fessor being a well rounded intellectual if we go back to seventeen ninety and the words of john lockewhen the sol civil contract is broken the people must result if we have bankers writing the laws to give them the ability to commit and i'll call it john karr's i committed massive fraud and massive criminality and when you let this happen hasn't a social contract itself be broken your thoughts professor yes i agree or hardly macs are or even take it a step further it's not just the social contract in the united states that is is at stake here it is capitalism itself and it's capitalism on a global scale and so yes i agree with locke that once the social contract is reproach in the way that it has been in the united states over the last three or four decades that's a huge problem but a bigger problem that is we currently have a global economy we're smart qadri are individuals who control bassed well are now about will walk they only they can change the law they dominate the law that's a scary reality and if i'm correct on that pieces then we can expect huge economic costs for the ninet

law center and author of the book on constitutional disobedience fessor side and welcome thank you so much for having me telling us to thank mr blake for joining us why should we give up on our constitution you know the arguments really very simple this is our country we live here we have a right to have the kind of country we want nobody would want france or germany to tell us what kind of country to have there's just no reason to allow a bunch of people who did not even represent a majority of americans when they lived and who've been dead for two hundred years to tell us what kind of country there isn't isn't. if you if you accept the concept of just the review which i frankly disagree with but it's been kind of subtle law since eighty three and marbury vs madison. if you accept that couldn't you make the argument or couldn't one make the argument that we really have been continuously fine tuning our constitution ever since it was written through the agency of the supreme court you know interpret in the constitution finding slavery in a finding you know in dred scott eighty four to

country's top court its order to arrest the prime minister over a corruption case has been rejected fessor paul sheldon food from california state university says message raises a lot of questions. his. campaign talks very big he says he believes in supporting minority rights you know i haven't heard him can do only murders. shiites by in large numbers he claims to have been a professor of constitutional law and yet he says that only he can understand what the prophet mohammed meant and this is a man thought of trying to do actions the people who wrote pakistan is always dependent upon the west particularly the british but there are programs too such as america. and to have the indication you have both international support and some money behind it is always a good indicator when you're running against the wealthiest families and part of the earth the euro action results don't come out the way he wants you to claim it was a rupture of the process the only a man such as him could run a real islamic democracy process but instead it is already an islamic republic. news to be very precise abou