they presented that evidence to the fisa court. and they represented to the fisa court that they had independent evidence to warrant an investigation of this court that ought to be treated with hallow respect. it was abused over comey's watch -- >> sean: who told him about the dossier when? he didn't know who paid for it? this is not adding up. i did get to disclose gregg jarrett's office is two doors down from mine. >> thanks for being with us. >> sean: we have so much more coming. bill cosby, and more. don't touch the dial. roundup for lawns has arrived to put unwelcome lawn weeds to rest. so draw the line. roundup for lawns is formulated to kill lawn weeds to the root without harming a single blade of grass. roundup, trusted for over forty years. but he hasoke up wwork to do.in. so he took aleve. if he'd taken tylenol, he'd be stopping for more pills right now. only aleve has the strength to stop tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. aleve. all day strong. why people everywhere are upgrading their water filter to zer

regarding fisa abuse. and people keep saying fisa, but for everyone should know, it's the foreign intelligence surveillance act. it's why the clinton probe ended and why the trump-russia probe began. it appears that for political gain, key federal employees at the f.b.i. and the department of justice deliberately misled our fisa courts and pursued a partisan political agenda. the fisa memo detailed -- detailing these abuses of power stated, and i quote, top obama administration officials knowingly used unfair verified information paid for by the hillary clinton campaign, some of which came from russian intelligence in a secret court document to justify a counterintelligence investigation of the trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election. the corrupt process was later the basis for a campaign to sabotage the incoming trump administration and to fuel a witchhunt against the president. the american people deserve to know if our government is misusing powerful surveillance methods to exact political

judge to get a fisa warrant?act did that, i would imagine -- >> sean: lanny, i got to believe on your side of the aisle, you have a civilea libertarian streak in you and i think you feel as i do. s the fbi can't put it in a fisa application, unverified information.fi they can't omit that one candidate paid for the russian lies that came from a foreign national. you can't omit that to a judge.t god help you. >> first of all, i want to address the double standard i'm hearing. donald trump praised james comey for sending that letter. >> sean: stick to the issue. you can't lie to a -- >> the fisa warrant was constructed by several layers oo people at the justice department and approved -- >> sean: is it wrong to use unverified information for a judge? yes or no? >> it is certainly wrong if it was intentionally false and unverified. >> sean: if they didn't now, then they didn't know. >> let me go back to the topic at hand, guys. i agree with david once in a b while, that when james comey held a press conference, and c

>> by not telling the fisa court, it's totally inappropriate.mation and they have a duty and obligation to tell the court everything they know. but sean, let's go back to when we were first briefed about the dossier. we, congress. so we heard in mr. comey'sir interview, what he said, what president trump's reaction was to learning what the dossier. he talked about why he didn't tell president trump that it was paid for by his political opponents.hy well, there are other people that are important in this, like the united states congress. i was in the meeting with senator mcconnell, speaker of the house paul ryan, and many others. he had ample opportunity in early 2017 to tell us who paid for the dossier. we were briefed on the dossier. i can tell you, if they would have brought up, if the fbi would have presented to us on the day that this information was paid for by the democratic party -- forget the fact that it was used -- >> sean: it wasn't verified. >> it wasn't verified. we knew it wasn't verified at the time because they told us it wasn't

it was a small part of the fisa application.is not what grassley, graham, and devin nunes said. they said it was the bulk. >> it was certainly the lead. >>ee if they didn't need it, thy should have not included at. >> sean: andrew mccabe, remember the report was. outcome of the dossier, there were not have been an application. contradicted, a collusion force between mccabe and comey. we welcome you back. you've been away for a bit. >> thank you. may i say that general sessions, i finally agree with him when he says, no second special counsel. >> sean: not yet. >> let the inspector general do his job. >> sean: this law has to go away. thank you both. when we come back, kanye west still sticking up for president trump, the left is viciously attacking him. wee will speak with a conservative woman who started kanye's tweed storm, candace owens, right here in studio withpa daryl parks. that's straight ahead. ♪ ♪look into my eyes ♪you will see ♪what you mean to me ♪don't tell me it's not worth trying for♪ ♪you know it's true ♪everythi

