despite the neighborhood, you cannot imagine the neighborhood effort to get in forssmann, with building code violations and police code violations, without success. anyway, continuing homeless encampments, sometimes looking like a dystopian movie -- i was up there waiting for the bus on a saturday, and there was the scene described to you by the neighbor across the street. the man with the walker was there. his friend had come out to talk with him. on the steps was a man with a cane. a lady with a dog had gone out to walk and was socializing with him. with the footprint, you can see how far beckett is set. it really is ideal for the thing that was suggested, that we suggested, and our alternative project, around the perimeter, where people can gather, and the community room, because we simply do not have something like that. one of the subject of people formerly with non-hill neighborhood -- that is completely incompatible. you think the homeowner association would say, just wander into our building for your meeting? never mind about security. we cannot even get into the church at 1300

responding to the example you present, the reality is -- and this is based upon what forssmann investigation techniques etc., -- based upon law enforcement investigation techniques, etc. -- using this drone to observe a marijuana field, it would not be a good investigative tool because of the restraint the faa puts on the use of uavs flying no higher than 400 feet and because of the noise and size of it. if we are trying to investigate whether there's a marijuana field to continue with our destination and ultimately arrest suspects, the uav is not yet. -- is not it. >> are you comfortable enough attention is being given to that individual rights and civil liberties of citizens given the use of this type of surveillance? >> i'm not sure of comfortable be the right term. we do respect the fact law- enforcement does not plan to use drones for broad tent -- are brought and then targeted access and we it -- we respect the supreme court precedent that allows for aerial surveillance in open fields. however, recently, the supreme court did investigate a case of police using gps without a warrant to

with regard to over one forssmann, i think we will end the fiscal year with similar results to last yearabout 400,000 removals. like last year, this will focus on for some priorities. over half left criminal convictions and the best majority of the rest will be those who have ignored the final order and those who have been deported before. i am cautiously optimistic we will remove the highest number of aggregate -- of aggravated felons and our history. i want to thank the committee for its thoughtful bipartisan approach. i have always on the committee's oversight of ice to have been firm but fair. i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thank you very much. i would start off talking about secure communities. it has been a successful program. that was one of the reasons we want to call this hearing today, to do our congressional oversight and italy with the program, how it rolled out, what were some of the hiccups we encountered along the way, and i think highlight the successful part of this program. everything we're doing with regard to border security is not as successful a