frank gaffney of the center for security policy. first from my facebook page.y so that it could be produced more efficiently. >> obviously you can open up federal lands for drilling wher they're currently not allowed, for instance the ctic national wildlife refuge in the gulf of mexico is a simple thing that w could do, but the reality is hydraulic fracturing giving as to additional million barrels per day which is a pretty big %-government interrence for the most part, producing -- john: in new york is bay and. >> but most of the reserves right now in north dakota are producing flat out. private lands are producing a tremendous amount of crude. we are seeing another surge fro california. john: the audience. >> you heard the term because oil, and i am wondering if that is a myth. we are opposing the point. we are all going to freeze in the dark. >> most people don't appreciate only 35 percent of the crude-oi we have an upper -- reserves ever gets put into the market. and technology changes allows t be more economic. if we were to move from 35% extraction to 40

frank gaffney of the center for security policy. first from my facebook page.nshackle the energy so that itould be produced more efficiently. >> obviously you can open up federal lands for drilling wher they're currentlnot allowed, for instance the arctic nional ldlife refuge in the gulf of mexico is a simple thing that w could do, but the reality is hydraulic fracturing giving as to additional llion barrels per day which is a pretty big %-government interference for t most part, producing -- john: in new york isbay and. >> but most of the rerves right now in north dakota are producing flat out. ivate lands are producing a tremendous amount of crude. we are seeing another surge fro california. john: the audience. >> you heard the term because oil, and i am wondering if that is a myth. >> we are opposinghe point. we are al going to freeze in the dark. most people don't apeciate only 3percent of the crude-oil we have an upper -- reserves ever gets put intohe market. and tecology changes allows to be more econom. if we were to move from 35% extraction to 40 percen

this piece from frank gaffney, the female scandal of the benghazi factor.e goes on to say -- there are plenty of men indicated in the run-up in the efforts to conceal the scandal. their contribution to this requires their own investigation, but so does the peculiarly not implicated valerie jarrett and hillary clinton, the deputy former deputy chief of staff. , as he says,ake of the female factor? guest: i think is bogus. it has been shown over zero bridges over and over again that it did not go that far. this is a test to start presidential election. as far as valerie jarrett, i do not even understand that implication at all. as i say, i think it is bogus and that they are trying to make something out of an incident that was obviously a tragedy, but these of the same folks, by the way, who have cut and cut and cut the state department funding. one minute they say that the federal government does not do anything, that you do not need a federal government, and they are constantly cutting, and the next they say they did not have enough security. have they look

frank gaffney is the president of the center for security policy.> you know, memorial day is an opportunity for us to reflect on one central reality through the history. one side can't end a war except through winning it or surrendering it. what the president laid out was a ruling out of winning and embrace though he may not have said so much surrendering. the trouble here is that we're not clear about who it is we're signaling a willingness to surrender too. we have been calling them terrorists for years. i don't think that's appropriate. we have been calling them violent extremists under this administration. euphemisms that seal. hillary clinton on her way out the door said what we are facing now is global jihad and indeed that's what i think in each of those various scenes that you just showed we are dealing with here and certainly elsewhere is the folks who believe that it is their god's will they will impose doctrine of sharia on all of us. muslims who don't want to be under that and us as well and they're willing to use violent means to do it.