our pam tonight democratic strategist roger fisk. the president seems lik he made an about-face. first he came out his tone was ry conciliatory a then the tweet this morning to the nation where he said very big part of the s anger weee today in our society is caused by the purposely false and inaccurate reporting of the mainstream media for which i refer to as fake news. you know, can the president really blame the media for this string of suspicious packages aimed at people who cahave been criti of him or doese need to take some of the blame forhi t roger i'll start with you. >> there's not a single presiden in our history that'siteen happy w their coverage. this can't be new information for the current president that theyre put under a microsediand that's the mcoth bey media's j. it's not their job to like amplify the agenda administration or something else. there's a couple things that one, this was a slow pitch. right over home plate. he didn't have to do all that po nailhaxathe ect country was to d to make it about him, he had go and turn night a victim an t m frustrating th

in part of why to some stun shows stimulus both in terms of monetary easing and in terms of fiske of easing and the combination of the two in fact work plus the symbolisation of the banking system by a somebody such as the dog and so on so these policies of work to because the economy has recovered and recipe somehow is worth the work a little less so in other countries what part of decisive b. was not apply this particular to fiscal stimulus so it's very hard for any politician of any color mania ministration to stop the pot of tea when he's going in for the pot to go on tina's longest possible what we claim is that the market forces a soft touch the divine surely. downturn because inevitable whatever day i mean a station in whatever they call it of by i mean a station might be now mr rosen i know that you also contend that if these benefits storm hits the policy tools available to the current administration for addressing it will sorely be lacking why is that. more than locking i would say be. rained well down the globe because so know what this cold policy space my be. reduced to

the carlton fisk game, 1975 gam. the series didn't have a happy ending for boston. that moment unforgettable. dodgers 1977 game 1, and now the red sox and dodgers playing in the 12th inning of game 3 in 2018. eovaldi. a check swing, didn't go. 2-2. >> john: amazing discipline for turner. what's amazing about his to strike approach, he will hit a mistake for a homer. if you get that down and in kind of scenario, he can throw the barrel of the bat right there with that leg kick that he uses for timing. stay back and check swing on a nasty pitch right there. >> joe: what's it going to be on 2-2 with the bases empty, two outs? get in there. manny machado, who has one hit in this game, 1 for 5 is on dec deck. or rather, two batters away, muncy. muncy will get a crack at eovaldi if turner can keep this 12th inning alive. otherwise, and the 13th, brock holt will lead off. 3-2. struck him out! 101 on the radar gun from nathan eovaldi. it's incredible what he's been able to do. brock holt, nunez, bradley coming up. what a game. into the 13th we had. kinder joy, a special way

was imposed but they might know we stand complete market crash let alone a meltdown and in this case fiske of resources will always be a vein surely they dissolved and that of course would be. even more and therefore that's why there's that risk of severe political crisis. the next financial. in a comic prize that you've pointed out in your article that the idea of bailouts will be particularly intolerable in the countries with resurgent populist moments but these kind of populism is self-contradictory because people suddenly don't want national money to go into saving big banks but they also don't want to see their savings evaporate do you think governments even the populists governments can really afford not to be populist in the sounds of providing some sort of occur for the population in dealing with the banking situation yes you pointed out correctly . contradiction in. economic positions it's easy to find an enemy where the fault in the way of their. political opponents and so on that's that's easy much more difficult to explain how things are once you stop telling people look you my

the next year, just three months after independent counsel robert fisk was named to lead the whitewater investigation, president clinton nominated justice breyer. .e was confirmed 87-9; supreme court justices have not hesitated to rule against the president to nominated them. perhaps most notably in the united states v. nixon, three nixon appointees who heard the case joined the unanimous opinion against him. judge kavanaugh has been unequivocal in his belief that no president is above the law. he has stated that marbury v. madison, youngstown steel v. s awyer, and the united states v. nixon are three of the four greatest supreme court cases in history. what do they have in common? each of them is a case where congress serves as a check on presidential power. i would note that the fourth case that judge kavanaugh has pointed to as the greatest in history was brown v. the board of education. one kavanaugh decision illustrates the point about the check on presidential power directly. a casee the opinion in that challenges the bush administration's military commission prosecution of an ass

