all right, let's move on to our next case which is "friedrichs v. california teachers' association." erin? >> so friedrichs should certainly be one of the closely watched cases at the court this term. this involves the question of whether the court should overrule its 1977 decision in "abboud" which is the case that held that public sector employees can be required to pay union dues. and there's really two questions in friedrichs that deal with the kind of two issues and dichotomy that abboud drew, which was to say the court said you can have compulsory dues for purposes that are germane to collective bargaining but if the union is using money for political reasons that aren't germane to collective bargaining you can't have compulsory dues, you have to give employees the opportunity to not pay them. but what the court said in abboud is it's okay to give them the opportunity to opt out of paying those dues rather than to opt into them. so this leads to the two questions that are presented in the friedrichs case. one is should the court overrule the p

all that matters to friedrich is how to support his family.jazeera, zambia. >>> a talented musician who was among the thousands of refugees stranded in the yarmouk refugees camp in syria has now arrived safely in greece after fleeing, he now plans to travel onto germany where he hopes to continues his music career, victoria gatenby reports. >> reporter: it's been a long and dangerous journey for him. last month he was crap ed in yarmouk a refugees camps for palestinians that's been we siege today three years by the syrian government. now he's made it to europe but at times during the journey from turkey to greets, he wasn't sure if he would survive. >> translator: the boat was supposed to hold 40 people by we had 70 on board. honestly i don't think the boat was safely equipped to carry more than 10 people but there was no other way to get to greece exempt sailing the sea, especially if you don't is have money. >> reporter: he says leaching hits home was tragic but necessary. throughout the war in syria, the talented pianist had held impromptu

friedrichs should be one of the closely-watched cases at court this team.this involves a question of whether the court should overrule its 1977 decision in abooed, which is the case that held public sector employees could be required to pay union dues. there is two question in friedrichs, that kind of deal with the two issues and dichotomy abboud drew. the court said you have can compulsory dues for purposes that are germane to collective bargaining but if the union is using money for basically political reasons that aren't directly germane to collective bargaining you can't have compulsory dues. you have to give employees the opportunity to not pay those. but what the court said in abboud it is okay to give them the opportunity to opt out of paying those dues rather than to opt into them. so this leads to the two questions that are presented in the friedrichs case. one is, should the court overrule the principle holding of abboud, that you can compel any dues, even for the germain to collective bargaining purposes. the dues for political purposes is it con

. >> friedrichs would be one of the closely watched cases. as some bath the question of whether the court should overrule its 1977 decision which is the case that held that public sector employees can be required to pay union dues and there are two questions in friedrichs did deal with the two issues in an economy that he drew which was to say the court said you can't have compulsory dues for purposes that are germane to collective bargaining but using money for basically political reasons that aren't directly germane to collective bargaining you can't have compulsory dues. you have to give employees the opportunity to not pay out but what the court said included its okay to give them the opportunity to opt out of paying those dues rather than to opt into them. this leads to the two questions that are presented in the friedrichs case. one is should the court overruled the principle holding that you can compel even the germane to collective bargaining purposes and the other being even add to the dues that are for political purposes is it const

where they are going to sell them is all determined by the view of another of my favorite economist friedrich hayek, by money as an information system. might look is a new information system, new information series of money and i came to this theory which really is contrary to all the previous analyses of the gold standard because all the previous people thought gold is as good as money because it's intrinsically valuable as jewelry and my friend richard vigilante told me that no, jewelry is valuable. people cherish it because it's really money and money is separate from the economy. it's a measuring stick and the root of the value of money is of time and this insight i sort of came up with but not fully to toti makkah. >> moderator: the inventor of that coin which is the new digital kurianzi for the internet chiefly but could ultimately become an important currency. bitcoin is explicitly based on zeroing out the impact of technology so the computer powered doubles every 18 months to two years. satoshi was worried that if they made his bitcoin dependent and responsive to economic activity in

and where they will sell them is all determined in the view of another of my favorite economist friedrich by money as an information system and my book is a new information system , new information theory of money. and i came to this theory, which really is contrary to all of the previous analyses of the gold standard because all of the previous people thought gold is as good as money because it is intrinsically valuable as jewelry and my friend richard told me that no, jewelry is valuable and people cherish it because it's really money. money is separate from the economy. is the measuring stick and root of the value of money is in time this insight i sort of came up with, but not fully because to know she macken-- the inventor of the coin, which is this new digital currency for the internet, chiefly could ultimately become a important world currency. that coin is explicitly based on zeroing out the impact of technology, so morris law says the computer power doubles every 18 months to two years. he was worried that it be made his bit coin dependence and responsive to economic activity in