bombshell secret texts show fbi, doj may have rushed anti-trump fisa warrants.ccording to sara carter, congressional investigators have discovered new text messages between anti-trump fbi agents, lovebirds, peter strzok and lisa page that show possible coordination between the fbi and the doj to get a fisa warrant to spy on the trump campaign associate, carter page. in one of the text messages,s, sara, strzok is whining and complaining to page that a warrant in the investigation is being held up. one of the congressional investigators is telling sara tonight, "everything here from the texts, complaining about fisa delays to the exchanges indicating coordination, to the white house visitors log, it seems to match to ach disturbing degree. at best, it's a strange coincidence worth investigating. it's much likely more." you have the fbi using an unverified clinton bought and paid for dossier as part of fisa application, then they rushed to get a fisa warrant approved, new evidence points to coordination between the obama white house, the fbi, doj, and the cia. sara

jesse: they are investigating the abuse of the fisa court.hey presented a dossier that was salacious and unverified. that's a crime, you are not allowed to do that. the white house chief of staff was involved in pushing the investigation forward with the fbi counter-intelligence people. and harry reid was involved and briefed by the cia director and wrote a letter to james comey urging the opening of the investigation. when you were being surveilled, were you talking to donald trump and people in the campaign? >> i have never spoken to donald trump in my entire life. jesse: that's huge news. the way the media spins it, you are a central figure. >> they approved my fisa warrant october 1, 016. the following friday i sent a letter to the organization of security and cooperation in vienna protesting the election abuse in terms of violations of human rights and a lot of the steps. jesse: you sent a letter. >> and i forwarded a copy of that on to several of the people in the campaign. jesse: that was the extent of it? jesse: they charged you with

but if he didn't know, and they presented it to a fisa court in a fisa application to spy on an american, in my opinion, a violation of law and fbi protocol, what a colossal admission, that we will spy on americans, may be possible, with russian lies that were paid for. it may be possible to get a warrant to spy on an american. you should be outraged, spitting mad over that. >> i'm not really. >> sean: i can tell. >> sorry. the dossier was a part of a number of sources that were used to get the fisa application -- >> it was the bulk of it. >> the bulk of -- is that all of it or a majority? >> it is gross misconduct on the court to. >> you are not a lawyer. there are a number of people who will go to that for christopher's deal, they have used his intelligence throughout the years. >> it's not only that, jessica. he also lied under oath about liking. he definitely leaks. >> unclassified material. >> he doesn't determine what is classified or not. also, it's his fbi memo. that is the fbi property. government property, theft of it, misdemeanor. leaking classified, that is a felony. not watc

to obtain a fisa warrant. >> there was a lot more than the dossier and a fisa application?my recollection is a was a significant amount of material about page. the dossier was part of that but was not all of it or a critical part of it. my recollection. >> tucker: i don't know that it's been -- hiding behind government secrecy once again. congressman trey gowdy represents south carolina in the house of representativesec and e joins us tonight. >> the two agents that were leading both the clinton and trump investigations should have beenos canned. director comey's recollection is flawed. if he does not remember telling congress that his agents told him, they didn't think flynn was lying, that he needs to get his lawyers to go back and look at the transcript. we did not miss here. maybe he misspoke. that is in the transcript. the double standard that he's had for the last couple of weeks still exists. clinton can lie and she had to be president, mccabe can lie and he is a stand-up guy about trump, boy, if he tells any lies at all, then impeachment is too good of a remedy for

we have a problem with our fisa courts in this country. >> if you look at the case for fisa, they led with the biggest majority of the application was spent discussing the dossier saying it wasn't necessary to get the report. the problem here is the facts definitively demonstrated if you didn't have the dossier and the salacious charges, you wouldn't get the fisa court's attention. without the fisa court to have something to wrap its head around, you wouldn't get the surveillance permissions. the papadopoulos information, the dossier and a couple other resources that were included in the application have their original roots stemming back to the hillary clinton campaign. this was a fundamental witch hunt based on a partisan son. >> that's not correct. >> julie: we're out of time. but if comey is a credible keeper of facts after he distributed the classification of memos without seeking clearance -- final word, richard. >> couple things there. number 1, the george papadopoulos and the fisa courts are distinct. what happened to carter page in the devin nunes memo is distinct from what t

