and he tweets back i'm four fsc athletics and sports are proud of your professionalism. i wish you the best. >> fsc as in florida southern college where the heckler was an assistant athletic director until he was fired because of that public heckling. program and then he goes around doing that at an event. that's not good. >> the way things were. too. >> some coaches add teachers at florida southern are turning this into a teaching moment. be very careful with what you say on social media. we called the former assistant. he had no comment. >> lloyd sowers. >>> now your sky tower radar forecast with paul dellegatto. >>> hello a nice looking afternoon. sunshine, boy this timer year that's a chilly number. 60 degrees at 6:00. on the second full day of spring that's 15 below the average. a chilly night a few high clouds will make for a nice sun set stick around a full moon and a halo. that could happen tonight, too. >> this morning was cold. brooksville down to 47 and 50 in tampa. 55 in st. pete. the average low of the day is 59. tomorrow morning colder and frost on the car

that tweet grabbed poulter's attention and he found out who downum works for and posted this, i'm sure fsc athletics and sports are really proud of your professionalism. i wish you the very best. that was saturday and four days later downum was fired and his twitter account deleted. and that sl lesson is a lesson that you have to be careful on what you post, and we know that. i just can't believe someone that on twitter. >> what are the odds he is able to look me up and find out who i am -- >> now he knows. >> the day of social media, and take a look at this. this is a time lapse view from today. we saw the high clouds move in later this afternoon, and basically ended up being a pretty nice looking day despite all of the cloud cover. still the temperatures are warming up into the upper 70's and 8's. and 80's and things are reallyexpanded. notice all of the shower activity now, back off of the west coast here? this is where it extends from cedar key back down south. if you follow this across it takes you cross the southern counties and showers will be impacting at least the coastal areas ov

we support the fsi, the tree farm, fsc certifications. it's something that's in your state, the majority of private land is certified. so we've always been supportive of that. so this is something i'm going to look into but it raises the question of potential problems. because when you think about clean air and to think about clean water, we need to be thinking about healthy forests in maintaining our forests. so today our nation's forest which is the majority of them are private land, ma as in your state. they said was from a 12-40% of this youtube that's been made each year. if we lose those forests and if it is a waste be able to have viable markets for the would, private land owners are going to develop their land for some other use. so it's essential that we make sure things we are considering, it actually helps us to be able to maintain forests on the landscape. so this is an issue i've looked into and get back to you on it but it is problematic when, we were looking at things especially we are concerned about clean air and clean wa

i'm also told the sfi and the atfs have the same sort of standards as the fsc, all these initials i'm sorry but that they're just not included. thoughts on that? why should we allow the national forest service products to be excluded based on their own rules and epa rules? >> well, senator, i'm going to have to look into this but there is no question we support the sfi, the tree farmed, fsc certifications. it is something that's in your state the majority of the private land is certified and so we've always been supportive of that. you know, this is something i'm going to look into but it raises the question of potential problems, because when we, when we think about clean air, we think about clean water, we need to be thinking about healthy forests and maintaining our forests. so today, you know, our nation's forests, which is the majority of them are private land as in your state. they sequester from about 12 to 14% of the coo 2 emitted each year. if we lose those forests. if there is not a way to have viable markets for the wood, private landowners will develop their land for some

recommendation for lumber defines fsc, you will know that term, the forest stewardship council certified and by including that but not including it, therefore excludes, if you will, the standard forestry initiative, sfi, and the atfs, american tree farm system. now, first in louisiana, about 85% of all of our lumber is either sfi or atfs. but then i also am told that from the national forest service land there's about 42,000 jobs attributed to the forest products from nfs lands and that the forest service does not allow their harvested wood to be subjected to a third party standard. so not only are 85% of my foresters excluded, but the entirety of the national forest service is excluded by these epa standards and i'm also told that both the sfi and the atfs have the same sort of standards as the fsc, all these initials, i'm sorry, but that they are just not included. thoughts on that? why should we allow the national forest service products to be excluded based on their own rules and epa rules? >> senator, i'm going to have to look into this. but there's no question we support the sfi, t

recommendation for lumber defines fsc, you will know that term, the forest stewardship council certified and by including that but not including it, therefore excludes, if you will, the standard forestry initiative, sfi, and the atfs, american tree farm system. now, first in louisiana, about 85% of all of our lumber is either sfi or atfs. but then i also am told that from the national forest service land there's about 42,000 jobs attributed to the forest products from nfs lands and that the forest service does not allow their harvested wood to be subjected to a third party standard. so not only are 85% of my foresters excluded, but the entirety of the national forest service is excluded by these epa standards and i'm also told that both the sfi and the atfs have the same sort of standards as the fsc, all these initials, i'm sorry, but that they are just not included. thoughts on that? why should we allow the national forest service products to be excluded based on their own rules and epa rules? >> senator, i'm going to have to look into this. but there's no question we support the sfi, t