under the hastings policy, if fred phelps showed up and said, "i consider myself a member of cls and am going to start giving my habeus around campus -- my hate views around campus," we would not be able to do anything about it. that is troubling. finally, it is an administrative nightmare for college officials because it brings them into every decision making policy of every group. it does not just confined it to "are you engaged in religious, racial, or gender discrimination?" every decision is now up to review. justice kennedy was frank that he does not expect college -- he does expect university officials to make sure it is not used to stifle a groups speech. i am not sure her college officials can do that. i will highlight the speech i see coming from the majority opinion. i will move to these quickly. the majority, in order to rule against cls, had to set aside three longstanding precedents the required universities to recognize student groups even when the university did not like the views of the student group. the court had to push those aside. as the court admits in the firs