this is just one form of blackmail. the us has a malicious purpose when they force nato members to increase the defense budget, given the current energy crisis and the serious inflationary situation in the eu an increase in the defense budget may further cause public dissatisfaction with governments, which will make it easier for the united states to influence the government of the eu countries. europe, the anti-russian strategy may result in a massive disruption of global production chains and will systematically affect food supplies lead to energy shortages expert clarifies against the sharp rise in energy prices, inflation and the supply of weapons to ukraine with such an appeal, protesters took to the streets of leipzig, local residents chanted slogans and beat drums. according to the demonstrators. in germany, this is a puppet serving the interests of the us and nato, the protesters are convinced that they are paying too high a price for the actions of their politicians. we cannot remain silent and not complain, because we do not want europe to the lights went out, we do not demand a n

the us also has a malicious purpose when it force nato members to increase the defense budget, given the current energy crisis and the serious inflationary situation in the eu, increase the defense budget. maybe even more to cause discontent of the population with governments, which will make it easier for the united states to influence the government of the eu countries, the publication also notes the energy crisis in europe arose due to a breakdown in communication between russia and russia, according to the director of the department of european and chinese institute of international studies the energy problem has reduced competitiveness, europe's leading economies the anti-russian strategy could turn into a massive one. disruption of global production chains and will systematically affect food supplies, lead to shortages and energy resources, the expert clarifies. in the meantime, europe is adopting documents that have no legal force, but somehow overlaps its own agenda, the european parliament by a majority of votes adopted a resolution recognizing russia as a state sponsor of t

the other he forc nato e other he forc nato and her he we 1:2: lat.have i: if -:�*i ll: ll . winds. have i: if -:li ll ll winds. hav it ll if -:li ll: ll . winds. hav it will. if -lli ll5 ll . winds. hav it will also lli ll5 ll . wind for av it will also lli ll5 ll . wind forav it will also ll putin ll . moscow and mosco thati use achieve se that russia has no win. does that mean russia has no resence win. does that mean russia has no presence in — win. does that mean russia has no presence in - or— win. does that mean russia has no presence in - or the - win. does that mean russia has no presence in - or the donbas? win. does that mean russia has no i presence in - or the donbas? at presence in crimea or the donbas? gift the end presence in crimea or the donbas? git the end of the day, it has to be ukraine that decides what kind of conditions they are willing to accept. the reaching solution the table is 77 strength 77 77 strength are 77 77 strength areable 77 77 strength are able tof z—zlelie g _ g m 7m on reason why we need to support him on the ba

yes, for collective security, this is a very significant escalation . to act, nato forces have been transferredo high alert, some units of the polish armed forces have been transferred to combat, this was announced by the president of poland at the evening briefing, who fired the rocket into the territory of the country and is still being established, according to angeluda , the search for evidence continues, most likely it was a russian-made missile, the head of the country noted that there were no signs of a repeat of today's incident, that is, yesterday's incident, we know very well that the russian missile attack on ukraine lasted all day, but at the moment we have no clear evidence the person who launched the rocket is an investigator. i hope they will clarify this issue, most likely it was a russian-made rocket, but all this is currently being investigated, not only will we talk with oleksiy buryachenko is a candidate of political sciences and the executive director of the international association of small communities oleksiy greetings to you good morning good morning good morning greeti

from us, marine co intelligence office escort were to say, nato has been preparing ukrainian forces against russia. 40 states, yes. anglo merck was admitted that she was buying time, buying time for what to make ukraine stronger out through nato training. and it wasn't just nato's united states to so america was involved in this as well. it's clear that all the nations that are accusing russia of being the aggressor, or in fact, a guilty of premeditated war of aggression. this is something that they conceived of in 2014, 2015. you know, the united states could a training facility on the ground and ukraine, where american military personnel bragged about how every 55 days. they were training a ukrainian, but valued to nato standards for the sole purpose of singing that battalion each, so they could fight russians in the eastern ukraine. this has been the goal from day one, ongoing america light, emanuel macro and light bill west light, can ever be trusted again. ah, the french defense minister has to india on sunday to boost ties between the 2 countries ahead of a possible visit by the frenc

