feigin. just so i understand, i asked before, as for the regulation for more,. we talked about the honest attempt standard. it does seem to me, and you said to the extent, there is some sort of men's rhea wrapped up in this honest attempt. i understood you to say that justice gorsuch said that was some sort of a mens rea requirement? they understand that correctly? i mean incredibly defended not similar to dissimilar law as we pointed out in the brief. to friend id, kind of a criminal standard that you could see if you look that model piÑa colada 202. the commentary there of. but if you have a defendant who is acting in a grossly unreasonable fashion that that is sufficient. it is context dependent it query whether or not that is the right mens rea, it depends on the circumstances. i think that portions of moore, parts of the harrison act, and i think common sense reflect that this is the situation. given the vulnerability of the patients, the general public, and the fact that these doctors seek out these dea registrations. they are licensed professionals. we sh

eric feigin, i sympathize with the position you are in. >> thank you. >> [laughs] >> because normally, when there is a registration, and noncompliance with the conditions for that registration, you lose your registration, like a car, you are right to drive or that sort of thing. this case, you have the dea registration, but it is self policed. your honor, you can retain it under certain conditions. that is, you comply with the standards of the medical profession, of prescribing drugs, it sarah. and then, it comes up as to whether this compliance is sufficient when you are indicted for the underlying 841 crime. you think of another condition of which a registration like this could then become a part of a criminal offense because you failed to comply with those conditions? >>,,,,. . . . ,. i'm thinking more of an authorization. this is an odd arrangement, where you have conduct that is illegal, that is distributing certain drugs, except if you are registered. the registration isn't withdrawn thus meaning, a subsequent justification without that registration is illegal. rather, you're no

well , let's put it this way, create very big problems for us and feigin's question is whether you wanta. on a quick note, he also clearly does not happen on the map. look at the depth of defense there. yes, you ca n’t keep it, considering that there are already e people. there, around odessa, around nikolaev, they are sitting, hardened for 8 years in battles, so i think the situation is very alarming, and about this too. eh, i understand, yes about it. you need to think about it. you need to have it in your head. yes there is. uh, a pure propaganda moment, this is also an attempt, but to open for russia excuse me to stretch the second front distract uh, the russian troops who are participating in the special. e operations. if e starts here, russia will be forced to react. this is the first moment of the second moment. this is purely propaganda. still, they say that russia wants to seize and break through the land corridor, not only to the crimea, but also to transnistria, and thus cut it off. ukraine from the sea she says, but for you, such a thing and the third moment, what am i talki

simple, even, well, sarcastic, humorous language, because lyosha says, not only here, he is with feiginther. and i don’t know this one, he is a russian lawyer lawyer, and they start such and say, they start spinning the topic. you see, dmitry is for me. i'm a person of state thinking, and i understand that if we now lose in some kind of battle, and there is every reason to believe that we will lose the battle for the donbass, what will happen then? the ukrainian state , if now the ruble is already circulating in kherson, what kind of ukraine is how much of ukraine is left, how is it? well, that is, i'm trying to think for mine. let's answer. let's answer the questions. i have the impression that almost one, of course, but maybe 10 other people. we have colonel macgregor here, american colonel macgregor here. uh, he's very curious about the same analysis. and there is no video, but there are quotes. i just give you uh, well, he's very precise about what's going on. yes, he has the accuracy of the first part of the operation, but i will stop at the final, given washington’s determination