we need to make sure we use the federal health care -- the federal government's power. yes, there is capitalism and there is let us put federal government power to work. >> mr. brubaker? mr. brubaker: i went to columbia, south america three years ago and i fell in love with her medical system. they have a free health care system. services were kind of like v.a. or indian care. they also had a government, free of government health care system. talking to health care providers in the united days, over 80% of our bill goes to regulation, insurance, liability, the whole nine yards, august government involvement. remove government for debts from our health care system. let us take a $30 a month they do in south america. england is going toward it. >> dr. cummings? dr. cummings: thank you. one of the changes the federal government should make is allowing the federal government to negotiate fees. that was a mistake of george bush. the constitutional provision for general welfare is not a grant of power, but if you look at the careful wording, the restriction of power on the po

the federal government. let me convey to you. about that story i have been telling you about the destruction, planetary wide level discussion of wildlife that we executed in the american west in the 19thcentury. our instinct, initially in , whory, was to blame that else, but on the federal government. this worry of how the federal government participated in the destruction -- this story of how the federal government participated in the destruction of western wildlife was first by former buffalo hunters during the conservation period, who found themselves cast at aspersions were what they had done. they had killed all these animals, millions of these iconic animals. the former symbol of the united states. a particular buffalo hunter named john cook, in 1905, wrote a memoir called "on the border with the buffalo," and he came up with this explanation for why they had done it. what he essentially argued in his book with that we were the heroes of the advance of civilization and not only that, we were actually t

he has mentioned the federal deficit. interesting because the president has called the federal debt to increase bypassing large tax cuts and simultaneously increasing federal spending, now saying if interest rates go up, we will be spending more money on interest payments and i do not want to spend more money on interest payments, no one wants to spit then -- spend more money on interest payments. host: does the president control the fed? guest: he appoints the board of governors come indirectly he has incredible" over the fed but once he has done that, they have -- he cant authority stand on the sidelines and yell at them but they have autonomy. host: what else has the fed chairman telegraphed in terms of other rate hikes and actions? guest: he has made clear rate hikes are having -- happening. they are predicting there will be more rate increases next at a rates are still low-level by historical standards and the fed is to provide stimulus to the economy, lightly tapping on the accelerator. they think the economy is str

those federal lands have been federal lands. they aren't ones that somehow got robbed from the people. they have always been federal lands, and quite frankly, they were lands which in many cases, nobody wanted, like nevada. [laughter] stephen: we have any nevadans out here? [laughter] would you like a follow-up? do we have time for one quick question? >> maybe one more. stephen: ok. any other questions? let me give you all a chance for one final remark, then. to sum it all up, send everyone home happy. [laughter] >> i think we are still trying to figure out how to live properly in the world. it has taken us a long time. we have been on this planet as species for more than 200,000 years, homo sapiens, trying to figure it out ever since we have been here and we are still struggling to do it. as you look at the future, that is how i think we have to confront the future. we have been trying to figure out how to make this planet work for us for a long time, and we haven't quite gotten it right yet, but we are closer. >> i cannot disa

but this has been a federal investigation and there are capital offenses under federal raw f law forimes. >> and i want to go back to the way that the law enforcement organizations have come toget r together. your reaction, what does it say to where law enforcement is today. you have all these groups working pretty well together moving quickly. >> and maybe ten years ago, they didn't have that kind of relationship. there was a turf battle going on. and everybody that was really good was the secret service. but then after the recent events that have happened, particularly things likes boston bombing, you have all these agencies coming in, and as you rightly said, they bring so much resources and there is a coordination. joint terrorism task force goes through its ebbs and flows. sometimes it is good, sometimes not so much. but what you see, it really is as seamless as possible. nd t and the locals are still first on the scene and the fbi comes in afterwards. so it is essential that you have the training done at the local level. >> and michael, i want to turn back to pete williams down

