we should be engaging on the fisa amendments act right now.e should be engaging substantively on executive order 12333 and try to figure what limitations and what protections we can put into place for that authority as well trying to make sure again that we are comply with international standards that every other country that the signatory complies with. in regards to necessity and proportionality of surveillance. the final thing we should be looking at is trying to come again i think there's a necessity to read the tea leaves about what the court was saying on the commercial aspect of safe harbor and looking towards potentially a comprehensive privacy law in the united states, something that many civil society groups capital pushing for an trying to put into place protections so that a next time the court of justice revisited the subpoena they don't strike it out under consumer protection elements as well. for congress does have a huge role to play here i think. >> going to turn to adam and gail to see if any thoughts. damien, i figure you do

i would hand-deliver it to the fisa court.i ever got caught not doing that i would expect at least i would be fired and probably i would be put in jail. >> mr. mayor, thank you for being with us. powerful case you are making. sounds like she may need a criminal defense attorney. >>> up next right here on "hannity --" >> the nra's position reminds me of negotiating with the iranians or the communists. there's no possible discussion. >> your friend mr. obama gave the iranians 1 $50 million a horrible dispushing comparison made by hillary clinton. >>> later tonight -- >> let me say right here, no more passive tolerance in britain! >> maybe time for the president to lerparn a thing or two from to lerparn a thing or two from prime minister cam on. to lerparn a thing or two from prime minister cam on. just like eddie, the first step to reaching your retirement goals is to visualize them. then, let the principal help you get there. join us as we celebrate eddie's retirement, and start planning your own. ♪song: "that's life" ♪song: "t

collection of other forms of intensely personal information have been conducted outside of fisa under a separate set of guidelines. 12333 first introduced by reagan in 1981 provides the framework. while the full scope of collection is not publicly known, i'm just going to discuss briefly a couple of the programs we now know about. under one program called mystic, the nsa collects all telephone traffic to, from, and within certain countries and in some cases, the content as well. a leaked nsa document notes that one of these programs processes over 100 million calls per day. notably, some of these systems appear not to be used for traditional foreign intelligence purposes, define narcotics, trafficking, for smuggling, sounding a lot like a writ of assistance. basically, traditional law enforcement concerns. it extends beyond communications to e-mail, address books and con taft list. web mail and chats are collected under 12333. gchq is one of our big headquarters in the you kingdom. from 2008 to 2010, they reference a program called optic nerve in which yahoo! webcam collections were c

the section 702 that amy is talking about from the fisa amendments act has that theme within it. section 702 does talk about foreign residents' controls. the privacy oversight board did a review of 702. i point you to that for more detailed discussions of 702. gail, i want to ask you a question. damien did a great job of summarizing the decision and what it was talking about. as amy pointed out, it talks a lot about, perhaps not wholly adequately, but in amy's opinion, in broad strokes, consistent with u.s. surveillance activities. do you think that the court should have looked at eu surveillance and national security issues as well as a comparison? >> so thank you, and first of all, i want to thank -- >> is your mic on? >> yes. >> cool. >> i want to thank you for having me here today. the light is on. >> go closer. >> can you hear me now? okay. so to reiterate, i wanted to say thanks to the internet caucus for having me here today. my name is gail slater, i'm here from the internet association. to answer your question, i think absolutely yes is the short answer. i can explain wh

other forms of personal information have also been undere of fisa guidelines. first internet -- first introduced by reagan in 1981 provide the framework. while the full scope is not underwent program called mystic, the nsa protections -- the nsa collects data from countries and in some cases, the content as well. systems some of these appear not to be for foreign intelligence purposes, such as narcotics trafficking or smuggling. basically, traditional law enforcement concerns. ,he data being collected extends to e-mail lists. chq, is one of our big partners, the nsa counterpart in the united kingdom. 2008-2010, g-8 cq files -- --whether the user was a foreign intelligence target. during 16-month period, they collected data from 8 million yahoo! users. turns out that nudity is a big problem, they are trying to figure out ways to keep the regions from looking all the nude photographs but they are finding it hard to filter out. not messages are similarly immune. the nsa collected almost 200 million text messages per day globally, using them to ascertain travel pla

i am not advocating that one thing required me to do was to go to the of fisa it took about a week therely to retreat i had them cited the opinion i gave the in english it is not classified [laughter] it is interesting but when the president of ghana support was in my office trying to figure out how to read figure this out? why don't the people of the united states listen? good question. i tell her it is the process taking 200 years but there was a time and to oklahoma were the descendants live to this day. i love that story the governor that i can remember standing there in the face of the order this is after brown v board of education. no more segregation. 1955 what has changed? said judge says the governor says no you may have a court order but i have the state police. eisenhower has to make that decision because they went in and said to the president i will integrate said he told the press the opposite. eisenhower got pretty a agreed that he had to figure out what to do and governor of south carolina that he said to eisenhower if you send the troops be prepared for a second reconstru

