have carried out his attacks if he felt that the attack on beirut and the assassination of shahid fekar had hit hezbollah's military strength, so civilians should not be attacked anymore, israel is in its weakest possible form and now we have this capacity. he has and naturally he should make the best use of it, which seems to be expected to happen. this is the issue that both the experts living in lebanon and now the capital city of beirut have mentioned, and i can almost say that we have been talking to the experts of the program for the past months, and they say that the language of force is the language of the zionist regime. can you stop your summation , we have almost less than a minute, i think the incident that made netanyahu decide this story the main problem was the main one that he had inside, then there was the problem that he has in getting the support of the united states, and of course the public opinion of the world, and then the incorrect assessments that netanyahu may have of the behavior of the resistance axis, which are probably the same incorrect assessments that ar

roud and the assassination of martyr fekar hit hezbollah's military power , so civilians should not be attacked anymore israel is in its weakest possible form, and now this capacity exists for us, and naturally, it should make the best use of it, which seems to be expected to happen. i can almost i am saying that we have been talking with the experts of the program for the past months , they say that the language of force is the one that can stop the zionist regime . we have less than a minute to sum up. in my opinion, the incident that caused netanyahu to make this story is a problem. the original one was the original one that you had inside, then the next one there was a problem in getting the support of the united states and of course the public opinion of the world and after that incorrect evaluations that netanyahu may have of the behavior of the resistance axis, which probably these incorrect evaluations are likely to work for him , that is, this action is a calculation error. maybe the future will show this, maybe i am very grateful to you, mr. kathirnejad, an expert on zionist

fekar . what they are suggesting is that the zionist regime has started a game of zero and one in the asian region and hoping to achieve something, for example , in gaza or in the specified axes in lebanon, according to what you mentioned, it is zero, which means the end point. i am about to talk about this issue. in the last four minutes of the program, we will talk about the fact that he is trying very hard to deal with the events the events that have taken place will separate the lebanese resistance from its support and support. in your opinion, this will happen. well, regarding the second question, i gave an explanation in the previous question. look, i want to tell you very briefly what the battle of wills means. for example, alireza mojodi is now in charge of a decision based on 10 indicators . he will change two or three of these decisions. he cannot cancel 10 of those two. three to one amount changes , but the same change in conditions is expected to create pressure to change my decis