even the strongest proponents of collective bargaining for the private sector, people like franklin delano and roosevelt, never thought there was a place in government where no one is playing with his own money. the representative on the government side is playing with the taxpayers' money. i think that is a legitimate issue. who works for whom here? is the government there to serve the public? tavis: if the debate is about the rights of workers, we could have a whole conversation tonight about government in this country. however government being oftentimes the worst discriminator, the worst offender. let's not talk about civil rights or slavery or woman suffrage -- i mean, i could do this all night, giving examples where government has been the discriminator in chief. why not access to collective bargaining? just because they work for government? >> there was a time when in the old days of of patronage and so forth when government workers were put upon and vulnerable, but that is a long time ago. now in 41 states out of 50, they are better paid than the taxpayers to support them. in the f