so this leads to the two questions that are presented in the friedrichs case. one is should the court overruled the holding of abood that you can compile any dues, even for the germane collective bargaining purposes, and the other being even as to the dues that are for political purposes, is it constitutional to opt out scheme or does the constitution or an opt in scheme would oppose be up to affirmatively choose to give those dues rather than raise their hand and say no, no. i want my money back because i don't want to contribute to the unions political activities. so i think it's always interesting when the court grants the case for a question of should be overruled something. and here is the kicker interested because the specific question of does trent lott apply to x, y or z, give it does should be overruled. this is a straight up case that was keyed up as presenting the question of whether abood should be overruled in the first i think there would be some dispute about what is the overruled after the second question but it is all set up with just those que

consider their options and a possible bailout by the international monetary fund, all that matters is friedrich support his family. al jazeera, zambia. >>> co-oco colombias president s meeting with venezuelans in a crack down on crime. more than 150 1500 clock bee ase been departed. >>> a muslim student was taken away by police after he brought a clock to school and the teacher thought it was a bomb. police later said no charges had been file. the incident led to fewer and i supporters coming in. the president has invited him to the white house, and facebook's chief mark zuckerberg has called him over to his headquarters. >> i took it to school to show my teachers the talent that i had. i wanted to show him. and in my perspective it didn't look like a bomb. >> we live in an age where you can't take things like that to schools. of course we have seen across our country horrific things happen. we have to err on the side of caution the reaction would have been the same. >> the founder and director of the council on american islamic relations, he said this is a sign of a wider problem of islam phob

because ronald reagan said that, because friedrich hayek said that. this is not a radical position. in fact, the social safety net is one of the greatest achievements of free enterprise -- that we could have the wealth and largesse as a society, that we can help take care of people who are poor that we've never even met. it is a historic, it's never happened before. we should be proud of that. but then when i talk to conservative policymakers, and say how should you distinguish yourself from the traditional positions in a marketplace of ideas from progressives, you should also talk about the fact that the safety net should be limited to people who are truly indigent, as opposed to being spread around in a way that metastasizes into middle-class entitlements and imperils our economy. and the third part is that help should always come with the dignifying power of work to the extent that we can. then we can have, with these three ideas -- declaring peace on the safety net, safety net only for the indigent, and always with work -- then we can have an interesting moral consensus and poli

and roughly 70 years have passed since my father that my mother and friedrich hayek attend that book known as the "road to serfdom". but long before that argument i had observed along the mississippi river so normally wave could walk together to and enjoy the beauty of the elms but every so often my father would turn to me in a solemn way to try to explain his experiences and what they taught him. ended reading in preparation he turned to me to say someday someone will offer you security in exchange for your freedom is you should never take the deal the casual end up without either. in a broad outline that was hijacked. at the end of the day in the essence of what he warned about was just as relevant today as it was at the time my father of would explain that to me as a young boy in minneapolis. it cannot be dissected meet the. the reason that hayak warrant without political and freedom is a death sentence for a free society and underscored for the of his injunction that the control of production of wealth is control of human life itself. the the system of private property is a guara

and will continue to track because the laser from the rest of the bay this morning the seashore friedrich at over 50 minutes for the drive on a westbound the macarthur maze still backed of laws that is this 880 ride forced five aided the e sure all these approaches to the bridge are jammed the ride on 880 is a really rough today southbound getting through the corridor that is nearly a 60 minute time getting down toward milt peterson and were looking at a 56 minute drive times for 1 01 northbound to that is nearly twice the normal commute time still back of all the way to help with getting to san mateo over to the weather center next. >>james: temperatures right now get you going if you're to get out the door the next five to 10 minutes in the south of san jose come in at exactly 7 degrees the one beginning 71 of livermore will respect those temperatures rising as a headed to the afternoon particularly in these areas and all this with his advisers in effect throughout the day to not even set to expire about 8:00 p.m. tonight that is how hot tempers as will stay with us and is how long this

because ronald reagan said that, because friedrich hayek said that. this is not a radical position. in fact, the social safety net is one of the greatest achievements of free enterprise -- that we could have the wealth and largesse as a society, that we can help take care of people who are poor that we've never even met. it is a historic, it's never happened before. we should be proud of that. but then when i talk to conservative policymakers, and say how should you distinguish yourself from the traditional positions in a marketplace of ideas from progressives, you should also talk about the fact that the safety net should be limited to people who are truly indigent, as opposed to being spread around in a way that metastasizes into middle-class entitlements and imperils our economy. and the third part is thatelp should always come with the dignifying power of work to the extent that we can. then we can have, with these three ideas -- declaring peace on the safety net, safety net only for the indigent, and always with work -- then we can have an interesting moral consensus and policy