i don't expect a revision of fisa, because the justice or department does not fisa. fisa regulates them. david: scary stuff. judge, thank you very much. >> you're welcome. melissa: retail data of thousands of -- david: saks buyers here. tell me more. >> i shouldn't be filing, i feel like every single week we're hearing a new story every week. this comes from hudson bay company, parent of lord & taylor, yes they have been compromised. they will reach out to any customers. during the time of may 2017 all the way until march 2018. that is just last month. five million customers have been hit. not all the customers have been hit. gemini a cybersecurity firm is saying a russian hacking group is behind this entire cybersecurity threat right now, they're slowly starting to sell credit card numbers on line. they haven't sold all of them just yet. this comes at a time for hb s hudsons bay company. they are going through changes. their ceo left just last october. you're seeing the stock price right now, it has been trending lower over the last little while because they turned

obtain a fisa warrant. >> bret: it was a lot more than the dossier in the fisa application. >> my recollection was there was a significant amount of additional material about page and why there was probable cause to believe he was an agent of a foreign power. and the dossier was part of that but was not all of it or a critical part of it. my recollection -- >> bret: intel briefing at trump tower you briefed the president-elect on the sliver of the dossier, really the salacious part about the prostitutes in moscow and that allegation. >> correct. >> bret: didn't include anything broader than that, correct? >> correct. my mission this that private briefing was just to tell him about that slice of it. >> bret: and who suggested you brief that? >> i think the director of national intelligence did and explained the logic of why it made sense for me to do it, which i agreed with. >> bret: that briefing was just oral. just talking. >> right. just the two of us talking to each other. >> bret: cnn roared a time you handed two page summary of the dossier over to him. >> did i not. >> bret: did not. spea

you use it before a fisa judge.avid, why again do i feel, if anybody in our audience, if i did, you did it, sara did it, we'd be locked up. you don't lie to a judge. if i am one of those four fisa judges, i would be apoplectic. i want to know what they think tonight. >> i would imagine the fisa k judges are outraged and they want a lot more information. in any circumstance, a prosecutor is not permitted toto lie or omit evidence, information when getting a warrant. but the fisa court of all things, since 1978 has been recognized as the exception. it's a secret court. a a court in which the governmentt makes ex parte unilateral submissions. they must be above board, the full disclosure at all times. i will tell you this, the government is being a bit selective, mr. comey andou othe, with what they want to disclose. another thing, those memos, the president asked about whether -- mr. flynn, comey said he would tell them but in the future there's a different protocol. can't be selective in those kinds of disclosures. >

then it's linked to the fisa application.he whole thing is crooked from the jump. >> just think about this. you have this hillary investigation about her mishandling fisa information. peter strzok is the main agent on that. you and i will agree the fix was in. but how does that guy then start to open an investigation of trump's campaign? do they not have any other agents at the fbi? he was the one who said when you interview hillary, don't go in with gun's blazing, she is going to be the next president. he's testing page saying we can't take the risk of a trump presidency. we need an insurance policy. this is a guy who should have never been involved in either of those investigations. this guy needs to be fired from the fbi. jesse: he's still work and collecting a paycheck. some of the horrible things he said about donald trump like you said, protecting the country against his presidency and needing an insurance policy. then he was the one who conducted the flynn interview. snuck up on flynn and flynn never even had a lawyer.