overall, fed officials, though, thethe risks as balanced to economy and said on the up side maybe that fisk the stiullus work out better than forecast. for nightly buness, i'm steve liesman in washington. >>> homemade building activitd dropore than than expected housing starts fell 5% last month. the biggest decline in the south which accounts for theulk of home building. mortgagey total application volume fell 7% in the recent week as rates rose to near 8-year high. housing stocks were all lower in today's session. >>> well, when it comes to a ayssible trade deal with china, president trump that the two countries are just not yet ready to start talking dagain. an that sentiment wasto echoed y by the commerce secretary. >> i don't know that i'd call it a continued impasse. we are where we are, and in any negotiation there are ups and downs. there are hiatus and more active periods. so it appears as though we may be in something of aw. hiatus >>> by the way, late today, the treasury department declined to lal china a currency manipulator. that's a title that has been threatened but not used

was kept for ninety six to three the next year just three months after independent counsel robert fiske was named to lead the whitewater investigation president clinton nominated justice brier he was confirmed to eighty seven to no supreme court justices have not hesitated to rule against the presidents who have nominated them perhaps most notably in the united states versus nixon three nixon up point tease who heard the case joining the unanimous opinion against him. judge kavanagh i had spent unequivocal in his belief that no president is the law he has stated that marbury vs madison youngstown steel versus sawyer and the united states versus nixon are three of the fort greatest supreme court cases and history why do they have in common each of them is a case where congress served as a chat on presidential power and i would note that the fourth case that judge kavanagh has pointed to as some the greatest in history was brown versus the board of education one cavanaugh decision illustrates the point about the check on president empower directly he wrote the opinion in hum versus c. in

why what happened to them others still active so let's find out a little bit more about the solid fisking unity we have this peace and then i'd like to get your reaction there after. they support a radical form of islam and reject democracy and freedom salafist. it's one of the fastest growing branches of islam in germany that's what the federal domestic intelligence service says in two thousand and eleven german authorities knew of about three thousand eight hundred salafist in the country three years later that number was seven thousand. and by two thousand and seventeen it was ten thousand eight hundred that's almost a tripling in seven years. and this is the salafist stronghold in germany the western state of north rhine-westphalia it's thought there are about three thousand salafist supporters here the regional intelligence agency classifies eight hundred of them as prone to violence authorities watch female salafist particularly carefully as wives and mothers they're important in holding the community together in two thousand and twelve a group of islam ists in germany were caught p

singapore which sees the year's best players take to the court outstanding performances from carolina fiskeall the and alina is fit alina on thursday saw them secure their spots in the semifinals of the season ending tournament that meant defending champion caroline wozniacki went out carol leave a place made light work a picture of give it to after winning the first six six three. pliska of a continued to control the match and took the second set six for staying in focus hope to record a first ever win over her check compatriot. the world number eight booked her similarly final spot for the second year in a row. she says of. the match between a lead is fit to lena and defending w t a finals champion caroline wozniacki down to the wire after stitch alina battled back to win the second set and with the momentum on the twenty four year old ukrainian side she held on to take the final six six three and book her place in this week in semifinals. to leno will find out who her opponent will be on friday. night is now it for starting with earnings season and some interesting figures for the tech s

their next year, just three months after an independent counsel, robert fisk was named to lead the investigationon nominatedjustice breyer. he investigation, president clinton nominated justice breyer. he was confirmed 87 to nine. supreme court justices have not hesitated to rule against the presidents who have nominated them. perhaps most notably in the united states versus nixon, three nixon appointees who heard the case joined the unanimous opinion against him. judge kavanaugh has been unequivocal in his belief that no president is above the law. he has stated that marbury versus madison, and the united states versus nixon are some of the greatest supreme court cases in history. what did he have in common? each of them is a case where congress served as a check on presidential power. i would note that the fourth case judge kavanaugh has pointed to as one of the greatest in history was brown versus the board of education. 0ne kavanaugh decision illustrates the point to bring the check on presidential power directly. he wrote the opinion in a case that challenges the british's military executio

the next year, just three months after independent counsel robert fisk was named to lead the whitewaternvestigation, president clinton nominated justice brier. he was confirmed 87-9. supreme court justices have not hesitated to rule against the president who have nominated them. perhaps most notably in the united states versus nixon, three nixon appointees who heard the case joined the unanimous opinion against him. judge kavanaugh has been unequivocal in his belief that no president is above the law. he has stated that marbury versus madison, youngstown steel versus sawyer and the united states versus nixon are three of the four greatest supreme court cases in history. what do they have in common? each of them is a case where congress serves as a check on presidential power. i would note that the fourth case that judge kavanaugh has pointed to as the greatest in history was brown versus the board of education. one kavanaugh decision illustrates the point about the check on presidential power directly. he wrote the opinion in hamdahn versus the united states, a case that challenges the

