representatives of the ministry of agriculture, the ministry of industry and trade, the federal fisheries agencyhe industry company took part in it. it was commissioned at the beginning of 2023. as a result of the group’s work, their number was increased to 26. by the end of this year , the fishing fleet should be replenished with another 14, in total by the twenty-seventh year it is planned deliver 106 ships. as part of the incident , serious work has been done in terms of regulatory regulation; in addition, the chairman of the government has agreed on the allocation of additional financial support. for the completion of the ships, colleagues, work within the framework of the incident will definitely continue, in addition, in the fall of twenty-three , we have already started the second stage of investment quotas, within its framework the construction of ships is also planned, i note that at the moment auctions for crab have already taken place, as well as the first application company for other types of water biological resources. and now it’s time for economic news: deliveries of russian liqu

agency interpretation of the law. statute is ambiguous. the quinn for the fishery group says it challenged the federal regulation requiring them to bear the cost of monitors on their boats. >> american citizens finally have the same rights in court as the united states government. and that's huge. >> justice kagan writing for the desenders accused the court of taking what she argued should have been left to the agency. quote, the majority disdains restraint and grasps for power. the court also sided with communities using ordinances like bans on camping and sleeping in certain public spaces as a way of trying to manage the issue of homeless encampments. critics have challenged the measures as cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the eighth amendment and say they don't solve the underlying problem. >> can you imagine anything more cruel and unusual than throwing somebody in jail for using a blanket in the middle of a freezing winter? >> and the decision from the justices on friday could impact hundreds of cases involving january 6th defendants. charged under a federal obstruction statute crafted in the wake of the enron scandal. in

the these federal agencies could say we have an interpretation you have to follow and he didn't give people a lot of chance to push back but you remember and have covered this case by these fishery who said we can't pay to put monitors on are both but you are requiring us to do it by federal regulations were big win for small businesses who say they just can't handle that level of burden or at least not have a way to challenge. >> that the burden off the backs thank you very much. here's former president trump walking onstage in chesapeake chesapeake virginia governor glenn young can will also be there. he's been sort of on the longer list of potential vice presidential possibilities, and only president trump knows who he's going to pick. that will be the really big piece of news that we get our knowledge this. who is his vp pick? there some inklings from insiders that it's going to happen at the republican convention in milwaukee and who he chooses may have influence on who wins this election and whether were not he can pick up some bouts with independence and some other places where he wants to win but virginia what a story this is. this is a tied state now and we had joe bide

federal agencies to regulate. tell us about the case. guest: this is a pair of cases challenging a ruling by fishery services, that require fishing boats toe cost of having an observer on board to monitor their compliance with fishing rules, costing like $710. the fishing boats went to court to challenge the agency's interpretation of the federal law, and the federal courts that upheld the agency's rule, it's known as the chevron doctrine, and this is a 1984 case called chevron v. national resources defense council, that that if a law is ambiguous, courts should generally defer to the agency's interpretation of the law that they administer. this is a doctrine that has been in the crosshairs for conservative lawyers and legal scholars for a while now. the supreme court had actually turned down several requests to overturn that doctrine, but in this pair of cases, what out of the d.c. circuit judge are in washington, and one out of the first circuit, which is in new england, the supreme court decided to take up the question of whether or not to overturn the chevron doctrine. they said they were not going to weigh in on whether this rule is

federal agencies to regulate. tell us about the case. guest: this is a pair of cases challenging a ruling by fishery services, that require fishing boats toe cost of having an observer on board to monitor their compliance with fishing rules, costing like $710. the fishing boats went to court to challenge the agency's interpretation of the federal law, and the federal courts that upheld the agency's rule, it's known as the chevron doctrine, and this is a 1984 case called chevron v. national resources defense council, that that if a law is ambiguous, courts should generally defer to the agency's interpretation of the law that they administer. this is a doctrine that has been in the crosshairs for conservative lawyers and legal scholars for a while now. the supreme court had actually turned down several requests to overturn that doctrine, but in this pair of cases, what out of the d.c. circuit judge are in washington, and one out of the first circuit, which is in new england, the supreme court decided to take up the question of whether or not to overturn the chevron doctrine. they said they were not going to weigh in on whether this rule is