i'm -- >> take what out of the fisa court? >> let's take sort of the question about submitting false information because this is -- lawyers and prosecutors, like all lawyers, we look to precedent. we look to cases that we've investigated and prosecuted before. and i'm unaware, again, having done this a long long time, i'm unaware of any prosecution in the fisa court context. now, much better to look at it in terms of what ron does every day, which is defend and file these kind of motions in state and federal court. officers all the time submit affidavits and search warrants, search warrant applications to judges, state and federal. and defense lawyers all the time challenge those based on both omissions and false or reckless information. and again, it's a process whereby the motions are filed. there's a hearing. and the sides testify under oath and -- >> i was going to say -- >> there's no defense there to present the other side. >> well, one second here because the -- yes, it is, the way they got the warrant. however we know

and we's looking at fisa abuse. but i don't think that's the case.se are two entirely separate issues. hey's u.s. attorney, allowed to have private opinions on certain policy areas. but when it comes to his job we have to reason to believe that he has ever deliberately skewed an investigation to an outcome he would prefer. eric: i hear people watching, what about the strzok-page e-mails were private opinions. many think that infiltrated the investigation. finally met me head you the attorney general's letter dealing with mr. huber, he says, i am confident that mr. huber's review will contain an objective review of the matters that is consistent with the law and the facts. i receive regular updates from mr. huber and will receive his recommendation as to whether me matters not currently under investigation should be opened, require further resources or whether they merit the appointment of a special counsel. what's so interesting is this guy, mr. huber, he's been on the job since november and there's been really no leaks. and the only time anyone real

who lied to trump, mishandled the fisa court system, may be lysed to the fisa court judges. leaked privileged government documents, failed to apply the law equally which should be everybody's concern. comey is now set to make millions of dollars off this impending book tour, all while trashing the president the whole way. again, i say to mr. comey, i am making you an offer you can't refuse. come on the show. you get the whole hour. i am on 570 radio stations with 14 million , 15 million listeners. promote your book and i will ask you tough, fair questions. also, we cannot forget the u.s. preparing to respond to syria's gas attack. the president sending a clear warning to russian president vladimir putin. taking to twitter earlier today. "russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at syria. get ready russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and "smart!" you shouldn't be partners with a gas killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it!" then the president continued. "our relationship with russia is worse now than it has ever been, and that includes the

the part of it not being part of the fisa application, why did you use it at all?t was just wrong. it was an indispensable part of the application period. >> tucker: how can he claim otherwise? his first reaction is you can't prove me wrong because you and the rest of civilians are asking these questions and you don't have access to the relevant information. you do, you've seen it. that forms a central part of the request. correct? >> there are three parts of it. this is one of the parts. they lead with it and it occupied a disproportionately large part of that. i go back and ask if it wasn't important, then why did you use it? why did you use it and why did you lead with it? >> tucker: lets a strip away the politics so we can see clearly. at the core is the allegation of carter page, the hapless carter page was acting as the former director said tonight, the agent of a foreign power. is that a plausible claim question what do you think any reasonable person can reach the conclusion that carter page is a russian agent? >> it would be tough. i think most people who

they lied to the fisa judges. remember they never disclosed to paid for this. make no mistake. this was campaign opposition research bought and paid for by clinton, her campaign, funneled through the law firm, put together by a foreign agent based on russian and russian government lies and used as evidence to get a warrant during a political campaign against an opposition party all the while comey and his cohorts, they never disclosed the true nature of this document, and they lied to the fisa court judge. that is a crime which brings us to our next top story. the democrats laughable lawsuit against the trump campaign, wikileaks, and russia. we know this court filed conspiracy theory. it's nothing. please understand. it's a desperate publicity stunt. breaking tonight, then dnc's brand-new lawsuit revealing what is almost an unbelievable double standard. we told you about the anti-trump dossier. they presented it to the fisa court to get the warrant. nearly every night we have talked about it. the dossier that was used to get the warrant that supposedly links trump to russia in

you mentioned fisa. today, carter page, the fisa argument has been around him. was it okay that he was spied on looking for anything let alone collusion, and he says yeah, i want my fisa application out there. >> and carter page, maybe he did something bad, talking to people he shouldn't have. i don't know. i don't care. if he's the means by which we get to see the fisa application, redact it. i understand it. most people understand that. but we deserve to see what is on that application. we deserve to see side by side the people charged in the mueller investigation and the people that weren't charged in the hillary clinton e-mail server investigation. if they did the exact same thing and if so far there's a discrepancy. >> jessica, why do you think there's a stall? did politics play a role? >> i think politics play a role in everything goes on. something that we can't escape. partisans are more likely to give the benefit of the doubt. to kennedy's point, if carter page wants the warrant out there, that's fine. but the mueller investigation kicked off because of

