enough to know the problems are, but i have not been in the legislature enough to be part of the fraternity party. having a plan to tell them where we need to go as a state and educate people on how we are going to get there. the second thing is being predictable, getting the consequences before they happen. the goal i want to have is the first year in office to give south carolina a win. i want the legislature to feel what it is like to really went for the people in the state, and i want the people to know what it feels like when they have the power again. they can go around and show an agenda of where we need to go and how we plan on getting their when looking at your. 5 and 7. >> talking about that fraternity, but in order to get anything done, do you not have to drink from their keg, so to speak? >> i do not think so. i was chairman of the freshman class. i was majority whip. i can get along with the legislature, and i can lead, but when i saw something wrong, when i saw votes were being cast by a voice vote, i said we had to start voting on the record. the legislature opposed me for 2.

i think people will be pleasantly surprised. >> you say you're not part of the fraternity, but in order to get anything done, don't you have to drink from their keg? >> you do not have to. i was chairman of the freshman class. i was majority whip. i was put on a powerful subcommittee chair. i can lead, but when i saw something wrong, when i resolve votes were being passed by avoid -- by a voice vote, and i sat there and said, we have to start voting on the record. we differed on that. the legislature oppose me, but i knew until we got a good government we could not get a working government. i got workers' comp done. tort reform. we will continue to work on other issues, but when they are done, my goal is to side with the people of the state, not the legislature. my goal is to make sure people know what they are doing and why they are doing it. i will make sure they vote for good government programs, but i will also be there when they vote against its and hold their hands tied. >> let me go to a brief follow- up before we move to the next question. he said he was committed to and no new

but i have not been part of tte legislature long enough to be part of the fraternity party. i can tell them where we want to go as a state. we need to be predictable. we need to tell them what we are going to do before we do it. the goal that i want to have is to give south carolina and the wind. i want the legislature to feel what it is like to win for the people of this state and i wanted people to know what it feels like. this can be done. i think that the people are going to be pleasantly >> you say that you are not part of the fraternity, but don't you have to drink from their kegs so to speak? >> you actually do not have to. i was majority whip, i was put on a powerful committee. i can get along with the legislature and i can lead. when i saw the boats were being passed by voice vote, and you would be embarrassed if you saw what i saw. i knew that until we got a good government, we could not get a working government. i worked on workers' comp with the legislature, tort reform, and we will continue to work on other issues, but when they are long, my goal is to side with

in the legislature long enough to know the problems are, but not long enough to be part of the fraternity. the key to leading the legislature and being governor is to put forward a plan that tells where we want to go as a state and educate the people and legislature on how we get there. second is being predictable, what we are going to do before we do it, consequences before they happen. typical of to have is the first year in office to give south carolina a win. what the legislature to feel what it is like to feel what it's like to win and i want people to return and have the power of the government. this takes a governor who can show an agenda of where we need to go, how we need to get there, with looking at years 3, 5, 7. i think people will be pleasantly surprised >> in order to get anything done, don't you have to drink from the fraternity keg, so to speak, to get anything done? >> i actually don't have to. when i was chairman of the freshman class, i was majority whip, subcommittee chair. i can get along with the legislature and lead. when i saw something wrong, when i saw boats bei

i think he is an exemplary member of the fraternity when they are writing. unfortunately, and i hear this from many people, is he not smart enough to ask questions? whether or not a justice really concerns themselves with public perception, i think it is injuries to his legacy, after all of these years of being a high quality justice, to how people perceive that he is not up to the task. i think that in the 60 minutes of oral argument, and by the way justice roberts does now allow some of the cases to run on longer than 60 minutes, and i find that a positive thing -- i do not remember very many cases i have heard over the years where i thought that the rapid exchange between justices must not allow managing. if you get a really bad logger committed a really bad lawyer -- but that is rare to. most people who make the argument before a court of competent to do so. i think oral argument is the label and i wish clarence took part in it. justice kennedy plays a role with a swing vote. this is a count of 5-4 decisions since the start of the robert court. and to a

how do you get into this fraternity? guest: this is one of those things that is part of the history which makes the question that just came come forward. it is self--selected. what happened was the last crisis was the asian financial crisis in the late 1990s, and it turned out that paul martin in canada, the finance minister at the time, came to washington and talked to larry summers who was deputy secretary treasury at the time and they came up with a grouping of countries, with input from others but they basically came up with the list of countries that you listed. so it's an arbitrary self-selected grouping. but on the other hand, we have been proposing the transformation of the g-8 to the g-20 for the last years, a group of us. this has come up often in these discussions. and the -- if you asked 20 people in a room to make a list of the 20 countries you want to have in this, they would all come up with different countries. but when you look at the countries that are there, it's pretty well balanced. and everybody cou