they'd get fingerprinted, those fingerprints stay in the data beas. whether or not they're charged with that, they're released, justice scalia pinted out, a traffic accident, whether or not people were charged. i'm having difficulty understanding how you can carve out from what the supreme court said your particular people, particularly when you have literally argued haskell v. harris to the supreme court in maryland vs. king. you made those arguments. >> the supreme court never mentioned haskell. >> they never -- we never -- we never mention our cases unless we're reversing it. >> they didn't mention other cases where they were talking about arrestees. i don't think article 3 courts retry other cases. >> i'm simply saying that they heard your argument, ve very ones you're making to us today, despite your desire that they would go in a different direction, scrussties kennedy's opinion, which was mentioned, started going down those points and scalia's interpretation of that, it seems to me that that -- that this distinction you're making on an as appli

different from fingerprinting. >> also different from fingerprinting? they keep them. >> and they periodically run them against the system to see fit matches any new prints entered into the system. >> i don't believe it has constitutional issues. the profile can be used, admittedly it's not being used right now but can be used for family searching. maybe not how it's being used now but why it's different from fingerprinting. >> let me ask you in a more concrete sense -- you're drawing the line at the judicial issue answer of probable cause is that correct? >> that's one of the lines, yes. that and the charging. >> charging or judicial determination. >> yes. >> so if somebody gets arrested and the person is released so this is no immediate charge but then there is. -- is a hiatus. under your line drawing, although the d.n.a. wasn't collected at the time of arrest, the law enforcement could not utilize that d.n.a. in any way, is that correct? >> not until there was a charge, some sort of judicial finding of probable cause. >> even though arrested, let's s

fingerprints, we give up fingerprints and loss of contact. the big difference about dna, , defending that dna data database by rest. now they are creating a database , and the thing or print doesn't carry with it all the biological

they get fingerprinted, those fingerprints stay in the database. whether or not they are charged or released and as justice out, in a traffic accident, whether or not people were charged. i'm having difficulty understanding how you can carve out from what the supreme court said, your particular people, particularly when you have literally argued haskell v. harris to the supreme court in maryland versus king, you made those arguments. >> the supreme court never mentioned haskell. >> they never mention our cases unless they are reversing it. >> they did mention other cases that it upheld or struck down d.n.a. testing of arrestees. i don't think that article iii courts secretly reach out to decide other cases and i don't think you can judge that based on -- i'm not simply citing this. i'm simply saying they heard your argument, the very ones you are making to us today, despite your desire that they would go in a different direction, justice kennedy's opinion, which the chief has just mentioned and points,going down those and scalia's interpretation of

are they being put in the back of these vans and fingerprinted? >> absolutely.e a story today a print store out website about a guy who was picked up and he was put in the back of a van and driven around for six hours while they found other people and other people they stopped for snacks, according to him. so, you know, he's shackled in three different places in the back of the fan, six hours waiting to get to the station and he was supposed to be picking up his kid and couldn't tell his wife that he couldn't go pick up the kid. >> how is that not racial profiling? people have to be raise that go question. >> absolutely. particularly the people there. because it's only really happening in latino neighborhoods. if they -- and i did ask ice that. if they go if in to a hispanic grocery story and am standing there and they decide to scan, they say, the other people, will i be detained and handcuffed and made to be fingerprinted. and the answer was, oh, no, not you. he couldn't tell me why i wouldn't fit in and others would. when they say they scan them they say they

it looked like someone took a fingerprint card. it was so perfect. >> there was dust atop the glass where the individual had gone over and hadn't touched in many months. the individual did not have any gloves on at the time and left a perfect fingerprint. the fingerprint is run through a national database that contains the prints of millions of noun criminals. but there is no match. the man who mystified police by making his olympic-style vault over the barrier has vanished into thin air. then less than a month later, the leaping bandit is back with another stunning takeover robbery. it's october 15th at the m and t bank on queens boulevard in forest hills. the pair of robbers follow the same m.o. they enter the bank, fire a shot into the air and then one of the men makes an incredible leap over the barrier. almost $14,000 goes missing. >> sure enough, second job came in, another shot fired over the bandit barrier. same m.o. >> a month later on november 23rd a third heist. the bank on lyndon boulevard in queens is hit by the leapin