half used to build the ukrainian forces to build the ukrainian economy, to train ukrainian forces alongside nato, to create the best on forces in eastern europe, according to nato stunned it. so now it makes a lot more sense why washington was able to freely pump $21.00 and a half $1000000000.00 into eastern ukraine. 2014, the region served as the fact of nato bass right up on russia's border while the west was more focused on training for conflict, rather than defusing it, as they had agreed to help do. meanwhile, russia consistently sounded the alarm over the fact that keith was in constant breach of the peace deal. we'll do guarantee the internal crisis in ukraine will not be resolved, as long as the current care regime avoids fulfilling its international legal obligations. the attempts to unravel the key points of the minster codes is a pause towards a catastrophe. uminski. the good on this is minsk agreements were killed long before the recognition of the people's republic subbed on bass. they were not killed by us or the representatives of the republics, but by the currents key of authorit

the ukrainian forces was hard to build the cranium, economy to try and ukrainian forces alongside nato, to create the best home forces in eastern europe. according to nato stumbled, sure. so nowadays, a lot more sense why washington was able to freely palm $21.00 and a half $1000000000.00 into eastern ukraine's at 2014. the region served as a de facto nato base, right up on russia's border while the west was more focused on training for conflict, rather than defusing it, as they had agreed to help do. meanwhile, russia consistently sounded the alarm over the fact that keith was in constant breach of the peace deal. the process of conflict resolution is still failing. despite all our efforts, keith is not complying with the means could ribbons and in particular, categorically refuses to enter direct dialogue with the mask and le ganske. thus sabotage the implementation of agreements on all the key issues of the main sc agreements. the amendments to the constitution, the special status of don bos, local elections, an amnesty nowadays, western officials are quick to repeat the mantra that

of the alliance, a military attack on that country could trigger direct involvement from other nato forces. however, nato's top military power is a us doesn't seem to be as confident as is partners and invoking article 5. as the pentagon has admitted that washington cannot confirm whether the missile was russian. well, i think we want to deal with facts. and so again, we've seen the press reports, and as i mentioned before, i walked in here no information to corroborate these reports at this time. but again, we're taking them seriously and we're looking into them. and so i think it's incumbent on, on all of us to get the facts before we start speculating or jumping to conclusions . and then we'll go from there. now it appears so far the united states has given us somewhat measured response, while some members of nato seem to be calling for an immediate escalation. we are hearing washington say that they need time to investigate and determine the truth. here's what we heard from the state department, just after what we heard earlier from the pentagon. i don't want to speculate about hypothe

build the ukrainian economy, to train ukrainian forces alongside nato, to create the best armed forces in eastern europe, according to nato standards. now he is the one who signed it originally back in september of 2014. and now we know once again that he never planned on implementing the minsk agreements. and this is something that vladimir putin was talking about all along. he said that one of the reasons for the special military operation was failure to observe the men's agreements. and if we take a look at a chart by the o s. c, we can see that the number of violations increased significantly in there. you have it before. it was just under 200, then it rose all the way to over a 1000 and some cases, 1200 explosions in the don boss. so again, when the key of in the west say that this is special, military operation was unprovoked. this is exactly what moscow is talking about. saying that this was one of the reasons why russia felt the need to start this operation. also. and other reason was nato and circling russia and trying to add ukraine to it's less than we heard from petra porsc

