they reviewed the allegations and the company and o'reilly have agreed he will not be returning to foch carl tuckerson will take over the 8:00 slot. i thought it was really interesting. what they said to employees. they made the point that the lineup is strong. they say that fox is demonstrating the strength of the talent bench and they have confidence it will be a powerhouse and they say it cops down to the decision to care about values. i'm trying to make a point the employees and investors they're trying to do the right thing of. >> thanks for the update. earlier this month, the president of china made a visit you might remember to the president's home in mar-a-lago. three new trade decisions were made by ivanka trump's brand. and the attorney says since she resigned her position, ivanka has had no involve wmt trademark pligss submitted by the business. she recuse heavy where there will be impartiality concerns. sales for the brand are estimated to be at record levels in 2017, asse ethics concernsontinue to be raised. for on all this, i'm joined by rachel abe raps will and dottie who

as gloria said, we have to look at the size of his audience, foch fox's audience. it's the dominant cable news channel in terms of viewership because he and others at fox and murdoch and ailes' vision of an alternative universe that was previously not mainstream -- >> carl makes some interesting points here. there's a strong argument to be made that in the end the public -- the consumers brought him down. it's not unlike what has happened to trump in some ways. his base has been very strong. but his overall approval ratings have been falling. that's because there are -- i think there are a lot of people out there that fox knew were going to put pressure on the advertisers. >> his advertisers pulled out a lot since that "new york times" article. it was an escalating -- a cascade -- >> when they pulled out, fox is in a situation where a lot of consumers will turn against the advertisers if they came back. that's why they in the end for a variety of reasons, but one was the business reasons that gloria cited. i think they felt the consumers -- even though they kept th

not necessarily of the but you have to think about foch and the next generation. they do embrace global citizenship. they have a massive partnership with "national geographic." think of what it is like for them. we have the e.p.a. getting strict and more climate deniers than anyone saw coming rflt they suddenly going to have a diversity candidate filling that slot? that's unclear. it is a massive company. they want to make a lot more acquisitions. so what their brand is on a global scale matters. >> talk to me with the murdoch sons and what value they want to champion with this company and how much this company stands to change with them taking on larger leadership roles. >> it is somewhat unclear. but if you spend any time with these guys, they are thoughtful, they are global guys. they have a different perspective than the traditional fox news model. but fox news is a cash cow that cannot denied. so it will be interesting to see how this plays out. when you saw someone like roger ailes get pushed out of the company. that was the influence of the murdoches, speci