you don't leave traces like with fingerprints. since it scans a vain pattern, looks for flowing blood. it is impossible to replicate your vane pattern. that is vain pattern. it is unique to every individual. melissa: how does this system work? >> this is retail point of sale terminal. i add a few items for you. a salad and -- melissa: this is like i'm sitting at a restaurant. i'm going to check out. i would need to have the screen here. >> right. the merchant would have this. the small business owner would have the machine. they would ring everything up for you. when you're ready to go, hit credit and turn it to you. melissa: i can say either swipe. get a little closer here, swipe or put your hand? >> just, yeah, scan your hand. and now, i'm sure -- melissa: we have a fake phone number for anyone watching over my shoulder here. a alas, the 555 you see on tv shows is not a real number. that's it? >> yep. melissa: basically looked at inside of my hand, the vein and blood flowing through it. >> it doesn't take an image. it converts t

they are handcuffing them, and then they are subjecting them to fingerprints. >> uncovered the carry program and some case file documents. >> it is not normally given to people, so we think emay have been accidental talk. >> what she found she says appears to be a blueprint for collaboration, phone local law enforcement and ice officials that launched nationwide in 2012. >> when we see ice vehicles driving around predominately latino areas of town, arresting people, and continuing to drive the vans around until they fill them up that's not targeted enforcement that's racial profiling. in november, the community took their ainge tore the streets and cities across the country. >> this protest culminated in a block kate of rush hour traffic for three hours. behind me another truck is trying to make it through, and proit is tors have put themselves in front of it. to protestors believe that obama turned owant they called an immigration dragnet, and he can turn it off. they just started their first arrest. the crowd is calling for obama to listen. they say the immigration system is broke

so that's a long time ago. >> the packet, there was the fingerprinting done. i did a check through our system and was clear. the only different stuff perhaps if there is an address change or things like that that are different from that. >> the reason i am looking for the application generally i look closely at the application and i noticed in prior ones sometimes that will bring up a little flag for us to look into previous employment history, any concerns at all i have seen so i feel uncomfortable voting on this without the information and i think for 2002 that's an old application and make sense to ask for a new application or updated application to moved from assistant patrol special to patrol special and given all of the problems that we had and compliance and make sure we're thorough and that's where i am when i saw the packet so i will vote no on this or ask for a continuance. that's where i am. >> commissioners any further questions? commissioner loftus. >> presumably you reviewed his application and maybe you just want to talk us through the steps tha

as a new report finds more than a million british students have given their fingerprints just so they can eat in the school canteen or burra in liberia but. international news and common live from moscow you're motional to international was made thanks for joining us human rights activists lawyers and journalists are standing shoulder to shoulder and preparing to march on the white house with one demand shut down guantanamo bay saturdays now the annual day of action has to protest twelve years of indefinite detention at the war on terror prison and as a tease us to see tricking our forwards age doesn't mellowed gone tunnel no one bit . hidden on a tropical island a symbol of promises made being far from promises kept will leave an appalling black mark in the history books unless the people who advocate for its continued existence when and if they win then i. suppose it's civilised values that america has will be gone forever twelve years ago the us brought to guantanamo its first detainees of the war on terror the us and powerful sections in the ruling class of the us want a place tha

after it was revealed that the fingerprinting of students has become a usual practice in schools the stories caused particular controversy after it was revealed almost a third of schools collected the data without consulting parents laura smith has the details. gone are the days when the only time you'd be off your fingerprints is if you were suspected of a crime nowadays they're starting them young at school to be precise research shows more than a million schoolchildren have been fingerprinted and their biometric data used to identify them for things like cash free lunches checking attendance and what. it is controversial the big brother watch is particularly worried about schools having access to this information and the car particularly when it's been collected without parents' consent and absolutely so it seems that over a million children in a single academic had this information collected so i think it's really necessary for schools to be transparent especially when it's related to very sensitive personal information what's your solution and obviously parental consent should b

this building fingerprint will be about 2 thousand square feet with 19 and a half feet in height. that's a high-level overview of the project and if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them and thank you for your attention and wish you a happy holiday season >> thank you. >> i'm tim johnson with the san francisco planning department. a copy of the draft certification eir certification memo is before you. because we tended to bring this to you la 90 month there's some dates we'll correct. the defrost eir was published on miracle 13. a public hearing was held before this body on april 14th. the comment period closed on april 30th and the comments to respond to the document was published and distributed on october 30th, 2013. the elevations didn't find that the mremths of the project would directly result in visible effects but because this is part of the improvement water system the project would contribute to the invaluable program impact and it can't be - this significant level impact is related to growth emancipation proclamation document. due to the projects contribu