>> yes, if there is federal land involved other federal agencies could do a . but the secretary could not have any independent authority with two private land except for designated private habitat. >> opponent -- imposes obligation on all other federal agencies should in consultation utilize authorities in furtherance of this chapter. critical habitat is just one part . >> at that is only if it is designated critical? >> know that is a general obligation . whenever you go for a clean water act permit. no critical habitat need be involved. wildlife agencies immediately gets involved in has to sign off on those . critical habitat does not have to be involved. there is a perfect example in this case. if you read the final designation here . the properties in mississippi were restored before there was any critical habitat designation. and the brief says that in doing so, the frog survived in mississippi through quote intense human effort and extensive habitat restoration. that was all done before the critical habitat designation in this case. and just to understand

we also represent dhs federal needs for firstnet use. so we have large law enforcement presence within dhs. they work in very difficult areas in this country that doesn't have sort of a lot of traditional two medications coverage. think about the border. these are very sparsely populated areas very difficult to build towers, et cetera. so working with firstnet as a build of how to make sure that a law enforcement needs our target as well. >> host: what are you most proud of in the last year that you worked on? >> guest: there's a lot of things. i think the things that i most proud of is, i feel like, well, a couple of things. one is i have an amazing work force, was that they're working public safety communications interoperability, whether they are working to restore communications after the massive hurricanes that we've had, just tireless working with the companies to get that done. the number of cyber incidents we had respond to and done it well. they all really rose to the occasion, it's a tremendously proud of this organization. we'

under federal foia, you couldn't because there's federal exemptions for this. so, the policy collaboration is -- as it evolves, the threats evolve, have to continue. it has to continue at the state level. has to continue at the federal level and we've all got to keep talking policy back and forth as this evolves and try to stay in sync. >> the only thing i'll add to what the general is talking about, the state attorney generals have to get involved. they're part of our cyber security commission and the other thing is we're really pushing to get moas and mous in place as well as nondisclosure agreements. that's really going to be the key moving forward to trust. >> yeah. absolutely. i had every council member do an nda as soon as -- they were like, you're interested? okay. do a vetting and stuff, because it is cyber. we can't just have anybody and everyone at the table. they have to have the expertise and there has to be an element of trust from that perspective. is it going to be perfect? no, but i think the due diligence has to happen first. >> and then the la

federal appeals courts and their respective circuits. one issue was whether to split up the large ninth circuit of the u.s. court of appeals on the west coast, which was dealing with the backlog of cases. a senior judge and two law professors testified before the subcommittee. >> this hearing is called to order. the federal courts occupy a unique role in our constitutional system of republican self-government. one of the bedrock principles of our identity is as a credo nation that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. that idea translates in a pretty straightforward way into the constitution's vision for the executive and legislative branches. the american people are never more than two years or 730 days from choosing whether to rehire or to fire the vast majority of the federal elected officials. at first inspection, the notion that members of the federal judiciary, one of the co equal branches of our federal government, can't be directly or easily fired by the people back home seems hard to square with

he was pressured by the federal reserve or if he goes down, pressured by the federal reserve. kind of in a box, is it not? it might be slowing down rate increases precisely because of what the markets have done, but it can't win for love or money here. >> no, they can't. listen, president trump is saying that because he's in power, he knows lower rates are going to stimulate the economy even more so sure he's going to say it. i will tell you this. when president trump made a statement that he wasn't going to fire jerome powell, even though he was very disappointed in him, he's not going to fire him, the dow rallied like 100 points. neil: can you imagine, think that through. if you were to fire the federal reserve chairman, i'm telling you t market would drop 1,000 points. be it justified or not. for him just to throw it out there i thought was like yelling fire in a theater. >> yeah. it wasn't great. i am a firm believer that the fed has to stay bipartisan and not involved in the politics and i do believe the fed will continue what it's going to do in keeping this economy on t

federal agencies such as the federal trade commission and the havetment of commerce performed long-standing rules in privacy and have been increasingly active in this area. congress has tried and failed over the last decades to and at comprehensive privacy legislation. we must keep open minds about a bipartisan bill. in the wake of the facebook cambridge analytic a scandal and the vulnerability in google plus accounts reported this week, it clear that industry self-regulation is insufficient. a national standard for privacy rules of the road is needed to protect consumers. we need to get this right. don'tg requirements that advance privacy would be a step backwards. early to determine the impact they will have in the u.s., but the most notable difference consumers can see directly is the increase in on theirired pop ups devices. i challenge would industry told us in our first hearing and benefitshe potential and unintended consequences of the new rules put forth by the european union and state of california. want to say thank you to our panelists for being here today. i will turn to our ran

