because no matter how innocent, how innocent our foodstuff may seem, everything we consume must be fraught with divisive political meaning and i'm not letting you off, water. two hydrogens, one oxygen. i will not stand if your freaky molecular three-way. you either drop one or i start showing in jack daniel's. by the way, jack-daniel, you better just be roommates. we'll be right back ( cheers and applause ) ( cheers and applause ). >> stephen: welcome back, everybody. my guest tonight is the cochair of the bill and melinda gates foundation. cochair-- they get all that money and have to share a chair? please welcome melinda gates ( cheers and applause ) hey, melinda good to see you again. nice to you have back. >> likewise. >> stephen: now and your husband, bill-- how is bill? >> he's terrific. >> stephen: please tell him to stop by more often. >> okay. >> stephen: once would be good. ( laughter ). now you're-- you're both trustees of the bill and melinda gates foundation. you have, through your work in impoverished countries, you have saved hundreds of thousands if not millions of lives. d

has been established is that the first interaction between a customer -- a driver and passenger is fraughtwith anxiety. i think it is proper for a regulatory body to address that. it should be invisible. it should be built into the rate structure that when you pay it does not come out of the cab driver's bottom line. it should come through the company. however it gets paid, it should come through the company. if you are interested in the customer, you will address that. >> i am a san francisco cab driver. i support this item, the way it is written. thank you for listening to cabdrivers' protesting in the past about 5% being excessive. in a perfect world, philosophically, i believe cabdrivers in san francisco should not have to pay any credit card fee, unless you own the tab -- the steering light, etc., and are paying all the expenses, setting your own schedules. when you do not have a right to do that, and you have to run everything through a cab company, i think it is wrong. as a compromise, i will go out on a limb and say i support this item. i think that is a fair compromise in the real

isn't that also fraught with peril. >> nobody wants to transition to a boom and bust but i think thate opportunity that with the commercialization of the internet, we've opened up a window of investment opportunities. it takes alot of risk and equity to underwrite the risk and tall tont harvest the opportunities. but the u.s. alone has created google, facebook, intel, microsoft, apple, ebay the list goes on and on. >> jon: so is your position that the risk and reward for the investor class is not great enough. >> well, it's pretty-- pretty nice way but i would say this, if we-- i believe that we have more risk-taking it in the u.s. that produces the innovation and the growth rate because the payoffs are better here. now the payoffs are better for lots of reasons. our guys are working at google and facebook. >> jon: what dow mean by risk thenment because i guess i might have a different view here it looks to me like the investor class is coddled and the working class is not necessarily penalized but certainly ignored to the benefit with the idea that the investor class is gain's will i

isn't that also fraught with peril. >> nobody wants to transition to a boom and bust but i think that we've been given an incredible opportunity that with the commercialization of the internet, we've opened up a window of investment opportunities. it takes alot of risk and equity to underwrite the risk and tall tont harvest the opportunities. but the u.s. alone has created google, facebook, intel, microsoft, apple, ebay the list goes on and on. >> jon: so is your position that the risk and reward for the investor class is not great enough. >> well, it's pretty-- pretty nice way but i would say this, if we-- i believe that we have more risk-taking it in the u.s. that produces the innovation and the growth rate because the payoffs are better here. now the payoffs are better for lots of reasons. our guys are working at google and facebook. >> jon: what dow mean by risk thenment because i guess i might have a different view here it looks to me like the investor class is coddled and the working class is not necessarily penalized but certainly ignored to the benefit with the idea that the i

because no matter how innocent, how innocent our foodstuff may seem, everything we consume must be fraught with divisive political meaning and i'm not letting you off, water. two hydrogens, one oxygen. i will not stand if your freaky molecular three-way. you either drop one or i start showing in jack daniel's. by the way, jack-daniel, you better just be roommates. we'll be right back ( cheers and applause ) it's olive garden's 2 for $25. an italian dinner for 2 where choice is on the menu. start with all the fresh salad and warm breadsticks you want. choose 2 appetizers made for sharing. then 2 entrÉes from 6 of our favorites. classics like eggplant parmigiana and new favorites like smoked mozzarella chicken and spaghetti with four cheese meat sauce & meatballs. 3 courses, 2 people, just $25. but only for a limited time, at olive garden. ( cheers and applause ). >> stephen: welcome back, everybody. my guest tonight is the cochair of the bill and melinda gates foundation. cochair-- they get all that money and have to share a chair? please welcome melinda gates ( cheers and applause ) hey, m

