in france, the great depression sparked a wave of protests.ss strikes virtually paralyzed the country's economy. during the crisis, the total number of protests in france increased by 10 times and reached 17 thousand per year. in 1936 , 2.5 million workers took part in the protests. that same year , a coalition of left-wing parties, the so-called popular front, won the parliamentary elections. the new government of france was headed by socialist leon blum. as a result of the crisis, the government of blum's popular front came to power, they took a whole series of very drastic measures, this included a forty-hour work week, an increase in social benefits, and generally an expansion of the social base, that is, it was quite expensive, but france had money in general on that’s all, another thing is that there was an overlay, it was at this time that it became clear that the situation... was largely populist from the moment clemenceau resigned in january 2020 until the start of the second world war, that is, until september 1939 , in france, 42 ca

100 billion francs.government was forced. nationalize all railways and some military factories. on the pages of the right-wing press, french industrialists launched a violent campaign against the popular front. propaganda campaign. publicist raymond oron recalled: these sheets, fed with hatred, expressed the psychology of a certain part of the bourgeoisie, including that whose symbol became the famous phrase: “better hitler than blum.” as stated. to build 300-400-700 tanks a year there in order to begin rearmament, and new models, then it is simply not ready for this, because it requires rearmament of production, expansion of this production, purchase of new machines when they say it is necessary here to rearm it factories start producing heavy, powerful tanks, renault says, but i won’t do this, it’s not for me to take down the factory that i currently have working for him, together build something and the same thing for the airplane. as a result, by the thirty-ninth year the french army was not ready fo

100 billion francs., the government was forced to nationalize all railways and some military factories. in the pages of the right-wing press, french industrialists launched a furious propaganda campaign against the popular front. publicist raymond aron recalled: “these are well-fed.” with hatred, the leaflets expressed the psychology of a certain part of the bourgeoisie, including that which was symbolized by the famous phrase: hitler is better than blum. like ... an airplane, as a result, by the thirty-ninth year the french army was not ready for war in its material condition, in its moral condition in the development of military art. neither the french army, nor french society, nor, in general, the french government was morally prepared for a military conflict. on the eve of world war ii, france still had the largest army in europe. however, the average age of the french commanders and army commanders exceeded 60 years, and the high command was 70. the generals who went through the first world war were

defeated, humiliated france bowed before the german eagle.sians watched the german triumph in silence. peering into their faces, the french officer emmanuelgerie would later write. a stream of people, consumed by fear, frightened jews, repenting. foresaw defeat, but no one seemed to think about victory. panic reigned in france, they were not ready for a serious war, some consumerism prevailed too much. interests, consumer psychology, they really lived as if behind a stone wall, behind this muzhino line, they believed that all this would work out, because they were among the masters of the world, everything was going well. the german fuhrer staged this event as a real performance. the staff carriage of the french marshal ferdinand foch was delivered to the campiène forest from the paris museum. it was here that in 1918 germany signed the first compiègne armistice and thereby admitted its defeat in the first world war. prepared for france. that's when you and i we remember the events of the forties, why such a shameful defeat of the french army

vladimir putin to china and the visit of the president of the people's republic of china xizen ping to france, to what extent these visits can really reflect china's desire to be such a mediator between moscow and the west, or is it primarily just part of this chinese policy to keep its own influences both in moscow and in europe? well, this is primarily about... the interest of china and it is very wide-ranging, as for putin, it is obvious that today china does not deny or hide that they are close strategic partners who coordinate external global issues, and as for putin, of course, after re-election, he needs to demonstrate his importance, both to the domestic audience and to the external audience, and the chinese are such a... weak force. in addition, these visits will take place in the month of may, as you said, and it is important that we do not know the exact dates now, because chinese diplomacy, it has such a peculiarity, not to talk, not to advertise about all these events, but nevertheless, it is obvious that putin's visit may take place before the trip sitting down to europe, and in

