by the way, only we have two frantsevichs on the site at the same time, maybe dofiga, but i ask for frenchanks for the attention this week. of course, we are chained to the upcoming nato summit a bunch, a bunch of reports, newspapers come out with this, but the rest of the world, which is not in the western bloc, has been watching some such resurgent organization called the shanghai cooperation organization for a long time, and the accession of iran as a full member, and the signing of a conditional roadmap for joining belarus this says that the format of this new world is getting stronger. we recently discussed brix here, it seems that there is a difference in what, as it were, a very similar shanghai cooperation organization, the main thing. it's still there at the security is the interaction of various structures of bodies to develop mechanisms for cross-border terrorism and drug crime. everything else and here it is very important that on equal terms in a mutually beneficial way, as they say , the keys are all being done, it is curious that afghanistan, in the person of the new leaders

god everything cost you andrey frantsevich's question.ere are the details that are now known, what kind of drones were used now, you can say, look, these are aircraft-type drones that allow you to fly long distances according to a predetermined flight task. that is, he does not need communication with the satellite in the form of non-direct control. well, how american drones flew along the crimea with great power, of course. that is, it flies along the coordinates. this is actually a cruise missile, only very cheap , inconspicuous and very slow and quite large, and relative to cruise missiles of 7-8 m in length, they are very small. that is, there one and a half to two meters can be all-round the rest is from five to ten, uh, carry a kilogram of explosives with you, as the air defense officers told me. so at the weekend i was just on the line there were contacts, they say they are very difficult to identify, that is, the materials from which it is made there. it's all that, practically radio-transparent, that is, it is not reflected, that

personalities of the collaborators, for example, arseniev, uh, eat the same ostrovsky vladimir frantsevichind of people were they for in the first place, uh, ate and uh, ostrovsky, these are people who collaborated with a variety of intelligence services. think about it for all the time ostrov, but he is there, of course, there was no landowner. no matter how. eh, yes , there was such a thing, well, this is a difference and a difference in meaning somewhere such a local intellectual. you know, in search, but each search can be in different places. start and he actively collaborated with the germans in the first occupation. then he actively cooperated with the poles, the poles suspected that he was a soviet agent. eh, and maybe it was. he then became the head e leader. these are the collaborators during the great patriotic war, and after the war he went to cooperate with the cia, and even the tsrushniks they considered it so dirty that they were forced to create a structure parallel to the forty-seventh year, he headed the belarusian central rainbow, they returned the belarusian folk rainbo

i completely agree, firstly, with the diagnosis of this vadim france by vadim frantsevich regarding polandituation there, although all this multi-layeredness is certainly, so to speak, absolutely destructive. so to speak character is not only for us. eh, in general. i would like to add to our inevitably tough conversation , which is difficult considering the situation we are in today, to add a touch of what it was nice to see today, indeed , the president of russia visited the kronstadt naval cathedral for the tenth time. it's good that lukashenka was there. uh, basically what we're talking about today, i'd like to go back to minute to andrey anatolyevich's speech on the one hand. of course, i do not agree that the third world war is over. we played it, we didn't lose anything. although, of course, we unfastened propaganda and counter propaganda as unnecessary in the nineties. we have visits today 119 times less than at the turn of 1989 and 1990, and we are hard to hear in the world, despite all the conditions, the satellite and so on. although then there was no internet, there were no ele

here he is, so we are entering belarus vadim frantsevich, absolutely right it means that you such an whites in black and white, in fact, they were polish frets from their lowest, they did not reach it and one such powerful force. and when the soup was opposed to colonization. we are a hunter, belarus has actually stagnated. belarus what was officially zaboronina, and la-deneshala at the underground and this rukh-national resistance would be leading, and the blackest terrible side. and why did igor alexandrovich tell good through the doors this is the period of the great quiet war. that's from this collaborationism. what blood is already behind the patches killed chervona white nets. this yong is actually discrediting the nearest one to us. there are tori. guess the pershupovy nineties. this was the banner of the sovereign republic of belarus, the most difficult now in our history, we are talking about the republic of belarus, the crisis of the socio-economic, gromatic and political. and this was served under heated symbolism. why are we trying so hard to shove the desktop? you are al