that the plans are incomplete and no notice was given to the neighbors, and because of how utterly fraught with confusion this project has been. i sincerely thank you for your time. gregg's you said december, 2012 -- >> december, 2012? >> december 8th, 2012. >> not 2012. >> i'm sorry, 2011. >> the last year that pdr record. >> yes. -- that the d.r. occurred. >> yes. >> we can hear from the permit holder now. >> president huang, do you wish to give the permit holder 14 as well? >> we have to, yes. you do not have to use them all, but that is your time allotment. seven minutes per appeal. >> thank you. good evening. i represent the permit holder tonight. as you heard, the cases before you are linked with the demolition and the replacement of a single-family dwelling. based on the appellants brief, it is my understanding that her issues are not actually with th. it is more with the process of the demolition and how that takes place. unfortunately, most of the concerns that she has raised are governed by local laws, building codes, regulations. they made no attempt to reach out to us. perhaps

you will go back and view with a thought that we live still in a dangerous world and one that is fraught with challenges but it is a next generation of leaders throughout the world that can change from a bleak picture in some cases to one that is more optimistic. i believe that your involvement in a

court really said in this decision is that the solution to the immigration problem in a debate so fraughtear and anger, that solution will come here in washington. one immigration policy for one nation. terry moran, abc news, the supreme court. >> the water is a little murky. if they would have passed all four provisions it would have made it clear if you do have to show your papers law and they failed to provide the, the proper certification and identification they are here illegally we would have known what to do next. now because 75% of the bill doesn't pass. what happens next? states cannot legally deport people. the fed has to do that. the fed. basically what is going to happen now. i am going to read something to you, all the arizona cops can do is inform federal immigration authorities if they round up an illegal immigrant. and the feds are perfectly free to ignore them. >> so, makes you question, if we made any real head way or not in this. with the governor of arizona can say she will not tolerate racial profiling as a byproduct of the law which is important considering the battl

the for profit sector in higher education has a significant and pervasive problem with waste, fraught, and abuse. this is not anything against the profit motive. we endorse it and the building we sit in was built by somebody who hopefully was doing it for a profit and did a good job. when you compare how we put up buildings in this country with building codes and inspections and heavy penalties, if somebody under sizes the seem beams we understand it needs to be framed. i am here to suggest to you as somebody who spent almost a quarter century looking at this stuff. we have a lot of procedural and burdensome regulations. we do not have substantive safeguards to ensure that an entity perporting to be a college or university is doing any teaching. that is equivalent to buildings falling on people's heads on a daily basis. the basic reason here is simple. when you put a building up or take a color tv home, there very obvious performance tests on the basis of which you know what you got. education is a lifetime experience service. you can show people all kinds of promises on the front end

is that no matter how skilled they are, how highly motivated, how well equipped, it is a mission fraught frustrations and i'm not sure there ever was a solution, a path to victory over there. >> one of the other things that you highlight is how dramatically this war is different from other wars. it's a lot ,v$%zzmore violent t people think. even though the casualty rates are lower than they've been in other wars, especially in terms of fatalities, that's because of a very heavy investment in antiied technologies and mine- resistent ambush vehicles, for example. but survival doesn't mean uninjured, does it? >> no, it doesn't. the signature wound of this war is the traumatic brain injury, when the brain actually bounces around inside the skull and guys in it, and if you listen to the fella who was the truck commander right afterwards, you'd think that he's okay. >> and we want to take a >>> uij.é; >> did you lose consciousness? he came down -- w.qj sure my driver was okay. after that wait for d.o.d. to get here. >> first time you've been blown up? >> no. >> how many other times? >> i've be

sending sophisticated anti- aircraft missiles appear the most sensitive locations along its share of fraught with syria. under the new rules of engagement, they will treat any syrian forces approaching the border as house file, and they are allowed to target them if necessary. we have not yet abandoned the search for the pilots shot down by syria on friday. but they must now be presumed to be dead. it was an action that turkey insists was wholly unjustified. the prime minister has toughened an already harsh stance toward syria, describing it now as a clear threat to turkey. but for all the bellicose posturing, turkey does not want to get dragged into a hot confrontation with syria. instead, it will be hoping that saturday's planned meeting convened by kofi annan will produce a diplomatic breakthrough. is proposing an interim government for syria, the start of a political transition, but everything depends on russia's support. so far, that is not certain. this is already a tense and militarized border. an increasingly porous conduit for refugees and insurgents, steeped in plots and injury. un

have been harsher and that the trial was a product of the old regime the situation below me which is fraught with the beat of drums and the chants of protestors is even more tense because of the soon to arrive second round of egypt's presidential election and people here are doubling angry because they say there's no real choice between the two candidates one of the candidates is the muslim brotherhood candidate mohamed morsi he has told the protest camp in an attempt to try and gain support from them and mohamed morsi has said that here he was elected president he would try to put my back back on trial and have him executed many people though are scared that the muslim brotherhood may hijack their revolution and bring in their own religious conservatism the other candidate who is mubarak's last prime minister has warned that the muslim brotherhood would take egypt back to the dark ages many people vote do not trust him seeing him as part of the old regime. your authority still to come this hour kept out of trouble sellout cast the russian parliament finishes a marathon session to push throu