if we talk about sociology, then 60% of french consider russia, russia a danger for france.his is very interesting sociology, because after all, it is more than half of the population who understand that in one way or another russia threatens the interests of france. another aspect is political: all the operations in africa were very important for macron, for his... his so-called political career, for seeing himself also as a leader who managed to expel jihadists from the african sahel region, and the barkan operation was extremely important for macron to its collapse. why was this operation curtailed? there are also two reasons for this: it is the russian presence that is growing more and more, this is a fact, but it is also sociology. french military operations in africa were not popular among the french population. and perhaps, it is already so here, running ahead. and french operations potentially in ukraine will also not be popular among the french, this sociology persists, the french do not like to send their soldiers to fight abroad for some illusory, possible strateg

defeated, humiliated france bowed before the german eagle.risians watched the german triumph in silence. peering into their faces, the french officer emmanuel della vegerie would later write. a stream of people consumed by fear, frightened jews, repentant politicians, dubious businessmen, the regime behind them collapsed, they renounced it, hastening to adapt to the new masters. in this crowd, which was torn away from the beaches, games and dances, i did not meet a single tail, this world, lived myopia, with resigned sighs, adapting to the new reality. no one foresaw defeat, but no one seemed to think about victory. panic reigned in france, they were not ready for a serious war, some consumer interests, consumer psychology prevailed too much, they really lived as if behind a stone wall, behind this maginot line, they believed that all this would work out, because they were among the masters of the world , everything is going well, everything is correct, and that this world could collapse, that’s what... came to mind, they psychologically, the

france, according to macron, offered russia some enhanced collaboration.n by this and how do you generally assess paris’s response to the tragedy? well, in continuation of what was said about the minute of silence at the football match, indeed the french, ordinary people, responded very sincerely to this tragedy, in the book of condolences... in our official book of condolences alone, there are already more than a thousand signatures bearing flowers uh even the national assembly also held a minute of silence uh the diplomatic corps also actively responded - they came to me uh ambassadors of the cis countries to jointly express condolences. as for official paris. then he, as they say, is in the western trend, they immediately blamed isis for everything , as for macron’s famous statement, but he likes to make loud statements, well, wait and see, in france itself, after the terrorist attack in crocs, the level of terrorist danger was raised to maximum , how this is manifested and what they are now saying about how they will ensure security in the future. face

in june 1940, france descended into chaos.panic-stricken people fled from the cities following the defeated army. russian emigrant writer roman gul, who lived at that time in the rural outback of france, wrote: “all peasants, winegrowers, artisans, grocers, restaurateurs, café garsons, hairdressers.” and these soldiers running like a rabble all wanted one thing, that anything, just so that this fall into a bottomless abyss ends. france and all its civic virtues have no choice but to die, because there is no strength to resist. the surrender of paris instilled horror and despair into the hearts of the french. june 11, when the french government fled the capital. having declared paris an open city, crowds of citizens rushed from it to the south. 3 million residents fled from a city of five million, abandoning all their property. children left their elderly parents, doctors abandoned patients who remained in hospitals to the mercy of fate. capital the stations were crowded. soon the trains stopped running. writer victor sersh was

, we understand that france was against , but, but, but, that is, france itself now has to rethink boththe security strategy and the strategy of using resources, and the readiness in the event of something to respond to russian aggression on the continent, that is, which could directly in to hit french interests in the literal sense, i know what you know, how french politics works and in general what... now the mainstream sentiments among the french not only politicians, but also society, that is, france in france, realize that it is early is it too late will they have to seriously decide? well, i think that now the french authorities, in the person of the commander-in-chief and the president of france, are showing this readiness and ability. and naturally, the discussion, the discourse is conditional, well, you know, when we talk about ukraine, it's always a bit of a political discussion. it is not so often discussed geopolitical things somewhere conventionally over a cup of coffee in france, but nevertheless, if we take the french establishment, the position, the division of the posit

france could not help but literally go into ecstatic excitement.o designate the point of your strength in such an attractive primorsky port as odessa. this was 105 years ago. well, so what? i have no idea at all. and in russia, we traveled here too, we came to you, we traveled, on whatever you want, where you want, as you want, from aroplanes to charabancs. in general, we ended up getting here on foot. hello, hello, hello to you. hello, hello, hello, andrei mironov is parodying the coupletists. episode of russian history. in march 1918, the entente countries began military intervention against their former ally russia. its ideologists were french prime minister georges clemenceau and his british colleague david lloyd george. the reason was the conclusion by the bolsheviks of a separate treaty of brest-litovsk with germany. but 3 months before him, in december the seventeenth, representatives. ukraine, bessarabia and crimea, and great britain the cossack and caucasus regions, armenia, georgia and kurdistan. on november 26 , 1818, a british warship a