so we go to belarus in one frantsevich.such an organization that went under white black and white, in fact they were polish frets from neschi on their own did not reach it, and one and such a fashionable force. and when the soup was opposed to colonization. we are a hunter, belarus has actually stagnated. belarus what was officially zaboronina, a la-money from the underground and would have gathered with this ruh-national sub-resistance and the most black terrible side. and why did igor aleksandrovich tell the door with goodness, this is the period of the great ranking war near this collaborationism. what blood already killed chervona white nets of this yon actually discrediting the one closest to us. great guess the pershupovy nineties. this banner was the sovereign republic of belarus, the most difficult now in our history for alcohol about the republic of belarus, the socio-economic crisis of the gromatist-political. and this was served under this symbolism. why are we trying so hard to shove the desktop? we are all this

the personalities of the collaborators, for example, arseniev to eat the same ostrovsky vladimir frantsevichat these were people for what, firstly, uh, kushal and uh, ostrovsky, these are people who collaborated with a variety of intelligence services. think about it for all the time of the islands. but he, of course, was not a landowner there, as it were. eh, yes it was. well, it's fun and entertainment somewhere such a local intellectual. you know, in search, but for everyone , searches can lead to different places, and he is with the germans. actively collaborated in the first occupation, then he actively collaborated with the poles, the poles suspected that he is a soviet agent. eh, and maybe it was. he then became the head e leader. these are the collaborators during the great patriotic war, and after the war he went to cooperate with the cia, and even the tsrushniks considered him so. so dirty that they were forced to create a parallel structure of the forty-seventh year , headed the belarusian central rada, they returned the belarusian people's rainbow, but they did not have anyone to

everything will be fine, boy. on the russia channel, only we have two frantsevichs in the program at of course, all attention is riveted to the upcoming donation themselves, a bunch of reports, a bunch of newspapers come out with this, but the rest a world that's not in the western bloc watched some such resurgent a rather long-term organization called the shanghai cooperation organization and the accession of iran as a full member and the signing of a conditionally certain road map for joining belarus this suggests that the format of this new world is being strengthened. we recently discussed brix here, it seems that there is a difference, in what, as it were, a very similar shanghai cooperation organization, the main thing. it is still there at the security is the interaction of various structures of bodies to develop mechanisms for cross-border terrorism and crime, drugs and everything else. and here it is very important that on equal terms in a mutually beneficial way. keys, as they say. this is all done curiously that afghanistan, in the face of the new leadership, also wanted t

andrey frantsevich is paying attention to the ukrainian customs services, the united states accuses chinanon-lethal e-e, non-lethal things in general. yes and despite the fact that they themselves supply the kiev regime with increasingly dangerous long-range, and weapons and military equipment. here. uh, how important are these deliveries from china to us, how much do you believe here this information. and what do you think about the american anti-china policy from a military point of view in the pacific region. well , let's start with the latter then, and the americans in their strategic documents identified china as the main geopolitical adversary and nato as a structure. they want to increase to the size of the earth. they want this structure to be completely under the control of the americans, and it includes all the countries that are part of their satellite bloc, therefore. absence in the indo-pacific as their military bases, well, their allies, so that european troops in the same way participate in patrols with their naval aircraft, this does not suit them. this should be a collect

yes, indeed, as adrena frantsevich says, that is, if completely all thrust in the ukrainian conflict uh those cravings. don't you listen well said, listen to the hardships and heaviness and cravings of this, so to speak this process of this crisis. the europeans will fall on. that's well said. thank you, namely the citizens. well , about, yes, and the question is, when, well, you say guys already. and when the truth will be, uh , for real, uh, riots against uh, this help is now what we see in europe now, such an economist has come. i understand what to say that because when there will be a riot - that's when it means they're tired. i'm just asking your feeling and understanding, not that when there will be riots, well, well, hedgehog there is no state now. what are you in now, what are we now and so, since again this is traction? uh, it doesn’t matter, somehow you still don’t feel it, yes , completely, otherwise that margin of safety still exists . we’re not tired yet, because the point is, you need to understand that they are financing together with an american and a ukrainian state