and how they lied to fisa court justice. won't the justice department release the unredacted fbi memo that devin nunes of the house intel committee has been demanding? what was used, of course, to justify the entire russia collusion investigation to begin with? now, this is more than frustrating and just one more example that we now live in a country with a two tiered justice system. this is what i have been warning you about. the fbi is more than capable of tracing a russia collusion investigation some thousand a porn star and door of donald trump's personal attorney, michael cohen. but the justice department of the united states of america is slow-walking and purposefully not even releasing documents they have in their possession. that has been subpoenaed by the united states congress, the judiciary committee, the intel committee. it is shameful. this should alarm every person watching this broadcast tonight. we'll have a lot more on that in a few minutes. alan dershowitz, sara carter and gregg jarrett are all here. while

obtain a fisa warrant. >> bret: there was a lot more than the dossier in the fisa application. >> myollection was there was a significant amount of additional material about page and why there was probable cause to believe he was an agent of a foreign power and thes to yea was part of that. but was not all of it or a critical part of it to my recollection. >> the disgraced former director is also under fire for saying the dirty dossier did not play a significant role in the fisa warrant of the trump campaign associate. even though two congressional memos blatantly dispute this. take a look. >> when did you learn that the dnc and hillary clinton campaign had funded christopher steele's work? >> yeah, i still don't know that for a fact. >> bret: what do you mean? >> i have only seen it in the media. i never knew exactly which democrats had funded -- you knew it was funded first by republicans. >> bret: but that's not true. >> i'm sorry? >> bret: that's not true. that the dossier that christopher steele worked on was funded by republicans. >> my understanding his work started funded by

warrant, it used to be even the existence of a fisa warrant or existence of the fisa court was something that public officials didn't even want to acknowledge. but now we know that you and many other officials are among those who at one point or another signed off on applications for a surveillance warrant against this guy who at one point was part of the trump campaign. nearly a dozen members of congress this week said that every official who signed off on those warrant applications, including you, should be prosecuted for doing so, that that fisa warrant is a scandal and that carter page was wronged. what do you make of that whole line of criticism? >> i don't think it's based in substance or law a genuine concern for the integrity of the fisa process, which is incredibly rigorous and overseen by federal judges. >> carter page was an adviser to the president's campaign. from what we know in terms of him being mentioned in other court cases, including a russian spy ring wrapped up here in new york, which he was in contact with, it seems from that there was a reasonable cause to at least

he signed the fisa warrant. he signed one of the fisa warrants on carter page. we note dossier was the bulk on the fisa warrants. >> how come we never talk about the washington "free beacon"? we never talk about that part of it. judge jeanine: sarah, wait. chris, stop trying to change the topic. the issue is whether jim comey leaked. and whether it's classified or unclassified is not the issue. if you listen to my open it's a violation of the federal records act and the reason people have to get approval from the court to get a 302. this guy isn't god. >> i would love to see a prosecutor bring that case. judge jeanine: let's take a listen to the president. president trump: if our justice department was doing the right thing, they would be and lot tougher right now object those people. because there is tremendous crime and corruption on the other side. judge jeanine: is the justice department going to do anything. >> i do believe they will. they are right now. remember, this started since last year, in the fall of last year when attorney general jeff sessions put

and then it was used as the basis to get a fisa warrant.hat's what makes this whole circus so frustrating. and i think it puts the entire justice department in a very bad light. if they used information paid for by hillary and the dnc, manufactured in order to hurt donald trump, in order to use the power of the federal government to stosm' all over him. then the very heart of our great rub is at stake. that's why this is not a small thing. i think james comey has a lot more to answer for. i thought nate silver, the "new york times" analyst had the best line. he said this book should have been called a "higher royalty." it was about james comey getting the most of amount of mofny he could and cash in on his 15 minutes of fame. jesse: people try to make money often do *. nobody cares what comey has to say. it's all about what he said about the donald. he's admitting in the book the dossier is unverified and he's not sure if it's true. you are not allowed to submit something like that to a fisa court. i can't believe this guy actually was the