federal housing in which we take those who are tenants' of federal housing, and they become a colony apart, a people apart from the rest. i like the roaches that a number of democrats as well as republicans, people like chuck percy, and the late robert kennedy has suggested, and of course have recommended them, too in my speeches for human dignity in which we would provide again a tax credit to private enterprise to build individual housing that could be owned by individuals who obtained it, but also an opportunity for people who live in high rises to own their houses. with that ownership will come the pride and the dignity that you are not going to get from living in public housing and feeling to be a class apart. what i am saying is this. i think that over the past four years we have seen billions of dollars poured into programs for a federal approach to the solution of our problems. what we are going to do is have federal housing. what we need now is to move away from that approach. have the federal government act , but to enlist private enterprise and volunteer enterprise in buil

federal agencies -- regards privacy use. agencies have rules regarding privacy and have been act do in the area up -- active in the area. congress has tried and failed in the last few decades to enact comprehensive privacy legislation. to be successful we must endeavor to keep open minds about the condors. in the wake of the cambridge analytical scandal -- cambridge analytica scandal, it is increasingly clear industry self-regulation in this area is not sufficient. a national standard for privacy rules of the road is needed to protect consumers. at the same time we need to get this right. passing requirements that do not materially advance privacy would be a step backward. while it may be too early to determine the impact they will have on the u.s., the most notable difference most consumers can see directly has been the increase in gdpr inspired and cookie consent banners on the devices. towards possible legislation, i encourage my colleagues to challenge what the industry told us that our first hearing but to examine the p

federal agents they such as the federal trade commission department of commerce has long-standing roles including privacy and have been increasingly act gave recently in this area. and while where congress has tried and failed over the last few decades to enact comprehensive privacy legislation. we all must endeavor to keep open minds about the contours of the bipartisan bill in the wake of facebook cambridge analytic of scandal and other similar incidents including a vulnerability in google plus accounts reported just as past week it's increasingly clear that industry self-regulation in this area is not sufficient. national standard for privacy rules of the road is needed to protect consumers. at the same time we need to get this right, passing onerous requirements that do not materially at its privacy would be a step backward. while it may be too early to determine the impact of gdpr and ccpa has been the increase of gdpr pop-up notices and consent banners on their devices. as we continue to work towards possible legislation i encourage my colleagues to challenge what industry told us

stephen schwartz, 34 years old, nominated last year to the federal -- to the court of federal claims, was not licensed in and have never tried it case before the court to was nominated to. although these nominations were not ultimately confirmed by the senate, they were voted out by our committee. and unanimously supported by my colleagues on the other side of the aisle. matthew peterson, who was nominated to be a federal district court judge in d.c., also never tried it case or argued a motion in federal court. his nomination had to be withdrawn just three days after his hearing, which brings us to the nomination of jonathan kobes to the eighth circuit, who was up for circuit today. kobes nots rated mr. qualified by a substantial authority of the evaluating committee. they found he does not have the to be ate experience" circuit court judge. troubleut, the aba had finding enough in this record to make a thorough evaluation. they found none of his writings were "reflective of complex legal analysis, knowledge of the law, or ability to write about complex matters in a clear and cogent

it is the largest federal court of appeals in american history. when two judges on a three-judge panel of the ninth circuit decide what federal law means, they are doing it for 20% of the country. 60 million people. that concentrates a lot of power in the hands of two judges. the down side to concentrating judicial power is that judicial errors become magnified. this happens in two ways. first, it's very simple. when a judge makes mistakes, when powers kuconcentrated the mistakes affect all people. second, judges are more likely to make mistakes to begin with when we concentrate power in too few hands. consider universal injunctions. right now litigants are able to file lawsuit after lawsuit asking for a universal injunction until they find a district court judge willing to enter one. but that judge may have odd views that are outside the mainstream. indeed, plaintiffs often seek out the judges with views most predisposed to them. it is called forum shopping. yet right now the one judge who enters the universal injunction can trump all the others

