small variations in their positions on ethics and society the best example is right now we have francois hollande a nicolas sarkozy and there's no real opposition between left and right it doesn't exist they're all roughly economic liberals libertarians for fronts the first step of visible liberalism is the european union there are those who submitted to the

voters show that francois hollande is in the lead while sarkozy continues to lose ground. his flagging popularity is the result of cost-cutting and raising the retirement age. standard and poor's decision to cut france's credit rating did not help. >> in times of crisis, it is better to have a president who was a fighter, to take action instead of sitting back and waiting to see what happens next. >> much like the french public, experts are also split on which candidate is the best choice. >> hollande has advantages, too. he seeks consensus. sarkozy rubs people the wrong way. they are not the only candidates in the race. the head of the right-wing national front party is pulling third. if she steals second place, she could enter a runoff vote. message resonates with many young french voters, a block every candidate is looking to attract. all three of these people attending university feel let down. they're looking for radical change, whether it comes from the left or the right. >> when i was 10 years old, the euro was introduced and we were promised everything would be goo

and after the primary election of the socialist party or launch was a circus the winner was francois hollande now the media then reduces the sarkozy hollande. political debate into a war of catchphrases or example with all and calling sarkozy the bad guy if you are theater there is no political content because in reality they are both fans of the european union and they cannot do what they pretend to want to do like green just realisation saving companies you know what they're proposing are against e.u. laws you know the socialist party of the ruling union for a popular movement have ratified ninety three percent of what the e.u. proposed because sarkozy and hollande are two economic liberal candidates with very minimal differences in stands on social issues like somalia which is why i'm interested in the poor who has good poll ratings and offers an alternative to leave the european union go back to the french france and defy wall street and the other to try to pretend she doesn't exist they try to get the french into the american system they are afraid and marie le pen can make it to the sec

small variations in their positions on ethics and society the best example is right now we have francois hollande a nicolas sarkozy there's no real opposition between left and right it doesn't exist they're all roughly economic liberals libertarians for france the first step of visible liberalism is the european union there are those who submitted to the e.u. which means the end of borders free movement of goods and capital ideology of right and left the ideology of miseducation this is the dominant ideology in france shared by left and right the difference is only a static and then there are those who oppose this dominant ideology who fight for the restoration of borders the restoration of the nation those who criticize the ideology of message a nation meaning to defend cultural identities and so on the battle today is to resist globalism on economic and cultural france etc we have to show that the fight between left and right no longer exists today the two battling sides are the globalists and those resisting globalism will be honest. with the audience so what exactly is your motivation for bei