they presented it to the fisa court to get the warrant.early every night we have w talked about it. the dossier that was used to get the warrant that supposedly links trump to russia in the most salacious, embarrassing ways, that was never verified. in this lawsuit, it is nowhere to be found. it's not even in there. let's lie to the judge but not the next judge. okay, i really understand this. the democrats along with a clinton campaign were the ones that paid a foreign spy to piece together this document on russian lies and rumors and so-called russian intelligence. listen to what chairman nunes had to say about this totally embarrassing political hail mary. take a look. >> we know who colluded with russians. they don't want to admit that they colluded with russians but they hired fusion gps. they hired a law firm that hired fusion gps that hired a british spy that colluded with russia. i don't understand why they didn't just open up a lawsuit against themselves. they should name themselves and sue themselves so they can get to the bottom

obtain a fisa warrant. >> bret: there was a lot more than the dossier in the fisa application. >> myollection was there was a significant amount of additional material about page and why there was probable cause to believe he was an agent of a foreign power and thes to yea was part of that. but was not all of it or a critical part of it to my recollection. >> the disgraced former director is also under fire for saying the dirty dossier did not play a significant role in the fisa warrant of the trump campaign associate. even though two congressional memos blatantly dispute this. take a look. >> when did you learn that the dnc and hillary clinton campaign had funded christopher steele's work? >> yeah, i still don't know that for a fact. >> bret: what do you mean? >> i have only seen it in the media. i never knew exactly which democrats had funded -- you knew it was funded first by republicans. >> bret: but that's not true. >> i'm sorry? >> bret: that's not true. that the dossier that christopher steele worked on was funded by republicans. >> my understanding his work started funded by

ed: i bet congress also wants to know about fisa address.wspaper yes, sir next hour -- devin nuÑes next hour, we'll can ask him about that. thank you for your help. >>> the founder of bet is saying it is helping african-americans. watch. >> what's happening in the labor force and the job market. when you look at african-american unemployment, you've got to say something is going right. ed: something is going right. we'll break down the economy and more with charles payne coming up. plus, what will our national garden troops be doing once they actually get to the border? the man who oversaw the bush era deployment is here with some insight next. ♪ ♪ ed: back with a green jacket edition of the headlines. president trump coming to his epa chief scott pruitt's defense saying he's doing a, quote, great job. the president said in a tweet: while security spending was somewhat more than his predecessor, scott pruitt has received death threats because of his bold actions while saving the usa billions of dollars. meanwhile, florida governor rick scott

do you have a fisa order on mike flynn? was he asking if mike flynn is currently under surveillance or if mike flynn is under a serious form of investigation? do you know what he was getting at by asking you that? >> not for sure. i think he was asking is there current electronic surveillance under the foreign intelligence surveillance act of the national security adviser. >> and you did give him an answer? >> correct. and then told him that the way that should work is you should go to ask the justice department. they'll figure out whether they can answer the question and they'll get back. >> was it improper for you to tell him directly in that moment? >> i didn't think so. i hesitated because i thought i'm trying to illustrate how it should work and i made a judgment in the moment that the answer -- that i was confident that if the president's chief of staff, white house counsel, asked the justice department they would get the answer so i could give the answer in the moment and use it toily v illus it going forward. >> so

rosenstein is implicated in the fisa abuse issue because he signed off on one of the fisa applicationsa mess. stormy daniels isn't going to save the mueller operation. the president is focusing on removing robert mueller. lou: to hell with official washington. it is the deep state and it's working against the interest of the united states. it is so obvious, so transparent and in the face of 330 million americans that it couldn't get much worse, i don't believe, than it is right now. because i don't think we can tolerate much worse than this. >> the justice department treats mueller like he's king of the justice department. he hasn't been appointed by anyone answerable to the president in any significant way. it's good government to shut down that office. lou: last question. slow walking all of this material that the house oversight and house judiciary committees have demanded over the justice department, and to be told by the incompetence and corrupt and just absolutely insidious officialdom in the person of owessen stein and sessions and mueller, what are they to do? are we in a const

