. >> francisco decosta, fran martin, jim roden? >> commissioners, if you have been to candlestick point, if you have been around san bruno, you notice there is a rail. and following the tradition of this nation, on one side is candlestick point. the other side is visitation valley. i love in the area. and forever people will tell you that candlestick point and executive park never ever come within the jurisdiction of visitation valley. so, we have a supervisor that is being termed out, thank goodness. and even as she is being termed out, in a dubious way she is trying different employs. a former employee that worked in the planning department is now her aid. it has been told to you by a man of character, that at the 11th hour, changes are being made. this issue came before the land use, and i spoke about it. this issue came yesterday, and somebody had the awe disity -- audacity to say you know what, executive park is in the jurisdiction of visitation valley. no. now if you as taught planning commissioners, if the director of the pl

. >> my name is francisco decosta. i attend most of the meetings in city hall. i have been studying the process. some of you i know very well. what i am here to state is, in this city and county of san francisco, i would like to see some accountability and transparency when it comes to outreach. i do not want to really expose what has been happening, but as a person who is at ground zero, watching and dealing with the constituents of san francisco, in these dire economic times, this is an opportunity. with the exception of mr. lloyd, i know all of you pretty well. all i will say is, i would like you to monitor and report on the real out reach on fte's available in san francisco. right now, what i am doing is adding to the documentation. i have a web site. i have access to several websites. i do not want to pass any gray clouds, negativity

. >> my name is francisco decosta. the explanation given to us is like reading your pg&e bill. every time it changes. there is relevant documentation that goes but this. what you see here is that businesses in executive park, which is not part of visitacion valley, have to pay the visitacion valley infrastructure fees. so you supervisors, and those of you who do the analysis, have to understand that the developers are held hostage. this is becoming a fashion. in the dire economic times, as you know, and you will be hearing a lot of items tied to the economy, it is very difficult for the developers to pay this money. but because you supervisors, at another time, when the economy was better, got past the visitacion valley infrastructure fees, not paying attention who was contributing to this fund, now as the budget analyst has revealed to you, there is less than $2 million. i have not heard you supervisors asked the people presenting whatever was being presented in a convoluted matter for line item fees or expenses. some grants were given and wanted to use it but they could not u