include the extreme but felt of the future conflict, demanding rotational schedules and requirements frydman on low-density skill sets, or the question of whether the selective service system can actually provide manpower for those requirements without displacing unique or urgent civilian labor inputs for generating significant political and economic push back. because the united states is an constant path of doing that but us a step in test do that, particularly in the great power conflict and experts like you can hear from today and later doesn't believe there will set up to pursue that mission. many folks have examined whether or not the art of the nation's the selective service system might take, whether it be meeting challenges and civil-military relations such as making the united states military more representative of the american people, or to lessen support for current wars and increase america's skin in the game for come in present conflicts, or to bring interviews military a broader set or more heinz technical set of skill sets that are not easily acquired within today's military.