but what about france, what are they saying about it in france, what is the society's reaction to suchwords of the president? regarding the nuclear threat, the situation is very specific. the fact is that france is the only eu country that owns nuclear weapons. there was britain, but britain left the eu, only france remains, so france somewhere can afford to speak on such topics, well, let's say, no, not quite naively or somehow prudently, but well, it can simply afford to appeal in such terms and say: well, putin, the nuclear threat, do what you want with it, because france is simply in such a position of strength in this regard, and macron himself has said this many times, and he knows this, and i think specifically france itself. .. is not under direct threat a nuclear attack or some direct attack by the russians, because everyone understands the reality of the response, but that is why macron can take on this role of leader and somehow play this position of strength in order to gain, for example, some production capabilities, capacities in france, build them up for to finally lead

france is gathering a new entente. plot from the scene . mom anarchy and the barbecue ultimatum.tes the holiday. disobedience, gangsters are still winning, secret secrets of the voodoo cult, how to rule through intimidation and magic, materials from our program. vladimir vysotsky sang about paris, that our spread across the planet is especially noticeable in the distance, meaning compatriots, but where they are, there are friends of our program, to whom we are grateful. i think i am the european leader who spent the most hours of discussion with vladimir putin, hundreds of hours, i was there 2 weeks before the start of the war, i continued later, we need to not only talk, but also do, we prepared texts and so on, but the minsk agreements, he violated this, this is controversial question. "madam, thank you for what you say, please, i'm glad i'm not the only one who thinks so, no, i was there, we were neutral on this issue, i spent so much time, i was so involved in it, and i then they criticized because i believed that i could involve russia in the peace process, i want peace, you

the agreement from france was si . ned france? the agreement from france was signed when — france?when it _ france? the agreement from france was signed when it is _ france? the agreement from france was signed when it is and _ france? the agreement from france was signed when it is and it - france? the agreement from france was signed when it is and it scheme | was signed when it is and it scheme to paris in february, but it was voted and approved by the parliament which was, in a way, a symbolic approval. it was not necessary, legally, to have that approval, but what it does do is to guarantee a certain amount of financial assistance to ukraine, assistant in training, assistance in military hardware, over a period of time, and thatis hardware, over a period of time, and that is what was very important, i think, to kind of cement that ukraine give some port of support, —— that ukraine are given some sort of guaranteed support, as it makes its way on its path to eu membership. it is important, honest bilateral deal, commit put some money, up to 3 million from france, thatis money,

i think you might be pushing france _ i think you might be pushing france. ~ ~ france.uilding something exciting france. we knew we were - building something exciting and we knew— building something exciting and we knew what _ building something exciting and we knew what we _ building something exciting and we knew what we were - building something exciting and we knew what we were capablel we knew what we were capable of. we knew what we were capable of we — we knew what we were capable of we really— we knew what we were capable of. we really have _ we knew what we were capable of. we really have to _ we knew what we were capable of. we really have to drive - of. we really have to drive that — of. we really have to drive that because _ of. we really have to drive that because we _ of. we really have to drive that because we obviouslyj of. we really have to drive - that because we obviously were on the — that because we obviously were on the back— that because we obviously were on the back of— that because we obviously were on the back of a _ that because we obviously w

oksana melnychuk, a political commentator from france, joined us, talking about how france is currentlysupporting ukraine, while some are supporting, others are talking about the need to start negotiations. actually, now let's watch the plot about what we should expect from the world and who is trying to act as a so-called peacemaker. about the state of affairs in the state is the name of the traditional speech with which the us president addresses congress every year, but for the third year in a row, joseph biden begins it with the war that russia has unleashed against ukraine. this year , the american leader directly compared putin to hitler, and himself to president roosevelt, who more than 80 years ago managed to convince stand aside from the second world war and help the anti-hitler coalition, so biden once again called on congress to immediately approve an aid package for ukraine of more than 60 billion dollars. if anyone in this room thinks that putin will stop at ukraine, i assure you, he will not. but ukraine can stop putin. if we provide her with the weapons she needs for self