which is why that was the most fraught moment of the war for the united states. forget gettysburg as the great turning point. of course it wasn't. the summer of '64 is as close as the confederates came. a long time after the supposed great turning point in the summer of 1863. there are tremendous links between politics and military affairs. i'll give you one example -- no, i'm going to give you two. we have a digital clock here. i know exactly how many minutes, seconds an seconds i have left. nothing left to chance in this conference. there's a trap door right underneath me, too. so you'll be out of here by 5:00, maybe even a little bit before. i want to give you two examples of these linkages. the first is the bloody stalemate -- the apparent stalemate in virginia and georgia during the summer of 1864, the incredibly bloody summer of 1864. grant and sherman seemingly bogged down, threatened republican prospects in the elections of 1864. prompting lincoln's pessimistic blind memorandum in august that predicted defeat. jeff wert mentioned that earlier. happily for

that, you know, the process of having a constitutional convention was fraught with controversy. the dynamics of the constitutional convention were bitterly contested. the ratification contest was a slugfest. and i think that -- and then, peter i think you talked about the 1790s. the politics of the jeffersonians and the federalists in the 1790s is every bit as bitter as it is today. so i think that another of the points that we can make as history teachers is that it's not so different in the founding era as it is today. it's just the sense of ownership, the sense of connection we feel with the political process and with our involvement in it that makes it different. and i think there's a real opportunity in teaching the founding period to show that it wasn't so different. >> akhil? >> i like team exercises. if i were in high school, i

which is why that was the most fraught moment of the war for the united states. forget gettysburg as the great turning point. of course it wasn't. the summer of '64 is as close as the confederates came. a long time after the supposed great turning point in the summer of 1863. there are tremendous links between poll takes and military affairs. i'll give you one example -- no, i'm going to give you two. we have a digital clock here. i know

you'll go back with the thought that we live still in a very dangerous world and the world that is fraught with challenges. but it is the next generation of leaders throughout the country -- the world that we can change from a bleak picture in some cases to one that is much more optimistic. i believe that your involvement in a cause greater than your own self-interest is the future of this country and the world. and i believe that when i'm associated with people like her in this room, i'm much more optimistic when i leave than when i came. thank you. [ applause ] >> thank you very much. [ applause ] >> the senator has raised a great number of issues and i'm thrilled that we have as distinguished a panel as we have today to discuss these issues. we also have in the audience members of every major faction of the syrian opposition and i also want to extend my welcome to them. sitting next to me on my right is a leading syrian human rights and prodemocracy activist and author. he's a fellow and a member of the syria working group at the foundation for defensive democracies which is pretty much

. >> leadership is making decisions that are sometimes difficult and fraught with personal risks. >> ed rendell endorsed hillary clinton in 08. a book nation of wouldn't says gives him guts during the campaign battle. >> he is truly not a wuss. >> avenue a number of things. since involved he was slow to the mark. he eventually did come out for a solution when he and john bay more came this clo-- boehner ca to the deal. >>> the president had rushed to embrace the medicine democrats would have fled over title cuts republicans would have run away because of tax increases. the president is vulnerable but hasn't come close to doing so. >>> be sure to watch tomorrow we will continue the series with a look at mitt romney's leadership tria style. >> it is 25 minutes after the hour. this is a story everyone is talking about this morning. look at the front page of the papers alec baldwin unleashing his fury on a photographer. wait until you hear what he did next. >>> hecklers trying to drown out these children singing "god bless the usa." who does that? first on this day in history 1975 the mo

it's an election fraught with implications for wisconsin where walker's brand of budget slashing andunion bashing and conservative social activism energized many on the right and fed a backlash that netted 900,000 signatures. the mayor is the democratic challenger, he lost to walker in 2010. >> there is an encouraging night is that they appreciated someone had challenge to take over the challenge autos and around the state energy has been building and building. and we think it's a good sign. so we're excited. >> and this is just a snap shot but there are imlixs beyond the state. the tea party serves into the mansion, if walker wins it certainly will brighten the republican outlook this fall. and there is another side it could signal a rebound for political clout of labor unions. walker has outspent barett two to one in television advertising that is well reflecting the financial challenge. the polls show voters say they favor barack obama over mitt romney and i know you're wondering why does mitt romney and barack obama work into this? they ask people which party are you affiliated w