charles: here to discuss, attorney gayle trotter and roger fiske. some are saying they understand the passion, the pain, and the need for at the time for kavanaugh to clear his name. but in the process he might have taken something away from the idea that he should be on the highest court in the land. your thoughts. >> we continue to find what we have been saying since the very day president trump nominated judge kavanaugh. he's faithful to the constitution. he's fair and you independent. if you want to know what his judicial temperament will be. when he testified before the senate last thursday in that hearing it wasn't as a future justice, it was as a man defending himself, his family, his honor, his reputation. charles: judicial temperament and temperament. he was in the midst of a job audition for the high court. >> it turned into an accusation of criminal conduct. it wasn't a job under view. it was about the presumption of innocence and the opportunity he had to defend himself against very difficult accusations. and i think when you look at thi

the next year justice three years after independent counsel robert fisk was named to lead the whitewater investigation, president clinton nominated justice breyer. he was confirmed 87-9. supreme court justices have not hesitated to rule against the presidents who have nominated them. perhaps most notably in the united states versus nixon, three nixon appointees who heard the case joined the unanimous opinion against him. judge kavanaugh has been unequivocal in his belief that no president is above the law. he has stated that marbury versus madison, youngstown steel versus sawyer and the united states versus nixon are three of the four greatest supreme court cases in history. what do they have in common? each of them is a case where congress served as a check on presidential power. and i would note that the fourth case that judge kavanaugh has pointed to as the greatest in history was brown versus the board of education. one kavanaugh decision illustrates the point about the check on presidential power directly. he wrote the opinion in a case that challenges the bush administration's mili

market rates, aggressive in the fisk you look -- in the fiscal stimulus at this time it is different. for china stocks. specifically, it targets to force them to sell them out. rebound china markets continues, then the other regional stock markets also has positive in a feedback. --haad: i think we have got having started today, they said they will help some of these private enterprises. that is what we are talking about. that was a great piece they are talking to the wrong people. i don't know if you read it. enda: it depends you look at it. there is a view that the private sector was the hardest hit. those are the ones that are struggling to get the money and funding. if you target that sector, money from our exporters who are also getting hurt by the trade war. if you target that sector, if these measures, there is a view that gun wavering support -- rishaad: lukewarm and unwavering. enda: nonetheless, there's also the view that these guys will be hit hard by the trade war. they will need to deliver on the unwavering support. in a column, they mentioned the burden has been fallen o

the observations of fisk of the second regiment of vermont volunteers were typical. this christian commission has become to be respected by all the boys. even those who care little about its benefits personally speak well of it and think it a very good thing. general george meade, the hero of gettysburg suggested that nobody appreciated the organization's efforts more than the army's top officers. i assure you he wrote, no one looks with more favor upon the true christian who ministers to the dying or lost and wounded. hence, you may rest satisfied that in this army, your agents will be treated with all the consideration do their noble work. grant did the best job of summing up the army's attitude. to the commission, the army has the same gratitude that the public felt for services rendered by the army. on february 10, 1866, the u.s. christian commision held its final business meeting. acknowledging that circumstances had created the need for the organization had passed. they formally close the activities of the commission. they thanked god for opening the country to

the next year, just three months after independent counsel robert fisk was named to lead the whitewater investigation, president clinton nominated justice breyer. he was confirmed 87-9. supreme court justices have not hesitated to rule against the presidents who have nominated them. perhaps most notably in the united states versus nixon, three nixon appointees who heard the case joined the unanimous opinion against him. judge kavanaugh has been unequivocal in his belief that no president is above the law. he has stated that marbury versus madison, youngstown steel versus sawyer and the united states versus nixon are three of the four greatest supreme court cases in history. what do they have in common? each of them is a case where congress serves as a check on presidential power. and i would note that the fourth case that judge kavanaugh has pointed to as the greatest in history was brown versus the board of education. one of kavanaugh's decisions illustrates the point about the check on presidential power directly. he wrote the opinion in hamdunn versus the united states, a case that c

the next year, just three months after independent counsel robert fisk was named to lead the white water investigation, president clinton nominated justice briar. he was confirmed 87-9. supreme court justices have not hesitated to rule against the presidents who nominated them. perhaps most notably in the united states versus nixon, three nixon appointees who heard the case joined the unanimous opinion against him. judge kavanaugh has been unequivocal in his belief that no president is above the law. he has stated that marbury versus madison, and united states versus nixon are three of the four greatest supreme court cases in history. what do they have in common? each of them is a case where congress served as the check on presidential power. i would note the fourth case judge kavanaugh pointed to as the greatest in history was brown versus board of education. one kavanaugh decision illustrates the point on check of presidential power directly. he wrote the opinion in homdon versus the united states, a case that challenged the bush administration's military commission, prosecution of an