the territory of poland and will not cause any new upheavals, any new tragedies there in order to force natoountries to review their own approaches now, including the situation regarding the possibility of closing the skies over ukraine or at least partially closing them, which was also discussed, and this initiative came from our polish partners. i just think that unfortunately such tragic incidents may happen in the future and this may change the position of nato countries. yulia, in the end, i ca n't help but remember the saying that if you choose between shame and war, the first one is getting the first and the second one in the european union, considering to numerous threats . let's say that in the direction of the poles and the baltic countries, in particular, great britain, there were threats from russia regarding destruction in the first place. they don't understand that war can come to them, that's how it is to sum it up briefly, thank you yulia, a diplomat from smolov was with us. thank you for the opportunity to join the broadcast. further short news: radiation safety and the situ

of the alliance, a military attack on that country could trigger direct involvement from other nato forces. however, nato's top military power, the u. s. has tone down its partners, will in to invoke article 5. joe biden says the missiles were unlikely to be fired by russia, with the pentagon admitting that washington can not confirm whether they were used by the russian military. well, i think we want to deal with facts, and so again, we've seen the press reports. and as i mentioned before, i walked in here no information to corroborate these reports at this time. but again, we're taking them seriously and we're looking into them. and so i think it's incumbent on, on all of us to get the facts before we start speculating or jumping to conclusions . and then we'll go from there. now it appears so far the united states has given us somewhat measured response, while some members of nato seem to be calling for an immediate escalation. we are hearing washington say that they need time to investigate and determine the truth. here's what we heard from the state department, just after what we hea

flavio and i've gone as non serious because the war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by nato forces in all of these countries, nato actually qualifies under articles 9 and 10 of the nuremberg stack. you are talking about the london agreement of 8 august 945. now articles 9 and 10 concern criminal organizations. criminal organizations, such as i have helped on in that your money as the, as, as et cetera. now considering the war, crimes that have been committed by nato forces in total impunity, they certainly qualify as a criminal organization and i would like to see em bathroom and then they figure a council actually hold natal. let alfred, let me, let me go down. guess in belgrade said, i mean international law, it's really quite whimsical. how the west uses. international law only mentioned it when it's to its own purposes and it, and most of the time it's very sloppy also. ok. they really aren't very good at invoking it. they always broken against someone else like war crime trials. i mean it's always a serve. it's never, never anybody out. it is weird. ok. ok. but i'll give you t

to build the ukrainian economy, to train ukrainian forces alongside nato, to create the best armed forces in eastern europe, according to nato standards. yeah, no load should rosa. well, as cross live, it's who are correspond to the studio. now marina call to river hooper. he comes in to discuss this further marina. this isn't the 1st time that portion care is admitted that he has wasn't planning on following through with the minsk agreements . tell us more. absolutely, and now he is the one who signed it originally back in september of 2014. and now we know once again that he never planned on implement in the midst agreements. and this is something that vladimir putin was talking all talking about all along. he said that one of the reasons for the special military operation was failure to observe the minsk agreements. and if we take a look at a chart by the o s. c, we can see that the number of violations increased significantly in there. you have it before. it was just under 200, which was again enough, but then it rose all the way to over a 1000 and some cases, 1200 explosi

already in the process er, and the pilots have already been determined by the commander of the air force, natoleonchuk, who really can would go to the same training in the near future. if the type of aircraft on which it is necessary to go to study has already been determined, the problems may be of a different, more complex nature, that is, with their maintenance of these aircraft at an already ground base the training of engineers, and the international evaluation service, which has to maintain these planes and runways and infrastructure of airfield networks on a daily basis, so these are all extremely complex things that need to be resolved, but i want to assure you that work has been going on in this regard for a long time and there is a certain plan of action and there are certain issues that have already been dealt with, with a decision, a political decision, which should be made by our partners, mr. yury nosyk, in the area of ​​the oryol region, the village of stariy kon, allegedly, they have something happened to the oil base, they blamed it on some unmanned aerial vehicle, uh, the gov