on the politics of it, ou left in france. on the politics of it, you talked — left in france.e politics of it, you talked about part - left in france. on the politics of it, you talked about part of i left in france. on the politics of it, you talked about part of thatj it, you talked about part of that balancing act for emmanuel macron, it is something he is clearly prepared to do, is it is a political reason or is the straight ideology? i don't think you change the french constitution for electoral reasons, that would be trivialising what it means to change the french constitution. this would be only the 25th revision under the fifth republic since it was founded in 1958, so it's not a trivial matter but it is nonetheless partly, i think, about embodying a balance in the politics that isn'tjust about what is seen at now is increasingly right—wing measures but also about fundamental rights that are considered traditionally left—wing measures. we'll see this afternoon it but i think it will get cross—party support, including on the right, even if it was a measure that original

so in france for women. >> okay. because exactly you said women are equal in law, but not in fact in many other issues as well, whether it's pay or whatever >> exactly. yeah. so what are you going to be telling the un with your fellow feminist? from around the world and given you where the minister for gender equality in your country, what will you be discussing and what steps to be taken in the future? >> we have writes about gender pay gap and chill, no gender equality at work between men and women. so i think emancipation, economic emancipation is key because when you have your own pay, your own salaries, send you are free to make your own choices. you are not in rana depending to your boss, to your husband to your family, and newark, truly free. i think freedom for women is the most improtant sink thing, but we cannot put just freedom in the low. so this is why it is so important. and this is why we have to live that struggle together with all women all around the royal governments, ngos, companies activists. and

are about 45-50 thousand fighters, well, maybe 60, they have four divisions, they have brigades, in francehere are two divisions in general, about 44 regiments, there are french foreign legions, they have 200 tanks. will perform cleaning functions, training, repair, and so on, but they will be quite themselves militarily, maybe, maybe, while it is being discussed, military personnel of nato countries, and in order not to invoke the fifth article of nato, this is still said, they say, each country separately, how, so zelensky signs the agreement, and what they will discuss in the french parliament the implementation of the agreement signed on february 16 between macron and zelensky on security guarantees... danger, that is, in order not to push the united states into it, they will therefore be in each country separately, that is, we can it’s easy to bomb paris, yes, but they also do it there, and why did france suddenly become so active? it’s not the political will of macron, but because france has nuclear weapons, they want to play this nuclear roulette, they’re talking about it they say t

he's very happy in france. obviously, he's ridiculously celebrated in france. he's warned that he might not be met with so exalted a welcome he were to come home. he is as puts it, among people whom i love and, who love me very comfortable in france the british had occupied and plundered his home so he knows he's coming back to a to a difficult situation and he's he's crossed ocean more times than he was comfortable. he did he did not know that he would survive crossing of the ocean. instead he gets on board ship to return in 1785 and immediately feels 20 years younger than he's felt in ages. what was it like to cross the ocean in those days brutal. franklin had swore never to do it again. several passages previous this it could take months and you often landed as was his case in 1776 not in the port to which you were headed. so for example, he was headed nahant, but he ended up in a little town called rye, which was hundreds of miles away, and has to sort of figure out how to make his way from to paris, from there. so it's a it's a it's a complicated and somew

destabilizing internal political processes in france.ng on the cake is the assassination of navalny. and against this background, when macron has a contingent of one and a half thousand french troops stationed in romania and 600 of his french soldiers are stationed in estonia, he makes a statement for putin, this is his statement, it is not was not about the french or his nato colleagues, it was about putin. with this phrase, macron slapped putin on the nose and said, dude, if you're going to sneer at me, it's against the background of what i listed. these were such triggers for macron. i forgot to mention the huge cyberattack on internal websites, government websites of france. that is, all this in a heap, you know, angered cataliapold, who always said: "guys, let's live in harmony." and then he came out and said: putin, if you snort in our direction, then our contingent can be on territory of ukraine. and what happened, did putin say something. about the appeal of transnistria. in this way, in my opinion, macron extinguished the possib

