fukuyama was a scholar. he wrote an article in a publication called "the national interest," a couple years later turned the article into a book. lots of people look back on it and i've seen conversations about how, like, fukuyama's argument is more sophisticated than people think of it, and it's going to seem -- the outline of it might seem a little silly based on what happens next in the world. i think it's important to think of it as, like, descriptive of how people thought versus how things are. this is the ethos right now. so the full quote i have here, the triumph of the western idea is evident, first of all, in the total exhaustion of viable, systematic alternatives to western liberalism. so fall of the berlin wall that summer, it's like the triumph of the west is evident. i'll even call up -- i'll link this on canvas so people can read it in totality, that this is like the very beginning of it. the very beginning. "in watching the flow of events over the past decade or so, it is hard to avoid the fee

fukuyama, i'd be like i've heard of the end of history. i don't know who this person is or this essay. so like familiar, i'm gonna i'm gonna illustrate that in in a little bit. so fuguayama was a scholar. he wrote an article in publication called the national interest a couple years later turned the article into a book. lots of people look back on it and i've seen conversations about how like fukuyama's argument is more sophisticated than people think of it. and it's going to seem the the outline of it might seem a little silly based on what happened next in the world. i think it's important to think of it as like descriptive of how people thought as opposed to fukuyama saying this is how things are. it's more like this is this is the ethos right now. so the pull code i have here the triumph of the west of the western idea is evident. first of all in the total exhaustion of viable systematic alternatives to western liberalism. so follow the berlin wall. that summer it's like the triumph of the west is evident, so i'll even i'll even call u

it 's generally to think about it, i always said that fukuyama is stupid. this was my conviction.for a long time, andrei, do not be offended. on the side, protect nikolai vasilievich zlobin with fuyami in the sense that in fukuyama translations was at one time there was a foreword by nikolai vasilyevich, but nikolai vasilyevich caused much trouble in his life. it is known that he taught a certain person by the name of makfu, that is, in america he was his professor, but nikolai vasilyevich is not to blame for this. blown away looking back at our studio. but fukuyama came up with the idea that liberalism is needed, a nation is needed, and then such a strong liberalism is correct. or maybe the nation still needs social democracy, and then it turns out such a strong nsp or maybe it also needs such an actively speaking as, for example, citizen navalny, who is a nazi for the nation, really liked the fukuami and liked the fukuami very much. and look, please, nazism is such a mini-purer and everyone is happy. in the west, they also believe that ukraine is what it is a country that, it tu

but continuing the theme of fukuyama, this is a famous rhyme.l bring him in such a civil form. oh, come running to the house. the children hurriedly call for father deceived us fakuyama no, end story. and here it’s to putin’s words, here you need to understand who we are fighting with first. turn. we are at war, not even with the ukrainians, not even with the europeans or with nato, not even with the americans. we are at war, in principle, with the idea, we are at war, in principle, a social big a layer from the dominant idea in the so-called western world, this is one we once talked with you, in my opinion, there are three of you on the radio total modernist totalitarian absolutely here totalitarian absolutely about christian e theories are precisely modernist, implying the modernization of man ethocism, this, which we lived in forty- five is in many ways communism, which we are on our own and lived. this liberalism is the oldest and most rooted of these totalitarian ideologies, which speaks of exclusivity, in general to an incomprehensible pri

. >> stanford professor francis fukuyama on where the invasion stands, what russia has already lost and how things could get worse. ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyy will appear on face the nation this weekend which airs at 8:30 on sunday morning, on kpix 5. >>> there was a rally in san francisco to mark this cesar chavez day. demonstrators carrying the familiar united farmworkers flag. there were posters and speeches as well. len ramirez tells us the demonstrators had a particular demand of governor newsom. >> reporter: this gathering in san francisco was one of several what happened around the state today on senior chavez birthday. if anything, they proved one thing, that all these many decades later, the fight for farmworkers civil rights in california goes on. >> reporter: chanting slogans once used by cesar chavez, farmworkers and supporters took to the streets once again. they are asking governor newsom to sign a b 2183 into law which would give farmworkers the right to vote in union elections by mail, instead of in person only. >> what better place to do it here on cesar ch

