if we do not get the folsom st. it the way transit resolved, at some point in my lifetime, we are going to have no ability to solve the traffic problems. every new project that goes up sells for a million-dollar condo. someone is going to drive. you get people in low income housing that have less of an incentive to drive. we must solve the transit problems. in the eastern neighborhoods and in this out the market in particular, this is high on the agenda and this is not something that the department has a function on. you have to be dealing with this. the second is if the planning department's staff reviews the project, the tendency is to look to the code. what you have been hearing about are planned policies and there will be language in the code that allows for a exception on parking in particular. all of these things go out the window if you have an exception in the code because the staff mentality is that they apply a coat, they don't apply in the plan. is the southeast quadrant a functional entity? i would say 9

as a prior facility and add a reference to the property at 935 folsom st.. the requested action is associated with the expansion of the san francisco museum of modern art, which would relocate the existing fire station from the property to a new facility located at 935 folsom st. pier 3 is 545 irving st., formerly 555 irving st., retail 1. it is a quest for a conditional use authorization to modify the conditions of a prior conditional use authorization to extend the hours of operation of an existing wine bar doing business as inner father in the inner sunset commercial neighborhood districts appeared and item four is case 2011, -- this is a request for conditional use authorization to allow at&t mobility to locate up to eight wts panel and tennis in faux vents on the roofs of two separate structures and related equipment in a building basement of the tibia and three-story commercial buildings within a residential, commercial combined, and high-density district. commissioners, following public comment, which would automatically remove the item from the conse

with folsom st. events for social heritage treatments on bring gold, between eighth and ninth street. -- ringgold, in terms of what is being done on improving the public realm in those alleyways. we're trying to create an application that would go to the committee challenge grant program that would look at actual, let's say, artistic sort of elements in those alleyways that would be part of the public realm.. the second speaker that of like to introduce is professor gail ruben, an associate professor of anthropology and a women's studies at the university of michigan, and she is currently a visiting fellow at the center for advanced study -- study in behavioral sciences at stanford university. gail has been extraordinarily helpful in looking at the rich array of lgbt yosources in the committee in the south of market. she is an extraordinary scholar in many respects, and she has perhaps one of the most comprehensive, outside of perhaps the formal museum for that community and a library. she has an inc

i would like to see something on folsom st.. we have connected with something there.se are the steps you have to put in place. as far as the recommendations you have in front of you, i would say that, yes, muni should be free. i believe in that. i am not a driver. i believe we should work on this interest and at the minimum, look at passing a resolution to make sure we do not lose services in terms of the 30 and 45 because that was promised. but this is a different subject about infrastructure for soma. supervisor campos: thank you. next speaker. it there is any member of the public who has not spoken on this item would like to speak, please come forward. >> thank you. i rely solely on muni, and i am concern about the project's impact on service across the entire system. perhaps supervisor farrell has misplace the location of where mission bay is located. gao was required to hold the hearing today in response to the grand jury. they would be doing a great disservice if it does not audit and hold a separate hearing on the cost overruns for the central subway project. s

of the city recently, it would be proposed that accessory entertain it would be permitted in the folsom st. nct, to add a little life to that street, with it being the main street of western soma. >> thank you. >> well, thank you very much. thank you so much for sitting through two informational presentations on the plan. no, the board of supervisors, which is currently elected by district, this commission, which shares split appointments between the mayor's office and the board of supervisors and the western soma citizens planning task force, are all basically the result of the excesses' of the 1990's. we had a planning commission and the board of supervisors back then that approved housing where housing did not belong. we are responsible for a mix -- for creating a mix of incompatible uses that are still fighting with each other. it caused a great deal of displacement. the western soma task forces how the community responded. we created a unique partnership with 26 stakeholders from the community, with a good many educational institutions, such as san francisco state, you see berkeley, c

i different project, on folsom st., letting people know that they may be impacted, wondering what efforts have been done, will be taken, going forward? >> folsom was coming out of the planning department's mission streetscape program. there were a lot of things from the planning department reaching out on the designs from the project. that is why our project is looking at 13th to 19th. it is a time-into other things going on from 19th and further out. there have been a lot of effort from our office and from the community. commissioner campos: just not sure to the extent the bike lanes was an emphasis there. it would be helpful to provide more information. i know most people would welcome that but, i know i am thrilled to see this happening, but it would be good to provide more specific information. >> the project manager did reference to me that they did meet with the community. there was some concern about some of the parking changes. they lost four spaces in the project between 13th to 19th mostly because of the extending of bus zones. since we are a multi-modal agency, we are trying to

. >> [laughter] >> in 1990 -- 1966, two gay bars opened on folsom st.. e stud quickly became a kind of hit the dance bar and is now located elsewhere, night and harrison. in 1968, the ramrod opened for the down folsom streets. then the place opened up called the in between, because it was in between the other two. that are was many incarnations, now powerhouse. in the late 1960's and through the 1970's, gay and other places started to multiplying in the area. much of this happen because the neighborhood, once san francisco is a desk drawer power house and primary working residential district has been undergoing changes brought about by de industrialization to dr. oz work, ii, many facilities lead -- during world war ii, they let the neighborhood. the core function shifted to oakland and didn't -- and their real roads in the area began to be dismantled. you can still see remnants of some of those railroad tracks, particularly in the areas out of harrison street and into the base of potrero hills. most of the blue-collar residents of population also went wi