it's also on the front page of the fte, we've got the picture - of the fte, we've got the picture thatr home affairs editorfor the evening standard, martin, these issues are easy for the electric to grass the micro grasp — cut crime, increase policing, do a people to expect. increase policing, do a people to exect. ., ,., increase policing, do a people to exect. ., ., _ increase policing, do a people to exect. ., ., ., , expect. not so easy to actually characterise _ expect. not so easy to actually characterise what _ expect. not so easy to actually characterise what cutting - expect. not so easy to actuallyj characterise what cutting crime expect. not so easy to actually i characterise what cutting crime by 20% means and how you deliver it, and one of the ways to cut crime is to ensure people who are caught committing crimes and go to prison and so on are dealt with properly there and rehabilitated. 0f and so on are dealt with properly there and rehabilitated. of course when you've got prisons continuing to be in crisis because of a lack of staff and investment, lack of education and

i am sympathetic and then it was 450 fte.at question and then relatively well-to-do a day job was organizational transformation and i have heard with hundreds of positions that need to be filled to fulfill current promises the budget request has another 795 to process claims. i have heard you loud and clear it has tremendous policies but i was on the train think i ran into you on the train. >> yes. >> i said my concern is more with us getting this right but this is one they can stand. at the end of the day we have to get this right. and then to implement policy which we all agree with. and one i'm considering sponsoring is community care from senator blackburn a familiar? >> a little. >> it's interesting and if we keep the agreement there will be two republican amendment say what they will be helpful for the respective organizations to take a position. and with that community care for abruptly 25 percent veterans we think are not receiving some care for the illness to be a presumptive condition and it's helpful to look at tha

onto the fte, because the rmt chief is - fte, because the rmt chief is hitting out at liz truss for attackinging of sam tarry, but maybe we'll come to that later on. 0'grady is not the type of person who would be calling for a general strike, person who would be calling for a generalstrike, but person who would be calling for a general strike, but these underlying principles of workers being able to withdrawal labour in response to not being treated fairly? it withdrawal labour in response to not being treated fairly?— being treated fairly? it would be frightening for _ being treated fairly? it would be frightening for the power - being treated fairly? it would be frightening for the power of - being treated fairly? it would be frightening for the power of the | frightening for the power of the unions to be curbed by these rules if you're the head of the tuc, you wouldn't want that at all. frances 0'grady says the trust plans to curb union rights will spark resistance rivalling the strike of 1926, talking about the strikes of a century ago as if they are fresh and everybody�*s minds. the fact

onto the fte. johnson quits defiant to the | fte. blaming others, third instinct, eccentric mood and events that had led to this downfall i was interested also by the sketch mps may no longer trust him but his historical significance is indisputable. presumably on brexit but what else? he is indisputable. presumably on brexit but what else? he guided us throu~h brexit but what else? he guided us through the — brexit but what else? he guided us through the covid _ brexit but what else? he guided us through the covid crisis _ brexit but what else? he guided us through the covid crisis any - through the covid crisis any reference that today, the uk being the first nation in europe to reopen having the fastest vaccine rollout. a real focus in having the fastest vaccine rollout. a realfocus in his statement having the fastest vaccine rollout. a real focus in his statement today on his legacy, that something that won't matter to him and enormously and perhaps explains partly why he was so desperate to cling onto power. it has been a tumult

but i think it is 450 f t's ftes?he reason i asked that question again, there's so many things that are burning in the u.s. senate, but once ignited relatively well when i had a day job was organizational transformation. and i've heard in your testimony hundreds of positions that need to be filled to fulfill current promises. the budget request has another 795 ftes to process claims for the current run rate, not a future one rate for the p. a. c. t. act. and mr. murray, i heard you loud and clear. i think there has p. a. c. t. act tremendous policy and it. i'm very worried. i actually was on the train between dirksen and the capital and iran into some folks who were from vfw visiting members on the hill. i think you were on the train. >> -- could be. >> yeah. and i remember saying that my concern has more of us getting this right. and i think that you said it, maybe a long line, but it least it's one that they'll be able to stand in. i think at the end of the day though we have to get this right. and i hope that throu

