match to zack fisk. mailed her to his house to have a thrill? there's a catch. melody is married to a guy named roy davis. brass is breaking the news and bringing him in. your wife's death was accidental. she got into that box voluntarily-- it's part of her... claustrophilia pursuits that she indulged in with her friend zack fisk. but i suspect you knew all about this, right? yes, sir, i did. i allowed it... to save my marriage. she said she needed her space. or... lack of space. she had met a man online, but she said it wasn't sex, it was just... play. and a couple of hours after your wife put herself in the box and mailed herself, i guess you got online and tracked the package on your home computer? she had told me about her shipping fantasy before. but i forbid it. it's far too dangerous. but apparently, she hadn't heeded me. you saw the package was delivered to, uh, zack fisk, so you went over there and confronted him, huh? no, sir. that is not true. roy, what, uh, what line of work you in? (laughs s

and it would go to fisk and you would have a review there. and thee review meticulousness and the care that people put into these things is substantial. of dialogue back and forth between every level, among every level with this. there is back-and-forth with doj and fbi. i always took it as a huge amount of my response ability to make sure that i maintain at all times the credibility of the justice department in front of the five the court -- fisa court for muscle it was transparent what was going on. and when we made mistakes, as we did, we brought them to the attention of the court and we tried really hard not to make mistakes. it was really the justice doingment in my opinion his job, executing its responsibilities to order the constitution and the delegates were there to make sure that the properly.ecuted we will do our best to make sure it is enforced in the right way. if they have not met the standards, we will tell you if they have not met the standards yet, and they have to x, y, and z to do so. i think the system has worked well so f

and it would go to fisk and you would have a review there. and thee review meticulousness and the care that people put into these things is substantial. of dialogue back and forth between every level, among every level with this. there is back-and-forth with doj and fbi. i always took it as a huge amount of my response ability to make sure that i maintain at all times the credibility of the justice department in front of the five the court -- fisa court for muscle it was transparent what was going on. and when we made mistakes, as we did, we brought them to the attention of the court and we tried really hard not to make mistakes. it was really the justice doingment in my opinion his job, executing its responsibilities to order the constitution and the delegates were there to make sure that the properly.ecuted we will do our best to make sure it is enforced in the right way. if they have not met the standards, we will tell you if they have not met the standards yet, and they have to x, y, and z to do so. i think the system has worked well so f

is that something that the fisk fisk -- we have heard competing views as to whether the fisk can do it and doesn't do it and should it do it more and thinking about new technologies or to try and avoid what we have heard to be a problem of miscommunications from technologists through the lawyers to the judges. i asked the question whether there is all -- already that capacity? >> keep in mind i am not in the government anymore but i would say you put your finger on an important issue the game of telephone where things get transferred and it's a real problem and it's a significant problem. .. d to bring in an expert from the outside, perhaps from one of the company's market is talking about, i do not see any reason that cannot be made to happen. i don't see that as being something that would not be possible to do. you would have to bring in someone who has a clearance, figure out what kind of questions you're going to expose this person to, what kind of information. there would be some security questions around that. i don't see that as something that should not be possible. >> does any

i've been before the fisk twice, only to be before the review. i don't think it's enough. we talked about the questions whether there's the stand-in to appeal. the court believes they don't have the power to force executives to make classification decisions differently, so the executive is not beginning to provide the private counsel with the full access to the classified material that would be necessary, and, certainly, not on a historical basis. maybe for the particular case, but an advocate knows that two years ago, the solicitor general stood up and made a representation to the court, for example, as what happened in redirectives case, there's no data base of incidentally collected u.s. persons communication, and only an advocate who had been in several cases know the representations of government making it one case may be inconsistent in the representations made in another, so as much as in my business interest, i'd love for there to be a small group with exclusive rights practice before the court, i don't think it would satisfy the interest of really protecting the c

combining sunset authority with disclosure of interpretation that the fisk is taking is an important step. but another approach that has not been suggested so far is a rule of d for foreign -- rule ofleddity with in the context of the law. that judges should adopt the narrower interpretation of criminal law, and that implies that government should have a broader -- to have a broader interpretation of the law, they have to go to the legislature and enact it. the idea being that it is ultimately up to congress, not the court. this rule would serve a similar function. if it is a close call, the default should be for the fisa court to reject the interpretation and tell the executive branch that they have to go to congress to get approval for the interpretation of the statute. branch tohe executive go to congress and not seek who are notm courts equipped to analyze the enormity of the questions and the sunsets, essentially a provision and the rule working together to force the executive branch to keep going back to congress as technology changes to have congress approve or disapprove any