i looked into our france 24 archives and found a focus report i did in 2014.lmed it at the university of lyon, where the party congress is held every year, a big event for the national association. and that year they invited a guest. from abroad, in particular the deputy head of the russian duma, his name was andriy isaev, he is a member of the ruling party in russia, a very conservative figure. he is also a member of the commission on veterans' affairs, i suggest watching a fragment from this report, which explains why he ended up there. let me remind you, this is 2014. russia has just invaded crimea and war has started between ukraine and russia. here is our plot. the french national front wanted its eurosceptic allies to attend the party's convention, but another politician drew attention. ladies and gentlemen, dear friends. andriy isaev, deputy chairman of the state duma of the lower house of the russian parliament. he is a close ally of vladimir putin. he specially came to lyon for the national front congress before returning home. he. delivered a very cl

agence france-presse reported.rything indicates, political scientists say, that the owner of the elysee palace wants to restore the former greatness of his country with such plans and harsh rhetoric about the ukrainian conflict. for details, as well as an overview of other key events in the international review program, see immediately after the advertisement. the world of bcs investment is limitless, there are those who boldly open it, are not afraid of turbulence at the start, accurately calculate the trajectory, relying on the support of experts, strive further to get more. we are happy to work with such investors, because we are the same. and we have something to offer to those who need it most. bks. the world of investments. it is important for us to be visible at any time of the day or night. our work is a race against time and the elements, and we need someone who is fully involved, who feels the power to help. there's money at stake, and we're up to the challenge. jetur t2, a hero by nature. and we are with

it is a contentious issue in france. the| contentious issue in france.e autumn emmanuel macron tried to pass banning another article of clothing. that has not been passed. i but it has opened a can of worms between something being a religious symbol and cultural dress. so it is hugely contentious in france. thank ou ve hugely contentious in france. thank you very much- _ hugely contentious in france. thank you very much. anna _ hugely contentious in france. thank you very much. anna richards. - some breaking news. a un committee has told the uk it should withdraw its "safety of rwanda" bill, or repeal it if it is passed. the illegal migration act would send some failed asylum seekers to rwanda. the un reviewing committee said the uk's arrangements with rwanda would not be compliant with international law. the recommendations come following a un human rights review of the uk's record on civil and political rights — the uk ratified the un covenant in 1976. let's speak to our geneva correspondent imogen foulkes. viewers here in the uk, viewers elsewhere may

let's talk more about the competition between russia and france in africa, mr. dolatabadi. hello, hello, good time. thank you. good time . your analysis of the withdrawal of the french puppet governments in africa to take revenge for france's role in the ukraine war by helping the military and nationalist groups in africa to deal a major blow to france and the french hand short of africa's uranium reserves kenan, in a situation where the french themselves were facing crises in the field of energy after the ukraine war, how correct do you think this analysis is? anyway, we actually know that france was one of the consuming powers in africa, and after the independence of the countries that it happened in africa, this country has its own influence and presence both politically in different governments and in terms of the military, with military bases, and on the other hand, for example, in the economic sphere with cfa francs in these countries. he kept it for several decades. which is actually the countries of this region from this story to every they are not satisfied now, bu

france has nuclear submarines. france has the charles de gaulle aircraft carrier. france has the only active army in europe, which leads to combat operations in different parts of the world, meaning it is more operational than any other army in europe. and against the background of all this, when macron is in romania. there is a contingent of 1,500 troops, when it has a contingent of 600 soldiers in estonia, when the french aviation is fully patrolling the skies of the baltics, against this background, the transnistrian parliament issues its own retort: ​​putin pridiya, apart from everything, apart from these and all, the whole world in anxiously waiting, yes, waiting for what putin will say there to their meetings, whether putin will come to transnistria, whether putin will not come to transnistria. at the same time , a wildly extensive spy network of russian spies is discovered in france, russian intentions to carry out terrorist attacks on the opening day of the olympic games are exposed in france. macron himself exposes the fact that he is being watched persona

