got the freedom of speech side of this. - freedom of speech side of this. hat's something we _ freedom of speech side of this. that's something we want - freedom of speech side of this. that's something we want to i freedom of speech side of this. - that's something we want to support. on the _ that's something we want to support. on the other— that's something we want to support. on the other hand, _ that's something we want to support. on the other hand, the _ on the other hand, the responsibility- on the other hand, the responsibility of- on the other hand, the responsibility of the i on the other hand, the - responsibility of the platforms to make _ responsibility of the platforms to make sure — responsibility of the platforms to make sure they— responsibility of the platforms to make sure they are _ responsibility of the platforms to make sure they are policing i responsibility of the platforms to make sure they are policing and i make sure they are policing and bearing — make sure they are policing and bearing down _ make sure they are policing and bea

is still the head of the verkhovna rada committee on freedom of speech, i.e., a person from the russian federation heads the committee on freedom of speech, and the answer to the second question : why is the psg still a member of the parliament of the verkhovna rada from local councils? and in general, they occupy active positions and positions in all state bodies. there is only one answer - it suits the government, and we can see from the voting in the verkhovna rada that the ukrainian people's party often votes for the ruling party when it needs it, and that's the answer to why . until now, a large part of the representatives of the ukrainian people's party sit in the verkhovna rada, and there are at least 20 of them there and he actively supports and votes for that, mr. shufrich. this is only the tip of the iceberg, and mr. boyko is sitting in the verkhovna rada . mr. boyko is doing well, and many other representatives of the russian federation, moreover, the draft law on banning the russian federation at the local level, and got stuck in the committees of the verkhovna rada and is n

together with this, we believe that this committee, it is, well, as you noted and in the context of freedom of speech , but also, especially in the context of freedom of mass media, for and protection of rights. and meddia, that is, this committee plays an incredibly important role, and in fact, if you liquidated such a committee, at least a new committee should have been created, but well less so, if we are talking about, well, again about the committee on freedom of speech, then the civic network is a support, a few years ago...' a statement that the committee, this committee should be headed, should be, let's say, delegated, for the leadership of the opposition, yes, it should be a representative of the opposition with an impeccable reputation, a certain authority in society, a statesman's mindset, and the committee should include those people's deputies who are really ready to defend freedom, words like certain value, from the latter, in particular, just the other day, the movement honestly announced a statement to which non-governmental organizations and the media, the civil network of opora, ca

a lot of people have been saying freedom of speech, freedom _ have been saying freedom of speech, freedomaying freedom of speech, freedom of speech and laurence fox had talked _ freedom of speech and laurence fox had talked about freedom of speech. yes, had talked about freedom of speech. yes. there _ had talked about freedom of speech. yes, there is freedom of speech but let's not— yes, there is freedom of speech but let's not conflate that with being misogynistic, sexist or racist. those — misogynistic, sexist or racist. those things aren't allowed and that isn't a _ those things aren't allowed and that isn't a standard that we would have at gb _ isn't a standard that we would have at gb news. most people at gb news that i speak to don't think that it's acceptable what he said and neither— it's acceptable what he said and neither do our viewers. can it's acceptable what he said and neither do our viewers.- neither do our viewers. can you understand _ neither do our viewers. can you understand how _ neither do our viewers. can you understand how it _ neither do our viewers. can you under

interpretation of a dream , see an issue called freedom of expression within the framework of the french constitution. what is the expression? is freedom of speech from the point of view of the president of france actually speaking from a personal point of view or freedom of speech from the point of view of the constitution of this country ? there was also the discussion of insulting the sacred space of the prophet of islam, and the president of france, as the highest authority of the country , should condemn this move, which we do not even have this issue in the teachings of christianity and other religions, that the highest religious authority is a door. in fact, insulting a prophet let's do it and everyone should be silent and let's defend him now that this issue of freedom of speech and newspaper has also come up in the form of a good issue . in the discussion of freedom, there is no cover for freedom. let's go. well, look at the discussion about wearing freedom. these are the effects , they say, islamic thinking and terrorist thinking, and it must be stopped . any symbol of this reason must be confronted . now, whether these drugs are in th

