frank hoffman can a senior research fellow at national defense university a

our ring from my friend, frank hoffman convoy brought this idea of front-end. the bottom line is institutional force management risk provides the foundation upon which the other two can be assessed. in the current structure, the way dod assesses risk going forward is operational risk being over the next 24 months, can we perform our work line is heavily favored and more formalized in the future challenges risk. but which trained to do is take a crack at rewriting the balance of the chart a little bit and looking more holistically future challenge risk. one thing that is import is today's operational risk. they really are a continuum. one assesses the ability of the forests to respond to problems, the other person's ability to problems with in the future. they really do have similar characteristics and therefore i joined somewhat. next slide bit of a context to identify the five core and should, i'm not going to go into great detail, but it was one of our charters in this tidy. these ventures that we derive really from and assess it a national security policy, s

and borrowing from a friend here frank hoffman, we borrowed this idea, what we call the fulcrum chart. the bottom line is, institutional goals -- provides the foundation upon which the other two can be assessed and rest. in the current, in the current sort of structure the way dod assesses risk going forward is operational risk in sort of over the next 24 months can we perform our work. it is heavily favored and more formalized and is this a view of future challenges risk. what we try to do is take a crack at rewriting the bounds of the charred looking more holistically at future challenges risk. one thing that's important that we see is really it is operational risk is tomorrow's future challenges risk. they really are a continuum. one assesses the ability, the ability of the force to respond to problems it sees now. the other sort of assesses the forces ability, the problems we see in the future. so they really do have similar characteristics and, therefore, are joined somewhat. next slide. as a context for study wikified five core interests. i'm not going to go into great detail bu

borrowing from frank hoffman, this is the chart. the bottom line is institutional and force management risks provide the foundation upon which the other two can be assessed and rest. in the current sort of structure, the way d.o.d. assesses risk going forward is operational risk being sort of over the next 24 months can we perform our war plans? it is heavily favored and more formalized than is this view of future challenges risk. what we have try to do is actually take a crack at rewriting the balance of that chart. one thing that is important that we see is really today's operational risk is tomorrow's future challenges risk. they really are a continuum. one assesses the aability of the force to respond to problems it sees now. the other assesses the force's ability to respond to problems we see in the future. they have similar characteristics and are joined somewhat. as a con text, we identified five core interests. i am not going into detail in the interests, but it was a charter in the study. we think these core interests we de

borrowing from frank hoffman, this is the chart. the bottom line is institutional and force management risks provide the foundation upon which the other two can be assessed and rest. in the current sort of structure, the way d.o.d. assesses risk going forward is operational risk being sort of over the next 24 months can we perform our war plans? it is heavily favored and more formalized than is this view of future challenges risk. what we have try to do is actually take a crack at rewriting the balance of that chart. one thing that is important that we see is really today's operational risk is tomorrow's future challenges risk. they really are a continuum. one assesses the ability of the force to respond to problems it sees now. the other assesses the force's ability to respond to problems we see in the future. they have similar characteristics and are joined somewhat. as a con text, we identified five core interests. i am not going into detail in the interests, but it was a charter in the study. we think these core interests we der