editor-in-chief margarita simonyan, also includes other high-ranking officers of the german army, fenskynd frostette. they considered this conversation strictly confidential, and therefore communicated without cuts. i would also like to say about the destruction of the bridge, we intensively studied this issue , unfortunately we came to the conclusion that the bridge. due to its size, it is similar to a runway, so it may not require 10 or even 20 missiles. it is believed that taurost will succeed if the french rafale fighter is used. they will only be able to make a hole and damage the bridge. i'm not promoting the bridge idea, i pragmatically want to understand what they want. the mentioned bridge in the east is, of course, crimean. and german officers are racking their brains about how exactly to get it with taurus cruise missiles. and at the same time pretending that berlin supplied these same taurus to kiev and trained the ukrainians to use them has nothing to do with it. the germans, direct participants in this war, the germans, are absolutely hypocritical to the highest degree, the

officers also appear in the entry published by arti editor-in-chief margarita simonyan german army, fenskynd frostette. they considered this conversation strictly confidential, and therefore communicated without cuts. i've come to the conclusion that there are two interesting targets: the east ammunition depot bridge, which is higher up. the bridge in the east is difficult to reach , it is a fairly small target, but taurus can do it, ammunition depots can also hit, if we take all this into account and compare with how much stormshadow and highmarc were used, then i have a question: is our goal the bridge or the military warehouses? i would like more to say, regarding the destruction of the bridge, we were intensively working on this. getting it with taurus cruise missiles and at the same time pretending that berlin supplied these same taurus to kiev and trained the ukrainians to use them has nothing to do with it. the germans, direct participants in this war, the germans, are absolutely hypocritical to the highest degree, they lie about how they are not involved, that they have no plans to

artie chief editor margarita simonyan, also includes other high-ranking officers of the german army, fensky frostette. they considered this conversation strictly confidential, and therefore communicated without cuts. i've come to the conclusion that there are two interesting targets: the bridge in the east warehouse ammunition that is located above. the bridge in the east is difficult to reach, it is a fairly small target, but taurus can do it. i would also like to say about the destruction of the bridge, we intensively studied this issue , unfortunately we came to the conclusion that the bridge, due to its size, is similar to a runway, so it may not require 10 or even 20 missiles. there is an opinion that taurast will succeed if he uses french. they will only be able to make a hole and damage the bridge. i'm not promoting the bridge idea, i'm pragmatic, i want to understand what they want. the mentioned bridge in the east, of course, is crimean, and german officers are racking their brains about how exactly to reach it with taurus cruise missiles, and at the same time pretend that berlin,

kiev immediately attacked the taura with two parties, fensky responded by saying that what was neededof the canopy, that is, the cockpit glass, fell on his middle finger. as you have already heard, defense minister pistorius intends to carefully study the issue of supplies of taurus missiles to ukraine, we have a meeting planned with him, everything needs to be discussed so that we can start working on this issue, no one knows why the federal chancellor is blocking these deliveries, the french they don’t do that, they supply q7 with scalp missiles to ukraine. storm shadow and scalp have similar technical characteristics for their installation. how will we solve this problem? will we transfer mbda missiles via riverback into their hands? one of our people will be seconded to the bda. we are now fighting a war that uses much more modern technology than our good old left. this all suggests... the idea that when we are planning deadlines, we should not overestimate them. if we are talking about combat use, then in this case, de facto, we will be advised to provide support for at least the