we are down there talking and all of a sudden someone says let's conduct our business here and two fte everybody in the room says no, no, no. we all came back later that night and finished our business. what we did is make sure we are finishing our business. we are just starting to protect the democracy. this form of democracy that we have as a representative form and the public that we are all responsible for and i'm so proud to be part of it and she is my dear friend and we worked many years together and will continue to. i want to thank you for the hard work your staff and we've worked together and i'm proud of all of our staff that they worked together for the betterment of the country so when people think the bipartisanship is not capable of happening in washington, i want to say watch. we've proven wrong and have done and we will continue to. so thank you and to all of those that participated for just hanging in there it took six months but t we've just begun. >> mr. president. >> the senator from maine. >> i want i to salute and thank all of the members ofha the grop who worked

but it says increase one attrition by 10 fte and then your accounting for less separation. can you talk through your recommendation a bit and how thatwould impact the academy classes ? >> sure chair. >> to the chair, nick minard fromthe budget legislative analyst . the way i got to the increasing patrician number was that i looked at the existing staff that were on hand as well as those for academies that are planned in each year. and also look at their retirements over the next two years. now historically the police department has had 80 retirements a year although more recently they had closer to 100 . so i use the 80 as a kind of as a baseline estimate for what's going to happenover the next 12 months . when you look at the headcount they have now the headcount that they need for the academies and once they're going to lose for their retirements based on our analysis it looks like at least over the next 12 months still have 35 vacancies. we didn't take all of those in this recommendation. we can to provide savings tothe board . that leaves around 25 for the department an

but would you say the total fte for the downtown ambassadors is what? >> well, again, it's 104 people but it's -- some are part-time and some are full time. >> uh-huh. and are both of these with urban -- >> no, the mid market tenderloin ambassadors are through a contract that we maintain with the mid market foundation and then the downtown ambassadors are really the economic core ambassadors if you want to call it that, is funded by us but runs through the tourism improvement -- sf travel who deploys those and works closely with around when we have conventions. >> the tourist improvement district hires the ambassadors. >> i'm going to double check cfo, are we running through sf travel? >> the contract for the downtown ambassadors is under the san francisco tourism improvement district. >> okay. >> just a couple other questions. one is has there been an evaluation -- significant evaluation of the ambassador initiative? this is a major deployment of people power and -- >> it is. are you referring to the downtown ambassadors? >> and also the mid market. >>

because they did not have an fte.he administration lost more jobs on its watch than any in the decision since herbert hoover, that is a fact. all based on failed trickle-down economics that benefit the wealthiest americans and hit the middle class and working people the hardest. we came in with a different economic vision, an economy that grows from the bottom up in the middle out. it is good for everyone, because when the middle class goes well, the poor middle class and the wealthy do well. that is why we designed the american rescue plan based on the would believe that a recovery should help all americans prosper. i believe that working, building power and unions, are good for workers and the economy. the plan that led to the most jobs created in the first period of a presidency than any time in all american history. [applause] pres. biden: we have seen how economic crisis can reach so many americans for years, sometimes the rest of their lives. economists call it the starring effect, a lasting bad effect of econom

enhancement so to speak as far as operational capacity, the main things incorporated were the new 50 new fte on ambulance side, community paramedicine or programs started in the previous fiscal year and then would be annualized for the upcoming year and of course labor salary and benefit increases are increased to the budget number as well. all those things are incorporated. the issues we had in the past of the chief mentioned have been related to mou impacts where full salary impacts on wage or benefit increases as pertain to premium pay or overtime rates were not from our perspective not fully include in our budget so every year we will be going back not to the board necessarily but to the controller's office and mayor's office. we obviously let them know of the issues but to make use of reserves and other things intended for that. that commitment on annual basis got pretty material, especially during covid so working with the mayor budget office the division was made to address that head-on and address them structurally in the budget. >> okay. so in terms of that, i know we are feeling go

it's with joe biden likes to call baby fte, a big bleeping deal. -- a big budget reconciliation plan 400 billion dollars, over the next ten years, towards the increasing health care access -- and reducing carbon emissions by 40%, funded in part by higher taxes on the corporations. it's a plan joe manchin was opposing two weeks ago. he was pointing it out -- of the original 3.5 trillion dollar package biden asked congress for last year. -- it also, the curdle, has had to get through the side of the house. joe businesses got bored. radio seven so far from his fellow -- democratic senator kirsten sinema of arizona. if it happens, it'll be good for democrats in the midterms. but, it will be enough to cancel out all the harm that manchin may have done over the past 18 months? imagine a 50/50 senate right now if democratic caucus hadn't been blocked by that at every turn. the senate could've got rid of the filibuster, secured voting rights and abortion rights. could've passed a bigger budget bill and done it a year ago. even manchin and sinema's -- spent much of the past 18 months exaspera

