territory of ukraine, if... affairs in ukraine will go bad, similar statements that supported francois macronis, there were few of them, but including from radoslaw sikorski, and how were mr. sikorski's words received in poland itself? eh, well, we must say to understand that it is very good, that it is very good that the politicians are in poland. we have to choose here, it is the development of our armed forces, it is the preparation of the state, the preparation of society for this threat. radoslav syakorsky actually made another statement, he said that poland will make a material , technical and financial contribution to the plan which was led by the czech republic regarding the increase in the supply of ammunition to ukraine, how do the poles react to this? e recent days, and today, in fact , and the day before, ukraine experienced quite strong missile attacks in poland, in connection with this , military aircraft were raised into the sky, and are people discussing among themselves how they react to the fact that poland is raising aviation, well sure if the discussion, of course it happe

federation , everything is on fire there, my god, why don’t they talk about french president francois macronfter he actually confirmed twice, first he, and then his ministers, that one must finally open one's eyes and see the real threat. today he spoke with such an appeal to the rest of europe. and spoke about not in word but in deed and talked about an actual coalition to send troops to ukraine and even discussed what the task they could perform, which is not , as they say, not in non-infantry troops, peter pavel unexpectedly joined mr. macron, macron's mission, the czech president also clearly communicates about it today, that is, there was some kind of surprise. the franco-czech coalition , which appeals to the rest of europe and nato members, let's do something, because this is no longer, not the news you see on tv, this is a real danger, and there are also the baltic countries, and there is also canada, and there are other countries that are refusing so far, i did not say a categorical no, so what will happen to everyone, well , we talked on the air many times, especially after munich,

russian federation, everything is on fire there, my god, why don’t they talk about french president francois macronis after he actually, twice, first he, and then his ministers confirmed that it is necessary to... finally open your eyes, see the real threat. today, with such an appeal to the rest of europe, he spoke, and spoke about the unspoken adil, and spoke about the actual coalition to send the military to ukraine, and it was even discussed what tasks they could perform, that it is not, as they say, not in not infantry troops. unexpectedly , he joined mr. macron's mission. petr pavel, the czech president, is also clearly pro it communicates today, that is, there has been some kind of unexpected french-czech coalition, which appeals to the rest of europe and nato members that come on... do something, because this is no longer, not the news that you watch on tv, this is a real danger, and there are also the baltic countries, and there is also canada, and there are still countries that are refusing for now, i did not say categorically no, so that everyone will be fine, but in etheris we spoke rep

troops to ukraine if the situation will become critical by supporting his colleague president francois macronthis is the second, this is not the second statement, this is the next such statement about this coalition, one might say, which is slowly being formed, compared putin. with hitler adolf, as a result of his re-election now, where putin himself reappointed himself as president, relatively speaking, well, in a word, this is the story, by the way, i can imagine now, ukrainians say, oh, how cool this dude is, this ben wallace, but i also remember how the ukrainians were terribly angry with ben voles and offended, er, when he said that listen, we're not amazons to you when we demanded more weapons from...our allies, so you see, the person who said that, she said that not because she didn't want to give weapons to ukraine, but because president zelensky then reacted very sharply, then the then ambassador prystaiko, as you remember, tried to settle it in london and said that such allies should not exchange bad words, for which the president, for which prystaiko himself was fired, relax. no ex

everything is on fire there, my god, that they not only do not speak against the president of france, francois macron, and this after he, in fact, twice , first he, and then... and his ministers confirmed that we must finally open our eyes, see the real threat. today, he spoke, and said, with such an appeal to the rest of europe about not in word but in deed, and talked about the actual coalition to send the military to ukraine, and it was even discussed what tasks they could perform, that it is not, as they say, not in non-infantry troops, unexpectedly to... to mr. macron, peter pavel joined mission macron, the czech president is also clearly communicating about it today, that is , some kind of unexpected french-czech coalition has emerged, which appeals to the rest of europe and nato members to do something, because this is no longer, not news, that you watch on tv is a real danger, and there are also the baltic countries, and there is also canada, and there are still countries that are still silent. they didn't say a categorical no , so that's what will happen to everyone, but we have repeatedly s

this week's initiatives, voiced by francois macron and then supported by radoslav sikorskyi and the balticountries, that one should not rule out the possibility of sending a military contingent to support ukraine if kyiv or odesa are under threat. how serious do you think it is? well, in turn, it was a political signal and military russia that such options could be in the case of a more global confrontation and accordingly activation of the aggression of the russian federation on the terms of ukraine and the threat to the european union, this is already a mobilization not only against ukraine, but under its threat to nato countries, this is the first component, the second is really a verification of nato countries, who is ready today and in what contingents, really there was a clear position that it would not be combat. actions and formats software, support, training, respectively, maintenance, repairs, possibly production, military equipment, weapons and instructors, this is training on the territory of ukraine, but this only part of the people, and the third component, more important, pr

federation, everything is on fire there, my god, that they just don't talk about french president francois macrone actually... er twice, first he and then.