you are going to sit down. >> i'm getting my fingerprints. >> i'm going to get my fingerprints. >> youerstand? >> we're go ing to do this again. >> after a minute, officer burnett returns and uncuffs the suspect a second time. >> all right. >> just off camera is campus police officer thomas shannon. >> officer burnett asked me to come back. he was having some problems with the suspect. the suspect turned to me and asked what i was doing back there. >> why did you come over here for. >> because i wanted to come over here. >> his reaction was almost like i was disrespecting him, as well. that what did you say to me? >> don't look at me like that. >> i will do what i want to do. >> oh, yeah. you are going to do what i tell you to do. don't disrespect me. don't disrespect me. >> put your hand down here. sit down. >> the second time he squares off, he's ready to go. blink of an eye the fight was on. >> burnett, who was unarmed, goes for his pepper spray, but bergen knocks him back with a blow to the neck. officer shannon uses his baton but it has little effect on the suspect. >> he ran righ

was like fingerprinting. if all of the things that you say about your particular clients are true, they would still nonetheless be fingerprinted and their fingerprints retained in a national data base just like the d.n.a. how do you distinguish that? the court made it very clear several times that d.n.a. and fingerprints are of the same, constitutionally one is a more modern technology. >> that is not how i read the case. d.n.a. is different from fingerprints. d.n.a. is our genetic blueprint. fingerprints have a history of being used to identify people, they do an excellent job of that. people who are arrested can be identified within minutes using their fingerprints. none of this is true with respect to d.n.a. and if the court had simply wanted to say there is no problem using d.n.a. anytime our system wants to use fingerprints whether it's in the criminal justice system or applying for a drivers license it could have said. so instead king as required by other cases engages in a new totality of the circumsta

. >> this is the rifle that has the fingerprints of james earl ray on it. >> everyone wanted a guiltyg is true or not, because james earl ray said it, i would say it's a pure toss-up. >> when a police team stopped for a rest break at this firehouse, patrolman gene douglas was left in a car outside to monitor the radio. >> i heard a noise, like a shot, well, it was more like a rifle. that's when everybody inside the firehouse started running out saying "king's been shot, king's been shot." >> douglas reached for his radio mic. >> we have information king has been shot at the lorraine. >> captain ray raced out of police headquarters heading to the scene. there, on south main street, he saw a bundle abandoned in the recessed doorway of a record store, right below the rooming house. the store owner told him two customers saw a man run by. >> there was two black gentlemen in there that had told him that a white fellow had dropped it there, and then had gotten in a white mustang and drove off. >> the bundle was covered with a green bedspread, this one. >> i took the bedspread off and looked

a lot of the days when the teeny tiny b l t o fingerprint is if he was suspected of crying. nowadays that's daunting and be on the school to be precise with that saves more than a mini eggs schoolchildren had being fingerprinted and that biometric dates we used to identify credit for things like tax free lump states taking attendance. onions look like the pics that borrowing. it is called to the chalet big brother what she's been taking any weight about schools having access to this information ideas and the cop that a key when it's being corrected without parents' consent. citi said it seems that over a million children in a single academic can't hide this information collected to second guess me the necessary skills to transpower inspection you it's great that a sense of misinformation. what's the city's an adult is the breadth of things and save the soul does not and how can we make so for some but the stakes raised its target was tilted weeks ago well the face agent and sit back and saying that the bike seat is taking place isn't taking the old state that penance the cit

reregistration includes getting photographed, fingerprinted and of course paying a fee.orney and radio host ebony williams said it is about time but emily miller is outraged about this. she is a writer at the washington times and the author of emily gets her gun. emily, welcome back. great to have you here. thanks to both of you. emily, you are a gun owner living in d.c. which is a real minority? >> yeah, legal. there are criminals with guns. >> and you wrote the book to talk about just how difficult it was to go through the whole process. what is your reaction to the new law? >> well i'm outraged by it. this is the first time in american history for those who are law abiding and registering our gun, which i think is a violation of the fourth amendment, and pay $30, a gun tax, like there is any tax on any bill of rights, it is outrageous. and so this will be settled in the court. dick heller who overturned the ban in the supreme court, the original ban is appealing this as well. but it is not fair. the criminals are going out and getting their guns on the streets and the

fingerprints, more than two dozen. multiple footprints in and around the trail where kim's body was dragged through the river. and on the truck near the passenger door a palm print in blood. the fbi looked at the print, said it would have to have been left by the killer. >> we worked very, very, very, very hard at determining whose that was. >> why kim nees? it wasn't a robbery or a sexual assault. people do talk. and around town the story was that this was, well, call it a jealousy killing. kim was popular, she was attractive, she was class valedictorian, the boys loved her, and she was about to leave poplar behind for good. so the story was that this was local kids, mostly girls, who beat her to death. so went the rumor. >> that was one of the, again, if you will, the theories that folks around town had is that there may have been three or four of kim's peers that were involved with her death. >> bobby clencher heard the talk. she lived down the block from the nees family. >> what did you hear? >> her grandfather had