franklin nevada was a buy after they came on. sandstorm is so much smaller than franklin nevada or real world which is the other big player. the company can focus on taking down smaller deals that the big boys wouldn't bother with because the deals with too small to move the needle for. at the moment sandstorm has acquired eight gold streams and three royalties. out of these 11 total assets five of them are now producing. most of these assets are in geopolitically stable areas, three in brazil, three in canada, one in mexico, one in nevada. maybe that's the least stable. fiscal cliff. financial joke. anyway the company has 150 million in capital it can use to acquire new production streams. i've seen one analyst who thinks sandstorm can grow production by an astounding 228% from last year through 2015 on a cumulative basis. even if that figure's too bullish, even within the realm of possibility makes it compelling. i am always looking for a way to play with gold with a lot of up side. at the end of the day this business is about

nevada. hi, ernie. >> caller: hi. i've been reading a book by a william luten berg about franklin delano roosevelt and the new deal? >> guest: yes, right. >> caller: and i'm struck by the parallels in particular around the second hyundais and up through -- hundred days and up through 1935 where the supreme court was making 5-4 decisions, and it included a justice named roberts. owen roberts. >> guest: owen roberts, yes. >> caller: yes. and how there's precedent really where these 5-4 decisions were made at a time when our nation was going through very similar patterns that we're now experiencing. and i just wonder if you could comment on that. >> guest: the supreme court -- you know, that's the big supreme court fight, the court-packing fight of, like, 1937 after roosevelt wins the big land slideslide so misprotected by literary digest. and he decided he's not going to deal with this court anymore. and they say, there was an old saying that the court decisions follow the election returns. so that to, again, protect the integrity of the court you start seeing key votes on the court, start to flip so that they allow

nevada. hi, ernie. >> caller: hi. i've been reading a book by a william luten berg about franklin delano roosevelt and the new deal? >> guest: yes, right. >> caller: and i'm struck by the parallels in particular around the second hyundais and up through -- hundred days and up through 1935 where the supreme court was making 5-4 decisions, and it included a justice named roberts. owen roberts. >> guest: owen roberts, yes. >> caller: yes. and how there's precedent really where these 5-4 decisions were made at a time when our nation was going through very similar patterns that we're now experiencing. and i just wonder if you could comment on that. >> guest: the supreme court -- you know, that's the big supreme court fight, the court-packing fight of, like, 1937 after roosevelt wins the big land slideslide so misprotected by literary digest. and he decided he's not going to deal with this court anymore. and they say, there was an old saying that the court decisions follow the election returns. so that to, again, protect the integrity of the court you start seeing key votes on the court, start to flip so that they allow