, because in the verkhovna rada people lived completely calmly and saw that the committee on freedom of speech was headed by none other than nestor ivanovich shufrych, and he was the head of the committee, and this one, too, is from the opzh, as they say, the right hand or leg of medvedchuk himself, also accused of treason and so on, and in this case, well, well, finally, well, better late than never, they say in the ukrainian people, the shufrich was demolished, the same with his landing to play temporarily, yes, at this moment someone must be appointed, and now when we look at what the duties of the head of the committee on freedom of speech, stavhenii brahar, you probably know this , servants of the people, this is a very famous personality, this is a dangerous intellectual, this is a person who fought against some ukrainian films in ukraine, it is impossible to shoot ukrainian films with state money in ukraine , and if grandma has any problems, so be it she will sell her dog and pay the utility bill, in my opinion, after such statements, you can't think of a bigger cringe, how can you chan

with anyone until the government, er, suddenly noticed that he is the head of the committee on freedom of speechs is some kind of insult and mockery of freedom of speech in ukraine at the time of the full-scale , that is, now everyone was talking about it, in fact , no one was talking about it, so, there was not enough power of the movement of votes, and only now, that is, this is a very interesting story, in fact, why shufrych i took it just now, eh, all the information is still unknown to whom shufrich's assets will be transferred, these are also very big questions, eh, why is it related now , or is the rating even falling and we need to pull out some new story, eh, let's see how it will develop, but what he hasn't had for a long time to lead, i will add simply that they have come now, the ideal boy for washing, conditionally speaking, for the authorities, it is finally called so many times , but but that is the question and the same for the leader . of course , it was a quota of the opposition. but when it did not become a party, the opposition. then, of course, it was supposed to lead. alrea

let's solve it, and freedom of speech to the committee on freedom of speech, we will return its functions to the actual active interaction with journalists so that they are allowed on the demarcation line so that they normally cover the events so that we know what and how is happening in the journalistic environment, in particular with regard to journalistic ethics, which, unfortunately, during the war is also subjected to certain oppression so that there is no no censorship, let's put it aside and organize the work of the committee normally. thank you . those who want to speak for one minute each from the faction of the group can proceed to voting. i understand correctly. dear colleagues, please take your places at work. dear colleagues, please, let's move on to making a decision, please, or in these discussions , by the past, so as not to lose the future. fellow citizens dear colleagues, the discussion is complete, we proceed to the adoption of a decision in accordance with article 83 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, article 7 of the law of ukraine on committees of t

therefore, there is a proposal at the next meeting to appoint the head of the committee on freedom of speechmost oppositional to the government, this is geoliros, please give the floor to people's deputy stefanishyna olga anatolyivni, the faction of the political party, the first vote to give the floor to yaroslav yurchyshyn, well, i don't know since when did monopoly on the opposition appear in our country, but i would like to emphasize that the russian opposition is pro-russian, legally prohibited, a huge thank you to the security service and everyone involved for the fact that mr. nestor shufrych was actually removed from the head of the committee in absentia, because it is a shame to have a person leave, the rest is still at the head of the committee, but the problem next, we now have a huge number of representatives of pro-russian forces, not only in the governing bodies, but also in many local self-government bodies , there is more than one draft law , in particular, the government bill to systematically solve this issue, it does not require changes to the constitution. let's return it

i think it is characteristic of this issue of freedom of speech and the newspaper also came and presented its opinion in the form of a good issue and went away, how does armin justify the same issue of freedom of expression. a symbol of this should be dealt with while the symbol wants to be in the form be it clothes , clothing, or anything else, there is a time when he comes to confront this thinking and insults the best indian personality. his policy and strategy is the same strategy of confronting the body of fighting against islamic thinking. the name of terrorism in the terrorist program of the parliament has been called the terrorist of the army day, and he is saying, well , the highest person of this thinking is the highest position of the candle of the prophet, and i can insult mr. shaheswar hosseini. i am so worried about this expansion are islam