he signed -- he also signed the fisa. so rod rosenstein who is in charge of this signed a fisa warrant. and he also signed a letter that was essentially fire james comey. he was right about that. he was absolutely right. so we will see what happens. i think it's disgraceful and so does a lot of people. this is a pure and simple witch-hunt. thank you very much. thank you. >> will rod rosenstein keep his job? >> thank you. >> will rod rosenstein keep his job? >> thank you all very much. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> thanks, everyone. >> more clarity on who was responsible? >> thank you. thanks, everyone. thank you. >> we are getting clarity on that. who was responsible forrest weapons attack. we are getting very good clarity, actually. we have some pretty good answers. >> thanks, everyone. >> what are your options? >> thank you. >> we have a lot of options militarily and we will be letting you know. >> thanks, everyone. thank you all. >> probably after the fact. >> thank you. >> can you stop lying? can you stop lying? >> t

the fisa application? >> my recollection there was a significant amount of time about page and why there was probable cause that he was an agent. >> is that true? >> no. when you lead with it, that's your primary evidence -- >> laura: have you seen the entire fisa application? >> we have not. >> laura: why? >> they won't let us. i asked christopher wray. they won't show us. >> laura: wow. >> they didn't tell the court who paid for it. they didn't tell the court that the author of the document, christopher steele, had his relationship with the fbi terminated. they didn't tell the court that. when we go to the court, we have to tell them the whole truth. they didn't to that. >> remember the house intel found out that the dossier was the bulk of it and separately the senate judiciary committee also found out that it was the bulk of it. >> laura: he also said he didn't see any bias in the page-strzok text when they talked about the insurance policy. they were clearly not wild about donald trump. even that's be

he signed the fisa warrant. he signed one of the fisa warrants on carter page.e note dossier was the bulk on the fisa warrants. >> how come we never talk about the washington "free beacon"? we never talk about that part of it. judge jeanine: sarah, wait. chris, stop trying to change the topic. the issue is whether jim comey leaked. and whether it's classified or unclassified is not the issue. if you listen to my open it's a violation of the federal records act and the reason people have to get approval from the court to get a 302. this guy isn't god. >> i would love to see a prosecutor bring that case. judge jeanine: let's take a listen to the president. president trump: if our justice department was doing the right thing, they would be and lot tougher right now object those people. because there is tremendous crime and corruption on the other side. judge jeanine: is the justice department going to do anything. >> i do believe they will. they are right now. remember, this started since last year, in the fall of last year when attorney general jeff sessions put j

he signed the fisa warrant. he signed one of the fisa warrants on carter page.e note dossier was the bulk on the fisa warrants. >> how come we never talk about the washington "free beacon"? we never talk about that part of it. judge jeanine: sarah, wait. chris, stop trying to change the topic. the issue is whether jim comey leaked. and whether it's classified or unclassified is not the issue. if you listen to my open it's a violation of the federal records act and the reason people have to get approval from the court to get a 302. this guy isn't god. >> i would love to see a prosecutor bring that case. judge jeanine: let's take a listen to the president. president trump: if our justice department was doing the right thing, they would be and lot tougher right now object those people. because there is tremendous crime and corruption on the other side. judge jeanine: is the justice department going to do anything. >> i do believe they will. they are right now. remember, this started since last year, in the fall of last year when attorney general jeff sessions put j

and it seems to me that the fisa process, i think some of the questions were about the fisa process.ormer very senior justice department official said, you know what, someone should call his boss and say, fine, we'll investigate the fisa process. the fisa court is the most incorruptible part of the justice department and carter page was such a shady bleep, bleep, bleep. if someone wants to see -- reauthorizing a fisa warrant every 90 days, bring it on. >> i'll just say two things about this. the first is it really bears remembering. most people remember this, but it bears making you recall. hillary clinton was under investigation. the investigation went on for a long time. it was the biggest political albatross around her neck the entirety of her campaign. it made her campaign against bernie sanders harder, it made her campaign against donald trump harder, in the final days when it became clear the investigation was being reopened because jim comey did something unprecedented, it cost her the election. the notion that we are going back as if to say she didn't pay a big enough price,