john flannery is fine. >> you've looked like john flannery your whole life. as you can tell by if you're watching, we're flying by the seat of our pants. we have more including what the democrats will do, what is their power the get the rest of the mueller report, and one of mueller's witnesses also joins me live. you haven't heard from any witnesses yet, but you will tonight if you stay with our special coverage. we'll be right back. coverage we'll be right back. i switched. we switched. i switched to chevy. i switched to chevy. we switched to chevy. we switched for value. for family. for power. it was time to upgrade. i switched from ram to chevy. see why people are switching to chevy. we love our chevy. i love my malibu. my colorado. my camaro. my traverse. why did we switch? just look at it. ♪ look limu. a civilian buying a new car.ug let's go. limu's right. liberty mutual can save you money by customizing your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. oh... yeah, i've been a customer for years. huh... only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. libert

we'll show people this like we did with john flannery. >> jean ross's notes.hat upsets you the most that you think it is not wrong but proper for an a.g. >> what is wrong and why this letter needs some sanitizer and it really does, he should not have made a decision on obstruction because in june of 2018, he already said i am not going to decide obstruction. number two, in those 48 hours. >> slow down. you are saying this attorney general took a position on this matter before he was put into power. >> yes, that should have been grounds for recusal so that's why this letter meant nothing to me. >> i look at the unsolicited -- he said it was grossly irresponsible, this is the man today made the decision of not enough evidence to bring charges against the president. what we have here, we are learning through history. this is the most controversial investigation of the president and american history. all we have right now is some skeletal information. some of it is ominous. what is it that mueller learned which made him unable to exonerate the president on the iss

and on the right is flannery underwood. she's a photographer. in the middle is their model, zoe. their job is to shoot high quality pictures in trashy areas. here they are on location number one. >> we've seen jessica's work on this show before. so i have no doubt they're going to make it look>> w comes to hi fashion, it's always about being weird. so some jex that position between their clothes and this stuff is what you expect to see. >> these pictures will be the first ones in your portfolio. >> and look at those weird poses, but then the pictures look amazing. >> a photographer has their own style, but this model knows what she's doing. >> i feel like it's harder if i have bad light than a bad location. >> lighting is everything. >> no sun or too much sun. >> the second location was flannery's choice. >> yeah, come on. >> it looks like something you see in vogue. >> it's clever. they matched the shoes with that. deliberate. >> and they actually did a bonus shoot. >> high fashion she's, that's in a magazine. now you're winning that. >> but the best photo pose came from maggie,

we'll show people this like we did with john flannery. >> jean ross's notes. what upsets you the most that you think it is not wrong but proper for an a.g. >> what is wrong and why this letter needs some sanitizer and it really does, he should not have made a decision on obstruction because in june of 2018, he already said i am not going to decide obstruction. number two, in those 48 hours. >> slow down. you are saying this attorney general took a position on this matter before he was put into power. >> yes, that should have been grounds for recusal so that's why this letter meant nothing to me. >> i look at the unsolicite unsoliciteunsolicited unsolicited -- he said it was grossly irresponsible, this is the man today made the decision of not enough evidence to bring charges against the president. what we have here, we are learning through history. this is the most controversial investigation of the president and american history. all we have right now is some skeletal information. some of it is ominous. what is it that mueller learned which made him unable to

this is flannery's note. can you come in for us?nobody can read my handwriting. >> here we go. >> you don't have steady? can we get steady cam? thank you for bearing with me. this is what mr. flannery have been doing all day. this is a complex piece of lawyering. i understand your point because you are saying -- >> it is a suspicious argument. if creative lawyering and careful quoting is being done to subvert the truth, you don't want to credit that. >> i am just pointing out that it is done in a very elegant way as senator blumenthal. it is not the last of it that we are going to hear. what i would like you to do is stick around. i am not here to do show and tell with your notes. robert ray is here. one of the things you think matters in nights like this is to actually engage in it. john flannery stays with me. what comes up next? well, i have a witness actually interviewed by mueller's team speaking out. lately, my take on this big night and i will share with you my special report on everything we have learned on the mueller probe

this is flannery. there you go. you got it? can you come in for it?can read my handwriting. here we go. all right. you don't have steady? can we get steadicam? there we go. now thank you to the audience for bearing with me. what i'm trying to show you, and i think it's worth the wait is this is what mr. flannery has been doing all day. and this is a complex piece of lawyering. you're not giving as much credit as i am. i understand your point. >> this is a suspicious document. >> you're saying if creative lawyering and careful quoting is being done to subvert the truth, you don't want to credit that. >> right. >> i'm pointing out it is done in a very elegant way is the way senator blumenthal said. i think it's not the last we're going to hear. what we'd like you to do is stick around. i'm not just here to do show-and-tell with your notes first. robert ray is here. one of the things that actually matters is to engage him. will you stick around next hour? >> absolutely. >> all right. john flannery stays with me. thanks to everyone. some of this we're doi

