has fmcma ignores this key signing.understand her festers fmcma submitted a report into the dock is seen in the her prodigious research to support conclusions. fmcma's unsupported assumptions about reduce driver vitality inflate the benefits of the proposed road by $690 million annually. in addition to these three issues there's other unsupported assertions and methodological errors which further inflate the apparent in a fit of the proposed rule. if these problems are corrected i find the new rule would result in a net cost of $320 million annually, rather than a net benefit of 380 million is calculated by the fmcma. i note that mr. jansy stated we had a recommendation that the new rule not include benefits from improved driver health. that is certainly not my position. i just believe calculations should be done based on the most accurate and the best available data. i thank you for your time and encourage you to read my report. >> thank you. that may start with you. mr. jansy said this proposal would create 30,000 job