they don't understand what freedom of speech is, what the rights and freedoms of journalists are to the market, right? so let's now discuss this with human and labor, right. so they've done corvalle done a very good evening to you. thank you. the 1st of all we'll see, will take on this default sation of the, the splitting editor editor for mold over without warning as well. it's very troubling, and it's, you know, it's part of a trend you're seeing not just in model that you're seeing it in germany. where people like c, j hopkins are being threatened with criminal charges including possible jail time for speech, a legal lip, and in germany, you actually blood and went to russia because she was being pursued for her reporting in the dawn. bad, you know, this is something we're saying all over the world, a real clamp down on freedom of speech, and it's very troubling. 40 said to those who level the same accusations against russia with the will see general journalist, for example, have on gus, give it she, he believes who claims that the charges against him, which comes of also the bbc bus

laws, a package of anti-democratic laws that significantly limited the rights of citizens and freedom of speechn the 2014 early elections to the verkhovna rada ran on party lists, the opposition bloc joined the party for life in november 2017, founded by a former member of the opobloc, vadym rabinovych from the people's party of ukraine, shufrich ran for the verkhovna rada of the ninth convocation, nestor ivanovych claims that he has in 2008, the green belt in karate publicly challenged the then head of state affairs , valery geletei, to a duel, but i usually do not comment on internal issues, because my field is external therefore, from the point of view of russia, let me first comment on nestor shufrych's pro-russian position, which has been known for a long time, and he is one of the few people who, for some reason, have not even changed, or to be honest, until 2010, i think that there were many illusions that it is possible to somehow solve something with russia without war, but nestor shufrich is an active person, lobbying for russian interests, and this is known, he always tried to do it

laws, a package of anti-democratic laws that significantly limited the rights of citizens and freedom of speech over early elections to the verkhovna rada in 2014, he ran for in november 2017, the opposition bloc joined the party based on the lists of the party. it was founded by a former member of the opposition bloc , vadym rabinovych, from the opposition party. shufrich ran for the verkhovna rada of the ninth convocation. nestor ivanovich claims that he has a green belt in karate. in 2008, he publicly challenged the then leader to a duel state administration of affairs valeriya geleteia, however, this fight never took place, instead ivanovich posed for tv cameras with his coach on september 30, 2014, the green train did not save shufrych in odesa, he got there under the arm of nestor shufrych's godfather, medvedchuk's wife, oksana marchenko, in july 2017, together with boxer volodymyr klitschko, she baptized the daughter of nestor ivanovich and his third wife, kateryna . shufrych was mentioned so briefly because it is clear that shufrych has been in ukrainian politics for quite a long time a

but in general, as for freedom of speech in america, for freedom of speech the americans will silence anyone and destroy the news on channel one. hello news on channel one with you andrey ukharev in yerevan in the morning mass protests resumed demanding the resignation of prime minister pashinyan after clashes between demonstrators and police, dozens of people were detained, including one of the opposition leaders; protesters tried to break through the cordon and block the entrance to the government house. where, at the moment that pashinyan was meeting, he had to leave the back through the emergency exit with heavy security in the center of the armenian capital , special forces were on duty, the opposition did not intentionally leave the street until the prime minister comes up , let me remind you that the fighting began after the events above the level of karabakh. they were stopped there through the mediation of teams outside the russian peacekeeping contingent. well , a remarkable reaction in washington is that american senators are already proposing to impose sanctions against th

freedom of speech and the press. the first draft, madison's first draft of the first amendment in the first continental congress on the first day had in it a draft of the first amendment which has language about how the press was invaluable. press freedom was invaluable, must be valuable, cannot be interfered with. that did not make all the editing processes, but from the start and certainly with the framers, i mean they really got the essentiality of having a press free enough not to be governed by, overseen by, and limited by the newly empowered federal government. remember, the reason that we have at our constitution -- federal constitution is that the articles of the confederation did not work. each state had its own coins. there was no federal army. there were no -- any diplomat had to be cleared by all 13 former colonies that were now states. and so, there really was a consensus here in philadelphia, not far from here, there really was a consensus that there was need to have a written constitution and a written