, go toy would say congress to get a specific authorization. >> it could certainly enable the fisk to back off of an earlier interpretation if that is in place. quick question. a quick one to professor vladek. 702 is kind of a competent a program. if you can speak for yourself or any of the ngo's you have had how would you characterize the main concern of outside groups about the way 702 operate? i think we all agree that they had congressional authorization to begin with, so it is not a 215. >> i would not speak for anyone other than myself. >> that is good enough. >> my biggest concern about section 702 is the volume of communications of u.s. persons that are, at least ostensibly available to be picked up. contemplate, based on my understanding of our technological capacities, the collection of data that on a scale that makes the incidental u.s. communications acquisition not just likely, but certain. theiggest concern is that unintentional environment is a bit this ingenuous. >> how would you correct that? >> there are a couple of possibilities. they all get to the same place. one

i did my under deprad wait work at fisk university, where i studied political science with a concentration in public administration and worked eight years largely in the public sector. then i earned a master's degree from carnegie melon in pittsburg, pennsylvania. i spent some time as assistant executive director for a non-profit. we did work if a lot of kids in the neighborhood. i have done fundraising for candidates and issues. i have experience with the federal reserve bank of san francisco. when i look around my neighborhood and see the changes that are happening, i so there is no neighborhood grocery store. i see that small businesses in particular are coming and going, and they haven't been able to really sustain themselves. from my work experience in working for the city in the mayor's office as well as in the non-profit, i had a good sense as to what some of the challenges were. when i look in the future, i could see more challenges coming. i thought i had a set of experiences and more importantly a passion and desire to serve. >> i understand that no one wants to have their progra

. >> i want to follow up on return requirement of selectors to the fisk. that sounds like a good idea in the abstract, but i'm unclear what exactly it would add in and, for example, you provide a list of selectors to the court along with some documentation, and i would be interested to hear what it would be, and what would the court do with the information? >> i'll defer to brad on the second part of that, but documentation, today, we keep that of the factual -- there's oversight mechanisms, but as to how they handle that, i'll bever to brad, the justice department requires that before the fifing. >> okay. >> [inaudible] >> one option would be -- compliance problems on its own, then it could call in the government saying it's not how -- [inaudible] >> i think there's something wrong with brad's microphone. i don't know what to do about that. >> we report those to the court and information could be purged, the court could respond if we have a compliance incident and order relief. they could suspend the operation of the order, suspend the program, take whate

. >> and morgan fisk makes it a habit to keep her eye out for the best prices.ll three of our 7 on your side staffers agreed to help us deal for the best way to keep tabs of the best prices. deal news, huxters and nifty tracks the prices of the items you would like to follow. sounds good. but how well do they really work? our three testers find out. on huckster you find the item you want to follow and huck it. >> there are specific notifications when just that product goes on sale. >> on nifty you can track the highs and the lows. >> you can see the items on the website. it has the percent they have gone down or the percent that some items have even gone up in price. >> noel garcia likes the way deal news laid out the website. >> you can choose your preferences and go and look at what you are looking are to. >> how much did our three save? >> the item i want to save the most on is the vitamix blender that started at $700 and now it is $595.95. >> noel had the opposite experience. finding a better score with hucster. it was a 49% off boots from hucksr. >> they we