all of the patent cases are going to the federal circuit. god forbid that the federal circuit makes a mistake. if all the agency review goes to the d.c. circuit then those judges have a lot of power. one of the hallmarks of our federal judiciary is that the circuits can learn from one another by considering the same issues in different places, and then when the supreme court finally has to get involved the supreme court has in front of it a number of different takes on the same question. we think this improves the supreme court's decision making ability because there's a lot of diversity of opinion that it can draw from. when we put all of the cases into one court of appeals we are missing out on all of this percolation. when i was at the court, that's what we would call it when we were looking at a cert petition. we'd say there are only two circuits that have weighed in on this issue. we should wait before we take the case for more courts to weigh in. wait for more percolation. we miss out on all that learning. that's a hallmark of the comm

the federal government has a dominant role in regulating the internet. been a nonregulatory policy since the clinton administration. they want to protect that nonrecognition policy and also restore the fcc's current rule. session's is jeff comments about this. once again, the california legislator has it that could an extreme law attentive to frustrate federal policy. we have a duty to defend the prerogatives of the federal government. we swallowed do so with vigor. we are confident that we will prevail in the case because the facts are on our side. -- is hes are he asked expected to present in this lawsuit? guest: there is a long president of federal law dominating communications. telegraph, for example. but the internet is clearly an interstate network. if you were to pull out your phone and send me an email, that would bounce across state lines to a server in maryland, virginia, then to my phone. if you were to watch a youtube video, that would probably retrieve data and video from a server in another state. the internet is inherently interstate. it i

that's why the west became such a federal thing. you don't have operating states. >> at the moment that the territorial system is most influential in the west is the time when federally appointed officials will be the ones that have more authority than they ever had before or since. most of us are accustomed to electing our representatives. we elect senators and congresspeople. we also let governors. during the territorial system, the governors are appointed by the federal government. in wyoming, and right after the civil war, there is a federally appointed governor and secretary of state. there was a federal appointed marshall. the chief law-enforcement officer are radical republicans. they have been abolitionists before. their union veterans. have a very liberal understanding of what kind of people ought to be admitted citizenship, and how they protect the rights of those people. there is a race riot at the polls in 1868 in wyoming when black citizens tried to vote. they were citizens by this time. white citizens tried to prevent

we call that federal testing a voter machine but is not done by any federal lab. it's in by a commercial lab. but machine companies pay for that testing and the eac then sort of administers that process of receiving reports from the lab, posting them on the website and hosting other information. >> so there's a semi- regulatory role for them? >> there is no regulatory role. lawmakers didn't want them to have any regulatory role. they wanted them to have the least amount of authority that they would have because they wanted to maintain the authority of elections at the local level. the state level and the county level. they didn't want federal interference. the problem with that, it's leaked into the eac. all they can do is suggest things to the state. they can create standards for voting machines and then the voting machines get tested by that standard. you can't force states to use only machines that have been tested and certified. they get a lot of pushback from the state about the standards. they get a lot of pushback from the states about a lot of things. so w

would you agree the ftc is the appropriate federal agency to enforce any future federal privacy standards, again yes or no? >> yes. >> yes, senator. >> yes, senator. >> yes. >> i think they have a rule. i think effective enforcement is important. but i think there may be options on additional enforcement mechanisms so i guess that is a qualified yes. >> thank you. >> yes. >> mr. enright i have a question and i ran out of time but i'll be back talking to you i hope in -- if we have an additional round on data portability in your testimony. thank you very much. >> thank you, senator moran. senator schatz. >> thank you mr. chairman. thank you all for being here. we're here at least partly because a lot of you are worried very much about just gdpr and the california law so let's lay that out and you want something that you can work with so you don't have to navigate 50 different statutory frameworks. i understand that. and i think there is an opportunity to do something meaningful, but as mr. trouble said, we should make sure that we do something meaningful and i understand that from the stan

one top priority for federal gun legislation? >> thank you for haven't me here today to discuss these issues. october 1 changed this community forever. i picked my son up the following day. he got in the car saying this guy did even know who he was shooting -- shooting. we have seen 33,000 people killed by guns in our country. i respect people want to protect their families. the issue is how we make the second amendment safer? the first piece should be universal background checks, keeping guns out of the hands of people who are mentally unstable and shouldn't have it, which has been passed here by nevada voters. >> you have 30 seconds. looks i'm glad my opponent rules with this commonsense principle. we have seen some great offense here. it devastated this community. we came together. of how to be a part of this. >> there has been a slight change of my opponents opinion on guns. he has talked about not even having background checks. there has been a change in a position here. i backed the initiative we supported here two years ag