has been recently runs as the absolute worst for freedom of speech. the foundation of an individual right inside instruction came to the conclusion of evaluating almost $250.00 colleges around the country and said, how those approach to free speech has quote a bit as well as all these kindly move in with the story or well, the study was conducted by the foundation for individual rights and freedom of expression. and the writing that harvard university received was 0 out of a 100. and those who conducted the studies said that 0 writing was actually pretty generous. but according to their mathematical calculations, based on the formula they developed for the study, they really should have given the harvard and negative 10 out of a 100. uh and that essentially freedom of speech on the campus is nowhere to these bout. they conducted a poll. i'm on harvard university students 72 percent said that conservative speakers should not be allowed on the campus. 43 percent said that a liberal speaker should not be allowed on the campus and a whopping 73 percent. sa

well, in general, the question here is about the powers of the committee on freedom of speech, which you know, has been trained and controlled by shufrich over the years. situation, so to speak, the all-conquering freedom of speech in ukraine, uh, so to speak, well, a slight irony, what role should this committee ideally play , ideally, it should be a place where, for example , a media journalist can come and to complain about the actions of the authorities that prevent him from carrying out his journalistic activities and for which he has already appealed to all the lower bodies of management or journalistic self-regulation and did not get his complaint satisfied, the only thing is that when shufrych was in charge of this committee, it turned into the fact that only journalists who covered the pro-russian agenda came with such complaints and they talked about the fact that they were being squeezed out. well, for example , medvedchuk's channels, which were closed, and they er, well, they told us that how one lives badly in ukraine. it was definitely a change of concepts. galina, we kn

for supposedly being ross and agents by practicing their freedom of speech. recently a group of anti abortion activists were convicted for conspiracy to violate civil rights because they blocked the. busy first one of course in clinic during the protest, they will soon be sentenced and could get up to 12 years in prison for their protest. in addition to that, we've seen the rico law involved against protesters in georgia who protested against the against them as cop city police training facility. and we've also seen the heavy sentences handed out to those and participated in the january 60 that surrounding donald trump, etc. so all across the united states, we're seeing a heavy crack down on people exercising their freedom of speech, whether it's on social media, whether it's on university campuses, or whether it's in the public square, engaging in protest itself. while the united states votes about being some kind of bass, gender of human rights and freedom that has the right to go around, criticizing governments around the world. that one looks at what's actually taking place in th

so all across the united states, we're seeing a heavy crack down on people exercising their freedom of speech, whether it's on social media, whether it's on university campuses, or whether it's in the public square, engaging in protest itself. while the united states votes about being some kind of bass, gender of human rights and freedom that has the right to go around, criticizing governments around the world. that one looks at what's actually taking place in the united states. one will see that it's becoming a less and less free country every day. a, oh, wow, that is also this new though, as always is great to have your company here. but obviously, i'm one of the, the architects of nato's proxy war on russia. i've been plans for the cab regime as a cranes color offensive sales the country's post 4 realities are being planned in the west. alas, these plans will fail to say god is convicted and sentenced to 55 years the ours was the 2nd largest robbery in the us at the time and the people from the 1st largest robbery and the 3rd largest. while we got 15 years, i was sense to 65, it's common p

of free speech. and learned hand was very influential in shifting homes to a much more encompassing view of freedom of speech. holmes had -- hand had issued a opinion as a district judge which was published in a marxist journal, and the post office could ban from the male subversive literature. the case argued it was a violation, and learned hand agreed, and prevented the government from confiscating it. holmes said that it was something like, i bid farewell to my little toy boat, might opinion which had one of the shortest wages in the history of a legal opinion. he was overall very quickly by the court of appeals. but hand said exactly what homes believed as a skeptic. we have been wronged ourselves 70 times that we should be cautious about censoring views. it is a very interesting point, because it is not so much how we think of rights today. we think i have a right to freedom of speech because i'm so wonderful, i have this great thing to say, and it's part of me as a human being. and neither of them saw it that way. he saw it as we have been wronged ourselves so we need to be able to hear other op

so all across the united states, we're seeing a heavy crack down on people exercising their freedom of speech, whether it's on social media, whether it's on university campuses or whether it's in the public square, engaging in protest itself. while the united states boast about being some kind of bass, gender of human rights and freedom that has the right to go around, criticizing governments around the world. that one looks at what's actually taking place in the united states. one will see that it's becoming a less and less free country every day. yeah, came over and the world is turned in and doesn't look for is doesn't, the light is going to be any better. but thanks for joining us. i mean it's up to speed kind of open, like any a days of fun and this i live at. babel has fruits as i rush up, a quote, play simple game when it goes to the green deal. shumate both comments during a press conference with the remaining counts of all the same food supplies in the black sea region. but the event has also gone. it attached because of a confusing slip off by that.