. >> and morgan fisk makes it a habit to keep her eye out for the best prices. all three of our 7 on your side staffers agreed to help us deal for the best way to keep tabs of the best prices. deal news, huxters and nifty tracks the prices of the items you would like to follow. sounds good. but how well do they really work? our three testers find out. on huckster you find the item you want to follow and huck it. >> there are specific notifications when just that product goes on sale. >> on nifty you can track the highs and the lows. >> you can see the items on the website. it has the percent they have gone down or the percent that some items have even gone up in price. >> noel garcia likes the way deal news laid out the website. >> you can choose your preferences and go and look at what you are looking are to. >> how much did our three save? >> the item i want to save the most on is the vitamix blender that started at $700 and now it is $595.95. >> noel had the opposite experience. finding a better score with hucster. it was a 49% off boots from hucksr. >> they

one theme was to end new york's stop and fisk policy. >>> federal health officials gave the go-aheado a vaccine for meningitis. the latest case on the campus was confirmed last week. that student is still in the hospital. >> i remember it was instant. she went from feeling almost fine to 103 fever. >> meningitis is rare in the u.s. and can be deadly. a vaccine is used in other parts of the world but has not been approved for widespread use in the u.s. a supply is being imported for use in princeton. >>> a southern california high school is considering a face lift for the mascot. the coachella arab drew a formal complaint. the district refuses to give up the name which dates from the 1920s but is gathering ideas of the appearance perhaps changing the mascot to a horse. >>> joan jett has been booted off the float of the macy's thanksgiving parade. she loves rock 'n' roll but she doesn't like meat. she was going to support south dakota ranchers but she's a vegetarian. she chose to make the switch because people's political agenda were getting in the way of an entertainment driven event.

. >> and morgan fisk makes it a habit to keep her eye out for the best prices.ee of our 7 on your side staffers agreed to help us deal for the best way to keep tabs of the best prices. deal news, huxters and nifty tracks the prices of the items you would like to follow. sounds good. but how well do they really work? our three testers find out. on huckster you find the item you want to follow and huck it. >> there are specific notifications when just that product goes on sale. >> on nifty you can track the highs and the lows. >> you can see the items on the website. it has the percent they have gone down or the percent that some items have even gone up in price. >> noel garcia likes the way deal news laid out the website. >> you can choose your preferences and go and look at what you are looking are to. >> how much did our three save? >> the item i want to save the most on is the vitamix b vitamir that started at $700 and now it is $595.95. >> noel had the opposite experience. finding a better score with hucster. it was a 49% off boots from hucksr. >> they were o

he's here on the right with langston hughs here at fisk university. he was head librarian for 30 years. he invited the people to visit him. sterling brown the national editor of the writer's project based in d.c. and here is the list of 17 projects. but the list of 17 -- number 15 was the negro in chicago laider became the negro in illinois dated november 1939. it says negro in chicago has begun. it's already underway. the best -- some of the first -- finally, some of these black projects started coming out. one of the most famous eventually became "crumb -- drums and shadows." collection of slave narrative. the actual during the day in 1940 the negro in virginia was published. and so this started getting him going. moving on the project. he starts working more quickly in 1940, '41, and '42. in the early day of the project the black writers worked alongside white writers. in downtown, these were known as the eerie street offices east of michigan avenue near the navy pier. one of the earliest black writers to work on the project was richard wright. her

you raisedded a valuable point that we have reporting requirements, and, in fact, we report to the fisk every 30 days, in fact, even though the program authorized every 90 days, and so that 30 day vehicle could well be a useful vehicle to provide determinations to review the document to determinations made today. i just note that those determinations are reviewed by the justice department, but to the extent it builds public confidence i think would be of no concern for nsa in particular to have the fifing review those after the fact. >> one concern that we've talked about in discussions with the idea you articulated of reviews with an emergency exception, the nature of the program is that we operate in the circumstances, we're uncomfortable with a scheme set up where the statutory exception swallows the statutory rule. >> what about after the fact, the court indicated publicly, difficult for the court to assess compliance with its own orders, what if there's a mechanism for every 30 days report back on the determinations made so it does not interview, but gives the court the chance to s

the industry share of institutional legitimacy that one could expect given the current set up of the fisk oversight that we have. so -- fisc oversight that we have. not only was this program approved by the foreign intelligence court every 90 days but it was twice approved, the particular provision was twice reauthorize by congress with full information from the executive branch about the use of the provision. now, as to whether that should be codified separately or not, i think as a confidence-building measure, for all intensive purposes i think that the the date that we are having now affect rates the public legitimacy aspect of the program and we will see how it plays out and how the reform measures are taken. but i don't think a separate codification is necessary. but the point is well taken that public confidence needs to be ensured and i would only suggest to the extent public confidence is shaken in part that is as a result of historical secrecy, and in part it's a result of a large amount of misinformation and confused public debate and it's hard to separate the two. they are inte