they think that if one guy can do it, flannery didn't have the confidence.s guy has the confidence. there will be more asset sales. someone said that maybe it was apollo's looking for $40 billion on one of the units. that's a lot of money but they have gazillions of dollars in debt. liz: annual high of the stock, 15 bucks. >> when was that? liz: what do you think, i can tell? we are at $10.33 right now. >> talking over the last couple years trn years, it's been rough. liz: where shall i begin? oh, my -- did i just do that? get me away from him. >> by the way, we deserve the credit at fox business, particularly this show. this is real. we deserve the credit, particularly at fox business on this show, for calling attention to the problems at ge. this time last year, we were saying they were going to withhold or take out the dividend to maybe one cent. remember that. liz: okay. this is real. unlike my love for you which is fake. charlie, thank you. we are coming right back. dow is up 26. this is decision tech. it's screening technology that helps you find a sto

this is flannery's note. can you come in for us?my handwriting. >> here we go. >> you don't have steady? can we get steady cam? thank you for bearing with me. this is what mr. flannery have been doing all day. this is a complex piece of lawyering. i understand your point because you are saying -- >> it is a suspicious argument. if creative lawyering and careful quoting is being done to subvert the truth, you don't want to credit that. >> i am just pointing out that it is done in a very elegant way as senator blumenthal. it is not the last of it that we are going to hear. what i would like you to do is stick around. i am not here to do show and tell with your notes. robert ray is here. one of the things you think matters in nights like this is to actually engage in it. john frlannery stays with me. what comes up next? well, i have a witness actually interviewed by mueller's team speaking out. lately, my take on this big night and i will share with you my special report on everything we have learned on the mueller probe up to tonight.

i am joined by federal prosecutor john flannery.did mueller file late today and what will it do in your view? >> well, he filed a notice about the government's side of the question whether or not mr. roger stone had violated the court's gag order not to say anything about the prosecutor or the prosecution in any media at all, including instagram. and it turns out even as he was standing be every the judge, he had written a book with a new introduction. the introduction talked about how crooked mueller was put him on his hit list among other things. >> right. >> so in addition owe ho. >> when mueller tells the judge, stone is talking about the case. do you think that makes it more likely this judge will jail stone? >> oh, yes. in fact, the judge said at the last hearing when the judge wasn't happy about having a target next to her picture in an instagram publication by mr. stone, she said, this is the last time. so, if she stands by what she said in the last hearing, i hope he brought his toothbrush, i hope he brings his toothbrush w

i'm joined by joyce vance and john flannery. everyone is here. neil is here as well. starting with you, nick, that's on the rules and what we're going to learn. >> right. >> what does it mean to you that bob mueller finished work tonight. he did not end with a bang of new public indictments. it would seem unless we get something else unsealed that this investigation ends with the 37. >> if you read the literal language in that letter, he's explaining the decisions to prosecute and the declinations he has reached. does that mean he is asking bar for permission i don't know. it certainly leaves that open. >> he suggests that. >> narrator: under the rules he must state and he never did. bob mueller is done with this job. >> if you read that language, it explains the decisions he has reached on prosecutions and declinations. we don't know what he reached on declinations. i don't know if the attorney general knows that. but when he uses the tense has reached, does that mean he has reached certain decisions on indicting individuals and he's asking for permission from the de

john carlin, john flannery, our two legal johns here. thank you so much. really appreciate it. >>> up ahead, an exclusive with a state lawmaker with plans that are being voted on to force trump to either release his tax returns or be shut off a key ballot in a key state. >>> or later, what does one freshman star, aoc have to do with potted plants and the census and holding ross accountable? all that later in the show. the way they subscribe to movies. we don't follow the naysayers. ♪ ♪ let's see, aleve is than tylenol extra strength. and last longer with fewer pills. so why am i still thinking about this? i'll take aleve. aleve. proven better on pain. your control. like bedhead. hmmmm. ♪ rub-a-dub ducky... and then...there's national car rental. at national, i'm in total control. i can just skip the counter and choose any car in the aisle i like. so i can rent fast without getting a hair out of place. heeeeey. hey! ah, control. (vo) go national. go like a pro. [zara larsson - "wow"] ♪ ♪ make you're jaw drop drop say oh my drop drop drop ♪ ♪ make u say oh m

next speaker. >> constance flannery. >> hi. i first appeared before you in early july of 2018 with a petition from 40 immediate neighbors of the proposed sites forg for go bike. all opposed the site. i live across the street from the miguel arlington spot. i have a car. i have a garage. i'm not against bikes either. bikes are great. but this is not the issue. the issue is safety. these are unsafe sites. since i last was here and had a petition from 40 neighbors, i now have it from 80. all of them live within a quarter of a mile of the proposed sites. all feel these are dangerous sites. the parking -- excuse me, the street of randall -- i'm particularly concerned about the side of the school because i feel it is really unsafe for the children and the traffic with people going down randall, people going down chenery, people going down arlington, trying to get to 280. it is a really unsafe location. i didn't get any of the notices, either. i found out about it from a friend, and i went door to door, and for. go bike difor go bike

