back to mark fuhrman on that? >> you know, at the beginning of this, sean, i didn't like this case, but as you see all the facts and all of the witnesses, you can clearly see that the defense, whether you agree with george zimmerman's feelings about great bodily harm and imminent death or not, he believed it, and he was a -- a soft body that didn't know how to fight and on his back, and he was in his first fight and tasting his own blood, he felt his head hit the concrete, no matter how that happened. he got scared to the point where he thought the only thing he could do is pull out his gun. to get out of that hurdle, the prosecution will have to have a statement from george zimmerman after the fact or before the fact. they have neither, or they will have to have an eyewitness that hears him say something or sees something that actually creates that reckless disregard for life and put trayvon martin as the passive one, not the aggressor. >> i think it was pretty clear to me, the logical conclusion of the person sc

while i agree with mark fuhrman. isn't one witness you can look to for the prosecution and say this is it. if you pick them apart, which a prosecutor should do, they are very well in the ball game for getting a conviction, although a lesser charge than murder. >> big picture, though. the story remain consistent? >> it did. consistent in a way that makes it more believable than a pat statement that never changes or a pat description. people involved in a shooting, they change as things come back. when you talk to somebody, they are not at the scene and they walk and they are walking and talking, bring themselves back to the location, different things will change, and when people actually -- questions can sometimes stimulate a memory, so, you know, the problem here is -- there is no unlawful act that george zimmerman committed. he can follow anybody he wants on public property and he did. the confrontation started -- no matter how anybody wants to believe it, started when trayvon martin turned toward george zimmerman w

mark fuhrman? >> it's going to be -- it should be an acquittal by the evidence. if anything goes sideways, you'll have one juror that hangs it. >> i agree. that's a possibility. i think it was over the second that john good, the one eyewitness testified that trayvon was on top. >> agreed. >> mma, ground and pound, straddling and fists going down. good to see you all. thank you. >>> also coming up tonight next on hannity. >> the president's actions on obama care last week were stunning. i never thought i'd see the day when the white house, the president came down on the side of big business but left the american people out in the cold. >> house majority leader eric cantor joins me live after the break. he will react to the president's brazen decision to ignore a key provision of his very own health care law. >>> video of the day is back, have you three choices. the only winner will air in its entirety at the close of the show. here's a time for sneak peek number one. an unsuspecting woman caught on tape, attempting to hire a hit man to kill her husband. you get to

effect about the details. >> all right, mark fuhrman, i'm going to you. there's also a witness that said zimmerman was on top. >> no. they didn't say zimmerman was on top. they were farther away, and they were going on colors of jackets, and they were actually farther away, and it was never definitive. john good was absolutely the closest to this whole situation. but could i add one thing, judge? in the prosecution's case, the most objective person that the prosecutor has in his quiver is the lead detective. the lead detective in this case actually said he believes everything zimmerman said which means he says that he believes it's self defense, and then the prosecution had to overcome that which i don't think they ever did. >> they never did, and i think that, you know, seriano said he found zimmerman to be credible. the prosecution is stuck with that. anyway, mark fuhrman, thanks so much for being with us. >>> coming up, more from sanford, florida on the zimmerman murder trial. we're here on verdict watch. [ tap ] [ tap ] ♪ 'cause tonight [ tap ] ♪ we'l

former lapd detective mark fuhrman and former d.c. homicide detective rod wheeler.rod, it seems to me, there are people that just seem they just want to stir this pot up. is that what nbc host al sharpton is doing? >> i definitely don't want to say that, sean. with all due respect to al sharpton, i don't think he wants violence to erupt or anything like that, we know we have a responsibility to maintain the peace, but we also have a responsibility, whether it's in washington, d.c., or l.a. to make sure that people have their legal right to protest, and we do respect that, sean. >> i respect it, but, mark, it seems to me like it's going to be a dangerous scenario for the cities where this is going to occur. >> i think you're right, sean. and i think that there's -- it's not really a fine line to -- right to assemble and freedom of speech, and disrupting commerce, traffic, blocking entries into buildings, breaking and destroying property. assaulting people, assaulting officers, so when you cross that line, it's pretty obvious, and, you know, this -- this is completely

