as franchesca and deputy city attorney indicated. the m.t.a. board did not want its response to be quite as defensive as the staff proposed and they toned it down and added language in a cover letter. i appreciate the civil grand jury effort here and hope that m.t.a. works better with d.p.w., p.u.c. and others in the future. projects like geary, better market street, others. the issues here clearly include agency coordination, the project delivery, underground utility mapping and others. i would also discuss agency coordination and practice at the agency's capital committee. seems to me like that would be a good place to talk about this. specifically today, i would change the resolved clause and maybe you're looking at that now to a language that just essentially says to incorporate today's discussion so it's not specific as to the attached response, but, you know, gives them flexibility to incorporate the discussion you're having now and i would give direction or have an agreement to add to the cover letter you could add a sentence or two that