and one would say bloomberg was right, then the crime rate should go up if stop and fisk was that effective25%. so it's happening because the nypd is doing better policing being they a, they're working with community groups, good nonviolent community groups doing the work on the ground and better policing. stop and frisk has not worked and we don't need the policy to bring down crime. in tha . >> thank you so much for that perspective. >>> soon after a new phrase with the phrase god save the united states and this honorable court, the justices will tackle the role of religion in the public square. they will hear arguments this week in the town of grace, new york versus galloway, the issue whether prayer at government meetings passes constitutional muster. it's argued the town is violating the separation of church and state by opening their council meetings with a christian prayer. jordan lawrence is with alliance freedom and reverend barry lind is representing galloway oig. good day to both you. reverend, the central focus in the case is the first amendment establishment clause. it says con

hezbollah is the work within this and the community to create within it as fisk on an as is the state of the hula but he cannot say that hezbollah enjoy it. divinity within this and the community to some the community in eleven on is still suffering from the warmth that inflicted to a standstill cells and five says that designation of a date night minnesota to itv so yes that is some voices within the sun the community which could the sup boards has blonde but i don't think that the these voices it does and eighty outta constituency while as within the shiite community we see that it be that fine indeed. that of the news see out on something since it is cool. i cannot issue that dissidents the views of the hezbollah would that be who has it that elections would it be cool them on stations. that and oh so finally the difference between the shiite dissidents and the sunnah and aegis of hezbollah is here. and that no one quarter into question an admission that the video that what happened today in beta what happened inside the heart of the hezbollah stronghold. and it's a big security se

we at nsa together with justice report to fisk every 30 days on use of the data. the program is audited every 90 days by the department of justice. pursuant to the court order, only 22 senior officials may approve wary into the data and those queries have to be based on a reasonable, our digital suspicion that the number used to associate with a specific foreign intelligence organization. only seven officials by court order or authorize to disseminate information to the fbi, for example, if any u.s. person information is involved. there were significant technical controls limiting access to the data. so, for example, a typo in this case can't go through in a query because there are technical controls but only allow approved numbers to be used as query terms. and, finally, pursuant to the court orders that are rules for the inspector general at nsa and, of course, we have oversight from the department of defense. >> i want to follow up on the reasonable standard. i have a question which will continue in the next rent if i need to but can you explain what that means

the fisk review course of a republican nominees, two of whom and the one who brought down a lot tonighthe constitutionality of five that the first place. there is bad denial at the application for the last 10 years at 18,000 some odd applications. eight have been denied. 463 modified and 26 with john by the government. i think these have given momentum now considering reform of the court exactly how it's appointed. it's not clear to what extent this would actually have an impact. jameel. >> you know, i'm not sure the current election process snakes a lot of cents. i could probably serve to governments interest to have a fair one that resulted in more representative court. that said, i wouldn't put this problem at the top of the list. i don't thought the problem is we have the wrong support. the problem is structural. in a different sense, the problem is the way to fisa court has its expert say on process. it is the kind that the fisa are addressing, that was supposed to address when it was set up in 1978. and then, you know, all the secrecy surrounding all this has allowed his entire bo

combining sunset authority with disclosure of interpretation that the fisk is taking is an important step. but another approach that has not been suggested so far is a rule of d for foreign -- rule ofleddity with in the context of the law. that judges should adopt the narrower interpretation of criminal law, and that implies that government should have a broader -- to have a broader interpretation of the law, they have to go to the legislature and enact it. the idea being that it is ultimately up to congress, not the court. this rule would serve a similar function. if it is a close call, the default should be for the fisa court to reject the interpretation and tell the executive branch that they have to go to congress to get approval for the interpretation of the statute. branch tohe executive go to congress and not seek who are notm courts equipped to analyze the enormity of the questions and the sunsets, essentially a provision and the rule working together to force the executive branch to keep going back to congress as technology changes to have congress approve or disapprove any