bob fisk former united states attorney for the southern district of new york was appointed in january of 1994 by janet reno by the direction of the president of the united states. it was not her assessment under any regulations or otherwise. this was during an interim period when the independent counsel law was not in effect. when you look back in time at the different appointments of special prosecutors, it's always driven by politics and a sense that we need honest government and may have been wrongdoing. here is the key challenge for the independent counsel, how do you free the investigation completely from politics and what are the guardrails that you can build in that provide public assurance that the administration of criminal justice is free of politics? it's especially difficult tower accomplish that no matter what kinds of internal safeguards you have. and our investigation, we had an elaborate indictment review echoed that mirrored and what the criminal department of the justice department does and rightly so. they have been given the authority to go forward with the evidenc

fisk or, i have seen you put the ted danson shoes of this question. i will ask you specifically. a teacher in the area, my city, -- how muchrage of would this teacher pay to the city of illinois in income tax under your plan? mr. pritzker: that teachers should get a tax break. is what this governor has went, what he has spent, and ought to ask people like governor rauner and me as the wealthier people in the state to pay more. look, here's the point of a fair tax system. the point of it is we want to lower property taxes, pay for our schools differently because that is causing a lot of the property tax increases people are feeling and we want to lower taxes on the middle class and those striving to get there because people living paycheck to paycheck be the ones who are able to spend that money on something good for them. why not give a rate? we did not get a rate in the first forum? can you give us a rate? mr. pritzker: we want to make sure we are negotiating it with the people in the legislature. members of the house and the senate, the representatives of the people and then --

so bob fiske, the attorney of the sovereign district of new york, william pope, another great lawyer, was appointed in january 1994 by janet reno on the direction of the president of the united states. it was not her assessment under any regulation or otherwise. remember, this was during an interim period when the impending counsel law was not in effect. when you look back in time at the different appointments of special prosecutors, it's always driven by politics and a sense that we need more discovery, there may have been wrongdoing and so forth. here's the key challenge for the special counsel and the independent counsel. how do you free the investigation completely from politics, and what are the guardrails that you can build in that provide public assurance that the administration of criminal justice is free of politics? it's especially difficult to accomplish that no matter what kinds of internal safeguards you have and are on investigations. i would say we had a very elaborate indictment review process that not only acted on what the justice department does and widely so. it's

so bob fiske, very able former united states attorney for the sovereign district of new york, partner davis polk in new york wonderful law firm, great lawyer, was appointed in january of 1994 by janet reno on the direction of the president of the united states. it was not her assessment under any regulations. again, this was in an interim time when infinite counsel was not in effect. when you look back in time at the different appointments of special prosecutors, it's always driven by politics and the says we need honest government. there may have been wrongdoing and so forth. here's the key challenge for the special counsel in the independent counsel. how do you free investigation completely from politics? neither fear nor favor. and what are the guardrails that you can build in that by public assurance that the administration of criminal justice is free of politics? it's especially difficult to call bush that the meta-what what kinds of internal safeguards you have and our own investigation, i would submit a very elaborate indictment review process that not only mirrored and echoed

movement has been growing in germany in recent years most of them up he said but some radical sunnah fisk have been linked to extremist attacks correspondence from the online have conducted an investigation into the rise of jihad to salafism in germany all this week you can find their reports on d.w. dot com. and now to find it more i'm joined by the news as the felde and she is not the reporters who has been investigating the rise of a solid fist seen in germany welcome as the first of all tell us why did you decide to carry out this investigation now well because we were basically curious because the scene which was very visible a few years back has practically vanished from sight and we were wondering what they were doing now whether they were still active and how they proceeded ok before we continue our conversation let's take a look at a report which is on the side of a scene here in germany. salafism is a fundamentalist form of islam some of its supporters reject modern western democratic norms the german domestic intelligence service says salafism is one of the fastest growing bran