also needed to maintain quality service the funding supports roughly 5% increase and the number of ftede dedicated to the grants. from 2.41fte to 2.53. das conducted i virtual program monitoring for the grant last year and determined the community living campaign in compliance and they met the objectives for 2021. thank you very much. i'm happy to answer questions i might have about this addition to their grant. questions on this item? >> i understand the cost -- what you presented the additional funds to fund additional staff. not increasing the number of groceries or clients served in >> no not with this modification. because community living campaign has -- [inaudible] i have to get used to this microphone. they have upon grown a lot over the last several years special nutrition in the nutrition world. and they -- because of that they needed to bring on more infrastructure. like for data reporting in the get care system. this it is just to keep this will -- on a good electronic to continue to be successful. thank you. any other questions the location of the services up answerd that

how many fte's will be paid. 24 total or 12. it says external team twice. >> i'm sorry. it is 12. apologies for that. >> and the total amount to date including the 2 changes or add-ons? for emphasis? >> let me get that number i believe it is -- um. one second, please. >> thank you. 16.48. >> okay. >> thank you. >> my last i have been meaning to ask. one of the callers talked about time sheets they have what was the logic having employees fill in their own time sheets? >> that is a great question. so. we have historically preempower we did in the have time sheets they were -- managed centrally by a clerk or at the office level. and we sign in the in paper and so the i believe the original logic was moving the paper process online. so the equivalent if i sign in the office in a book i sign in digitally some place online. in terms of how that was done, you know, whether there can be you know, a daily -- positive sign in, think in attention. positive attendance verz us exception based where you fill in if you are not present. >> and were folks trained on time sheets? >> we did provide

. >> okay, so you have low 20s ftes, two vacancies within that vacancies. you rely on per diem to augment those vacancies and it gets a lot worse when people have to stay out longer. >> why the reliance on per diem. >> per diem has always been part of the model. i think it's part of our model that we have civil service staff and then our per diem staff. >> okay, all right. so let's go back to the existing services. response team, pull that one up. >> are we asking for the slides to come up. >> we are asking for the slides to come up. >> can the slides come up, it looks like it's slide 10. >> there we go. between 10 and 11 and 12, we see various services that have been stood up that conceivably might have an impact on demand, i mean you can see response traemz if they're engaging with more folks identifying more need in the community and increasing demand for psych emergency. but other, or you can see situations being resolved in the community and then not, you know, not leading to a 5150 which would reduce demand. curious to see and that may be more dr. lea

believe the cost of implementing the legislation as is, is between three and $400,000, i would take 1.5 fte of staff and take about a year. we do point out also that if the board instead just added a veterans category, so a 5th category to chapter 47, it would be technically less challenging to implement and probably take less time but then you would have to decide how to order it among the existing categories so it's a different policy than the one you're contemplating it today. we do consider this to be a policy matter for the board. >> thank you. just a quick question, mr. manar, why would it take a year? >> based on the hours and the work plan, it's about 2600 hours, right. so just thinking about the time it takes to accomplish that many hours of work. thank you. >> yeah. thanks for your analysis and report, mr. manard and i want to point out the work to implement this and that projected cost of several hundred dollars is just a one-time cost, right? that's just to add this new preference or priority category for veterans? >> that's correct. it's a one time cost. >> thank you. chair pre

believe the cost of implementing the legislation as is, is between three and $400,000, i would take 1.5 fte of staff and take about a year. we do point out also that if the board instead just added a veterans category, so a 5th category to chapter 47, it would be technically less challenging to implement and probably take less time but then you would have to decide how to order it among the existing categories so it's a different policy than the one you're contemplating it today. we do consider this to be a policy matter for the board. >> thank you. just a quick question, mr. manar, why would it take a year? >> based on the hours and the work plan, it's about 2600 hours, right. so just thinking about the time it takes to accomplish that many hours of work. thank you. >> yeah. thanks for your analysis and report, mr. manard and i want to point out the work to implement this and that projected cost of several hundred dollars is just a one-time cost, right? that's just to add this new preference or priority category for veterans? >> that's correct. it's a one time cost. >> thank you. chair pre