fisa relates to the oil pipeline but is there an opportunity for the department of energy to modernize and improve the safety of oil pipelines? whether a safety standpoint? >> a critical question with the aging of our energy infrastructure. i personally think and while doing it making it much more resilient to the risks we are seeing. such you have the responsibilities secretary fox is concerned about this week to work to provide technical assistance we don't have the regulatory authority for technical assistance. >> looking at the infrastructure we include safety even with their broader jurisdiction so it has a broad implication and again and we are deeply concerned to see the devastation to make sure that pipelines are open and safe. >> thanks for appearing. we talk about energy and national security to of a domestic source of enriched uranium. also for the commercial power plants with the proliferation and around the world so with that capability as when the notices were given to have 236 employees with the centrifuge project they are angry understandably. with the cent angry unders

collection of other forms of personal information have also been outside of fisa under guidelines. executive order 12 333 introduced in 1981 provide the framework. while the full scope is not discuss some of the programs. under one program called mystic, the nsa collects data from countries and in some cases, the content as well. a leaked nsa document notes some process systems hundreds of calls per day. some of these systems appear not to be for foreign intelligence purposes, such as narcotics trafficking or smuggling. sounding like a writ of assistance. basically, traditional law enforcement concerns. the data being collected, extends to e-mail lists. and contact lists. webcam images and chat sections appear to be collected. gchq, is one of our big partners, the nsa counterpart in the united kingdom. from 2008-2010, gchq -- whether referenced a program called optic nerve in which webcam chats were collected in bulk regardless of whether the user was a foreign intelligence target. during one 6-month period, they collected visual data from 8 -- 1.8 million yahoo! users. turns out t

other forms of personal information have also been undere of fisa guidelines. first internet -- first introduced by reagan in 1981 provide the framework. while the full scope is not underwent program called mystic, the nsa protections -- the nsa collects data from countries and in some cases, the content as well. systems some of these appear not to be for foreign intelligence purposes, such as narcotics trafficking or smuggling. basically, traditional law enforcement concerns. ,he data being collected extends to e-mail lists. chq, is one of our big partners, the nsa counterpart in the united kingdom. 2008-2010, g-8 cq files -- --whether the user was a foreign intelligence target. during 16-month period, they collected data from 8 million yahoo! users. turns out that nudity is a big problem, they are trying to figure out ways to keep the regions from looking all the nude photographs but they are finding it hard to filter out. not messages are similarly immune. the nsa collected almost 200 million text messages per day globally, using them to ascertain travel pla

one of the things that did not speak to is section 702 and other sections of the fisa amendment acts with this case was filed under. it had small steps forward on transparency, but it does not really change any of the practices or have any real substantive modification of the surveillance authority. big wayne,authority. big win, but does not touch what we are talking about in this case. the question was, does the case accurately describes surveillance? so, actually, the european court of justice decision only mentioned prison once, but what they mention is this discriminate type of surveillance that is happening in the us, and so from a perspective that you are not looking at aa specific program but 702, executive order 120003, yes, that is happening. they say that it was exactly technically proper with regard to 702, there were some inaccuracies as regard to how surveillances conducted, but the overall general programs they are describing in the court order can happen, are happening, and it is because the us does not recognize any rights for people outside the us. and discriminate s

that can manifest effort in everything from sort of skepticism towards different deals, for instance, fisa, or bidding for -- or ge bidding for a french company, can't remember the name right now. and sort of how the politics around these deals came to be very sensitive and very controversial. we're seeing in today's financial times, an interview with the ceo of barclay's bank who is making this case for a european champion in investment banking, feeling that american investment banks are getting too competitive. that is the sort of all-time government interference in economy that we're seeing and it's going to sort of garnish companies and governments to become most closer, sometimes with a crony type of regs. that's the context i see, which translates itself into a new type of scenario for global trade where trade is going to grow far my slowly in the future thanked did in the past 25 years. are going to see re-orientation of the structure of trade, partly because asia, emerging markets have developed to that point in the economy where they begin to integrate much more regionally than th

we would need a title three order or fisa court order. >> my question was though, does the fbi request, maybe you don't, manufacturers to put a device in the phone itself to obtain that back door information, to have it available, then a warrant obtained. >> no. >> don't request that? >> nope. >> okay. >> when we collect information it is pursuant, we're talking about the consent of people's communication or what they have stored on a device, we do it through a court order. we don't do it through asking someone that made the device to give us access to it voluntarily. >> when you say court order, talking about a warrant or some other type of court order? >> either a search warrant from judge to open locked device or order from federal judge either in national security case or criminal case if we're looking to intercept communication as it is moving. >> i think that the fourth amendment applies to that type of procedure, and you, you're saying the fbi complies with the law, the fourth amendment, obtaining that information. >> yes the fourth amendment is part of the fine of the fbi. >> i

he should not be fisa bears are going to maintain him and definitely not. >> 32 out of 32.he way continues to play out as you said it's early. jack harris is a very back-and-forth in st. johns east and we will keep our eye on that but you are looking at parliament of canada were there wouldn't be a single opposition member in the fordlandia provinces. >> you would have some senators though. mike duffy would be conservative senator and honestly that is a part of the story we would have to talk about. if you don't have anyone else except liberals in atlantic canada then you have to start wondering about the importance of senators to give some balance in some weight to the legislative process going forward and you would see representation from some other senators in that area that would represent other parties. that would start a conversation about what the senate is really about which provides that regional balance that you might see there. that would be astounding. if you hadn't any opposition party representing the whole swath of the country. >> there has been smooth so far