federal election campaign act has mandated disclaimers on all political advertising that advocates the election or defeat of a candidate. but much of the fake news and fake ads at the center of the current storm did not engage in such overt candidate support. there were not a bunch of secretive russian moles purchasing vote for trump or hillary for president internet banner ads. rather, there were sophisticated posts about social and political issues, which were made more widely available because they were paid to amplify them in people's feeds. some of the scandalous messaging was not even placed for payment. both social influence advertising fall outside the scope of federal campaign disclosure rules. americans have first amendment rights to shout on street corners, put signs on their lawns and post on social media without registering as political committees or reporting how much they spend on mega phones or smartphones. there is one more complex challenge, the traditional regulations from the fec and the fcc require disclosure by campaigns and by the m

senate which would require internet companies to reveal the identity of their advertisers to the federal electioncommission now this is the latest step in the an ongoing controversy about alleged russian influence in last year's presidential election she have a ton. of the sponsors of the almost ads to say the u.s. is political system is at stake our entire democracy was founded on the simple idea that the people in our country should be self governing. we don't want other governments influencing us and now two hundred forty years later our democracy is that risk russia attacked our elections and they and other foreign powers and interests will continue to divide our country if we don't act now it's been reported that one hundred thousand dollars in rubles was spent on advertising on facebook between twenty fifteen and twenty seventeen a company that's been associated with the kremlin quote appears and quote to have been behind the purchase according to the washington post most of the ads didn't specifically referenced the u.s. presidential election or a particular candidate many appeared off to

when two people meet and conspire to engage in another criminal act like to violate the federal election law or to violate campaign finance law or the law against foreign agents coming here and influencing public policy without register with the justice department. if two people have an agreement to meet about that and then conduct an overt act and a meeting is an overt act, that's a violation of federal law and bob mueller is looking at conspiracy. but again, just to come back to the broader point, it may be a violation of law but more importantly, it's a violation of america's national security and our national security principles. and when the president brings russians into the oval office and complains to them and says, you know, this russia investigation is a hoax and now the pressure is off, that only showcases his state of mind that, in fact, he is beholden in some ways to russia and is concerned about those who would investigate him. >> obstruction of justice. we know that obstruction of justice is a crime or a set of crimes that bob mueller is looking into. one of the avenues of

the federal election commission requires campaigns for any money spent over about $200. to sort of have an item description for each of those amounts. there isn't an item description for this law firm for the amount of money that is being alleged to have been given to this research firm. >> martha: paid for through direct campaign funds, an outside donor, that's possible? >> a lot of money went to this law firm and there is a $56,000 research item that was mentioned, but there is no reference to h. one of these public interest groups has filed a complaint with the federal election commission saying we think if these news reports are accurate that the clinton campaign violated federal law. >> martha: what about the other side, and another piece of information that came out today, about the trump data team and cambridge analytics. saying he reached out to julio n assange and asked about the 33,000 missing clinton emails and whether or not he has access and if they would help put push out something along those lines. what does that say to you? >> i feel the same way about t

standing laws on political advertising for television and radio, there are long standing laws in federal election law that deal with disclosure by candidates and outside groups. the goal was simply to say let's take a modest step forward and include social media as appropriate and as fits that particular platform. and that was really the goal here. and i think the disclosure tool is probably the best tool. it's not seeking to ban anything other than provide disclosure. the ban has existed in long standing law. and that's on foreign interference. >> our guest is with us. if you want to ask her questions about this legislative proposal her thinking on it, 202-2 202-248 -- -- one of the criticisms that came out of this legislation came from bloomberg. a gentlemen named leonid better sin ski writes, under the act a troll cleverly disguised as jane doe or john smith would till be able to buy an ad. it would be recorded under a fake name and stored in a vast archive where no one will be able to find anything of value. >> i think you could criticize the way political advertising can be conducted anywher

. >> liable suits against major news organizations, why because the federal elections commission chairwomanhe government decide what fake news is, slippery-slope, a lot of trouble. that's what i say. lauren: gary, wrap this up for us? >> dow up 23,000, new guy on the block, he's going to unlock the value over the next couple of years, 4% dividend. getting close to low here. lauren: i want to say thank you to all of you our catchen -- cashin' in crew. have a great weekend, america, i will see you on fox business every day 5:00 a.m. eastern time. ♪ ♪ >> brand-new tweet from president trump on everything on economy and tax reform and the controversy to call to gold star widow. we are live at the white house with the very latest. >> season of war against the gop establishment. this time aiming harsh words at president george w. bush, so will all the tough talk cause problems getting the white house agenda through congress? >> meanwhile president trump is vowing today to make long classified documents on the jfk assassination open to the public .

week the anti immigration alternative for germany party took a big bite out of space in the federal elections. i mean according to the current situation the last around one point three million voters to the f.t.p. and one million to the f.t. considering the air of these voters it is our duty to win them back through good policies and solutions to problems i call mass germany's justice minister called out one of social media's biggest names directly saying they shouldn't have to be forced to do more. for us but i think that this is in the interest of facebook nobody can have an interest in being known as a medium which has been used in an extra way by far right extremists to overwhelm the world with ideological waste companies will have to report back on how they're doing every six months so let's have a look at how the big three stacked up before they slow came into place well according to the new york times over a one month period facebook removed way less than half of all online hate speech within twenty four hours for twitter an embarrassing one percent for them were far and away the best

. >> liable suits against major news organizations, why because the federal elections commission chairwomangovernment decide what fake news is, slippery-slope, a lot of trouble. that's what i say. lauren: gary, wrap this up for us? >> dow up 23,000, new guy on the block, he's going to unlock the value over the next couple of years, 4% dividend. getting close to low here. lauren: i want to say thank you to all of you our catchen -- cashin' in crew. have a great weekend, america, i will see you on fox business every day 5:00 a.m. eastern time. ♪ >> i'm bob massi. for 32 years, i've been practicing law and living in las vegas. i help people with all sorts of real-estate problems, from trying to save their homes to closing major deals. eight years ago, 6,000 people a month moved here, looking for employment and affordable homes. little did anyone know that we would become ground zero for the american real-estate crisis. now, it's a different story. the american dream is back. we're gonna meet real people who faced the same problems as millions across america, and we'll dive deep into a city on