let's talk more about the competition between russia and france in africa, mr.ulatabadi, hello , hello, good time, thank you for your time. what is the withdrawal of the french puppet governments in africa? some believe that the russians were able to take revenge for france's role in the ukraine war by helping nationalist military groups in africa to deal a major blow to france and kill the french. cut africa's uranium reserves , even when the french themselves are facing crises in the energy sector after the ukraine war. how correct do you think this analysis is? anyway, we actually know that france was one of the colonial powers in africa and then from the independence of the countries that happened in africa, this country has gained its influence and presence both politically in different governments and in fact in terms of military with military bases and on the other hand, for example, with economic specialism with cfa francs. these countries kept, well , it was several decades that actually these countries in any case, the region was not satisfied with thi

and ... as always france and germany, in this leadership the roles are slightly different, in france it is political leadership, in germany it is financial leadership, and there is also the element that france would like to pool european resources in the vision as it sees it, because well enough said , which, for example, the fund about which everyone knows, 100 billion, the german fund on modern. tion and the change of weapons, it is still basically the f-35, american, in france there is a different vision, that is, i want to say that in principle it is natural, what was said, how realistic it is from the point of view, and that it means for the security of ukraine, i would, it's clearly not about nato troops fighting instead of our troops, it's... not about replacing the law on mobilization and everything related to it, it's more about those agreements that now ukraine is concluding an agreement with europe about the automatic reaction of our partners in the event dangers for ukraine, this is the presence, we are talking about such and such forms of presence that make reactions on

well here is... suggestion for france to begin with, why doesn't france go to rafa, send send french military forces to rafa to escort the thousands of trucks that are waiting at the raf border to enter that are being prevented from entering rafa to stop this genocide, and they could easily do that, would take just few hundred french soldiers, israel would not d attack french soldiers in the sinai desert or going into rafaah to deliver this food aid, look, i mean it's very clear that the the only way to stop this and and feed the people of gaza is through you know the normal route of delivery of supplies, one airplane drop that even kills people is equivalent to one truck and there is over 2300. trucks now lined up at rafa border, so it is not really this, this is all throwing dust in the eye of the world, about air drops and peers for delivery way, this is nonsense, there is there is no need for peer or anything like that, what we need is to stop the genocide by complying with the international convention against the crimes of... every country is obligated, including france and the

let me remind you, france is a nuclear power in france, and i can pick it up, because we have very little first graph, which... shows what kind of nuclear response russia will receive in the event that it resorts to its nuclear arsenal, you see now, this is everything that will fly to russia from different parts of the world, if so, and against the background of all this, you see, macron simply cannot stand what is happening to him inside the country, inside the country they expose a network of russian spies throughout france, they expose the intention to commit terrorist attacks in broad daylight. of the olympic games, they expose the fact that fsb agents are following macron personally and his wife, they expose 40 agents who stirred up the pro-palestinian mood of the demonstration in france and killed navalny, and against the background of all this, macron comes out and says, this phrase about him "i do not rule out" , yes, it was addressed exclusively to putin, it was such a slap in putin's nose, putin, if you if you squirm, then have...

why haven't we hit france yet? and that's why they didn't realize that france also has nuclear weapons. as for conventional weapons, the first strike against france will direct the full force of nato's long-range missiles and aircraft against you, which will make your situation very difficult. pay attention to one more very important point. the first thing putin did - activated his fifth column in paris. and on the very first day, all the left parties, the main one - pensha, all spoke about the fact that macron is pushing us to a world war, that this is adventurism and so on, but two days ago, lepensha appeared on the screen again and unexpectedly declared that macron is right putin is an aggressor, he has broken all the laws, now he is a threat to europe, and therefore he must be stopped by all means, she was well dealt with, documents probably showed her funding by the putin regime, her presidential campaign, and macron secured domestic political rear. putin has one argument left for france. i am sure he will app

macron immediately replied: france also has me... and with that, putin's threats were immediately nullified. look at the discussion that has unfolded now on all russian patriotic channels. it zt bydlo says indignantly: in essence, macron declared war on russia against putin, said that we are for the defeat of russia. and our armed forces, our specialists are already participating in hostilities. so why haven't we struck france yet, russian patriots ask. well, not immediately with nuclear weapons. well, we already have. excellent convention, that's why they didn't attack, which they perfectly understand, if they attack france, germany, poland and any other country, the fifth article of nato will be triggered automatically, and putin will be attacked in response. actually, a blow to the french territory, he will use the entire nato arsenal against him. he will no longer worry about whether the dutch will provide 40 or 60 planes, but potentially. all 600 f-16s in nato can be used against him, and he understands that. with one of his con