of the things that you are doing at the federal and state level, i haven't seen much of the federal levelregarding regulation of social media to help with this problem, what should we be doing? in a policy since? >> this is the second of two events we did. we had an event on social media and the elections. some of those issues are directly connected to the election administration. if you want to take that on from from that perspective. dhs is working closely with our partners at the fbi. one of our key roles has been working with the social media companies who have been good partners to help inform the state and local officials about activities they see on their platform, sharing information around technique -- tactics and technical information to make sure they understand what is happening. we have had phone calls with all of the states with facebook and twitter and other social media companies to say here is what we are seeing and the actions we are taking. we want you to know. heading into the election, we will continue to engage in that way to make sure they have the information. one

thought it was needed in these places to have federal troops and federal authority on the ground. what ends up happening is they essentially hijack the democratic and the traditional system in the south leading up to what is going to be the restoration of home rule in 1877. the southwinds -- the south winds. it takes several years for them to get back control of all the southern states. the clan is ridiculously popular in the carolinas. i always ask if anyone is from york county. 100% of the citizens of york county belongs to the [null]. the clan is enormously popular. this is a period when the clan is the most popular as it ever was in american history. what klansmen were trying to do was restore white for supremacy which is basically just another word for homeroom. -- rule. they believed that they were protecting their community from outside influence that was going to mess things up. this is the basis of any fear that we have as a domestic citizenry. what the clan does, like the issue of black voters, is used liquor tax to get more white people enthusiastic about kicking out re

white house cybersecurity report shows federal agencies still struggling to get secure. do you agree with that assessment quick. >> it's hard to make such a generic claim. there agencies that are struggling with certain aspects and some are really good. typically large well resourced agencies have a lot of experience but they also manage very complicated networks. medium-sized agencies may be have less resources but also have less complicated networks to manage. so it's hard to say every single agency is struggling categorically but we are trying to help agencies prioritize the resources that they do have to have the most demonstrable progress through those directives to give new authority to connect agencies to take action. with one of those most consistent challenges and self reporting with those issues and closing those agencies with critical vulnerabilities so industry standards these are the highest and most critical vulnerability management is a really important part of a strong cybersecurity program. so maybe there is an indicator there is other challenges if that

organizing federal credit unions securitize lows - - loans. number four with the appeals process to ensure due process and fairness. number five. improving the efficiency of the ncua stress test rules. number six flexibility to the membership process. number seven. proposing additional options for federal credit unions to offer payday alternative loans that have a viable alternative to the traditional payday lenders. eight. with a more tailored risk-based capital rule that does not burden the smallest credit unions. additionally with the advanced notice of proposed rulemaking with a capital for risk-based network purposes. to also take initiatives for the agency's efficiency to reduce unnecessary examination and burdens specifically to be organized by eliminating two of those regional offices to streamline several agency functions to increase efficiency. to. with the examination cycle expanded at 18 months and expand the presence of credit unions. three. taken the modernization and to implement a program to incorporate emerging insecure techno

federal bureau of investigation the f.b.i. this is the most horrific crime scene i've seen in twenty two years with the federal bureau of investigation members of the tree of life synagogue conducting a peaceful service and their place of worship were brutally murdered by a gunman targeting them simply because of their faith the suspects for motive is unknown but we believe he was acting alone. president donald trump said the attack was an act of evil and called for tougher penalties to have the right to decide today. whether it's. one of the. we have to bear the death penalty or. the u.s. is once again in mourning this time after what's taught to be the deadliest attack on a jewish community in u.s. history. well u.s. president trump ordered flags at federal buildings across the country to be flown at half staff in a mark of respect for the victims of the synagogue shooting he's also said he plans to travel to fix pittsburgh earlier we asked our correspondent in washington michelle how political leaders are responding to the