problems, and we have to deal with them, find a way out, and navalny is useless here, today francois, emmanuel macronmet with the leaders of the parliamentary factions in france, and said that there are no restrictions, no red lines for supporting ukraine anymore , and here medvedev is our... a character from of russian politics, said that if macron says that there are no more red lines in supporting ukraine, then the russian federation no longer has red lines in relation to france, how determined is macron in your opinion in order not to see red lines anymore and give ukraine everything that the country now needs, well, you see, everything is very cool and cool in this concept and... for the fact that they even raised the topic of strengthening ukraine with western, western troops, it's generally cool, it's a historical moment, because you remember , they always said, no, no, no, no, by no means , the discussion has already started here, it is important for the western world, that is, decisions may be made during the year, again, you have to... look not exactly not because of the statements of dmitr

today, roman , françois, emmanuel macron, forgive me, met with the leaders of the parliamentary factionsrance, and said that there are no restrictions, no red lines for supporting ukraine anymore, and right there, medvedev, our favorite character from russian politics said that, well, if macron says that there are no more red lines in support of ukraine, that and ... the russian federation no longer has red lines in relation to france, how determined is macron in your opinion in order not to see the red lines and give ukraine everything that the country needs now? well, you see, everything in this concept is very cool and cool for both emmanuel macron and the french government for the fact that they raised the issue of strengthening ukraine with western, western troops. it's totally cool, it's historical moment, because you remember, they always said: no, no, no, no, by no means, immediately the discussion began, and for the western world this is important, that is, decisions can be made during the year, and again after all, you have to look at the statements of dmitry medvedev, because

stop aggressive russia and the minsk agreements, that is, in fact , macron turned the whole story upside down, crossed out what françoisut whoever remembers history now, macron is writing a new one, at least trying. write a new one and says that all the economic problems of france, the price of gas, the price of grain, that’s all, that’s all the protests farmer, all this, only russia, only the kremlin, is to blame for all this, and at the same time his eyes don’t even twitch when he says this, but nevertheless, he continues in the same spirit and says that this is inevitable, this is the very thing, probably the main thing that needs to be identified and deduced from this interview, despite the fact that so far the european leaders... do not fully support him, in fact, it was not in vain that he went to berlin today to persuade scholz and the polish president of the polish prime minister, but nevertheless the country the baltics are already in the forefront, as usual, we are ready to send troops, all the procedures have already been completed and everything is ready, now it’s up to western europe, and as macron said, t

as former president françois hollande said, this is called creating strategic ambiguity, the purpose of which is to sow doubt; what emmanuel macrono, but not to limit our options in this game. however, as the russian proverb says: what goes around comes around, the political storm on the pages of macron’s figaro, which quote: blows the coals, is criticized by the entire french opposition, from left-wing parties to right-wing ones. one gets the impression. saw footage of him at one of the polling stations in moscow. it is clear that the screen was showing the usual news broadcast on channel russia-1, but in paris it was presented almost as an election campaign. the main federal channel of russia cut out and showed several well-selected fragments from an interview with the french president. it's like an election poster when you see the face of macron, who is shown as the real enemy of russia. however, western propaganda contradicts itself. here is the british magazine economist in the headline calls russia a rogue because of sanctions, but the article itself essentially refutes this. america and europe have relied on two strategies

françois méterand wanted to use this moment to strengthen the european independence. in particular, the white paper speaks of the need to conduct its own operations in any region of the world. 2 years ago, president macronctrine. which involves both independent actions of the french army and interaction with the armies of other nato countries. paris has begun reducing its military presence in africa. currently , france is taking on the role of nato's main ally in europe, wanting to oust great britain. meeting with leaders of opposition parties, macron clarified: the french military will go to ukraine if... a threat looms over kiev and odessa, and the mont newspaper confirmed that the elysee palace began to consider a similar landing in odessa last year. well, we love historical rhymes. france could not help but literally go into ecstatic excitement. the very idea is to designate the point of your strength in such an attractive primorsky port as odessa. this was 105 years ago. well, so what? i have no idea at all. and in russia, we traveled here too, we came to you, we traveled, on whatever you want, where you want, as you want, from aroplanes to charabancs. in general, we ended up getting here on foot.

françois miterand wanted to use this moment to strengthen european independence. in particular, the white paper speaks of the need to conduct its own operations in any region of the world. 2 years ago, president macronctrine that assumes both independence. this year there was such a loud performance at the moscow theater of satire. in general, of course, thanks to macron, he respected him and gave him a reason to remember a colorful episode in our country’s history. in in march 1918, the entente countries began military intervention against their former ally russia. its ideologists were french prime minister georges clemenceau and his british colleague david lloyd george. the reason was the conclusion by the bolsheviks of a separate treaty of brest-litovsk with germany, but 3 months before it, in december 17, representatives of england and france signed an agreement in paris on the division of russia into spheres of influence. the interests of france included ukraine, bessarabia and crimea, and great britain’s cossack and caucasian regions, armenia, georgia and kurdistan. on november 26 , 1818, a british warship appeared on... in the roadstead of the port of odessa. soon he was joined by ships from