commission certification of the final environmental impact report for the museum expansion , firehouse relocationd housing project. the objections raised to the board are related to the eir's project description, the evaluation of visual impact, and concerns related to site access and circulation. as our repeal response states, these issues have been addressed sufficiently in the final eir. the staff has indicated the response is adequate. the appellant has not presented substantial elements to the contrary. the appellate clem's this is not accurate because the final expansion design may differ from these dramatic design analyzed in the eir. proposed height, masson, square footage, location, and open space access matched those described and analyzed in the eir. the level of the project description the tilt is typical of eir's prepared in san francisco. the staff considers its sufficient to understand the physical attributes of the proposed museum expansion. the appellate claims that the expense would -- the effect of the east-facing windows of the hotel would be considerable. the question is whet