in particular, what does france want from him, what, what does he want from france , how important isot, do you think, well, he wants more, i think, from france than france from him, because few people have him... in in principle, i am ready to listen to his mediation ideas, since his proposals for peace are actually proposals for capitulation for ukraine, right? a little so beautifully wrapped, but the essence is that let's sit down at the negotiating table, which means negotiations, negotiations means let's agree to do what moscow wants. well, even if earlier, two years ago, macron wouldn't have been naive, calling putin and trying to convince him to behave better, i think he had enough time to understand that it wasn't working, and then obviously, as well as threats. russian propagandists and leaders themselves, as well as information from the special services of the french and others, prove that moscow is in principle considering a potential war against the nato countries, starting with the baltic countries, and since this information is known, macron is promoting another, differe

and now we talk about france and germany all the time, but this cannot happen forever.country will occupy this place, but it cannot be a quadrangle. ugh. so, from the one who will play this game correctly now, it depends on which country will be the most authoritative in europe in the future next to france and germany. poland or italy? and by and large , george meleni, who represents the right-wing radicals, and donald tusk, who represents the centrists and related parties. thus with its right-wing centrists, they are now essentially competitors in this great geopolitical game, this must also be remembered, and therefore there, when on the one hand there was president andrzej duda at the meeting at the vilice palace, and on the other hand all the poles, now to all the polish elite will have to decide how they will handle this situation in the situation of the polish-ukrainian crisis, that is, it is very much, that is what we are saying. about the fact that these are not simply questions of aid to ukraine, no, this is a question of the world order for the next ten years,

azerbaijan and turkey, and it is clear that france will only do it for the sake of it., after we have seen and heard macron, with all his recent speeches, which clearly indicate that france wants to seize the strategic initiative in the west. and such behavior in the south caucasus seems quite understandable and logical, considering the fact that in france there is a rather powerful derbet community of spurs, and considering the interest that the french express that they would like to be present there, and in general, in view of the strategic interests of confronting russia. there were reports that the president of ukraine should visit both yerevan and baku, then information appeared that such a visit would not take place, precisely because he did not receive support from the azerbaijani side, what could be the problem and whether it was a reality at all, well, you know, i even commented on the possibility of zelenskyi for the azerbaijani press, and we were just discussing what this visit could not pose any problems for ukraine and the ukrainian-azerbaijani relations. a

france. france, by the way. france. france is even worse than germany, to honest.some like a billion a yean provide some like a billion a year, which is absolutely nothing. i mean, it's a drop in the but germany, yeah, the ocean, but germany, yeah, germany's on the germany's never been on the right in a war europe. right side in a war in europe. >> what on the >> and what they said on the sorry, the accent, sorry, i won't do the accent, but said know the but they said i know how the engush but they said i know how the english they do it english do it. they do it completely in reachback. and i've had a reachback . i've had a i've had a reachback. okay. we're very good at it. >> i think it's time for a break. on that note, that's the end section two. do join us end of section two. do join us though, for though, in part three for constitutional change in france. speculation about premier league footballers shouting match footballers and a shouting match in hampstead don't go anywhere welcome back to headliners your first look at tuesday's newspapers. we're going to br

it’s okay that france is a nuclear power. yeah, 200 missiles.nfortunately, history teaches that it does not teach anyone anything. the war in europe, the beginning of the 19th century , crushed millions of people in its wars, from moscow to the atlantic, from the lomanche to the adriatic, and many then thought that peace could be arranged. on stable grounds, eliminating the causes of bloody european dramas, this is how alexander i came up with the idea of ​​a holy union european states, and wrote the main provisions of the treaty on the holy union with his own hand: to maintain bonds of fraternal friendship between states, to provide assistance to each other in the event of destabilization of the international situation, to govern their subjects in the spirit of brotherhood, truth and peace, to consider themselves members of a single christian community of international... in affairs of state, be guided by the gospel commandments. in september 1815, the act of formation of this sacred union was signed by alexander i, the austrian emperor franz,