. >> how much more so with the federal government involved in this process is 2016? what would've changed on that level in your relationship or in a state the federal level. >> so let me back up to 2016 and start from there. i think when we first got the phone call, the secretaries of state were called her a conference call with secretary of big johnson. we were far and it an attack that occurred and we are perhaps as the federal government was considering creating a critical infrastructure designation for elections. we didn't know what that meant. i think many red states and blue states, many of the states were opposed to that designation because we had no idea if it was the federal stakeholder of our elections process. to say was a rocky road in the beginning as far as communications i think even dhs would agree to that. what has happened since then, the critical iced infrastructure was designated in january of 17. we actually didn't find out what resources and what that meant to last until june or july of 17. we have since set up a coordinating council of which i

at the local level you will not wait on federal assistance. federal assistance. you will go and do triage on whatever it is that the issue is in a c.t.a. environment and provide subject matter expertise and look at the reachback capability of the technical expeens that you need. you would ask for federal assistance, so you know, we are lucky we are not like colorado or the atlanta hacking where we had to exercise that in real world other than a couple of simple things. most of the stuff that happened is people trying to download unauthorized software and we disconnect them from the system and take that software off their program. we do have a cyber element within the national guard bureau for incident response and we do exercise that within that and it does report all the way up to -- - you know, so i think >> the operations center at the department of homeland security. >> right. i do think that the state is in a position to assist the local level if something should happen. so we will have to see if there is anything that generates a need for the national guard

providing testimony will be federal reserve vice chairman for supervision, federal deposit insurance corporation chair, national credit union administration chairman, and comptroller currency. each of these agencies plays an integral role in preventing key provisions of the law. as policy makers, it's our job to enact laws and regulations that ensure proper behavior and safety for our markets but tailored propo tailored appropriately. shortly after dodd/frank was signed into law, we began to see the burden it had on certain financial institutions. for years, i and many other members of the committee on both sides of the aisle worked to find a solution to provide meaningful relief to small financial institutions and we succeeded in crafting s 2155. we're now approaching five months since it was signed into law by the president. having passed both the house and senate with significant bipartisan support. the law's primary purpose to make targeted changes to simplify and improve the regulatory reshumgime. it right sizes regulations for financial institutions make it easier for consumers

they have argued against the paper ballots because federal law requires that after any federal election you can store the election materials they have to store thousands maybe hundreds of thousands of ballots for more than a year. and they don't like that. and they talk about chain of custody's they don't like the handling of paper. they were happy when machines went paperless the cement many of event many of the arguments against paper. has there been any effort to federalize voting standards or voting machines there are standards in addition to giving money in addition to creating the eac mandated that would help create new standards for voting machines. it does have been done. they were created. the last ones are created in 2005. more than a decade old. and obviously it has advanced much further than the computer security has advanced much further than that. they been tested and certified to a decade old standard. the eac is working on advancing those standards. they had put in the hands of state and local election officials. there is a very aggressive fight against any attempt to fe

number one is my support for the federal tax plan because federal tax plan we were able to appropriate $225 millio $225 mie general fund. there is a 50 billion-dollar industry with 15%. number three, i talked about the broken medical marijuana system that has a 15% security. >> you are out of time now. >> i think we can find money. >> even if colorado gaming work to produce the same revenue as it would take 600 years for the revenue infrastructure. if they want to change that, they can but it's not enough revenue for the road. if those initiatives fail this november you are going to need a governor who can conven convenid people together and unite. not somebody interested i in name-calling with somebody that unites people so that we can solve the issue. we spend a lot of time in colorado talking about the north and south corridor and its importance for the state and particularly for the central area commuters. what about the east and west corner door or highway 50. these and others are the lifeline and as governor, what would you do to strengthen the infrastructure between eastern and

her complaint charges him with 29 federal crimes. there are 11 cou nts with 29 federal crimes. counts of murder. there are 11 counts of murder. there are 11 counts of using a firearm to commit murder. each of these are punishable by death. race officers put their own lives in danger. three of these men were shot by bowers. he will appear in front of a magistrate judge on monday at 1:30pm. the investigation is under way and work will continue. we will spare no effort or resellers in ensuring the defendant is held fully accountable for as unspeakable and hateful cranes. we would ask the public and media to have patience with others as we conduct this investigation and understand there are things we cannot share. we'll be happy to take questions. now you will hear from special agent robertjones. questions. now you will hear from special agent robert jones. last night at approximately 9pm robert bowers was ta ken night at approximately 9pm robert bowers was taken into formal custody. he is presently still in hospital in surgery and under guard. there is nothing to indicate that bow