cities. members of the russian, duma and defense forces say the strike is a ukrainian attempt to force nato to be directly involved in the conflict. ukraine's president has demanded immediate access to the site. jonah, how report snack from keith? this missiles trajectory had the potential to affect the course of the conflict as a whole, the war in ukraine seeming to spill over on to neighboring territory polish territory . nato territory. i'm ha, ha ha. i ran over to the window because it was pretty close. 100 meters, i saw this monstrous black cloud and a streak of terrible smoke. on the other side of the world in barley, leaders of the g 7 and nato nations convened an emergency meeting a missile attack on one nato country could trigger a collective response from the whole alliance. but afterwards, the u. s. president remained cautious. i found my claim. the mines in yet was fired from russia. right. we're will see photos of the miss al debris in poland suggest it was part of an s 300 air defense system. soviet made and used by both russian and ukrainian forces. poland now says the missil

a military attack on that country could trigger direct involvement from other nato forces. however, nato's top military power, the u. s. doesn't seem to be as confident as its partners and invoking article fine . as the pentagon has admitted, washington can not confirm whether the missiles were russian. well, i think we want to deal with facts. and so again, we've seen the press reports. and as i mentioned before, i walked in here no information to corroborate these reports at this time. but again, we're taking them seriously and we're looking into them. and so i think it's incumbent on, on all of us to get the facts before we start speculating or jumping to conclusions . and then we'll go from there. for more on the cross live now to archie correspondent, caleb mop. and now kayla, what do we know? so far about this incident, while other nato countries seem to be pressing for some kind of escalation, we are hearing a very measured response from washington. we heard 1st from the pentagon and then from the state department from the state department, we heard quote, it is impor

i think the only possibility, but 1st strike would come from nato forces. and there, i don't think there's a complete consensus over doing it. but i think there are certainly a strong element of thought, both within the white house and the one number 10 downing street to use nuclear weapons. i think it's a very big risk, and i think there sort of us a struggle going on over whether that should be done. now speaking about this lack of consensus and just the other day if you want to heal a respected american caller, a freshman, the former adviser to president trump said in one of the interviews, the americans have to have what you called strategic empathy, about putin and that they need to understand how the guy things do you agree with that? and if so, it doesn't mean that washington at this point doesn't understand. most goes rationale, despite being so heavily involved and invested in this bloodshed. don't really think that washington cares about the russian perspective. it is not difficult to see why russia was finally forced into this war in february 23r

to support the war effort, the ukraine, but a lot of funds are also going into strengthening the nato forces in europe. i think since the beginning of this year and the number of nader troops in eastern europe has 12240000, that's nearly 10 times more than it was last year. do you think nato at this point is fully prepared for an open confrontation with russian not only weapons wise, but also in terms of the battle field experience of its troops? i think there's a move in that direction to where the nato nato to build up is forces to, to become more combat. ready. it's interesting that before all of this began, i stumbled over the fact that germany, which has the greatest interest in national security, they should be russia. they only had $200.00 facts, $200.00 operational tanks for the entire country of germany. that to me is clear, prove that, that germany considered the risk of war with russia at absolutely 0. they saw a note from russia. senator, you can blame the germans for that because i think many in russia also believe the a, including among military personnel. they believe that a k

i think there's a move in that direction to where the nature of nato to build up its forces to, to become more combat. ready. it's interesting that before all of this began, i stumbled over the fact that germany, which has the greatest interest in national security the should be russia. they only had $200.00 facts, $200.00 operational tags for the entire country of germany. that to me is clear, prove that germany considered the risk of war with russia at absolutely 0. they saw a note from russia. senator, you can blame the germans for that because i think many in russia also believe the a, including among military personnel. they believe that a kinetic war is impossible and yet that, you know, the, the issue of battlefield experience is becoming a crucial issue in this conflict. and in one of your articles, you mentioned that the russians are now fighting one of the most challenging forms of warfare, urban combat, which is very brutal, very difficult. but as we know, what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. don't you think that if russia succeeds in defending an interest in ukraine than