sitting next to her is alex fisk. alex has returned to postal service a couple years ago, and i just want to say thank you very much for your continued service to our country. we're going to miss you guys. >> thank you for your service. senator jones. >> does that 30 seconds go against me? >> you've got the full seven minutes. [laughter] >> thank you, mr. chairman. and thank you both, to nominees, for your willingness to be here and for your service. i really appreciate it. dr. dillingham, i want to ask a couple questions about the census, and you answered senator hoeven's questions, and i had very similar questions about rural america, because, you know, 55 out of my 67 counties are rural. so i would appreciate being updated and continuing the update on how we're going to reach out, because there's so many of them that are also not served by the internet, and it's going to be a real problem. the other area that it seems to me the statistics i've seen is that coverage of adults for the census has improved a good bit s

i want to be a martin luther king, and i wonder where a james lawson is who galvanized students at fisk university, right? to sit at lunch counters, right? galvanize the diane nash. galvanize the john lewis, right? where are these figures. folks, be in the game, but also be the coach, and, so, i think with the moment in which we have with religious life, particularly when i think of, say, black lives matter, right? primarily a queer movement and folks practicing an ifa and you go to a black lives matter protest and often you see folks burning sage and wearing all white, right? mostly outside of this christian contact, right? it's a rarity to some extent, my former classmate, so i'm kind of wondering how we can galvanize the left in some particular way, some helpful ways that might speak to our new plurality. thank you. all right. thank you ever so much. i can pose you three questions and maybe you can beat me to the punch and i'll pose you other questions first. all right. you pointed to european roots to a great degree and bannon's sense of the collapse of western civilization and the

she is sitting next to alex fisk. i want to say thank you very much for your continued service. we will miss you guys. jones.tor senator jones: thank you mr. chairman and thank you both to the nominees for your willingness to be here. i really appreciate it. i want to ask a couple questions about the census. you answered senator hoven's questions. i have a question about rural america. updatedappreciate being and continuing the update on how we will reach out because there are so many that are also not served by the internet. me other area that seems to the statistics i've seen is coverage of adults for the senses has improved a good bit since 1980, but there is still a net undercount of children and that has been increasing. according to the census bureau's own data, the 2010 census missed one million children under the age of five. because there is so much that depends on the census count whether it is congressional seats or federal funds, head start, medicare, have you looked at or thought about how we can the to make sure that undercounting of children starts going down and

she is sitting next to alex fisk. alex is returning to oig postal service a couple of years ago.i want to say thank you for your continued service to our country. we will miss you guys very much. >> thank you for your service. >> senator jones. >> does that 30 seconds go against me? >> you've got the full seven minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. and thank you both, to the nominees, for your willingness to be here and for your service. i appreciate it. dr. dillingham, i want to ask you a couple questions about the census. you answered senator hoeven's questions. i have very similar questions about rural america, because 55 out of my 67 counties are rural. i would appreciate being updated, and continuing the update on how we are going to reach out, because there are so many of them that are not served by the internet. it is going to be a real problem. the other area that it seems to me, the statistics i have seen is that coverage of adults for the census has improved a good bit since 1980, but there still is a net undercount of young children. that has been increasing. according

the next year, just three months after independent counsel robert fisk was named to lead the whitewater investigation, president clinton nominated justice breyer. he was confirmed 87-9. supreme court justices have not hesitated to rule against the presidents who have nominated them. perhaps most notably in the united states vs. nixon, three nixon appointees who heard the case joined the unanimous opinion against him. judge kavanaugh has been unequivocal in his belief that no president is above the law. he has stated that marbury vs. madison, youngstown steel vs. sawyer and the united states vs. nixon are three of the greatest supreme court cases in history. what do they have in common? each of them is a case where congress served as a check on presidential power. and i would note that the fourth case that judge kavanaugh has pointed to as the greatest in history was brown vs. the board of education. one kavanaugh decision illustrates the point about the check on presidential power directly. he wrote the opinion in hamdam vs. the united states, a case that challenges the bush administrat

come on back keith fisk. we held you over the break. is as close to a win-win for tesla, as you can get but you still won't touch the stock, will you? >> no, absolutely not. they have a billion dollars in debt. they have a high conversion price and they have a ceo who is still out of control. the real thing that stinks about this, for investors, they settle, there is no disclosure, no depositions, the public never sees what is going on behind the door. i think tesla has got significant problems why i still won't get near the stock. stuart: supposing this week we come out to say, yeah, we're producing all the model 3s we thought we were going to produce, we're on target, we're meeting the schedule, would you change your mind? >> we heard that before. we have the t-shirt. i would have to see hard numbers and cars rolling off the line. i would have most importantly to see the cash. if they don't hit the 359 conversion price, they don't individual. stuart: good stuff, keith. we'll see how it works out. >>> esports as arrived can i put it li