i think it's a really fraught issue for many chinese people. on the one hand, they're heirs to one of the world's greatest civilization, some day they'll be able to be the world's biggest economy, and yet recognizing all the ways in which there is this catch-up that's necessary for china. i think the practical application of it for us on the outside is to encourage chinese pride and achievement and the beijing olympics. it's great that they went well. chinese development, that's good. i think american governments have leaned in that direction because the only time i've ever seen nasty sides of chinese sort of mass temperament is when there's a sense of being disrespected as a country. >> rose: respect is a big word. >> yes, respect is a big word. in the late 90s when the u.s. mistakenly bombed them, nobody thinks that was an accident. >> rose: i've sat next to chinese at dinners and they say it could not have been an accident. >> "how could your military have made such an mistake?" we can't believe it was on purpose. they can't believe it's not

the fusion between the two, which could have been fraught with danger, is actually looks completely seamless. maybe because you three haven't aged. that's ridiculous. >> really. i mean, sue ellen, i have to be honest, you don't look a day older. >> but i am. >> i know you are. >> many days older, but this is one of the reasons it works. it looks like we're just carrying on where we left off. >> it was all set up with that pilot episode. that pilot was so amazing. a seamless transition from where the show left off into the new series. and as far as chemistry is concerned, i mean, these three set the tone. we call them the big 3. their friendship and enthusiasm is contagious. >> they made us really comfortable coming in which really helped the storylines feel real and very believable. there was a lot of -- they'll really welcomed us with opened arms and made it a lot easier for us. >> larry, how have they been getting on. >> they're going to drag us into another 13-year run. >> even at 94, i wouldn't trust you. just a leper never changes his spots. to me, as you can probably tell, this is all

all of these -- it is all very fraught. they have the opportunity to get it right.as human beings, they usually screwed up, don't they? [laughter] >> okay. we have five minutes, and i am sure that lindsay would be happy to entertain your questions. yes, sir. >> it is interesting that saudia arabia and kuwait have avoided the conflict situation. i'm interested in a couple of words from either of you. is that just a matter of having a critical mass, or is it a fundamental difference? >> it is a fundamental difference. basically, saudi arabia has a shia and sunni population. they have had demonstrations, because they are very suppressed. those demonstrations have been put down. the reason they are putting put down is to make sure they don't spread. they have a sunni population and not one quarter has been given. the same weekend that nato intervened in libya, the saudis wanted to make sure that those people did not overthrow their government. the gulf states are extremely hard off, and there's no way it's going to happen. that is what they say. are there any more quest

do you realize that is fraught? >> she resigned after discovering she had been writing bad checks. there are only two of many employees from across the country who reveal what they say is a culture of deception within the nation's largest gold mine operations. many attribute the bounced checks to the ceo extravagant lifestyle. court documents show he owes the irs more than $3 million and used corporate accounts to purchase things like luxury homes >> half of what is on the table >> she says she is not surprised by the findings of the undercover investigation in which some employees really repeatedly lied about the quality of gold. she says they felt pressured to take advantage of customers and felt they might be spied on anytime >> you never knew when they would be watching you through your computer >> says employees were instructed that buying gold at less than 10 percent of the value, a practice confirmed. the incentive is big bonuses. we questioned a company spokesperson about the practice following our initial investigation. don't you think that would encourage them to live or

manning was deeply from 20 was first arrested, as i certainly would be in that position -- was deeply fraughth was first arrested, as i certainly would be in that position. it was said he did not need to be kept under suicide watch. attorney tried's from very early on to get his client moved into less harsh conditions. >> he was naked. >> early on he was not stripped naked at night exactly, but not allowed writing utensils in his cell, allowed only one piece of reading material at a time, had to surrender all of his clothes but his underwear in the evening, had to respond verbally to guards to make sure you still living but could not converse with the guards. he was kept in his cell for like 23 hours a day, one hour a day allowed to walk figure eights and nt gymnasium, essentially. the situation gets much worse later and apparently there's a moment when he talks about in a complaint he filed that is attorney posted on his website and which the marine guards after a protest outside quantico, protesting this treatment, the marine guards basically start harassing him. no answer is the right answ

court really said in the decision is that the solution to the immigration problem in the debate so fraughtoss the country with fashion fear and anger, that solution will come here in washington. one immigration policy for one nation. this is abc news, supreme court. >>> many in san francisco mission district worry the decision will lead to racial profiling. >> we still get stopped because of how we look and then have to be questioned if you are english. if you don't speak english mostly clear enough maybe you don't have your papers. >>reporter: of course the law will have real life impact is arizona. david wright has the story from there tonightism as of today anyone in arizona who gets pulled over by the authorities has to know could vince the officer they are here legally. >> whole illegal immigration problem facing our nation. something has to be done with it. >>reporter: with this family a huge worry. vladimir is not a citizen. but his kids are. he now carries document in his glove compartment so if he's arrested and deported, his kids won't end up in foster care. >> this person says a