john flannery, good to see you. in addition to those facts, special counsel to three different congressional investigations and we begin with you there. our panel will weigh in as well. for starters to you, what does it mean when you see the looming deadlines on the putin docs, the business associates in the judiciary committee? >> i'm very encouraged by it. it shows that the congress is doing its business. they'll get probably satisfaction from most of the requests they've made and then they'll have to pick and choose which ones they want to fight about, if they have to fight about it, and i think they might do better if they defined what their objective is rather than just saying it's oversight. by that i mean if they have to get into a court case, it would be more helpful to say it's in constant plagues of possible impeachment. the courts have made distinctions in grand juries and subpoena fights between whether or not there was a criminal case pending and whether it was a congressional subpoena. and in this case

former federal prosecutor john flannery, special counsel counsel to three investigations, and former attorney barbara mcquade knows her way around these issues. john, i see you moving around in your chair, but you can hear me, can't you? >> absolutely. >> reliance. do you buy it? >> no, i don't. it's interesting what these guys do. reliance is based on the pla n platonic idea of an attorney -- he didn't want an attorney, he wanted a fixer. he wanted someone to do what he wanted done and he didn't care about the law. this guy has a whole line of these people, starting with mr. cohen, the famous get the communists who associated him with mobsters who told him to fight and make demands and everything else. there is no reason to believe for an instant that reliance -- and sean hannity, what a pair talking about this as if they know what an attorney is and that's what they want to have done. that's not at all what this was about. >> yeah, i thought, and i say this in all fairness, barbara, i thought this was one of those rebuttals and defenses that really showed they have no ground left.

it had a very important place, especially in literature, people like faulkner, flannery o'connor had great influence in american letters. here, we are talking about pop culture. americans are really kind of absorbing this very specific southern culture. as we look to civil rights, we saw upswings, in terms of women's rights and gay rights, but civil rights is a different story in the 1970's. i will also put this powerpoint up, so have no fear. after the civil rights act of 1964, after the voting rights act of 1965, the question is what comes next? as the supreme court begins to take up hearings on certain issues, many having to do with schools, one that does not have to do with schools has to do with employment. what kind of test can an employer give to potential employees? intelligence testing. what kind of requirements can they make? can they require a high school degree? the plaintiffs argued that duke power company was using the high school degree argument, and it was adversely impacting african-american applicants. african-americans had lower rates of high school graduation. the

john flannery was there sunday night as this news broke, and he said one of the most telling things barr was withholding at that hour was the number of pages of the mueller report. >> what do you take from the first facts before we get beyond that? >> i wonder why we don't even know the number of pages in the report. >> if barr would have told us today that mueller wrote a report that was fuft pages or 200 or 500, that alone would be a great piece of context for these four. >> as ari melber pointed out in his coverage of this last night on this network, the attorney general didn't tell us something as simple as how many pages there are in the report. is it 50? is it 500? >> it's at least 300 and we're five days out of a lot of discussion, including some in the media that seem to play into barr's strategy there. now what does this page count mean in terms of comparisons to other reports? we can show you. the iran/contra and starr report were longer but in the ballpark. 445 pages from starr. a lot more than 4. now today democrats are seizing on this. they are saying that, number one, they

people like flannery o'connor, faulkner.-- americans are really beginning to absorb this there, very specific southern culture. rights, weto civil saw upswings in terms of women's rights and gay rights, but civil rights is a little bit of a different story in the 1970's. i will also put this powerpoint up on the blackboard. after the civil rights act, after the voting rights act, the question is what comes next. and the supreme court begins to take up hearings on certain issues, many of them having to do with schools. one that does not have to do with schools has to do with what kind ofd tots can an employer give potential employees? testing, what kind of requirements can they make? can they require a high school degree? and the plaintiff had argued that the duke power company is where using a high school requirement, that was adversely impacting african-american athletes. african-americans had lower rates of high school graduation. and the court argued that any kind of requirement has to be essential, irreplaceable and directly related to a job. impact, if disparate some requirement

thinking is this another -- i don't want to make the comparison necessarily, but is this another john flanneryoment where you have the guy coming out and giving forecasts and just months later sort of taking that down again what can you belief? >> it's hard to get your arms exactly how quickly things are eroding and, i mean, it also comes after they do this sale of part of the health care business it seems like -- you see clear operating performance pulling up behind it and getting better >> the stock was up tremendously >> it was. >> recently he had said he thought things would get a little worse he has been right on just about everything he said on that he was joking around yesterday up during this call and actually -- or during this conference and said people asked me all the time if you hate me or not anything you want to say on thathat culp responded, no, we're friends, as i told my daughter tuss has been right on seeing things coming. >> it's a concern that the stock is down in response to this, but it's more of a concern that the bonds are down, particularly ge capital. right now the bo