well, fukuyama turned over more than once for his, so to speak, intellectual history. say anything new though. we have all seen that usually in the countries of eastern europe, at least in the soviet space, usually. appears some kind of nationalist movement, and it immediately merges with the liberals. that is, these are two poles of one and they attack the communists there. e, the reds, yes, that is, all those who do not want to, especially raged about e religious consciousness, and most of all it was the church, of course, and so , by the way, about religious consciousness. when i listen to ukrainian politicians. i don't know what to call it already. but i always caught myself thinking that something was bothering me there. yes. that is, when they say war, we will fight for 10 years. well war or special operation. in general, this is a very material thing, that is, we need weapons, production, economy, food supplies all the time. well, that is, this is a huge economic mahina, yes, that is, an army, especially a warring one. and when i hear a statement from ukrainian

iii is overblown, if by that you mean actual escalation to nuclear weapons. >> reporter: professor fukuyama, a fellow on the professor of democracy, development, and rule of law says russians are being pushed out of positions they once held like a town that was occupied for a month then liberated by ukrainian forces last week. >> the russians are doing pretty poorly. they claim they are simply regrouping, and getting ready to focus on the south and west, but they really have been defeated pretty much in the area around key of. >> reporter: will they take yes? >> there's no way the russians can take ef. >> reporter: with ukrainian forces attacking supply lines, russian soldiers are running out of fuel, ammunition, and morale. >> at a certain point, you cannot maintain a big army in the field in a foreign country. so, it is possible that, you know, in future, the russian position will collapse more suddenly. >> reporter: according to nato estimates, 10 to 15 thousand russian troops have been killed but under state-controlled media, putin's approval rating has gone up domestically. >> in the l

the end is literally historical not mythical, which fukuyama described. there are, and they know it, why even europe looked yes , which before that somehow held on. well, they held on, because they understood, in principle, the words of the entire economic system will happen, there will be a different price parity. there will be no cheap energy resources in the new world and the artificial european economy will end and for them it is the end. this is a vital choice. everything is correct. you said, yes, you know the bones, when you say that the population there is shocked by the statements and so on. believe me, i am more than sure that in ukraine the population was shocked by many of the actions of their government. and in this kind of part, you know , but the british have americans. there are technologies for changing the government, the arrival of new governments, and so on. i've paid attention. you know, and the arrival of austin, but now they are replacing any institutions that are shy to continue this war. that is, i looked at all the photos of the

that's what im fukuyama, well immigrant understand?n which these bzizhinsky people, all the rest, they come to the states and in order to make a career there is this neophyte effect just like the most terrible bandera. yes, these jews are bendera. these are people with russian surnames. well yeah, well let's be honest. these are people with russian surnames who are the most frostbitten, who before that are still one of the biggest scumbags, in general, a war criminal - this is a short boatswain, which he is generally short from belarus - this is in general, their surname is generally siberian well, this is special. yes, that is, you understand the nazi? i'm very important. this is it, including europe was brought by these emigrants, including all the rest of poland, who proved to them that they really are at the top of history ended the elite believed in it. the media propagated this. they self-irradiated about and now, what is this degradation? well, that is, in reality, what we are to me, i am most afraid for the us allies, because i

the end, literally historical not mythical, which fukuyama described.

and thirdly to challenge therefore fundamentally the notion that there is to use fukuyama's notion and end of history point, which is about liberal democracy that the chinese revolution is in fact, not just a stepping stone to ultimate liberal democracy, but a stepping stone to marxism and socialism and that that's now under direct ideological challenge in terms of a chinese core interest. there's a final one which really does bring the the electric nodes together, which is the future of taiwan and the future of the unresolved territorial issues in both the east china sea and the south china sea and in a different context on the sino-indian border. so are these reconcilable well in the basic question of logic? no. but what is manageable and what i think is therefore doable is a series of mutual understandings. perhaps reached to internally and diplomatically about what constitutes the red lines in the mind of each government in each system, which cannot be crossed unless you want to risk a moving across that trip wire into the real risk crisis conflict and war. and that can only be don

did you read francis fukuyama, but the argument about kind of the the end of history that is mentionedn the book the idea of the end of history, which was a popular idea in the you know, very early 90s this idea that sort of like i know neoliberalism had succeeded and that the the way that america functioned and sort of the way we had constructed our government in society would just be the way it would always be i don't think anyone believes that now even though you know, i i mentioned earlier how there seems to be this stasis. so it seems that that you know after all those years of culture accelerating like during the 90s whenever i wrote stories for newspapers, i was always talking about the acceleration of culture and then the internet happens, it seems like the internet is gonna be be the ultimate excellent of culture. and yet has become a deceller into some ways that. we are now kind of in this kind of molasses period where it is hard to get back on that. then that kind of marched through time. it seems like humanities supposed to experience but but with that. um, i think i will e