president trump recently said despite that that whole, the federal -- death toll, the federal response was an unprecedented success. if granted five minutes of the president's time, what would you like to convey to him about what happened? 51% iseadership, empathy. if you don't show empathy, you can't be a leader. [applause] jose: you can be right and you can be left. the number of 3000 dead, probably more. not at theey were hands of president trump directly. you can't do anything about the current -- hurricane, but the lack of response to emergency even now because people were lacking electricity and didn't have generator, people were dying because they were on breathing machines. people were dying because they didn't have water to drink. i saw that firsthand. they were drinking from dirty streams water. sure, it is his responsibility to make sure that the best -- death toll will be as little as possible. if you follow indonesia, there has been another earthquake. we are about to be sending a second team. they almost update the death toll daily. if a country like indonesia updates the

more federal money? >> there is always a trade-off when you look at tp see, by operating cost, i look at my budget for the upcoming year, i had to increase my operating cost. therefore, either offset it by reductions elsewhere or i got to ask for more money. so while congress required to see to be implanted, the rail lines by d summer 31st just here, the federal railroad and ministration, the authority to give commuter reverence at your extension if they demonstrate progress that installed, hardware, testing, employee training, i'm pleased, that it has already made this progress. as december 31, deadline to meet these requirements rapidly, approaches, i fear the fra may not have enough resources. needed to have the process of volumes and plants and documents, literally thousands of papers in a timely manner. this administrator -- >> you confident the fra will be able to process this volume of materials some no commuter railroad is deprived of an extension due to untimely review and approval and if commut

i think it is an area of federal regulation. there may be areas where we need to make sure we are not intruding on state consumer protection rules, but for privacy and data services, i think it is essential to be federal. >> thank you to all of our witnesses for lending your expertise to us today. there is no question that consumers want better transparency and control over their personal information. that is why we are here today. we hope we leave today with a better understanding of what a federal privacy law might look like and how we protect the consumer well not stifling innovation in the process, as well. my first question is, for mr. enright, through google's dashboard, you provide numerous mechanisms for users to control the collection of their data. i am curious about what you know about the dashboard's effectiveness and if you could share that with the committee. which percentage of your users actually utilize the dashboard? >> thank you for the question. as i said, my account, the dashboard, that is an area we are con

i was a federal prosecutor. i've not seen an fbi investigation that can only last a week and that comes up with credible information. i think what needed to happen was a longer investigation into just what the facts were, what the truth was. at that time, i would not have supported his nomination to the bench. >> if you had to vote when the senate voted, you would not have voted for him? >> correct. >> love you follow and start the kavanaughdoes confirmation change the landscape of this campaign, if at all? >> i don't think it changes the landscape of this campaign. what this campaign has always been about are the issues that are near and dear to people in new jersey. after over a year of listening to people throughout this district, after a year of going to living rooms and kitchen tables, the concerns or the fact that this tax plan is worse for our district than any other state in the nation. the fact that the tax on our health care resulted in rising premiums. the fact that we cannot get our critical infrastr

lee, what is your one top priority for federal gun why?slation and >> first of all, thank you both for having me here today to issues. these you know, october 1, i think -- ged this community and forever. i picked my son, who is 13 years ld, up from school the following day. he got in the car and started rying, saying, you know, this guy didn't even know who he was shooting. and as a mother, i couldn't say him, it's okay, i can protect you, it won't happen again. 33,000 people killed by guns in our country. believe in the second amendment right. we have a strong culture of gun hunt. who like to i respect that people want to protect their families. issue is how do we make the second amendment safer. i agree the first piece of should be universal background checks, keeping guns of criminals and people who shouldn't and are shouldn't stable and have it, which has been passed by nevada voters. tarkanian, 30 seconds to rebut. it.i agree with i will say this was in the years, growing 5 up here and seen great events here and tough things. the ng

federal regulation? yes or no? >> be cautious with federal regulation. >> this is the final question. president trump tweeted of your outstanding ins every way, strong on the borders , less the military and cents, a crime freighter. jay has my total endorsement. what would you reply to his tweet? he gets some infrastructure funding here, that he make sure we get quality affordable health care, that we have a tax plan that works for everyone come and we work hard to move this country forward. >> mr. weber? it shows up on twitter and you say well, thank you mr. president. free worlder of the wants to help me bring my vision of the more prosperous and it.nger america i welcome i welcome the juxtaposition between donald trump's america, hash is working then it been in decades and the nancy pelosi agenda that she thinks she is in respect of -- effective speaker. i think we will be successful based on that. >> it is time for closing statements. mikey -- michael, for your time. i want to ask the voters to think hard about