censorship in the best traditions horror and with all this, they start shouting that there is no freedom of speech in russia or belarus , you need to understand that freedom of speech is in our country. of course there is also a state. uh, they act only on those areas that directly contradict state interests. in particular, when they try to disseminate information that is frank. the poles are simply resorting to the instrument of prohibition, and are not simply trying to hide their mistakes. if you thought that law and justice were about care, then you are right. it’s just that they care about their family and friends over the 8 years of government, more than 100 million dollars in the form of salaries and ten million in the form of bonuses were paid to persons directly related to the list and by party and blood ties in recent years, 152 party functionaries were included in the leadership, 19 the country's largest companies , including the oil holding, lotus group , are responsible for gas, energy, distribution and supply of electricity. and, of course, the largest coal mining company in poland .

what i like think of as the golden rule of free that if you don't defend freedom even for speech that you loathe, then freedom not going to exist for a speech that you love. and those are two examples you use in hate your book. eight what is the component of hate in free speech laws? there is absolutely no concern of hate speech in first amendment law. peter precisely because the supreme court has never recognized as a category of speech that is defined in terms of the hateful or content consistent with the viewpoint neutrality principle. the court says we have to defend freedom even for the thought that we hate, even for the hateful thought. if you disagree with it, if you loathe it, answer it back. ignore it, support the people who are the targets of it but don't empower government to outlaw one person's hateful idea. if somebody else is beloved idea, it's so completely subjective. and still today, 2023 no hate speech definition in law. and let me one amendment, if i may. i will repeat that there is no concept of speech that is defined by its hateful message or content. however, if

graves injustices against a truth. sugar in the united states are our 1st amendment of ports, freedom of speech and freedom of the press. as being the cardinal principles upon which our democracy is based and that the attacks brought attack using the powers of government to go after mister such a remark. uh this as one of the dark ages in government and uh, the united states. certainly, unexpressed and where have the power to issue a party. and i certainly will support that. i've had the opportunity to meet mister assange, and i can tell you that he is someone who she is the importance of trust. this is something that mr. kennedy understands. we're told that we should know the truth and the truth will set us free. but if we don't know the truth, then we are prisoners. and uh, we need to free mr. assignments, freezers, nation and the world allies have been told us to keep us, or were they keep us turned against each other to make money off of war. and so we, uh, we are at a terminal moment in history. and a relative kind of a junior has stepped in, as the true teller, manager, authenticity, amou

therefore, this issue of the holy qur'an and the holy things is actually a violation of freedom of speechnd i must say that freedom of expression should not be raised in this regard in such a way that it is misunderstood and if it is misinterpreted, it should not be turned into a heavenly holy book in this context, and if it is closed , it is actually a violation of freedom of speech and human rights and against every human being, and this issue takes place in the context of islamophobia and islamophobia, which is in the context of the internal problems of westerners. it is said that muslims live in these societies and such phenomena and such events lead to voluntary prostitution , which is the ultimate and end of violence and creating problems for the muslim world. in this regard, there are decisions and resolutions between internationally, any insult to the sacred should be issued in zomit. once again, mr. minister , i thank you for the good banquet and your hospitality. continue by emphasizing the need to develop relations at the cultural , social and cultural levels. the validity peri

what is an administrative resource, how does the ruling party respect freedom of speech in quotation s, how blatant lies can it be, and how to hold on to power with the help of gangster methods. pis clearly decided on the strategy for the elections, the search for external enemies, their three parties, germany, russia and belarus, are horror stories and fables. in these areas, the fragile minds of the polish electorate are stuffed with politics from the ruling group and propagandists are lured by them. for victory in the elections , two long-standing rivals, the parties of law and justice, are fighting, here kachin's marovets duda and the civil platform. donald, dude. the first they really want to go to the third term, the second to return to power. the only thing that we need to understand for our interests is both. they will not differ in anything, that is, inside poland, it is possible that someone will feel some nuances, but for you and me there was and will be in the foreseeable future such an aggressive and physical - it's tusk or it doesn't matter plans for militarization. pola

