the finestration is very simplistic. i think it has a need for further detailing, which has not been provided. thank you very much. >> vice president melgar: okay. thank you. we will now hear any public comment in support of the d.r. requester. so this is the second time we're hearing this item, so one minute. >> hello. thanks for the time. i'm still opposed to this project. i do appreciate the other side making some changes since we were last in front of the commission. but to me, it comes across as a bit of a bare minimum effort and didn't address all of the points that were raised by the -- the insightful discussion that the commission had after our last hearing. in particular, i'm concerned about the motion of a single-family home really changing kind of the dynamic of our neighborhood, and most particularly, the roof decks. there's also -- the same owners purchased the residence next door and there's a plan to have a roof deck on that one, as well, so we're looking at putting three roof decks in a very tight area in

i do appreciate some of the finsetration changes that -- finestration changes that will bring the windows into good shape. that's a good thing. in general, i'm very much in support of the museum being located here. >> president wolfram: thank you, commissioner black. commissioner pearlman? >> commissioner pearlman: yeah, i forgot to say one thing. i worked with a group of nonprofit film organizations here in san francisco, and it was a south of market warehouse building, and my understanding was they ended up purchasing the building years ahead because of the income and the way the organization supported it. so i especialmean, to me, the f what mr. oliver's organization is doing is also so supportive of the city. and again, that may be more of a planning commissioner type of comment, but i think relative to this project, i think that's very significant because of, you know, all the concerns now of the arts organizations fleeing the city because there's no way to support the arts, and here, we have this incredible opportunity with no need for the city to jump in and try to save something b

its highest point at its peaked roof is 30 feet, with finestrations. because it's more -- a more economical treatment, this would be the second corrugated metal treatment used within a 100-foot radius of the project within the last few years, by approval it, it will have the cumulative effect by creating a corrugated metal streetscape and have a corrugated metal redefine the aesthetic in the dogpatch. 1001 tennessee is not a contributing property. so please do not approve the use of the corrugated metal and give the project sponsors other options. allow them to use alternate engineered products similar to those approved on other new projects allowed to be used in the district. allow them to use a cement type product and it's consistent with other contributing commercial properties in tone and texture. may i keep going on? >> president wolfram: you have 30 seconds more. >> or if you find the wood design more appropriate, allow them to use a tongue in groove engineered wood product like hardy board siding. you save for new construction and it's the same