rod wheeler and mark fuhrman.the reaction if any by the jurors. >> well, when george zimmerman's attorney mark o'mara spoke for three hours during closing argument, the jurors were very focused and some of them took notes. i notice that b 29. the only minority on the jury, she actually nodded her head and looked at trayvon martin's parents as well as zimmerman's parents. i also noticed that one of the jurors actually smerkd when o'mara was mocking one of the prosecutors. that was kind of funny. six women also, of course, they were very focused as prosecutor john guy said that zimmerman lied. >> sean: mark fuhrman we have been talking a lot. have you been with us throughout the case. what was your reaction today and the jury instructions? >> i thought the defense did a great job at laying out every witness statement and every piece of evidence. and then clearly showed how they believe the entire incident went down. and, the second time i saw the arguments both prosecution and defense, something struck me, sean, and

the reuben boys, tim geithner, jacob lew and jason fuhrman. this is one hell of a way to make one of the most important economic decisions. they're going to do it on the basis of boys versus girls? >> this is just something that continues to happen withins obama white house, even on public policy as well. what i always say is what is best for the country? i'm not very interested in having a woman into a leadership position, i'm not interested whether someone reflects my anatomy, i'm interested whether they reflect my principles and values and embrace what we need for the economy. this is another instance of having a failure coming out of the obama administration. you won't have the right fit for the job if it's based on gender. >> jessica, this is kind of the ultimate quintessential democratic interest group politics only the stakes are extremely high, federal reserve chairman. do you think that in fact the battle that's being described now between the women and the men over this is correct? do you think that's true? do you think that's going

mark fuhrman, former l.a.p.d.ide detective and fox news contributor joins us from sand point, idaho. mark, welcome. what can you tell us about the evidence in this case? >> when you look at this, martha, the situation is you have a controlling husband that is about to be divorced by his wife and then the evidence is pretty clear. he orders cyanide from his lab at the school without having any project to actually need the cyanide. he has control over the drink or the protein drink that he is actually putting the cyanide. they recover the cyanide. at the location. paramedics observed the powder and of course the victim was given cyanide. he has means, opportunity and motive and now you just have to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt. martha: well, you know, it sound almost like a fugitive kind of story when you look at this, this doctor, neuroscientist, charged in his wife's death. we would imagine there will be some other explanation on his part, right? >> well, you would think so but i think this personal

. >> stephanie: as a lawyer you could break into a cold sweat, for paula dean we'll bring in mark fuhrmanhe his website. >> stephanie: 19 minutes after the hour right back on the stephanie miller. >> for a good time call now 1-800-steph-12. [ ♪ music ♪ ] you >> "viewpoint" digs deep into the issues of the day. >> has the time finally come for real immigration reform? >> with a distinctly satirical point of view. if you believe in state's rights but still believe in the drug war you must be high. >> only on current tv. [ ♪ music ♪ ] [ ♪ music ♪ ] >> stephanie: it is "the stephanie miller show"," this hour brought to you by identity guard. making it okay to trust again. go to identity guard.com. 1-800-steph-12 the toll-free number anywhere, let's let's go to robbie in alabama. you're on "the stephanie miller show." >> caller: hello robbie stephanie. >> stephanie: hello, robbie, go ahead. [ dog barking ] >> stephanie: what is that. >> caller: my dog is going crazy. >> stephanie: what's up. >> caller: i ant to want to talk about the gay marriage thing. >> stephanie: mm-hmm. >> caller: i'm aga

she continued to help fuhrman, and fuhrman was less needy perhaps than ruby black. she got help from eleanor bus not in such an obvious way. now, i'll end up with this. after eleanor left washington, following franklin's death, in 1945, must be remembered that eleanor had made quite a lot of money. for example, i have here eleanor's earnings in the white house years. this is based on a study of her income tax returns which are available here in the hyde park library. and it showed that from the years 1937 to 1939, for example, she had average net annual earnings of $62,000. that's a lot of money in those days. those were net earnings, too. 68,000 before expenses. so, these women never wrote things about eleanor. saying she is using her position to enhance herself. instead they covered up that kind of thing because they did feel somewhat grateful to her for allowing them to come to the white house every week. it was may craig, the one who first asked that men be allowed in and been told that wasn't going to happen, who played an important role in pushing for the 1964