preparing for war before the twelfth year, that is , russia was also preparing for war, it’s just that franceanaged to prepare first, for example, he was the first to recruit a great army, alexander was also ready for war, things couldn’t do without war. but here it must be added that there were other related contradictions. napoleon's invasion of russia was over in a month, and although alexander had not treated kutuzov very well since the time of the australasian, because then kutuzov warned alexander that there was no need to give battle to napoleon, it would end badly, well, i'm exaggerating, of course, but the meaning was this: alexander insisted, he still wanted laurels then, well, young blood was probably still playing, the laurels of the victorious napoleon, plus there was a numerical superiority in this battle of the three emperors, what was there, respectively, the austrian emperor, the russian emperor one side of the barricades is napoleon. but instead of saying clearly and clearly that it was impossible, he said in the end, what if you please, now we need to remember, so to speak,

we don’t necessarily have to hit france, france is not the owner of tactical weapons, we can hit theich they also have planned, for example. for french warships, that’s also an option, also not bad, but on the other hand , french ships are the territory of france, if we’re talking about the french contingent stationed, say, near lvov, it’s just a french contingent, i’m with you i agree, firstly, i think that it is unlikely that macron will send his troops, at least his combat units, and secondly, i think that if they were there, they would behave extremely ... carefully, but i i also know something else, i know that when you embark on this path of escalation, very often the parties see the situation completely differently, if you just look at the memoirs of kaiser wilhelm and look at the memoirs of russian generals and statesmen of that time , then this is the attitude towards who wins provoked. this is a new challenge that we are successfully resisting, because those who invaded our territory were destroyed very quickly, but it seems to me that we need to look very carefully, to ana

that's what happens when france click. instead of - when france click.y with it, - when france click. instead of running away with it, they i when france click. instead of l running away with it, they kept coming up against stubborn resistance. the 80 minutes are up before france produced another breakthrough. it’s before france produced another breakthrough.— before france produced another breakthrou:h. �*, .,~ ., ., breakthrough. it's taken longer than an one breakthrough. it's taken longer than anyone expected. _ breakthrough. it's taken longer than anyone expected. for _ breakthrough. it's taken longer than anyone expected. for them, - breakthrough. it's taken longer than anyone expected. for them, victory| anyone expected. for them, victory took a sense _ anyone expected. for them, victory took a sense of— anyone expected. for them, victory took a sense of relief. _ anyone expected. for them, victory took a sense of relief. for- took a sense of relief. for scotland. _ took a sense of relief. for scotland, mixed - took a sense of relief. for scotland

one _ from france. france is a perfectly safe country. one of— from france.fectly safe country. one of the other i safe country. one of the other amendments... safe country. one of the other amendments. . ._ safe country. one of the other amendments... :, , :, . , . amendments... can you answer that ruestion, amendments... can you answer that question, france _ amendments... can you answer that question, france is _ amendments... can you answer that question, france is a _ amendments... can you answer that question, france is a safe _ amendments... can you answer that question, france is a safe country? | question, france is a safe country? the labour party would work closely with france — the labour party would work closely with france and work with euro poll so we _ with france and work with euro poll so we could — with france and work with euro poll so we could return people. philip is trying _ so we could return people. philip is trying to— so we could return people. philip is trying to distract from the fact that more people across the channel today— tha

always in such periods, france takes political leadership.s now taken such political leadership in order to unite and unite europe for certain goals. and at the same time, why is it important, because in the... leadership that exists now in europe, in france and that has always been france and germany, in this leadership the roles are a little different, in france it is political leadership, in germany it is financial leadership, and here there is still such an element that france would like to pool european resources in the vision as it sees it, because well, suffice it to say that, for example, the fund that everyone knows about. billion german fund for the modernization and change of weapons, these are mainly f-35s, american ones, france has another vision, that is, i want to say that in principle it is natural, what was said, how realistic it is from the point of view, and what it means for the security of ukraine, i would, it is clearly not about the troops.. nato fought instead of our troops, this is not about replacing the law on mobil