okay the idea of freedom of speech and expression was intimately linked to freedom from fear. yeah right. that's right given given the muggings of elderly, you know, men and women on the streets of places like and brooklyn and elsewhere by. really reactionary sort of almost well, hitlerian kind of in america. okay. mean freedom of worship may have been the case, but that freedom of worship beyond a synagogue, a temple. that's right. was whole idea of freedom from fear to to be able to walk the street kind of of freedom. so, yeah, they're absolutely very intimately connected. and the other thing i'd say, and this was also very striking to me, i did i when i get into a subject, i just dig. and it was it was really well, it really was amazing that when you looked at it from the vantage point of, the generation that heard that speech, whether they were in their sixties and seventies or younger, when they heard fdr, his words were, we shouldn't assume they that what fdr said exactly was what ended up being in their memory banks. so and i mean by that is that most people when asked a

nationalists were calling it a clampdown on their freedom of speech. to the coastal town of lowestoft in suffolk to meet the former social media administrator of the edl. his name is ivan humble, and he used to be the regional organiser for the east anglian division and had now become a campaigner for tolerance. after i left, i realised the consequences of my actions with my children, and especially me eldest daughter. the two kids at home, they're being neglected, i weren't hurt them or nothing, but they were going without my time. the thing back then, i had quite a ruthless heart, my heart was covered, if you understand what i mean. ivan's tattoos signified the loyalty he once had to his edl division. yeah, i had them done. it kind of, most tattoos have a meaning, this is probably me only tattoo that has real meaning. it says, "we have far more in common "than which divides us." yes, that's jo cox's saying. that i've realised that, i suppose the pleasure of what i do now is realising that we've got common ground with people we think we hate or we dis

i believe in freedom of speech. i believe we have opinion programs we need to be watching. if they break the law, they should be held accountable. >> you are in favor of smaller government, correct? >> yes. >> these guys are pummeled with information as you guys, 24/7, nonstop -- how do you get your children to focus on around them rather than at them? >> we have to understand that those individual freedoms we have are being taken from us all the time and our ability to capture those freedoms, we have to know the constitution and embrace those and what is it is stealing from them. as i thought about this message. you guys have your hats on way to freedom, w.t.f., we are trying to connect a whole new generation. when you see a socialist movement, bigger golf message, let us be more in control of your life, let's decrease your speed and your ability to say what you teal, decrease the press, let's decrease -- and before you know it. i'm standing for land owners in iowa because they are getting their rights infringed because of imminent domain. people don't know it, they lose th

so all across the united states, we're seeing a heavy crack down on people exercising their freedom of speech, whether it's on social media, whether it's on university campuses, or whether it's in the public square, engaging and protest itself. while the united states boats about being some kind of vast gender of human rights and freedom that has the right to go around, criticizing governments around the girls, that one looks at what's actually taking place in the united states. one will see that it's becoming a less and less free country every day. oh wow, that's all for this news. oh, as always is great to have your company here when odyssey. i'm the the, [000:00:00;00] the mm. the .

they don't understand what freedom of speech is, what the rights and freedoms of journalists are. a human and labor rights lawyer den, cuz alex says the situation with the sputnik chief, it shows the decline of free speech in the west to be forced out of the country is a pretty severe thing based purely on, on speech and information. and, you know, i've been interviewed by split that many times and find it professional and, you know, good journalism. so, i mean, it's troubling to see someone thrown out of the country for that and, and certainly to give them a warning if it's, you know, and say, look, these are the things we're concerned about. give them a chance, maybe to correct some things. uh yeah, i mean that would be good um, but i mean, clearly this isn't really, is something he could correct. they just want one side of the story being told in their country and that's the problem. there is a tendency in the west now to start limiting, free speech to guarantee only one side of the story. what it particularly when it comes to issues relating to russia. the wes prides itself on