of course, pennsylvania also has the death penalty, but similar to federal law, or the federal system, no one's been put to death in pennsylvania for over two decades. it's not used very often. >> we do not know if the state made this request to the federal government or not. but we do know the federal government is in charge of this investigation and charging and whatever other legal process is used to deal withholding this person, bowers, accountable. >> that's correct. this is one of those instances where federal and state law overlap. this is overlapping jurisdiction between the federal government, fbi and other investigators and state and local authorities. this happens a lot in criminal law, this is one of those instances, the federal law is a hate crimes law, and then also in pennsylvania, of course. pennsylvania would handle local murder cases, but it also has an ethnic intimidation law, which is pennsylvania's version of a hate crimes legislation. >> all right, thank you, danny. joining me now is nbc's jeff bennett. he's following the president in murphysboro, illinois. what

tribal sovereignty and asserting that in federal and state courts and having that recognized by the federal government. second principle is federal trust relationships. those treaties build a federal trust beneficiary relationship. when terry talks about indian property, that is the third property. the land is often times held in trust. when tribes hold property, we are missing one of the sticks, so to speak. those who went to law school, when you talk about property and it is a bundle of sticks, you're missing that one stick and the ability to transfer it. and then fourth, state -- limited state authority. those are the principles we talk about. within all that, and a lot of the work that i do is, i work with children, actually. i represent children in foster care, juvenile delinquency, a little bit, and so, how do we deal with -- and this is something that i think on the ground, myself, most indian families living in tribal communities is that there was 500 years of terror that drives lived in. they lived in policy terror and psychological terror. they were told they were not intelligent

so i found myself at d.h.s., eventually joined as a federal official and here i am. also worked at the white house. nationalen on the security council. jeanette: i have. directoras the deputy director -- part of this organization. i worked in the national council as the director for critical infrastructure cybersecurity. johnson'setary cybersecurity counselor at the administration in last june i was appointed this position in the trump administration. host: as somebody who is career, background, who's worked at the white house, is cyber czar ator a the white house? honest, ii will be have -- i have sort of different even within mys own mind. very important when of cyber was still new in the government policy about theyou talked different agencies that have different roles. of the policies that we think about particularly in infrastructureal really got their roots in the administration, actually, thinking about counter terrorism, so there's been a lot overarchingcy in policy but thinking about how the government builds capacity we work out different agency rules and r

of course, pennsylvania also has the death penalty but similar to federal law or the federal system, no one's been put to death in pennsylvania for over of two decades. so it's not used very often. >> now, we do not know if the state made this request of the federal government or not. but we do know the federal government is in charge of this investigation. and charging and whatever other legal processes uses to deal withholding this person, bowers, accountable. >> that's correct. this is one of those instances where federal and state law overlap so this is overlapping jurisdiction between both the federal government, fbi and other investigators and state and local authorities. so they happens a lot in the criminal law and this is just one of those instances because the federal law is a hate crimes law and then also in pennsylvania, of course, pennsylvania would handle local murder cases but has an ethnic intimidation version -- >> joining me now is nbc's geoff bennett following the president in mur frfrees borrow, illinois. what is president doing in the middle of all of this. >> th

the federal judge is currently heading the 29 federal charges. jean casarez is in the courtroom and we will have a live report as soon as she can walk out. whooo! want to get a move on your next vacation? tripadvisor now lets you book over a hundred thousand tours, attractions, and experiences in destinations around the world! like new orleans! from cooking classes, to airboat tours,, tripadvisor makes it easy to find and book amazing things to do. and you can cancel most bookings up to 24 hours in advance for a full refund. so your whole trip... will be smooth sailing! there lots of people who are confused about which medicare plan is right for them. hey, that's me. i barely know where to start. well, start here with me, karen. i'm a licensed humana sales agent. well, it's nice to meet you, karen. i'm john smith. hi, john. at humana, we know you're unique. so you have different needs from other john smiths. yah, i've always thought so. and together, we can find a plan that's right for you. great! i go to the doctor a couple of times a year. and