this is generally not florensky china.e can say that this is a project of socio-cultural political reform of the soviet union that happened. but at the same time, what we observed uh in the country after the collapse of the soviet union followed a completely different model. it seems to me that one can describe our life in the nineties with such a prison slogan. don't believe, don't be afraid. don't ask, so we lived no, really, we asked for humanitarian aid. we we received. i remember when we were in school, uh dry milk in cans and stew from america were sent from america how did it happen that the country went some other way after it collapsed from the union, we most often say that the lack of ideology gave here the tone of the state, uh, which hmm was tuned to emama extermination and self-destruction. i disagree with this, by the way. the very extermination and self-destruction is inherent in general modern civilization and culture. she's very culture uh, liberalism turned from a way of thinking to a harmless way of thin

this is generally not china, the florensky priest refers.e can say that this is a project of socio-cultural political reform of the soviet union, which happened much later. moreover, what we observed in the country after the collapse of the soviet union followed a completely different model. it seems to me that you can describe our life in the nineties like this prison slogan. don't believe, don't be afraid. don't ask, so we lived no, really, we asked for humanitarian aid. we we received. i remember when i was at school, they sent us dried milk in cans and stew from america how it happened that the country went some other way after the collapse of the soviet union, we most often say why the lack of ideology gave the tonality of e state here , uh, which was set to uh, the most extermination and the most destruction. i disagree with this, by the way. the very extermination and self-destruction is inherent in modern civilization and culture in general. it's very culture, uh, that 's the post-modern ideology of liberalism, which has turned from

you will never understand what father sergei bulgakov wrote and i can’t convey in words to pavel florenskyf the motherland of the great mighty essence would be mine for all sins and falls. well, in the trials of his chosenness, how it lived in his father, and of course it was no coincidence that he did not go abroad. we can say that life seemed to offer him a choice between the solovki and paris, but he chose his homeland. although those were solovki, he wanted to share your fate with his people to the end. and he himself and his fate is the glory and greatness of the motherland, and in front of you, after all, there is far from such a choice. if the question would be like this, you would tongue the asphalt in pari lick you, but they simply ask you not to be cattle, and after all, not a single educated person even uttered a word in memory of the murdered oles elder, where is your intelligent solidarity and not a single timid word was heard from one department in defense of i am on the taxi of the ukrainian poet and writer whose behind the walls your fights, on which you secretly pray, the

still, to take a little wider, you have many works dedicated to the philosopher priest, and pavel florenskys work. this is the iconostasis. well, here, i want to start with his other works. this is the proposed state structure in the future. how do you see ideology for modern russia - what should it be and should it come from above? or should it rise from the masses? what do you think? there must be some kind of synthesis associated with the opposition up and