yaroslav yurchyshyn may be one of candidates for the position of the chairman of the committee on freedom of speech, well, at least there is such a discussion within the faction, now there is a vote, we believe that we have an unconditional right to receive the chairmanship of one of the committees, because i will remind you that there is no committee, unlike, for example, european solidarity, which heads the committee on european integration, plus at one time , at the beginning of the term, we refused even the position of vice-speaker, which was offered to us then , so i think there is every reason to believe that from a political, legal and professional point of view there, yurchyshyn's candidacy is probably not the worst in order to essentially restart the work of the committee, which, in fact, i think created huge problems both for freedom of speech and for parliamentarism in ukraine in general. so that such vacancies in the parliament are closed strengthens the borders of ukraine with drones join the meeting of the border guards, congratulations, this is a marathon, the only news for you is th

so all across the united states, we're seeing a heavy crack down on people exercising their freedom of speech, whether it's on social media, whether it's on university campuses, or whether it's in the public square, engaging in protest itself. while the united states votes about being some kind of bass, gender of human rights and freedom that has the right to go around, criticizing governments around the world. that one looks at what's actually taking place in the united states. one will see that it's becoming a less and less free country every day. wow, that's off of this new though, as always is going to have your company here. but obviously, i'm the, the museums are important for preserving our history so that it is a loss to future generations. but our physical museums, places themselves a relic of the past. this is one of the best museums in the world of human touch in saint petersburg. to help proceeds the director here and i bet he has met the the hello and welcome to the cross top. were all things are considered on peter lavelle the architects of nato's proxy war and russia have big p

completely incompetent and for the leadership although there were absolutely no issues related to the freedom of speechittee, it was not interesting as shufrych , as for some time, was engaged in the defense medvedchuk tv channels and that's the end of it. in particular, when i spoke about the resolution on the dismissal of shufrych, i emphasized that this committee should be headed by the opposition - it should be representatives of european solidarity, and since we have extremely few positions in the parliament, we are talking about the heads of committees deputy chairmen or secretaries of committees, unlike other factions that claim, that is, in this case, if there was a fair game, then european solidarity should head this committee and we have enough people who could do it, or victoria syumar, who headed this committee in the previous convocation , as a result of which a lot of fundamental laws were adopted, or mykola knyazhytskyi, the same whose volodymyr aryav, as a journalist, investigator, has the potential to make this committee absolutely, i will say this now, we will be as if from of the oth

in fact, the committee on freedom of speech should be headed by a representative of the opposition forcence the only opposition in the parliament is european solidarity, so we have already announced that we are applying to head this committee. we have enough absolutely worthy candidates, starting with mykola knyazhytsy, vika syumar, volodymyr ariyev, and volody vyatrovych. and so on, and unfortunately , we see trends when pro-government groups, factions in power, really want to lead the same way and are already conducting separate negotiations about it, although they have no relation to the opposition. at the moment, if i am not mistaken, there are only three people in the committee, because all self-respecting people actively left there in order not to be with shufrych, but this committee is now desperately needed and its work is needed, in particular, in the restoration of democratic a message and open information space, well, the work of your committee and the committee on freedom of speech is also needed, in the formation or creation of foreign language, which was once destroyed by t

what is an administrative resource, how does the ruling party respect freedom of speech in quotation blatant lies can it be, and how to hold on to power with the help of gangster methods. they get up in the morning, lie and go to bed. and again they decided on a strategy for the elections. the search for external enemies , there are three of them, germany, russia and belarus, with horror stories and fables. in these directions , the minds of the polish are feeding me stronger. and the propagandists are fed by them. two long-time rivals, the party of law and justice, are fighting for victory in the elections, here is kachinsky marovets duda and the civil platform. donalda, tuska. first, they really want to run for a third term; second, they want to return to power. the only thing that we need to understand for our interests is that both will be practically no different, that is, inside poland, perhaps someone will feel some nuances, but for you and me it is more: there was and will be in the foreseeable future such an aggressive and whether it’s pis or tusk, it doesn’t matter; plans f