they were sincere, but they wrote down the documents for clapping, you know, yes, in one of frantsevichd other leaders of the soviet era boris nikolaevich yeltsin , the late god, we protect america in the us congress yes, we say there is no interest in national ones. what do they say our interests are the same as in america and then what about the chechen war and what was the surprise? i just, let's say, talked like this with some people who worked with yeltsin, at least they claim that it was the sincere surprise and indignation of the president of russia when they caught the hand of american spies inciting the military in chechnya, god forbid that our president of belarus, our leader of russia, has ever been applauded in congress , it is absolutely not necessary. god forbid that this never happened and never will. about the west, but in what way when you find yourself in slavery, and i'm sure that the ukrainian state, but people still, maybe not, ended up in slavery of the collective west, look what nonsense you are talking about this week zelensky held a small educational program. le

where is frantsevich new history, but you know that you have to manage to look for such barbarians as a few centuries ago, but the 21st century is in the yard. i'm talking about the european parliament even more sophisticated. well, you correctly said ivan mikhailovich that between the fugitives and the european parliament there, the difference is small, these are hired talkers, which do not solve anything, but the situation is important here. why was the rule about children introduced as an element of a war crime, because there was a second one, just compare the situation with people like that. uh, vile, little soul to those who organized this company. here is the untwisting that these norms are supposedly some kind of crime. e international legislation was introduced after the second world war, when children were subjected to occupation by the nazis, and we all know the exploitation of the red coast. there they took blood , used medical e, experiments they were excommunicated from their parents, subjected to fascist treatment there, and so on and so on and so on and was introduced.

eh, really, andrey frantsevich. how can you comment?ainian counteroffensive is still treading water. look first you need to understand. i'll start with an aid package , move on to 1.3 billion cluster munitions. what was transferred from the americans. there are two transfer options. the first is presidential decisions taken from the warehouses, they quickly transferred it only by logistics, and the second is an order at the enterprise. and for enterprises, this is more than a year, that is, the fact that at 1.3 is now the twenty-fourth plus, and ukraine is now starting to receive, through such support measures, what was contracted for in the summer 22 years, and that's not all, that is, somewhere it goes ahead, with regard to cluster munitions, the americans opened pandora's box themselves and the ukrainians. this is recognized. they opened the weapons of the third world war when the big war of the warsaw pact countries with nato in eastern western europe was going to strike at each other, but the leaders in the production of cluster mu

when using artillery at the stage of minefields, the second american official said, because andrey frantsevichdown the pace, uh, instead of leaving your people, uh, to slaughter and break through, in spite of everything and thirdly, in general, they shoot too much, you need to shoot less. know in this article. i am very strong. there, one word hit so hard and sometimes aviation is used in combined operations, where it is generally key. but in general it is very revealing. this shows that americans, based on arrogance, believe that they are the best nation and military . they have the best in the country and their tactics are the most successful. although lately. they did not fight with more than one strong enemy, and in fact ukraine ahead in this operational skill, but they told them how to fight, they offered them their concept of breaking through, such heavy defensive lines. they are on the heavy breakthrough division and all together they gave ukraine these opportunities. they act, with the exception of one point with the americans. this concept says that there should be huge air support in

i completely agree, firstly, with the diagnosis given by vadim france by vadim frantsevich regardingto say, the characters are not only for us, but in general. i would like to add to our inevitably tough conversation , which is difficult considering the situation we are in today, to add a touch of what it was nice to see today, indeed , the president of russia visited the kronstadt naval cathedral for the tenth time. it's good that lukashenka was there. uh, in essence what we are talking about today, i would like to return for a moment to andrey anatolyevich's speech on the one hand. of course i don't agree that world war iii is over. we lost it, we didn't lose anything. although, of course, we unfastened propaganda and counter propaganda as unnecessary in the nineties. we have visits today 119 times less than at the turn of 1989 and 1990, and we are hard to hear in the world, despite all the conditions. they say that there is a satellite and so on. although then there was no internet, there was no electronic media, we could hear better than your information pay. yes, we do not win,